Shoppers - Please note: Be sure to check your purchase and then fill in all your details correctly on the right-hand side, (name, address, city, state, zip etc.) and check our terms and accept them. it will greatly help us to get your order in a timely manner.
Should England be a Catholic Country Again?Written by Moriel Administrator
by Tony Pearce
The Spectator magazine organised a debate on the subject "˜England should become a Catholic Country again' on 2nd March 2010. The speakers for the motion, Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor, Piers Paul Reid and Rev Dom Antony Sutch, were all strong Roman Catholics who made their case for Roman Catholicism being the dominant church while being inclusive of other churches to give a united Christian witness to our secular society.Ã‚Â The speakers against the motion were Lord Harries, former Anglican Bishop of Oxford, Matthew Parris, a journalist with The Times and Stephen Pound, a Labour MP and a Roman Catholic.
Cardinal O’Connor presented the view that the Reformation was a loss to the country causing a "˜millennium of Christian history’ to become alien territory to the church.Ã‚Â He denied the view that the clergy before the Reformation were largely corrupt and that the only good priests were the Lollards, although he did say that the translation of the Bible into English was a good thing.Ã‚Â He did not mention the fierce opposition to the translation of the Bible into English by the Catholic Church at the time.Ã‚Â Cardinal O’Connor presented a benign view of a Catholic dominated England in which the Church of England is united with the "˜universal church’ (i.e. Rome) in aÃ‚Â "˜shared endeavour’ to speak to our secular society and ensure that "˜the forces of darkness’ will not prevail as a united church brings "˜good news’ to all.
The second speaker for the motion, Piers Paul Read, a Catholic writer, spoke strongly on Catholic doctrine as bringing the means of salvation through the sacraments, confession and the Eucharist.Ã‚Â He went on to speak on family and moral issues. He said that the permissive society has made an institutional attack on the family by promoting sex outside of marriage and same sex marriages.Ã‚Â He then accused Protestant churches, in particular the Church of England, of failing to stand for the biblical teaching that heterosexual marriage is the only sexual union sanctioned by God.Ã‚Â I have to say that although I disagree with Catholic doctrine on salvation, on this issue he spoke the truth and this points to one reason why the Roman Catholic Church is likely to reach a stronger position than the Church of England in this country.
The third speaker for the motion, Rev Dom Antony Sutch, gave a rather rambling talk on how faith is necessary for all religions and that we should all be one.Ã‚Â When all Christians agree we can have an influence in society.
Since all the speakers for the debate were convinced Catholics it was not surprising that they took the line that they did.Ã‚Â The real scandal of the debate was that not one the opposition speakers was able to give a reason either from history or faith for not being a Catholic country.
By far the most abject and pathetic speech of the evening came from the first speaker opposing the motion, Lord Harries, former Bishop of Oxford.Ã‚Â He began by expressing his huge admiration for the Roman Catholic Church, its saints and the Jesuits and its absorbing of Greek Aristotelian thought.Ã‚Â His defence of the position of the Church of England was to point to how it had "˜reacted creatively to social developments,’ which he said the Catholic Church had failed to do. Examples of this were how the Church of England had accepted Darwinism and Evolution into its teaching and absorbed Higher Critical Theology from Germany.Ã‚Â Higher Critical Theology means denying the Bible as the Word of God, questioning God in creation, the miraculous interventions of God in the Old Testament, the virgin birth of Jesus, His miracles, sinless life and death as a sacrifice for the sins of the world, His resurrection and the promise of His return in power and glory to judge the world in righteousness.Ã‚Â Ã‚Â In other words the achievement of the Church of England according to Lord Harries is to abandon the Bible as the Word of God and make it up as they go along.Ã‚Â His speech did not contain a word about God or Jesus and later in the discussion time he said that you could not say that a baby in the womb has life from the moment of conception.Ã‚Â In many ways he exemplifies the reason for the decline of the Church of England "“ its bishops generally let us know what they do not believe about Christianity rather than what they do believe
The best speech by far of the evening came from the second speaker opposing the motion, Matthew Parris.Ã‚Â He announced that he was an atheist and in the course of his speech said that he did not believe that Jesus was the Son of God.Ã‚Â However he was the only speaker to bring to light the vast difference between Jesus as revealed in the New Testament and the Jesus of the Catholic Church.Ã‚Â In fact as an atheist he was the only speaker to say much about Jesus at all.Ã‚Â He said how Jesus was an embarrassment to the Catholic Church.Ã‚Â He said how Jesus would have set his face against the ritual, robes, finery and pope mobiles of the Catholic Church and its hierarchy of Bishops, Cardinals and Popes.Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â He said how Jesus had been pushed to the margins of the church and how the clergy had sought to keep the record of his life from the laity and clothed the Virgin Mary with powers they had created and which are entirely absent from the Gospels.Ã‚Â He denied that Catholic Church in power had a record of tolerance towards others.Ã‚Â Pity he was speaking as an atheist.
The final speech came from Stephen Pound, a Labour MP who is also a Catholic. He said that he did not want to see England as a solely Catholic country, and that Catholics have many things in common with Anglicans.Ã‚Â He agreed with the speakers for the motion that Roman Catholic teaching makes for a better way of life.
The evening was then thrown open to the audience to make points.Ã‚Â The first speaker made the best point of the evening by saying that the whole thing was a set up.Ã‚Â On the side of proposing the motion were three convinced Roman Catholics.Ã‚Â On the side opposing there was no one able to give the historic reasons for biblical Protestant Christianity and opposition to the Church of Rome.Ã‚Â In fact only one of them, the atheist Matthew Parris, gave any critical view of Roman Catholicism.Ã‚Â The Reformation view has been blotted out.Ã‚Â This in fact is what is happening in our media in general.
At the end of the discussion I was able to get in a brief comment that the church needs to preach the Gospel of salvation through faith in Christ alone and how the Roman Catholic Church teaches error in such areas as the Mass / transubstantiation, the role of the Pope, the status of the Virgin Mary and life after death / purgatory.Ã‚Â It was good to find that one of our church members, Tony Beasley, had been standing outside the meeting handing out leaflets making this point to people as they left the hall where the debate took place.
Perhaps the most serious issue of this evening was the way in which the real issues of difference in theology are being air brushed out of the debate over the place of Rome and how the media will not give a place to those who stand for the truth of the Gospel and against the traditions of Rome.Ã‚Â In the January 2010 edition of Light for the Last Days I listed areas of doctrine in which the Roman Catholic Church is in error.Ã‚Â This is available at our website www.lightforthelastdays.co.uk or on request.Ã‚Â Sadly it is not just the secular media, but also much of the Christian world that has suppressed this.
Roman Catholic persecutions of non Catholics "“ the Lollards in England, the Hussites in Bohemia, the Huguenots in France, the Waldensians in Italy "“ were of course not mentioned in the debate. Cardinal O’Connor’s version of life before the English Reformation needs a bit of correcting, particularly in the light of his comment that the translation of the Bible into English was a good thing.Ã‚Â Certainly the Catholic Church at the time did not agree with him!
Wycliffe translated the Bible into English in 1382 and was the leader of the Lollards, who sought to preach the simple Gospel to the people of England and opposed the wealth and power of the Roman Catholic Church. The Council of Constance declared Wycliffe (on 4 May 1415) a "˜stiff-necked heretic’ and under the ban of the Church. It was decreed that his books be burned and his remains be exhumed. The exhumation was carried out in 1428 when, at the command of Pope Martin V, his remains were dug up, burned, and the ashes cast into the River Swift, which flows through Lutterworth where he was buried. The "˜Constitutions of Oxford’ of 1408 aimed to reclaim authority in all ecclesiastical matters, specifically naming John Wycliffe in a ban on certain writings, and noting that translation of Scripture into English is a crime punishable by charges of heresy.
William Tyndale was a gifted linguist who wished to translate the Bible from the original Hebrew and Greek text into English in 1523.Ã‚Â He was convinced that the way to God was through His word and that scripture should be available even to common people. Foxe describes an argument with a "˜learned’ clergyman, who had asserted to Tyndale that, "˜We had better be without God’s laws than the Pope’s.’Ã‚Â Tyndale made his response: "˜I defy the Pope, and all his laws; and if God spares my life, I will cause the boy that drives the plough to know more of the Scriptures than the Pope himself!’Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Tyndale was forced into exile in Europe from where he completed the work of translation and with the new invention of printing was able to send copies of the English New Testament into England and Scotland in 1526.Ã‚Â He was condemned as a heretic by Cardinal Woolsey in 1529 and burnt at the stake in Belgium in 1536.Ã‚Â His final words, spoken "˜at the stake with a fervent zeal, and a loud voice’, were reported as "˜Lord! Open the King of England’s eyes.’Ã‚Â Within four years, four English translations of the Bible, all based on Tyndale’s work, were published in England, and one of them was the official English Bible.Ã‚Â This was the result of Henry VIII’s break with Rome and the establishment of the Church of England.Ã‚Â We have DVDs of the life of both Wycliffe and Tyndale available for Ã‚Â£15 each plus postage.
With the Pope coming to England in 2010 and the Church of England in disarray there is no doubt that the push for Catholic dominance will continue.Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Bible believing Christians are being pushed to the margins and face discrimination and suppression when they try to get their view across in the public domain.Ã‚Â In my view the likely end result is that some kind of EU wide registration of churches will be brought in with the only option being between Roman Catholic and liberal ecumenical Protestant churches, the unity of Babylon (see Revelation 17).Ã‚Â In this case the true church will have to go underground.Ã‚Â But the Lord Jesus will have the last word and He will build His church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it.
Latest from Moriel Administrator
- Muddy Waters: The "Church of Christ"
- The Islamization of Britain in 2014
- JORGE MARIO BERGOGL alias POPE FRANCIS THE RELIGIOUS CHARLATAN WHOSE HYPOCRISY KNOWS NO APPARENT LIMITS
- Is Allah Almighty God?
Leave a comment
Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.