|
| Add to Favorites |
| Printer Friendly |
| Send to a friend |
|
Moriel Ministries > Teachings > Discernment |
|
11 Reasons To Reject The Teachings Of The Indigenous People's Movement by Sandy Simpson
This movement has ties to the apostolic leadership of the New Apostolic Reformation and C. Peter Wagner. A number of the announced speakers at their "A Call To All Nations" conference in Honolulu were also on the Aloha Ke Akua "Advisory Board" including John Dawson, Richard Twiss, Terry LeBlanc and Don Richardson. You can go here for more information about these people. One thing you will notice is that people involved with YWAM play a major role in the promotion of this agenda and conferences around the world. Daniel Kikawa and his book "Perpetuated In Righteousness", as well as the teaching of the First Nations, YWAM and the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) lay the basis for the ideas put forth by this movement. Kikawa's book was endorsed by John Dawson of YWAM. YWAM is firmly a part of the NAR which is headed by C. Peter Wagner, Chuck Pierce, Cindy Jacobs, Dutch Sheets, Bill Hamon, Tommy Tenney, Mike Bickle and includes hundreds of other false apostles, false prophets and false teachers. If you want an in depth study of the NAR, read free articles here or go here to purchase the book and/or DVD/VHS series on the NAR. Richard Twiss and his ministry Wiconi are endorsed by the leadership of the NAR including C. Peter Wagner, Francis Frangipane and Charles Kraft. The IPM is full of the false teachings of the Third Wave, NAR, Word-Faith, Dominionism, Latter Rain and many other false theological systems. But it does have it's own distinctives that are driven by the works of Daniel Kikawa, Richard Twiss, John Dawson and Don Richardson in particular. They are teaching Christians to “redeem” their cultures by worshipping their former gods, pretending they are YHWH. But when Jesus Christ was first introduced to the islands He was introduced as the biblical Jesus Christ, the Son of David, born a Jew, the second person in the Triunity of God. Jesus was NOT introduced as Pele or Io of Hawaii, as Tagaloa of the Marshalls, Nahnsapwe of Pohnpei, Wonofaat of Chuuk, Uchelianged of Palau, Yalafath of Yap, Puntan and Fu’una of Guam or any other mythological or demonic god. To call Jesus by these other names is to blaspheme His name (Phil. 2:9-10)! There is salvation in only one name under heaven … that is the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 4:12). We are to worship God by His name, not in other names. 27 times the New Testament declares that we are to follow God in the name of Jesus Christ. (Ac 2:38, 3:6, 4:10, 4:18, 4:30, 5:40, 8:12, 8:16, 9:27, 9:29, 15:26, 16:18, 19:5, 19:13, 19:17, 21:13, 26:9; 1 Cor. 1:2, 1:10, 5:4, 6:11; Eph. 5:20; Php. 2:10; Col 3:17; 2 Thes.1:12, 3:6; 1 John 3:23) I believe it is time for islanders to take a stand against this stuff coming into the island churches. I personally stand fully against this influx of these "First Nations" unbiblical ideas, and I do so because the ongoing ministry of my family for 44 years has been to minister alongside the churches of Micronesia in the furtherance of the Gospel. We love the island people! For people like Richard Twiss and Daniel Kikawa to teach the stuff they are teaching constitutes an ALL OUT ATTACK on mission and church work in the islands. Please read also refer to the following articles for reference on Daniel Kikawa's book "Perpetuated In Righteousness": Perpetuated In Righteousness - A Review by Mike Oppenheimer, 5/5/07 (1) Overview of the Book Perpetuated in Righteousness Indigenous People Issues - A Warning About The World Christian Gathering Of Indigenous People by Sandy Simpson, Pacific Waves Newsletter, 5/02 Richard Twiss Connections by Sandy Simpson, 10/1/04 A Call To The Nations? by Sandy Simpson, 4/28/05 Regarding The Accuracy Of Oral Traditions - With Reference To Daniel Kikawa's Book "Perpetuated In Righteousness" by Sandy Simpson, 5/10/05 The Testimony Of Heneri Opukaha'ia - regarding the state of religion and society in Hawaii before the Gospel - A Rebuttal To Daniel Kikawa's Book "Perpetuated In Righteousness" by Sandy Simpson, 5/17/05 11 Reasons To Reject The IPM Movement 1. IPM Leaders Teach That God Has Been Redeeming Cultures And That He Placed In All Cultures A Way For Men To Have A Relationship With God Outside Of The Gospel
A few years ago some friends and I were contemplating how we would be able to reach indigenous peoples and we thought that what was prevalent at that time was a misconception among, within the church of God's presence here in the islands. The misconceptions that, as was expressed earlier, was that God didn't arrive until the missionaries arrived. You know, and so when we started to look at this we started to look into our culture and see what things within our culture what God had originally intended for this particular group of people, Hawaiians. (Leon Siu, Word To The World, show #544) You can find a fuller expose' of the first series of "Word To The World" programs here: http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/lehmann.html In this new article you will also find quotes from the second "Word To The World" program featuring moderator Danny Lehmann and IPM Guest, Daniel Kikawa. Let's address the two false assumptions above, namely that (1) God is in the business of redeeming cultures and (2) that God placed in cultures are way of redemption apart from the Gospel. First, the only "culture" that will be redeemed will be that of God's chosen people, the Jews (Ps. 130:8), during the Tribulation (Zech. 13:1). But this will be because a certain percentage of the Jews (Rev. 7:3-4; Rev. 14:3) will come to understand and believe that Jesus Christ is the Messiah (John 3:3). Other than this example there is nowhere in the Bible where it talks about God redeeming cultures. Rev. 7:9 speaks of nations, tribes, peoples and languages standing before the throne of God, but not "cultures". This verse is talking about individuals who have believed in Jesus Christ as their personal Savior and Lord from all the nations of the earth. Cultures are the traditions of men (Mark 7:8-9, 13; Col. 2:8), not God-created as many of the IPM people claim. God is in the business of redeeming individuals from sin (1 Pet. 1:18-23; Gal. 3:14) not cultures. The idea of the redemption or "transformation" of whole cities, societies and cultures is actually a Dominionist idea from the Latter Rain and NAR. This has no basis in Scripture whatsoever. Each man must believe for himself (Act. 16:31; Rom. 10:9) upon conviction of the Holy Spirit (John 16:8-9). Notice that though the Holy Spirit is sent into the world to convict of sin, He is convicting men who do not believe in Jesus Christ, not whole cultures. Second, there is no way for men to come to believe in Jesus Christ without having heard the Gospel (Eph. 1:13). You cannot hear the Gospel without it being preached to you (Rom. 10:14-15). The Gentiles had no knowledge of the Gospel message until it that mystery was revealed to them by way of the apostles and missionaries (Eph. 2:12). 2. IPM Leaders Teach That The Gods Being Worshiped In Cultures Were Really the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit and Deities Are Renamed Accordingly See #5. Kikawa makes up an elaborate mythology about Hawaiian culture claiming that Hawaiians already were worshipping God in the form of the bird god “Io” long before missionaries arrived (pg. 18, pp. 2). He claims that the Polynesian people were descended from Israel (pg. 62) that they can trace their genealogies back to Noah (pg. 72-73) and that they knew the gospel because it was written in the stars (pg. 55). (Arnold Fructenbaum review of Kikawa's "Perpetuated In Righteousness", http://www.letusreason.org/current4%20.htm Here's proof of Leon Siu, a member of Daniel Kikawa's "Aloha Ke Akua" and IPM spokesman, participating in praying and celebrating "Io" as Jehovah. As we stood at the edge of Hale-ma'uma'u Crater, singing praises to 'Io (Jehovah/Savior), thoughts of what took place 171 years earlier on that very ground, were on the minds of all who came. Included in our present celebration were prayers of thanksgiving and intercession for Hawaii. In 1824 Chieftess Kapiolani (not to be confused with Queen Kapiolani) made that same trek from Kona to the volcano - by foot. It took her two months. Many had tried to convince her not to go. But she felt compelled by God, as if on a divine mission. This true Hawaiian story is not unlike Elijah and his confrontation with Baal, described in 1 Kings 18. After this event at Kilauea, many Hawaiians - including Kahunas (ancient Hawaiian priests) of Pele, believed in Jesus, as the Christ - 'Io. {See article on the Hula, this issue}. Included in our present celebration were prayers of thanksgiving and intercession for Hawaii. There was also special music by Leon Siu and friends, and hulas by young Hawaiian Christians, telling of the historical event. As the crowd disbursed joyfully about three hours later, there was a strong sense of having participated in a very significant event in Hawaii's spiritual history. I'm soooo glad I went!! Later in the day the celebration continued at "The Gathering Place" (Hilo New Hope). 'Io - Jehovah God- is indeed alive and well in Hawaii nei. http://across.co.nz/articles.'Io.html Notice Richard Twiss and YWAM were at the following conferences, along with Kenneth Copeland and other false teachers: http://www.brokenwalls.com/archives_2000.html Danny Lehmann had Richard Twiss, Leon Siu and Terry LeBlanc on his Word To The World radio program who are involved in the First Nations events. This is one of their reports. Notice that Richard Twiss was involved and look at the opening invocation. http://www.injesus.com/Groups/ViewMessage.cfm?MessageId=YA006JT4& GroupID=SA006ILX&UCD=hjn In case you can't bring up this page (I had trouble) here is what the opening said: May the Father, Adadoda, who is the Creator, Adanehilahusgi, and His Son, Tsisa, bless you with perfect peace and favor by the power of the Holy Spirit, Yohewa (Great Spirit). http://www.injesus.com/Groups/ViewMessage.cfm?MessageId=YA006JT4& GroupID=SA006ILX&UCD=hjn Danny Lehmann argues that Christians can use the names of foreign false gods if we simply redefine them as the "Jewish God". "... and you have been under the gun on this issue of Io in the Hawaiian culture, well that’s a bird god and its obviously a demon and so forth, you can’t worship it. We’re not saying that we need to worship a bird god or we’re not saying we need to worship a moon god. But were saying that those people understand it that way and they already have it as their god and perhaps we can use that name and teach the truth about the character of Jehovah God, without going to an arab muslim saying you have to accept the Jewish God, so that’s where we are coming from. So give us a little bit of illustration of this out of your experience." (Danny Lehmann, Word to the World, Feb.14/06, #7) If Io is a false demonic bird god in HI, how can you change that to the real thing? Won't people forever be confused about who God really is if their concept of God is a mixture. Remember, God hates a mixture. From the beginning He separated the light from the darkness (Gen. 1:4). Psalms 75:8 For in the hand of the LORD there is a cup, and the wine is red; it is full of mixture; and he poureth out of the same: but the dregs thereof, all the wicked of the earth shall wring them out, and drink them. God blesses those who trust in the Lord Jehovah, and curses those who turn aside to false gods. Psalms 40:4 Blessed is the man who makes the LORD his trust, who does not look to the proud, to those who turn aside to false gods. From the beginning the nations had false gods, just like the Hawaiians have their false bird god Io among a pantheon of other Gods, including many "supreme being" creator gods. Those who follow the Lord God of Israel and His Son, Jesus Christ, "walk in the name of the Lord", not the names of other false demonic gods. Micah 4:5 All the nations may walk in the name of their gods; we will walk in the name of the LORD our God for ever and ever. Any prophet, or Christian for that matter, who speaks in the name of other gods, was put to death by Old Testament Law. Today we are to rebuke false teachers and false prophets, marking them and avoiding them. Deuteronomy 18:20 But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded him to say, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, must be put to death." What are Daniel Kikawa, Danny Lehmann and many other IPM "Christians" speaking today? They are "speaking in the name of other gods"! There is only One God in Three Persons as revealed to the prophets and apostles, the subsequently to those who believe in Jesus Christ. In the Old Testament God revealed Himself to the Jews exclusively and there was no salvation apart from the Jews. In the New Testament God revealed Himself through the apostles, and especially through Paul to the Gentiles. All the gods of the nations were and are false gods (Deut. 32:17; 1 Cor. 10:20, Jer. 16:19, Amos 2:4). Even the supreme beings of the nations are not God, as in the case of Amen (Amon) of Egypt (Jer. 46:25), Hadad of the Arameans (1 Kings 20:28) Marduk of Babylon (Dan. 3:16-18) and many other "detestable" gods (Lev. 18:30; Deut. 7:25, 7:26, 12:31, 18:9, 20:18, 27:15, 29:17, 32:16; 1 Kings 11:5, 11:7, 14:24; 2 Kings 16:3, 21:2, 21:11, 23:13, 23:24; 2 Chron. 15:8, 28:3, 33:2, 34:33, 36:14; Ezra 9:1, 9:11; Prov. 21:27, 28:9; Is. 1:13; Jer. 4:1, 7:30, 16:18, 32:35; Eze. 5:9, 5:11, 11:18, 11:21, 12:16, 14:6; Mal. 2:11). By teaching these ideas the IPM is bringing people who have just come out of unbelief back into slavery to false gods (2 Pet. 2:18-21), and teaching things they ought not to teach (Titus 1:9-14). As those in Paul's day were spreading Jewish myths, today the IPM is spreading Gentile myths instead of the true Gospel. 3. IPM Leaders Teach The Spiritual Warfare Techniques of John Dawson, C Peter Wagner And Other Third Wavers To Rid Cities And Nations Of Demonic Influence, Then People Will Just Find Themselves Wanting To Geg Saved See the following expose of John Dawson's book "Taking Our Cities For God", a manual for the NAR and IPM. http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/dawson/
These pragmatic techniques will not liberate anyone. The spiritual warfare movement is based on a false understanding of Matt. 16:19. They claim they can bind and loose demons not only in individuals but over whole regions and nations. This is a perfect example of the absolute necessity of "context, context, context" when studying the Scripture. Matt. 16:17-20 Jesus replied, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." Then he warned his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Christ. The context is one of establishing the Church and preaching the Gospel and has NOTHING to do with casting out demons or casting down territorial spirits. Notice that the time had not yet come to proclaim that Jesus was the Christ, but the time would come when that Mystery would be revealed, first to the Jews and then to the Gentiles (Gal. 2:7-9). This is also the context in which Matt. 18:18 must be understood where they are addressing church discipline. Matt. 18:15-20 "If your brother sins against you, go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over. But if he will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector. "I tell you the truth, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. "Again, I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about anything you ask for, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven. For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them." The context is one of establishing and maintaining the Church, not one of spiritual warfare, unless by "spiritual warfare" we are talking about confronting sin. If a person in the Church sins and will not repent, then the leadership of the Church has the authority to bind or loose that person. This all has to do with the continued establishment of the Church which is in the hands of God-called leadership of His Church. It has NOTHING to do with spiritual warfare as proposed by people like John Dawson. A larger question remains for the careful thinker ... why do this unbiblical spiritual warfare to rid towns, cities, cultures and nations of demonic influence when you are getting the people to go back to their old gods and worship them under the name of YHWH? This is a case where two wrongs don't make a right, they make a mess! 4. IPM Leaders Teach That God Can Be Worshipped Using Cultural Methods Heretofore Used To Worship Other Gods Richard Twiss travels all over the world teaching people to "dance their prayers".
For the information of the reader, the word "pow-wow" is defined this way in Webster's Dictionary: Etymology: Narraganset powwaw or Massachuset pauwau 1 : an American Indian medicine man 2 a : an American Indian ceremony (as for victory in war) b : an American Indian social gathering or fair usually including competitive dancing 3 a : a social get-together b : a meeting for discussion. So I guess the above "pow-wow" would have to be described as definition 3 or possibly 2. Notice definition 1!. This next explanation of the actual meaning of the word is even clearer: Word History: Because trances were so important to the Native American shaman as a means of getting in touch with spiritual forces beyond the ken of the normal person, the title powwaw, literally meaning “one who has visions,” was accorded him. An occurrence of this word in an early piece of propaganda designed to bring more settlers to New England represents fairly well the Puritan attitudes to the religion of the native inhabitants of the New World: “The office and dutie of the Powah is to be exercised principally in calling upon the Devil; and curing diseases of the sicke or wounded.” The word whose spelling was eventually settled in English as powwow was also used as the name for ceremonies and councils, probably because of the important role played by the shaman in both. Eventually the newcomers decided that they could have powwows too, the first reference to one of these being recorded in the Salem, Massachusetts, Gazette of 1812: “The Warriors of the Democratic Tribe will hold a powwow at Agawam on Tuesday next.” The verb powwow, “to confer,” was recorded even earlier, in 1780. (The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.) The Bible is clear that we don't "dance" our prayers or entered altered states to pray. That is what the heathens have done with their false gods who had no knowledge of what God requires. Born again Christians are to pray with their minds (1 Cor. 14:15), not in altered states (1 Cor. 14:14). We are to remain alert when we are praying in the Spirit (Eph. 6:18). We may lift up holy hands in prayer, meaning we worship God in our praying (1 Tim. 2:8), but prayer is a way to worship God (Acts 13:1-3), thank Him and present our petitions to God (Heb. 12:28, 1 Tim. 2:1), being devoted to prayer in watchfulness and thanksgiving (Col 4:2), not in partying (Rom. 13:13-14). We used to be pagans, now we are children of God in Jesus Christ, not given to debauchery (1 Pet. 4:3). There is nowhere in the Bible where dances were used for prayer. Dances were used to praise and worship God such as in the case of David (2 Sam. 6:14). But we do not pray with dances. Prayer is an act of communication with God using our minds. Daniel Kikawa also defends the use of the hula in Christian worship.
There are a number of false, diaprax assumptions in this teaching. (1) If Kikawa says he can feel the "anointing" when the hula dance is done for Pele, what distinguishes that "anointing" from the one when the hula is used to worship YHWH? The fact is that the idea of feeling an "anointing" and knowing it is from God is subjective and no proof of the activity of the Holy Spirit at all. There is only one Anointing, and that Anointing we share if we are "in Christ", the Anointed One of God. God is the One Who gives the Anointing (2 Cor. 1:21-22). There is only one Anointing (1 John 2:20), that is the Anointing of the Anointed One (Ps. 2:2, Acts 4:2), Jesus Christ, King of Kings. When a person is born again, they are anointed by the Holy Spirit (2 Cor. 1:21-22, Eph. 1:13), foreknown, predestined, called, justified, glorified (Rom. 8:29-30). Also, no one can or should try to transfer the Holy Spirit to another person as the Anointing is the person of the Holy Spirit (Luke 4:18, Titus 3:5). The Anointing is the indwelling Holy Spirit, and He gives us various gifts (1 Cor. 12:4) so that we can minister in the Church and preach the Gospel to the world. God is not in the business of giving out free massages, thrill rides, ecstatic experiences, and He does not want His people can play around with, act like or think they have some kind of higher revelation of the supernatural, going around claiming there is an "anointing" or assigning "anointings" to things that He has not assigned them to. He expects us to act in an orderly fashion in the congregation of the saints (1 Cor. 14:33). I'm sorry if this is offensive to modern Hawaiians, but the older islanders rejected hula in the churches for the very reason that it caused men to lust and was a dance dedicated to their former gods. Why is it so hard for men like Daniel Kikawa to understand this? All he has to do is read the historical accounts of mission work here, both by islanders and Western missionaries, to comprehend that what he is promoting is an affront to his own culture as a "Christian"? (2) God is a Hawaiian god? No. God is God. He is the great I AM and does not view different people groups or different people with partiality (Duet. 10:17, Acts. 10:34). Apparently Kikawa and his friends DO view people with partiality. (3) That Acts does not prohibit dancing is an argument from silence. The Bible also does not prohibit transexuality either. Does that make it okay for Christians? (4) Satan did not steal the hula. The hula was invented by people to worship Pele and other Hawaiian false satanic gods. Here is what Titus Coan, one of the early missionaries to Hawaii, and probably the greatest evangelist of his time in the Hawaiian islands, said about the hula in regard to Polynesian cultures, which covers Hawaiian culture as well: "...the hula or dance. -- The actresses undergo long previous training, during which time their persons are sacred to the gods." (Titus Coan, "Hawaii's Greatest Evangelist, Titus Coan ... his life 1835-1882", Published 1882, pg. 188) What other types of activities did the Hawaiian gods require? "On the coast of Kawaihar I have seen and measured the last great heiau, of heathen temple, of the renowned Kamehameha I., where human sacrifices were offered to the gods that can not save or destroy. I have also visited other heathen temples in Kona, Puna, Hilo, on Molokai and in other places." (Titus Coan, "Hawaii's Greatest Evangelist, Titus Coan ... his life 1835-1882", Published 1882, pg. 225) The hula is a dance dedicated to false gods. The movements of the lower parts of the female body in this dance are very suggestive to island people and do not help them escape from sin, but rather give the enemy a foothold. The fact the Kikawa can feel an anointing from hula, for whatever reason it is performed, should give you a clue as to how the hula effects island peoples. You cannot fully sanitize something that has been offered to false gods. Let me try to be helpful by suggesting what COULD be done with the hula. (1) Take out the religious references to the false gods of Hawaii like Io and Pele. (2) Take out the suggestive movements the tourists and island males love so well. (3) rename is something else. Then it may be useful as a way to tell the story of the Gospel. (5) Lehmann makes, yet another in a long line of, bad analogies by trying to equate the issue of using the hula with the use of a house. Of course Christians can use houses formerly used for drugs or pot smoking (in the case of the Indians). But they do not continue to do drugs and smoke pot anymore! That's the point Lehmann misses. Hula is not a house. Hula is a dance dedicated for centuries to false gods. To take that dance and make it a large part of the Hawaiian Christian experience is to deny the dreadful and shameful use of hula in the past. Why not uplift other cultural activities not tied to worship of the demonic. Isn't the idea to make a clean break from our past when we accept Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord?
If Paul considered the Jewish culture and its activities "dung" in view of the cause of Christ, how much more should we as Gentiles consider our cultures double "dung"? The fact is that what Kikawa and Lehmann are promoting is the direct 180 degree opposite of what Paul believed, lived and taught with regard to culture. 5. Richard Twiss Says Indian/First Nations Peoples Worship The Great Spirit Who Is Really The Holy Spirit
See this article for more information on what Richard Twiss has been teaching and his associations. http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/twissquotes.html Twiss and his IPM friends are teaching these same ideas.
Wiconi endorses Eagles Wings who claims the Great Spirit's son is Jesus Christ. Eagles Wings is the ministry of pastor and author Randy Woodley and his wife Edith. Both Native Americans, their mission is "to present the Great Spirit's Son, Jesus Christ and His Words, the Bible to Native Americans in culturally relevant ways." http://www.ethnicharvest.org/peoples/nativeamer.htm Yet the historical facts are that the Great Spirit is panentheistic!
Note: Richard Twiss is a Lakota Indian! The Great Spirit required human sacrifice/suicide to lift a sickness he had sent.
The Great Spirit required blood rituals. The Sun Dance - Each year, the summer sees another type of blood sacrifice; the Lakota Sioux and other natives of this continent spill their blood onto the earth in one of their most powerful rituals, the Sun Dance. In this controversial ritual, the participants pierce holes into the skin on their chests, thread large hooks made of antler or wood through the holes and hang themselves from a sacred tree until either they rip the skin through and fall or until they pass out. Through offering their own blood, they are able to achieve an ecstatic state, making a connection with the Great Spirit and giving back to the earth something that is truly of their body. This ritual was outlawed but still survives today as an Indian-only event, within the larger Sun Dance festival attended by thousands. (Sacrifice Today, In the Andes - And Closer by Wendy Davis, Copyright © 2004 by the article's author, http://www.widdershins.org/vol1iss3/l04.htm) Richard Twiss is a Lakota/Sioux Indian. In summary: Richard Twiss is spreading the doctrines of the NAR and is endorsed by them. He claims that the Great Spirit of the Indians is the Holy Spirit of the Bible, and endorses ministries who make this same claim. He endorses and promoted books by people like Daniel Kikawa that present information as fact when it is proven myth. He continues to teach that the Great Spirit is the Holy Spirit by wearing the cultural items associated with the Great Spirit, even though it is a historical fact that the Great Spirit is a pantheistic god that required blood rituals and human sacrifice. Richard Twiss claims that what he is doing is not syncretism, when it is the very definition of syncretism. The Bible is clear that ALL Gentiles did not know God. Again, ALL the gods of the nations were and are false gods (Deut. 32:17; 1 Cor. 10:20, Jer. 16:19, Amos 2:4). Even the supreme beings of the nations are not YHWH, as in the case of Amen (Amon) of Egypt (Jer. 46:25), Hadad of the Arameans (1 Kings 20:28) Marduk of the Babylonians (Dan. 3:16-18) and many other "detestable" gods (Lev. 18:30; Deut. 7:25, 7:26, 12:31, 18:9, 20:18, 27:15, 29:17, 32:16; 1 Kings 11:5, 11:7, 14:24; 2 Kings 16:3, 21:2, 21:11, 23:13, 23:24; 2 Chron. 15:8, 28:3, 33:2, 34:33, 36:14; Ezra 9:1, 9:11; Prov. 21:27, 28:9; Is. 1:13; Jer. 4:1, 7:30, 16:18, 32:35; Eze. 5:9, 5:11, 11:18, 11:21, 12:16, 14:6; Mal. 2:11). Also, again, there is no way for men to come to believe in Jesus Christ without having heard the Gospel (Eph. 1:13). You cannot hear the Gospel without it being preached to you (Rom. 10:14-15). The Gentiles had no knowledge of the Gospel message until that mystery was revealed to them by way of the apostles and missionaries (Eph. 2:12). What Twiss, Kikawa and others are doing is to teach Two-Thirds World Christians to make up fables about their former religious practices not based on facts but based on myths.
God's work among the Gentiles is a work of faith in Jesus Christ, not faith in their former gods who they are not renaming to try to sycretize their heathen, pagan beliefs with Christianity. 6. Richard Twiss Teaches That The Gospel Was A Source Of Division And Stumbling For First Nation's Peoples And This Is Blamed On Western Missionaries
This is how you confuse the issue. You turn the issue of syncretism around and blame it on the missionaries. It is true that some misguided missionaries, though clearly not the majority, tried to change indigenous cultural values to Western ones. But he ignores the many missionaries who, in presenting the Gospel and sound doctrine, necessarily preached things that were in opposition to demonic cultures and practices like those of the Indians. The missionaries were faced with heathen cultures, not unlike their own, and attempted to apply biblical principles, in cooperation with those in First Nations, to come up with a way of living in accordance to the Word of God (which is what ALL CHRISTIANS must abide by!). Mistakes were made, but if you talked to the first generation of converts (like I had the privilege of doing long ago in Micronesia) you would understand fully what First Nation's cultures were like at the time. Sexual perversion, women and child abuse, murder, human sacrifice, ruling elite who lorded it over everyone else, worship of demons, and other atrocities were commonplace. Read A New Culture by Juanita Simpson. Those who heard the Gospel preached to them and recognized the freedom in Christ offered were saved and delivered from the things in their cultures that were evil and immediately wanted to make a statement about the difference God had made in their lives. Can we then blame them, in retrospect, for putting on clothes, stopping cultural activities that were tied to the demonic, and no longer being involved in sexual immorality, abuse, perversion, murder and the occult? People like Kikawa and others are trying to rewrite history when they clearly have not done their research. They have little understanding of what their formerly (and in fact currently) pagan cultures were like before the missionaries came and sacrificed their lives, in many cases, to bring the Good News. They were not sent to bring culture nor was that their purpose. They were primarily bringing God's culture, the Bible, and applying its time-tested truths, together with First Nations peoples, so that they might be light and salt to the nations. That historical mission work is now being demonized by these people in order to make way for the unbiblical ideas of the "First Nations" movement is a clear indication that its whole premise is "out to lunch". The IPM is using diaprax methodology in order to bring in this new paradigm of unbiblical and even demonic thought. IPM teachers are the ones bringing division because they are laying error alongside truth, teaching heresy. The Bible is clear about heretics: Jude 1:19 These are the men who divide you, who follow mere natural instincts and do not have the Spirit. It is not a coincidence that the message of the IPM is targeted at Christians especially. Our mandate as Christians, with regard to these divisive malcontents is this:
7. Richard Twiss Teaches That The Bible Is No Longer Our Sole Source of Truth, Nor Should We Be Tied Down By Doctrines Taught In The Bible We are constantly growing, maturing and consequently changing in our perceptions and conclusions. How do we avoid getting stuck in our conclusions? Or harder yet, when we've grown so accustomed to the perceived "normalcy" or "correctness" of our beliefs, how do we get unstuck when we realize what we believed is no longer as true and right as we once believed? How can we change without "losing face?" We must create paths to change for one another that are highlighted by honor, respect and the love of Christ. (Smoke Signals "Views From the Hill" - New E-mail commentaries Richard Twiss, Apr 5, 2004) The Bible is the ULTIMATE source of truth for the believer.
Those who add or take away from Scripture, either through written or extra-biblical means, are denounced and judged by the Word itself:
8. Daniel Kikawa States That The Gospel Needs To Be Presented To "Shame based" Societies In Terms Of "Jesus Christ Came To Take Away Your Shame."
Granted ... the issue of "shame-based" rather than "guilt-based" societies is a real missiological issue that must be dealt with in order to preach the Gospel effectively. But Kikawa forgets that Middle Eastern societies are also shame-based, and it was to those societies the Gospel was first presented! Shame is not guilt of sin or repentance. Shame is basically an exercise in self-indulgence and self-pity. When a person is caught at something in a shamed-based society, they lose face. They generally do not repent nor do they stop doing what they were doing, they are simply embarrassed at the public humiliation of being caught. The recognition of sin, on the other hand, is the starting point toward repentance. The way to present the Gospel in a shame-based culture is not to take the word "sin" out of the picture but to ask these questions: (1) If a person steals something and no one sees him, is it a sin? The point of the above example is that it is possible to bring people from a "shame-based" paradigm to a biblical paradigm, which is the continuing work of the Holy Spirit in anyone who believes. The Holy Spirit sharpens our conscience and convicts us of sin, at first while we are doing it, then eventually before we do it. This is the biblical process, which Jesus Christ, a Jew, introduced to the Jewish culture, which is a shame-based culture. As Christians we are to present the Gospel in the terms that it was presented by Jesus Christ and the apostles. Rom. 10:9-11 That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. As the Scripture says, "Anyone who trusts in him will never be put to shame." The problem of the human condition is one of sin, not shame. Sin is defiance against the holiness of God. Shame may be the result of our realization we have sinned (or may not) but rarely leads to repentance (turning from sin). Therefore in preaching the Gospel to nations and cultures that have not known the character of God, it is important for them to understand that God is holy, we are cut off by virtue of inherited and willful sin, and that there is no way to salvation without confessing our sins and believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. If calling sin what it is causes people to lose face and is an affront to people, then the Gospel has been presented CORRECTLY because the true Gospel message is an affront (1 Cor. 1:23, Gal. 5:11). If Daniel Kikawa and others are no longer willing to talk about sin, they are no longer preaching the Gospel. 9. Danny Lehmann and the IPM's umnbiblical usage of the example of Paul at the Areopagus in Acts 17
Paul did preach the Gospel in terms that the Greeks could understand. He used the illustration of the "unknown god" which they were worshipping, with some sarcasm as scholars note, to point out that they did NOT know the true God at all, not to bridge a "gap" between them and their worship of an "unknown god". Acts 17:23 For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: TO AN UNKNOWN GOD. Now what you worship as something unknown I am going to proclaim to you. Barnes New Testament Notes states that an altar had been erected in Athens during a time of pestilence some 600 years before Christ because all the other "known" and named gods could not deliver them. Paul came and used this altar to illustrate that they did NOT know God at all saying "Him I declare to you" in other words, "I make known to you his name, attributes, etc ... In other circumstances it might seem to be presumptuous for an unknown Jew to attempt to instruct the sages of Athens. But here they had confessed and proclaimed their ignorance. By rearing this altar they acknowledged their need of instruction. The way was, therefore, fairly open for Paul to address even these philosophers, and to discourse to them on a point on which they acknowledged their ignorance". An "unknown god" means they were worshipping something unknown, not known. John Gill Expositor states: God is an unknown God to those who have only the light of nature to guide them; for though it may be known by it that there is a God, and that there is but one, and somewhat of him may be discerned thereby; yet the nature of his essence, and the perfections of his nature, and the unity of his being, are very little, and not truly and commonly understood, and the persons in the Godhead not at all, and still less God in Christ, whom to know is life eternal: hence the Gentiles are described as such who know not God; Another problem with Lehmann's analysis of this passage, out of context, is that most of the Greeks rejected the true God Paul was preaching because they did not believe in a resurrection. Acts 17:32-18:1 When they heard about the resurrection of the dead, some of them sneered, but others said, "We want to hear you again on this subject." At that, Paul left the Council. A few men became followers of Paul and believed. Among them was Dionysius, a member of the Areopagus, also a woman named Damaris, and a number of others. After this, Paul left Athens and went to Corinth. So if Paul was bridging a gap between the Jewish God and Zeus he was doing a very poor job! As far was we know Paul was never invited back to the Areopagus to speak, so this invitation was really an empty one, designed to get him to shut up and leave. Only a few believed in Jesus Christ. Paul was not there to bridge a "gap" between an unknown foreign "supreme being" like Zeus and YHWH. He was there to tell them that they had been worshipping an unknown god among many other false gods and to use that as an illustration that they were in error and to preach the Gospel about Jesus Christ. This example of Paul, the only one in Scripture, does not justify telling people around the world that they have already been worshipping the true God and just have to add Jesus Christ into the mix. Paul was clear about the Gospel he preached: 1 Corinthians 2:2 For I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus Christ and him crucified. Apparently, according to people like Kikawa and Lehmann, we now need to be experts in foreign gods to present the Gospel effectively, bridging the gap between false gods and the One True God. Paul resolved to be an expert in the Gospel!
"Theos" is a general word for "god" as is the word "god" in our language. This in no way shows that Paul was talking to them abou |