Christmas is Coming - Afrikaans

April 1, 2025

Die Hebreeuse woord vir Kersfees is: “Hag Ha nolod,” letterlik: “Die Fees van die Geboorte.” Romeine 14:4-6 sê vir ons dat ons nie mense moet oordeel vir geestelike fees dae wat hulle vier nie, en met dieselfde trant sê Kolossense 2:16-18 vir ons dat niemand ons moet oordeel in die hou van dae nie. Dit is geval van kultuur en verband wat streng tussen jou en die Here is. Vir my maak dit nie saak of iemand kersfees vier nie, maar wat baie saak maak is die teologie van kersfees, “Christmass”- en die Geboorte van Jesus. Wanneer is Hy gebore? Wie weet? Maar dat Hy gebore is, is ‘n feit en ons almal weet dit. Omdat my familie Israeli’s is, vier ons Hanuka. In Joh. 10 vier Jesus Hanuka, die fees van die tempelwyding, toewyding en dit is baie belangrik om onderandere die opkoms van die Antichris te verstaan deur Antiochus Epiphanes en die Makkabeërs. Ons het ‘n Hanuka geselligheid waarheen ons ongeredde Jode nooi, en weereens, in ons huis vier ons nie kersfees nie, ons gedenk die Geboorte. Ons gaan na ons gemeente toe en ons woon ook ‘n sang geselligheid by maar niks meer as dit nie. Kersfees of Christmass is vir ons iets wat met die Kerk te doen het, ons vier Hanuka.

Kersfees en die Laaste Dae.

Wat het kersfees, die Geboorte, te doen met die Laaste Dae? Dit gaan jou verras, want die antwoord is: - Alles. Ons sal nooit die Wederkoms van Christus verstaan voordat ons nie die eerste koms van Christus verstaan nie. Wat met Christus se eerste koms gebeur het gaan basie weer met Sy tweede koms gebeur. Jesus was gebore in die tyd van die Roomse Keiser Augustus, voorheen Octavius. Hy was die eerste Roomse heerser wat in sy tyd vergoddelik was. Dus, toe die Here Jesus die eerste keer gekom het was daar ‘n Roomse

Keiser wat oor die Roomse Ryk geheers het en wat as ‘n god aanbid was. Hierdie heerser het ‘n volkstelling gehou, hy het nommers, getalle aan mense toegeken, alhoewel hy nie die nommers op hulle gesit het nie, het hy nommers aan elke mens in die bekende wêreld toegeken. Daar was eintlik twee volkstellings deur Augustus gehou, beide vir die doel om finansiële beheer oor die wêreld te verkry.

Wanneer Jesus terugkom gaan dieselfde dinge weer gebeur: Ons gaan weer ‘n opgestane Rooms Ryk sien met iemand aan die hoof wat as ‘n god aanbid gaan word. Hierdie halfgod sal mense se hoofde nommer om sodoende ekonomiese beheer oor die wêreld te verkry. Wat met Jesus se eerste koms gebeur het gaan ook met Sy tweede koms gebeur. Kersfees is nie net iets van die verlede nie, dit is ook iets wat in die toekoms weer gaan gebeur, dit is profetiese gebeurtenis.

Die Boek Joel, Openbaring en die Berg Rede vertel vir ons van tekens in die lug en in die kosmos wat Christus se koms sal voorafgaan. Met Christus se geboorte was daar tekens in lug en in die kosmos wat die Geboorte voorafgegaan het. Die Jode was in hulle eie land, maar onder die beheer van ‘n Roomse Keiser. Hoe het hy daar gekom? Deur misleiding, die Roomse generaal. Pompeii het die Jode mislei en in die Allerheiligste van die Tempel ingegaan.

Wanneer jy sien dan iemand anders as die Hoëpriester op die Dag van Versoening in die Allerheiligste ingaan, dan is dit die een of ander beeld van die Antichris. Wat met Pompeii in Rome gebeur het, sal weer gebeur. Al hierdie dinge wat in Europa en die Midde Ooste gebeur is alles dinge wat besig is om die verhoog op te stel.

Jochanan ha Matbiel, Johannes die Doper het gekom in die gees en krag van Elia. Hy was net voor Jesus gebore en hy het ook net voor Jesus sy verskyning gemaak. Die profeet Maleági het dit op ‘n manier geprofeteer, Elia gaan weer kom, die Here Jesus bevestig dit.

Daar was baie valse profete in Israel toe Jesus die eerste keer gekom het, en daar sal weer baie wees wanneer Hy weer kom. Die algemene afvalligheid van die geloof van die mense wat die eerste keer in Hom moes geglo het, is in baie gevalle dieselfde as die afvallige toestand waarin die Kerk nou is.

Die Eerste Koms van Christus.

Kersfees is nie hier nie en ook nie daar nie, maar die Geboorte is baie belangrik. As ons nie verstaan hoedat die Here die eerste keer gekom het nie dan sal ons ook nie die Wederkoms verstaan nie.

Natuurlik is daar verskille, maar die een is ‘n beeld van die ander. Ek het in die laaste twintig jaar baie van my tyd as ‘n evangelis onder die Jode gespandeer aan een vraag:

Hoe was dit moontlik dat vir die laaste 2000 jaar van geskiedenis van voorbereiding vir die Messias se eerste koms, en in ‘n verbond verhouding met God, met al die Skrifte tot hulle beskikking. Hoe het dit gebeur dat so min Jode gereed was vir Jesus se eerste koms?

Paulus sê vir ons dat die duiwel hulle oë verblind het. Daar was 2000 jaar van voorbereiding vir die koms van Jesus, Israel het ‘n Verbond verhouding met God gehad, en hulle het die Skrifte gehad, maar tenspyte van dit was daar net ‘n oorblyfsel wat gereed was vir Sy koms? Dieselfde dinge gaan weer gebeur wanneer Hy weer kom, maar hierdie keer sal dit nie net Israel wees nie maar ook die sogenaamde Kerk. Watter soort Christene gaan in die Laaste Dae gereed wees vir Jesus se Wederkoms? As jy wil weet kyk dan na die soort Jode wat gereed was vir die Here se eerste koms. Die Here sal egter nie weer as ‘n baba kom nie, Hy sal nie weer uit ‘n aardse moeder gebore word nie. Daar is verskille tussen die twee komste, maar die een is ‘n beeld van die ander.

Die Soort Jode wat Nie Gereed was nie.

Wanneer ons verstaan watter soort Jode nie gereed was nie, dat sal ons ook verstaan watter soort Christene ook nie gereed sal wees nie. Blaai na Mattheus se verhaal oor die Geboorte: 2:1: “En toe Jesus te Betlehem in Judéa gebore is, in die dae van koning Herodes, het daar wyse manne uit die Ooste in Jerusalem aangekom en gesê: Waar is die Koning van die Jode, wat gebore is? Want ons het sy ster in die Ooste gesien en gekom om Hom hulde te bewys. En toe koning Herodes dit hoor, was hy ontsteld en die hele Jerusalem saam met hom; en hy het al die owerpriesters en die skrifgeleerdes van die volk bymekaar laat kom en by hulle navraag gedoen waar die Christus gebore sou word. En hulle het vir hom gesê: Te Betlehem in Judéa,

want so is daar deur die profeet geskrywe: En jy, Betlehem, land van Juda, is volstrek nie die geringste onder die vorste van Juda nie, want uit jou sal 'n Leidsman voortkom wat vir my volk Israel 'n Herder sal wees.”

Die Magi, Wyse manne:

Dit is hulle wat niemand verwag het nie, wat gereed was. Wat ons hier sien is dat sommige mense wat gereed was vir Jesus se eerste koms, mense was waarvan hulle dit die minste van verwag het.

Hierdie wyse manne het van Persië af gekom, hulle was veldpredikers van die ou tyd se Mede en Perse. Op ‘n manier was daar in die ou tyd se Persië ‘n godsdiens wat oor die eeue verander het, wat genoem was Zoroastrianisme. Hulle was monisties en hulle geglo dat daar net een God is en dat die mens verantwoordelik was vir sy eie sonde. Hulle het geglo dat daar ‘n stryd was tussen die seuns van die lig en die seuns van die duisternis, hulle het met ander woorde basies dieselfde geloof gehad as die Esseners en die Christene. Gedurende die Babiloniese gevangenskap toe Persië Babilon oorgeneem het volgens die profesie van Daniël, het sommige van die Persiese konings tot die geloof van die Jode se God gekom en hulle was alreeds monisties. Daar was ‘n langsame Joodse invloed in daardie gebied. Ons lees byvoorbeeld daarvan in Ester, en van Darius die Meder, sowel as die profesie oor koning Kores deur Jesaja die profeet, meer as 200 jaar voor die geboorte van Kores.

Ons lees in Esra en Nehemia wat daar gebeur het. Al die pad deur die Hasmoniese tydperk tot in die tyd van Jesus het die Perse van die Jode gehou. Tot met die val van die Sha van Iran (Persië) was hulle nog Israel goedgesind. Ek twyfel vir geen oomblik daaraan dat die Prins van Persië, waarteen Daniël gebid het en vir twee weke lank gevas het, dat hy vandag nog daar is in die vorm van Shai –Islam, die Islamitiese fundamentaliste in Iran. Mense in die moderne Christen sirkels hou daarvan om hierdie demone “gebied geeste” te noem wat natuurlik nie ‘n goeie vertaling of ‘n vertolking is nie. Die Griekse woord is “arche,” die Hebreeuse woord is “shadeem.” ‘n Beter woord kan miskien: Gebied heersers of vorste wees, dit beteken ‘n demoniese krag wat oor nasies heers. Daar is vandag baie dwaal

leraars met hulle “binding and loosing” idees wat natuurlik ‘n hoop strooi is, maar wat egter ‘n feit is, is die bestaan van bose magte wat oor volke heers, die Boek Daniël bevestig dit. Die duiwels het ook vir die Here gevra dat Hy hulle nie uit hulle gebied moet wegstuur nie. (Die Gergeséners) Gebied geeste bestaan, as jy die term wil gebruik. In Belfast (Engeland) sien jy oral afbeeldinge va die ou tyd se Keltiese oorlog gode in beide die protestantse en Rooms katolieke woongebiede. Die wyse manne het verstaan hoe om die tekens van die tye te vertolk. Dit is so jammer dat wedergebore Christene vandag nie die belangrikheid van wêreld gebeure en in die Midde Ooste kan verstaan nie.

Hulle is verblind en hulle nie kan sien nie, so as of die Boek Sagaria nie in die Bybel staan nie. Hulle kan nie sien wat in die EEC gebeur nie, hulle verstaan nie die globalisering van die wêreld ekonomie nie, die verwoesting van die omgewings, of enige van die tekens wat die wyse manne verstaan het nie.

Die hele Jerusalem was ontsteld.

Die wyse mane het gekom om die Messias te sien en hulle was nie Jode nie, mense van wie jy dit die minste verwag het, omdat hulle die Ster in die Ooste gesien het. Hulle het na Jerusalem toe gekom, dit is waar Herodes van hulle gehoor het en dit het hom en die hele Jerusalem ontstel. Dit is die stad waar Dawid gesê het die Messias sal kom, dit is ook waar die Tempel was, dit was die fokus punt van hulle identiteit en Messiaanse hoop, maar tog wou niemand wat daar gebly het gehad het dat Hy moes kom nie. So sal jy vandag baie kerke kry met dieselfde houding, ry maar so met die pad langs en kyk na al die kerke wat jy sien en vra jouself, hoeveel van hulle wil regtig hê dat die Here Jesus moet kom? Die Hele Jerusalem was in beroering, O’ ja, hulle het hulle rituele, liturgie, hulle feeste en vakansie dae gehad, maar toe dit begin lyk asof die Here sy verskyning gaan maak was hulle onrustig. Maar die nasionale en godsdienstige leiers was baie meer onrustig. Dink daaraan, en dit gaan nog slegter gaan. Hierdie mense het die Skrifte geken en Herodes wou weet waar die Messias gebore sou word en hulle vertel vir hom wat Miga 5:2 gesê het dat Hy in Betlehem gebore sou word.

Hulle het baie kop kennis van die Skrifte gehad maar geen hart kennis nie. Toe die Here gebore is was dit die laaste ding in die wêreld wat hulle verwag het of wou gehad het. Dink jy dit gaan anders wees met die Wederkoms van die Here?

Satan se Wip: Afvalligheid.

Omtrent elke leuen van Satan wat vandag in die kerk bedryf word is ontwerp vir een doel, en dit is om God se mense se hoop op hierdie lewe en in hierdie wêreld te vestig, per definisie is dit wat afvalligheid beteken, dit is om jou hoop op hierdie lewe en die wêreld te stel.

Die Koninkryk Nou teologie, gebied heersers, die segetog ridders, Calvinistiese herbouers, wat probeer hulle doen? Hulle probeer om die Koninkryk nou op te rig, hulle stel hulle vertroue in hierdie lewe. Voorspoed geloof, geld predikers wat die sonde van Hebsug preek wat hulle geloof noem, hulle noem die aanbidding van Mammon die aanbidding van God! Waaroor gaan dit? Geloof en vertroue in hierdie lewe!

Gerald Coates en Rick Joyner sê die wegraping is ‘n fantasie en ‘n mite, hulle spot daarmee, hulle vergelyk dit met Star Trek se: “Beam me up, Scotty”. Wat is hulle doelwit? Hulle wil die Kerk laat vergeet van die Wegraping en hulle wil mense se hoop op hierdie lewe stel.

Waaroor dink u gaan die ekumeniese beweging? Dit is die oprigting van die broederskap van die mens, weereens ‘n vertroue en geloof in hierdie lewe. Die hele Jerusalem was onrustig met die Here Jesus se eerste koms en dit gaan weer in Jerusalem gebeur wanneer Hy weer kom, en nie net Jerusalem nie maar die hele Israel. Hulle nasionale en godsdienstige leiers wat die Skrifte geken het, wou nie gehad dat Hy moes kom nie, vir 2000 jaar het God hulle voorberei vir Sy koms, die hele doel vir hulle bestaan as nasie en ‘n volk was die Koms van die Here, maar net ‘n oorblyfsel wou gehad het dat Hy moes kom, en dit sal weer so wees met die Wederkoms.

Hulle wat gereed was.

Watter soort Jode was gereed vir die Koms van die Here Jesus? Mirjam: Die bekendste vrou wat nog ooit gelewe het. In Lukas 1:46- 55 het ons die Lied van Verheerliking wat as jy dit in die Grieks lees, sal dit ‘n letterlike herhaling wees van die lied van Debora wat ons in Rigters 5 van die Septuagint kry. Die engel Gabriël, wat die “Magtige van God” beteken. Het gekom en vir Maria gesê dat sy die grootste vrou is wat nog ooit gelewe het. “Die Here is met jou; geseënd is jy onder die vroue. Vers 31: “En kyk, jy sal swanger word en 'n Seun baar, en jy moet Hom Jesus noem.” Haar naam was nie Maria nie maar Mirriam, (Mirjam) dieselfde as Moses se suster. Sy het nie blonde hare en blou oë gehad nie, sy was donker en van ‘n Semitiese afkoms. Sy was ook nooit in plekke soos Medjugorje, Guadalupe, Fatima, of Lourdes nie. Haar naam was Mirjam en sy was ongeveer in haar middel tiener jare toe Gabriël vir haar hierdie verstommende boodskap gebring het.

Wat het hierdie grootste vrou wat nog ooit gelewe het gesê toe daar aan haar gesê is wat sy is? Vers 46-47: “En Maria het gesê: My siel maak die Here groot, en my gees is verheug in God, my Saligmaker;” Hierdie vrou noem God haar Saligmaker, haar Redder, sy erken dat sy gered moet word van haar sondes. As die beroemdste vrou wat nog ooit gelewe het ‘n Redder nodig gehad het, waar kom ek uit? Nie een is regverdig nie, nie een nie,- want almal het gesondig en dit ontbreek hulle aan die heerlikheid van God-” (Rom. 3:23)

Die woord: “Theotokos- Moeder van God,” is nie in die Griekse Nuwe Testament nie. Daar is aan haar gesê dat sy die moeder van die Messias, wat Sy mense van hulle sonde sal red sou wees, waarop sy gesê het: Ek verheug my in God my Saligmaker. God Almagtig sou in haar Vlees word, en al wat sy kon sê is dat sy gered moes word. As hierdie beroemdste vrou wat nog ooit gelewe het gesê het dat sy ‘n Redder nodig het, dan glo ek haar. Ek glo nie sy sou gelieg het nie, maar al het sy ‘n leuen vertel dan sou God nie hierdie leuen in Sy woord gesit het nie, so wie sal ek glo? Maria self, of die leuen van die Sondelose Bevrugting waar daarop aanspraak gemaak word dat Maria ‘n sondelose vrou was? Wat hier gebeur het is dat daar ‘n verchristeliking van Minerva, Diana van Efese ens. plaasgevind het, en die toepassing daarvan op Maria in die vervulling van die

profesieë van Esegiël en Jeremia.

Die Madonna met die baba was oorspronklik afgelei van die Tammus aanbidding met wie Esegiël betrek was. Jeremia waarsku ons teen die aanbidding van die Hemel Koningin.

Die betekenis van ‘n “Persoonlike Redder.”

Mirjam sê sy het ‘n Redder nodig. God het ‘n Mens geword en Hy neem my sondes en plaas dit op Sy Seun, die Messias, en God neem Jesus se regverdigheid en plaas dit op my.

Hoekom het God ‘n Mens geword om my plek in te neem? Toe ek ‘n jong Christen was het ek hierdie uitdrukking van: Jesus is my (persoonlike) Verlosser, gebruik. Ek het nie verstaan wat dit alles beteken het nie. Ek het gedink dat Hy my persoonlike Redder was omdat ek persoonlik Hom aangeneem het, maar dit is net die helfte van wat dit beteken.

Wat dit in totaliteit beteken is dat al was ek die enigste persoon wat nog ooit gesondig het, dan moes Hy nog deur Mirjam gebore word en na die kruis gaan en uit die dood opstaan net vir my. Vir my alleen; Hoekom moes God vir my sterf, ek wat ‘n kokaïne verslaafde was?

Hoekom moes God ‘n Mens word en vir my sterf? Hoekom het Hy uit die dood opgestaan om vir my die ewige lewe te gee? Miskien kan ons dit van Mirjam verstaan, maar tog sê sy, sy het ‘n Redder nodig. Die godsdienstige mense dink nie hulle het ‘n Redder nodig nie, hulle het mos hulle rituele en feeste. Die duiwel kry meer mense in die Hel met godsdiens as met al die verdowing middels en immoraliteit, dobbel en alkohol saam. Per argument was die twee mense wat die meeste invloed op mense gehad het albei Jode. Carl Marks en Jesus Christus.

Daar is ‘n groot verkil tussen hulle en dit is dat beide op die teenoorgestelde ente van die spektrum is behalwe op een punt: Godsdiens is die grootste bedrog wat nog ooit in die geskiedenis teen die mensdom gepleeg is want die Evangelie is nie ‘n godsdiens nie maar ‘n verhouding, ‘n leefwyse. Maria het gesê sy het ‘n Redder

nodig. Sy was ‘n tiener meisie wat nie behep was oor Brittany Spears' se video’s, of oor haar persoonlike voorkoms nie, haar uitroep was dat sy ‘n Redder nodig het. Dit was die soort Jood wat gereed was vir Jesus se eerste koms. Ek hou van Mirjam, ek is lief vir haar en ek dink sy is wonderlike mens en ek kan nie wag om haar te ontmoet nie. Maar ek wil niks te doen hê met die blonde leeghoofdige meisie wat Maria geword het deur die sogenaamde Kerk nie.

Sagaria en Elisabet.

Mirjam het ‘n familie en ons lees daarvan in Luk. 1:5-6: “Daar was in die dae van Herodes, koning van Judéa, 'n sekere priester met die naam van Sagaría, uit die afdeling van Abía; en sy vrou was uit die dogters van Aäron, en haar naam was Elisabet. En hulle was altwee regverdig voor God en het in al die gebooie en regte van die Here onberispelik gewandel.”

Nou, onthou dat die Sanhedrin, die leiers, was korrup, dit was ‘n bedrogspul. Dit was Hinn, Copeland, en Hagen. So was dit met die eerste koms van Christus. Maar tenspyte van al die populêre verdorwenheid en die skynheiligheid van die leiers, was daar enkelinge tussen hulle wat regverdig was.

Ek ken enkele pastore in die Assemblies of God wat baie hartseer is oor wat in hulle denominasie gebeur. Ek ken Anglikaanse leiers in Engeland wat baie hartseer is oor wat in die Kerk van Engeland aan die gebeur is, ek ken ook Baptiste wat deur dieselfde dinge gaan. So sleg as wat dit is en wat dit nog gaan word, gaan daar mense soos Sagaria wees wat nog regverdig, toegewy en opreg gaan wees. Dit maak nie saak hoe korrup die stelsels en die leiers gaan wees of gaan word nie, hierdie mense gaan nie saam met hulle stem nie.

Daar is nie baie van hulle nie maar hulle is daar en dit is die soort Christen wat gereed sal wees vir die Wederkoms. Kom ons kyk verder.

‘n Arm man se Offer.

In Luk. 2:24 sien ons dat Maria ‘n paar duiwe as ‘n offer vir haar gebring het, sy het ‘n arm man se offer gebring. (Lev. 12) Daar is ‘n

leuenprediker in Amerika, John Avanzini, wat vertel het dat Jesus se familie ryk mense was en nie arm mense nie. ‘n Persoon het hom in die openbaar gevra dat as dit die geval was, hoekom het Maria die arm man se offer gebring? Sy antwoord was dat die inleiers haar moes uitlei, sy het die verkeerde vraag gevra.

Simeon.

Luk. 2:25-26: “En daar was 'n man in Jerusalem met die naam van Símeon; en hierdie man was regverdig en vroom en het die vertroosting van Israel verwag, en die Heilige Gees was op hom. En aan hom was dit deur die Heilige Gees geopenbaar dat hy die dood nie sou sien voordat hy die Christus van die Here gesien het nie.” Onder die Ou Verbond was die Heilige Gees net vir sekere mense in sekere tye soos vir hoëpriesters, konings, profete en sekere ander persone. Hulle het die Heilige Gees in ‘n sekere manier ontvang en eers na Pinkster het Hy gekom vir almal wat tot die geloof gekom het. Die Gawes van die Gees het net fundamenteel deur persone gewerk wat die gawes ontvang het. Vers 27: “En hy het deur die Gees in die tempel gekom; en toe die ouers die Kindjie Jesus inbring om met Hom te handel volgens die gebruik van die wet, (Die besnydenis) - het hy Hom in sy arms geneem en God geloof en gesê: Nou laat U, Here, u dienskneg gaan in vrede volgens U Woord, omdat my oë U heil gesien het, wat U berei het voor die oë van al die volke-- 'n lig tot verligting van die nasies en tot heerlikheid van u volk Israel.” Hierdie man, Simeon, was met die Heilige Gees vervul en hy het die belofte ontvang dat hy nie sal sterf voordat hy die Messias gesien het nie.

Simeon was al oud en afgeleef maar hy het geweet dat hy nie sal sterf voordat hy Jesus gesien het nie, volgens die Nuwe Testament het hy die gawe van geloof gehad.

Die Gawe van Geloof.

In die Nuwe Testament lees ons van die mate van geloof. Ons word gered deur genade en geloof en sonder geloof is dit onmoontlik om God te behaag, en alles wat nie in geloof gedoen word nie is sonde maar afgesonder hiervan is daar die Gawe van Geloof en nie almal van ons het hierdie gawe nie. Dit is die kapasiteit om absoluut op God

te vertrou vir dinge wat nie spesifiek in die Skrifte geskrywe staan nie maar wat die Heilige Gees aan jou geopenbaar het.

Die meeste mense met hierdie gawe is voorbidders, dit is hierdie mense wat waarlik deur gebed vir ander kan intree, wat glo en weet en wat nie wensdenkery is nie, en wat ook nie vertrou op die futiliteit van hulle eie denkes nie, maar wat vashou aan die belofte wat hulle deur geloof weet dat dit wat hulle ontvang het waarlik van God af gekom het. Dink aan hierdie ou man, vervul met die Heilige Gees begeer hy die versoening van Israel, en al wat hy wou sien is die Koms van Jesus, dit is al waarvoor hy gelewe het.

Anna.

Nie net was daar hierdie ou man nie, maar daar was ook hierdie ou vroutjie.

In Luk. 2: 36-38 lees ons: “En daar was Anna, 'n profetes, die dogter van Fánuel, uit die stam van Aser. Sy was op baie ver gevorderde leeftyd en het van haar maagdom af sewe jaar lank met haar man saamgelewe; (Vergeet hierdie Britse Israelisme en Armstrongisme. Hierdie mense het hulle stam identiteite behou tot in tweede en die derde eeu.) en sy was 'n weduwee van omtrent vier en tagtig jaar. Sy het nie weg gebly van die tempel nie, en met vaste en gebede God gedien, nag en dag. En sy het in dieselfde uur daar gekom en die Here geprys en van Hom gespreek met almal in Jerusalem wat die verlossing verwag het.”

Vir baie jare is dit al wat hierdie ou vroutjie gedoen het, sy het gevas en gebid, sy het God in Sy huis gedien. Sy kon nie ophou om mense van Jesus te vertel nie, almal wat uitgesien het na die verlossing van Israel. Die wêreld vind jong vrouens aantreklik, maar God sien dit anders, lees die Boek Spreuke- God vind ouer vroue in ‘n geestelike wyse aantreklik. Hier is ‘n ou dame wat haar hele lewe toegewy het aan gebed en om God te dien en uiteindelik vertel sy die mense van Jesus. Dit was die soort Jood wat gereed was vir die eerste koms van Jesus en dit is ook die soort Christen wat gereed gaan wees vir die Wederkoms van Jesus.

Getroue Herders van gister.

Maar dan is daar in Luk. 2:8-11 sommige herders: “En daar was herders in dieselfde landstreek, wat in die oop veld gebly en in die nag oor hulle skape wag gehou het. En meteens staan daar 'n engel van die Here by hulle, en die heerlikheid van die Here het rondom hulle geskyn en groot vrees het hulle oorweldig. En die engel sê vir hulle: Moenie vrees nie, want kyk, ek bring julle 'n goeie tyding van groot blydskap wat vir die hele volk sal wees, dat vir julle vandag in die stad van Dawid gebore is die Saligmaker wat Christus, die Here, is.”

Wat opgevolg word in vers 14 in die Latynse Vulgaat deur: “Gloria in excelsis Deo” - 'Ere aan God in die hoogste Hemele.” Die Hebreeuse woord vir wagter en herder is dieselfde en dieselfde geld ook in Grieks. Hierdie mense was wagters wat hulle kuddes opgepas het, hulle was nie huurlinge nie. Daar kom ‘n groot geestelike duisternis aan die einde van hierdie eeu: “Wagter, hoe ver is dit in die nag?

Wagter, hoe ver in die nag? (Jes. 21:11) “Kom Hy in die tweede of die derde nagwaak? (Luk. 12:38) “Hy kom soos ‘n dief in die nag.” (1 Tes. 5:2) Werk terwyl dit nog lig is want as die nag kom kan niemand werk nie. (Joh. 9:4) Maar daar sal die getroue wagters en herders wees wat al is dit hoe donker, getrou sal bly.

Getroue Herders van vandag.

Ek het eenkeer met ‘n Engels gebore pastoor van Zimbabwe gesels waar vreeslike dinge gebeur, toe ek hom vra hoe dit met hom gaan het hy gesê hy is baie dankbaar vir al die gebede en hy vertel toe vir ons hoe sleg dit in Zimbabwe gaan en dat die meeste geleerde blankes en swart mense besig is om die land te verlaat en die wat nog daar is ook besig is om ‘n ander heenkome te soek. Ek wou hom die volgende dag weer sien maar hy het vir my gesê dat hy terugkeer na sy skape toe, “my skape is daar” het hy vir my gesê. Hier was ‘n wit man wat sy lewe toegewy het om swart mense te help wat besig is om aan vigs te sterf. Ek ken ook ‘n goeie Christen dokter wat ‘n baie goeie lewe in Amerika kan geniet wat saam met hom daar is.

Hoekom vlug hulle nie? Hierdie is ‘n gevaarlike plek en dit gaan nog

slegter word. Hulle is wagters, herders. Daar is twee soorte Jode wat gereed was vir Jesus se eerste koms en dit is die soort Christen wat gereed sal wees vir Hom wanneer Hy weer kom.

Wie is besig om gereed te maak? Herodes was baie ontsteld en die hele Jerusalem saam met hom. Die Sanhedrin was omgekrap. Die teoloë het hulle hare uit hulle koppe getrek. Hierdie soort mense sal nie gereed wees nie, by hulle is dit ‘n rare verskynsel. Maar individuele leiers soos die Sagarias, of Josef die pleeg vader van Jesus, ‘n regverdige man, en ‘n tiener meisie wat sê: “Ek het ‘n Redder nodig,” of die wagters wat waak oor hulle kuddes, of die ou vroutjie wat haar lewe gewei het aan gebed en om die Here te dien, wat mense van Jesus vertel het, of die ou man wat met die Heilige Gees vervul was en wat gewag het op die koms van die Here- dit is ‘n ander verhaal - hulle is die soort Jode wat gereed was vir Jesus se Eerste Koms en dit sal ook die soort Christene wees wat gereed sal wees vir Jesus se Wederkoms. My gebed vir julle en julle families, vir myself en my familie is, wanneer ek na al hierdie Jode kyk wat gereed was vir Jesus se Eerste Koms, is dat deur die Genade van die God van Israel, ons onder diegene sal wees wat gereed sal wees vir die Wederkoms van Jesus. My liewe broers en susters, moet nie ‘n fout maak nie, waak: Kersfees Kom! My geliefde Kers lied is: Hark the Angels Sing. Die musiek was gekomponeer deur Felix Mendelssohn, ‘n Jood, en die woorde is geskryf deur Charles Wesley, ‘n Heidense Christen, dit is een van grootste samewerking waarvan ek van weet. [Hark, the herald angels sing, Glory to the newborn King! Peace on earth, and mercy mild, God and sinners reconciled! Joyful all ye nations, rise, Join the triumph of the skies, With th'angelic hosts proclaim, Christ is born in Bethlehem! Hark, the herald angels sing, Glory to the newborn King!


October 12, 2026
Written by - Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Examples abound in history of how the responses to innovations in technology that disrupted and transformed the nature of warfare have taken a delayed time to be adapted. Chain mail and armour had to be altered and bolstered to repel arrows from the English Longbow in Medieval Europe, but this didn't occur in time to the dismay of the French at Agincourt. It took the Spanish decades to redesign their cumbersome Galleons that lay prey to the swifter English ships. Napoleonic era field tactics were still being employed during the American Civil War, with mass charges mowed down by the Gatling barrel machine gun. Trench warfare was only later embraced during WWI. With the cheap manufacture of drones and the advances in AI a new chapter has opened in how war is waged in our own time. The conflicts in Ukraine and Iran have demonstrated how asymmetric warfare has become as much an economic calculation as a game of cat and mouse. Drones (and relatively cheaply manufactured ballistic missiles by Iran) are being shot down at great expense. AI which has been extensively deployed for target identification in Gaza is also proving to be a vital tool in hunting incoming drones. But as in the delayed development of military countermeasures historically, drones are ahead of AI in the battlefield. This is reflected in the enormity of Russian military casualties that have fallen victim to Ukrainian drones. AI is able to cut through the 'background noise' of distracting projectiles, birds and other debris to home in efforts to eliminate the actual drone target. The magic formula is speed and precision. Humans can detect and assess a threat, but AI can process radar, cameras and other sensors almost instantly, and with increasing accuracy predict where a drone intends to strike. When swamped with a wave drone attack, AI acts to identify and track the multiple threats. AI can also help decide how to respond. Depending on the system, the response could involve electronic warfare, an interceptor drone, a missile or a gun-based system. Ukraine has installed automated machine gun turrets instructed by AI to protect Kiev. In some cases, humans still make the final decision to engage, while AI handles the calculations and tracking required to make that decision quickly. More broadly, drone warfare is becoming a contest between autonomous systems. The challenge is no longer simply building a better missile or a better drone. It is building a system that can see the threat first, understand it quickly and respond before the drone reaches its target. In that sense, AI is becoming a critical part of air defence. The advantage may increasingly belong to whoever can make the fastest and most accurate decisions—not necessarily whoever manufactures the most expensive weapons. AI's pace of progress is exponential. It is beyond comprehension what capacity could be realized in even the next 2-3 years. The combination of drones, robotics and AI may render the traditional military hardware of tanks, frigates and fighter jets almost functionally obsolete. The development of AI's course of military application will be largely directed by the conflicts where it is deployed. In the pre-AI world of 1987, the black Friday market crash during the Reagan Administration saw a dangerous drop in the Dow, where computer analysis issued sell orders against a background of Reagan's massive budget deficits. Amidst Reagan's budget deficits this created an environment where social security was looted to fund defence spending. A supposed conservative President ran a fiscal policy with simultaneous increases in the Pentagon budget, coupled with tax cuts. The computer generated sell off was beyond the functional control of brokers and market makers, while the Soviets attempted to engineer market irregularities affecting the American economy which had further global ramifications due to massive American trade deficits with Japan under Reagan. The current Securities exchange environment is at best no less complex now. Given the spectre of what transpired in 1987 with computerised over control of stock exchange trading, and a shadow hanging over the bond market we are left to ponder could another such scenario be triggered in the age of AI? And even more illuminous prospect over shadows us now with the question can AI gain a decision-making operational capacity over command-and-control decisions. Certainly, for tactical weapons systems or even a doomsday scenario with Russia, China, India or Pakistan placing nuclear launch control in the hands of AI that could result in an exchange that either the US, Britain, France or Israel would be forced to react to. Without scaremongering it is necessary for strategic planners to prevent the nuclear powers that be from arriving at the precipice of such an abyss.
September 21, 2026
The interlinked nature of third-party involvement in the ongoing conflicts in Iran and Ukraine has increasingly come to the fore in recent weeks. It emerged that China has not only been providing Iran with radar systems, navigation tools, and electronic warfare technology, but also high-resolution satellite imagery and geospatial data to direct its rockets. The same great-power relationships that are shaping the Middle East are affecting the conduct and constraints of the war in Ukraine. It is apparent that a reciprocation in kind is dictating Russia's conduct towards the US in Iran. Intelligence and targeting support mirror similar U.S. assistance to Ukraine. But this picture becomes murkier when considering the backroom accommodations Trump is willing to give Putin. Recently, Trump pressured Zelensky to stop targeting Russian diesel infrastructure, saying the attacks were causing a shortage of the fuel that is "hurting the world." The U.S. national average price for diesel, which is used by trucks, trains, ships, and farm equipment, rose above six dollars a gallon for the first time last Thursday. Such interventions demonstrate how developments on the battlefield in Ukraine can no longer be considered independently of wider economic and geopolitical calculations. China has been using tankers that are already at sea, when that runs out the American blockade will create shortage problems for the Chinese economy, as China no longer gets Venezuelan oil and is reliant on Iran and international spot market prices. The war with Iran is now spreading to Yemen, with the Houthis attempting to replicate the Iranian chokehold model perfected in the Strait of Hormuz. The strategic importance of controlling or threatening critical maritime chokepoints is central to the wider contest. What happens in the Gulf can therefore have consequences for shipping, energy markets, and military calculations far beyond the immediate theatre. So far, the US has declined Saudi requests to slow the Houthi advance. Neither Turkey nor Egypt seems inclined to come to Saudi Arabia's aid. This is despite the signing of a very recent mutual defence pact between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan. More developments can happen in these conflicts on an average day than can be afforded mention, but they should be increasingly understood as interconnected parts of a wider geopolitical confrontation. Assistance in one theatre triggers reciprocal action in another. Consequently, these cease to be discrete, containable conflicts and are extending into prolonged multinational conflicts. There is a distinct possibility that these may become frozen conflicts over time. A more terrifying eventuality is something more akin to the Thirty Years' War, which was fought in the first half of the 17th century in Europe. It is important to remember that this calamity, which ravaged Europe, began as a localized rebellion that gradually drew in more and more powers. The initial religious nature of the fighting gave way to political struggles. The mechanism by which a localized conflict becomes a multinational struggle offers a historical warning worth considering. The danger today is that a collection of individually distinct conflicts could become sufficiently interconnected that containing any one of them becomes increasingly difficult. Iran, Ukraine, Russia, China, the United States, and the conflict involving the Houthis are already linked by military assistance, intelligence, energy, trade, and strategic competition. The question, therefore, is no longer simply how any one of these conflicts ends. It is whether they can remain separate conflicts at all.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore • September 12, 2026
Moriel & Jacob Prasch request prayer for our sister in Jesus - Wendy Blomkamp, widow of Brother Fred Blomkamp (now with The Lord), the founder of Moriel South Africa Branch (not to be confused with Moriel's Ebyown Aids Children's Mission in South Africa founded by David Royle). Wendy, (an equestrian rider of all things) is originally from West Yorkshire, England but has lived most of her life in South Africa and is currently in retirement in the USA. Unfortunately, Wendy is diagnosed with inoperable pre terminal cancer with cardio pullmonary complications. The Lord will either intervene supernaturally or call her home. We request prayer for Wendy and her beloved family and wisdom for her physicians. In Christ, All at Moriel
By David Passmore • September 7, 2026
The US midterm elections are around the corner and the results could have profound effects on US foreign policy concerning Israel. Much has been said about this vote being a referendum on Trump's unpopular war with Iran. But it can equally be said to be about Trump's other foreign policy engagements that are viewed rather more favourably like the overthrow of Maduro in Venezuela and his replacement with a pro-American regime. With Israel the picture is less clear. It used to be a given that Israel enjoyed bipartisan support on the Hill. You could count on the fingers of one hand the number of politicians opposed to supporting Israel - the occasional fringe Democrat representing a singular Michigan constituency with a high Arab origin demographic, or a rare odd ball Republican preaching strict isolationism. This dynamic has shifted quickly in the last decade. The Democrats have all but abandoned any inclination of a pro-Israel position. Even establishment figures like Chuck Schumer have been pressured to side with the Party's radical left wing. With 60-80% of Democrats now anti-Israel, Israel can no longer rely on Jewish Democrats to oppose anti-Zionism or antisemitism. The most outspoken Democratic member of the Senate advocating a pro-Israel position, Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania is being pressured to resign and leave the party even by Pennsylvania's Jewish Governor Shapiro and Soros sponsored Philadelphia Prosecutor Krasner. This is happening concurrently with mass endorsement from 170 leading Hollywood Jewish actors writing a letter of support for Mark Ruffallo - despite his antisemitic comments naming Jewish investors supporting a Hollywood studio mega merger as being associated with apartheid genocide. However most shocking, were the comments by Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel who stood before an audience of Jewish Democrats last weekend telling them they may need to sacrifice the safety, and even the future, of their own people in exchange for saving the rest of humanity. Such rhetoric is contrary to basic human instincts of survival and self-preservation. If any other nation were suggested this course of action, I wonder what their response would be? On the Republican side the foreboding sense of an altering course towards Israel no longer seems so distant. The anti-Israel faction in the Republican party led by Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes are now being supported by Vice President Vance. Jewish kingpins in the Trump Administration such as Witkoff and Kushner have been tied to business dealings in N.Y. with the Muslim Brotherhood controlled Qatari government through its business holdings. Should Republicans lose control of the Senate while Democrats take the House, Israel could find itself having to drastically re-access its relationship with Washington. We wouldn't see an immediate break in ties. American military, intelligence, technological and strategic cooperation with Israel is too integrated into the core of US institutions and corporations that would take a protracted period to dismantle. However, the power of Congress is in no way feeble. Congress controls funding, foreign-assistance legislation, sanctions, arms-related legislation and, perhaps most importantly, the political milieu in which an administration operates. A Democratic House combined with a Senate no longer controlled by Republicans could place enormous pressure on Trump to alter his attitude towards Israel. Practically this could entail demanding further accountability from Israel over military operations in Gaza, and the West Bank Settlers causing civilian casualties and property damage. Military aid could face more conditions or restrictions, but an immediate cutoff is unlikely. Israel has historically depended upon the presumption that regardless of who was President, there would be a robust enough bipartisan coalition in Congress to prevent a major deterioration in the relationship. Now the opposite appears true. Israel is taking the gamble of solely relying on a friendly President like Trump getting elected to maintain cordial relations. With the erosion of even much of Jewish American support for Israel and the hijacking of the Democratic party by a pro Islamist socialist left seen in Mamdani and others, Israel is forced to confront the inescapable reality that the last strong bastion of support for it is the Republican Party's evangelical base. But even younger voters in this key demographic are beginning to question support for Israel. The hostility displayed by the Haredim in Jerusalem and elsewhere against Christians including evangelicals, is to say the least counter-productive to the national interest. To attack the one friend Israel has left with a proven track record of loyalty and is vital to pro-Zionism internationally, is particularly detrimental to the national interest. It is Iran with its Mahdiist interpretations of jihad and sharia as a religious ideology that drives its hatred of Israel and the USA, and The West, to the detriment of the interests of the majority of the Iranian populace who want non hostile co-existence.  Such religious fanaticism and ideologically fuelled hatred ought not be given place in Israeli Judaism. It too, will generate adverse consequences for the majority of Israelis, including religious moderates, who desire an ongoing friendship with Evangelical Christians whose theology is not one of anti Semitism, but of proven Philo-Semitism and pro Zionism.
By David Passmore • August 21, 2026
Don't bite the hand that feeds you - Irish hypocrisy towards Israel Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Amongst European nations, Ireland in recent years has gained the reputation as being the leading anti-Zionist country. The Irish Republic has never been favourably inclined to Israel. It only established an Embassy in Tel Aviv in 1996. In poll after poll the vast majority of the Irish public have indicated hostility towards Zionism and strong support for Palestinian Statehood. The curious aberration to this is that in British Ruled Northern Ireland support is demarcated along sectarian lines. Catholic Republican areas predictably tend to ardently support the Palestinian cause, while Protestant Unionist communities are overwhelmingly pro-Israel. Perhaps some credence can be given to sentiments of traditional Catholic antisemitism hardwired into the Irish psyche as contributing towards this disposition. It was certainly odd that the Irish government promptly sent a delegation to the Nazi German Ambassador in Dublin to convey condolences after news of Hitler's suicide broke at the end of WW2. But more concretely if you were to ask the average Irish protester on a pro-Palestine march the basis of their empathy for the Palestinian cause, they would point to the ostensible parallels between the Irish experience of fighting for independence from British colonial oppression to the plight of Palestinians living under Israeli occupation. Further remonstrations on a diplomatic level concern the actions of the IDF interreacting with Irish Peace Keepers in Southern Lebanon that have caused the deaths of several Irish Peace Keepers over the decades in friendly fire incidents. Ireland has contributed the most peace keepers to this mission per capita and the government has condemned Israel for these deaths that they view as avoidable. This animosity towards Israel is unbalanced. There are reasons to consider that Ireland and Israel have a shared experience of national liberation. Both countries fought the British in the pursuit of independence. Both countries made great efforts to resurrect their ancient languages for modern wide scale use. Both the Irish and Jews form major diaspora communities in New York. Despite all this Ireland ranks as Israel's second largest export market after the US. The preponderance of Israeli exports to Ireland comprises electronic integrated circuits, micro-assemblies, and tech manufacturing components. American multinational colossal tech corporations like Intel are substantially engrossed in this trade through the chain of supply. Ireland and Israel are hubs for design and manufacture of high-tech hardware components for US corporations. So, due to the nature of the most prosperous and competitive sectors of their respective economies, Israel and Ireland are inextricably bound in bilateral trade ties. Resolutions from the Irish government to impose sanctions on West Bank originating produce is merely perfunctory rhetoric. Such actions amount to a drop in the bucket in terms of impact to overall trade. The stark reliance of Ireland on advanced Israeli aviation equipment recently caused a spectacle when Ireland's new government jet struggled to land in heavy fog due to it being ordered without an advanced Israeli made navigation system. This was directly due to a short-sighted government decision not to buy Israeli military technology. There is a marked disparity between the official position of the Irish government designed for domestic public consumption and the economic policies that it actually pursues towards Israel. The government is acutely aware that the US is massively invested in the Irish economy and they don't want to do anything to jeopardise this. Washington demands that their enterprises in Dublin are intertwined with operations in Israel. The Irish government dare not even prevent US military supply flights refuelling at Shannon Airport on their way to Tel Aviv. The Irish government knows that times change and now the gripping social issue is the anti-immigrant/anti-Islam popular street protests. Soon the anti-Israel protests could become a mere side show only really promoted by Sinn Fein given the pressing ramifications of mass migration. So, in the meantime certain politicians will rile against the occupation, purported genocide and pass paltry sanctions against insignificant produce from the West Bank. All the while making hand over fist in money with the Israelis where it really matters in tech.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore • July 31, 2026
The Tide Has Changed Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The America that Netanyahu touched down on is a changed America. The death of Lindsey Graham represents a changing of the guard. Graham was a staunch Israeli ally who will most probably become an increasingly rare breed in Washington. Sixty percent of Americans now hold a unfavourable view of Israel which politicians are finding difficult to ignore. It was once unthinkable to believe that New York City with such a strong Jewish electoral base and influence on all sectors of economic and cultural life would have a mayor that is so hostile to Israel to such an extent that he is calling for the arrest of its Prime Minister. From all accounts Netanyahu was cordially welcomed at the White House. The official press release stated that the talks were constructive. What is more telling is what was left unsaid particularly concerning the proposed sale of F35's to Israel's new regional adversary -Turkey. Trump is keen to find a swift resolution to the Iran War, while Netanyahu is opposed to a premature departure. When the US and Israel initiated their attacks on Iran over five months ago, Trump and Netanyahu appeared united in the War's goals and purpose. But as the protracted conflict has staggered to topple the Iranian regime fractures have emerged. Much has been said about the imminent political realities both leaders face. The Republicans could take a big hit in the November midterm elections should the war continue and global energy markets be negatively impacted. Netanyahu is anxious to demonstrate a big win to the Israeli public with the upcoming October election. In Israel, the Iran War is not viewed in isolation, but rather as an extension of the response to the colossal disaster of the October 7th massacre. Netanyahu must rehabilitate his reputation as a competent steward of national security having had the greatest loss of civilian life in an attack happening under his watch. Aside from the Iran issue, Trump is being pressured by Erdogan to insist upon Israeli withdrawal from Syrian territory pre-emptively seized by Israel following the toppling of Assad. Trump has also indicated disapproval of the extent of continuing Israeli measures against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, questioning the proportionality employed. Netanyahu is not in an envious position. Throughout his tenure and political career, he lauded his ability to engage successfully with the American public by zealously advocating Israel's position. Yet under his government Israel's reputation has plummeted in the US. Trump may be the last US President to extend such overwhelming bilateral support to Israel. The days of politicians like Lindsey Graham are fast ending. While John Fetteman and Marco Rubio appear to be remaining more solid, even some of the most warmly inclined leading Republican and Democrat voices like Donald Trump and Rahm Emanuel have nuanced their support for Israel. The tide has shifted and will at best level off if not continuing to shift further.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore • July 24, 2026
The Saudi Nuclear Deal: An attempt to alter the Regional Balance of Power Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The initiative to develop a civilian nuclear program in Saudi Arabia with US assistance isn't new. There were concrete plans discussed towards these ends during the first Trump Administration. The recent announcement to actualize this deal follows the geo-political regional tumult in the wake of the Iran War. Several dimensions of motivation underlie the US decision. An overarching US strategic agenda is to keep the Saudis firmly in the American sphere of influence. Washington knows all too well that the Chinese and Russians are eager to offer their nuclear technical assistance to the Saudis in order to draw them closer to their camp. On a personal note, the nuclear agreement is a significant achievement for Bin Salaman. The Saudis have long had designs to diversify their energy supplies. Having a civilian nuclear program also adds prestige to Saudi Arabia as an emerging market economy. For the US, a monopoly on contracting companies for the requisite construction offers lucrative economic opportunities. Although the Civilian Nuclear deal does not allow the enrichment of Uranium, the Saudis will be in a position to do so if Washington gives the green light. This will act as a counterbalanced threat hanging over the Iranians. After the recent flare up of renewed fighting with Iran due to their lack of adherence to the moratorium of understanding, something had to budge in Trump's estimation. A reconfiguration of the power balance in the Gulf by introducing the potential of Saudi Arabia to be able to acquire nuclear weapons shifts the dynamic and places further pressure on Iran to strictly abstain from nuclear proliferation. Despite Israeli concerns about the agreement, Trump sought to assuage their alarm by making it contingent upon Saudi Arabia normalizing relations with them. Given the inherently unstable nature of an autocratic Saudi regime Israel views a diplomatic relationship with the Saudis as being on precarious footing in the long term. Israel is already forced to contend with the implications of one nuclear armed Muslim state - Pakistan and it will further weaken its own deterrent capability if another similarly capable hostile neighbour were to emerge in the future. The roles of Turkey and Qatar in all this foray are a wild card. Officially Turkey is served under the NATO nuclear umbrella for defence that is subject to US control. However, its civilian nuclear program remains in its infancy. Now with the Saudi deal, Erdogan may be inclined to exert pressure on the US to help accelerate his own nuclear program. Just as Erdogan's efforts to acquire F35 fighter jets from the US greatly disturbed Israeli military planners, a heightened Turkish nuclear ability will intensify this fear. Qatar views itself as pursuing its own independent foreign policy that has managed to remain rather neutral during the current war, thereby escaping the ire of Iran's strikes on US regional assets. Overall, the Qatari government has grown closer to the Turkish vision for the region and so likely isn't particularly amiable to the Saudi agreement. Ultimately the Saudi deal is a gamble. Many will see it as throwing more fuel on the fire which will further imperil the tinder box region and heighten tensions. But Trump finds himself at a continuing impasse with a stubborn regime in Tehran that is leveraging their geographic hold on the straits of Hormuz to inflict damage on the global energy markets. Iranian strikes upon US Arab regional allies have underscored the de facto alliance between Israel and the Arabs against Iran and its Shia proxies. The US hopes to use the Saudi nuclear deal as a means of making this alliance official by having Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords as a pre-condition.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore • July 14, 2026
Circling the wagons Ruben Rothler LLB, LLM Israel is a society riddled with tension and division. It is sociologically, if not politically miraculous that a country drawing Jews from all over the world is able to exist at all. The army affords a degree of integration as a melting pot. But this is only a marginal source of national unity in the overall scheme of things. More so are the myriads of external threats that face this small country. In the former generation the Ashkenazi (Jews of European descent) - Sephardic (Jews of Oriental descent) divide was far more pronounced. The dominant Ashkenazi establishment held the reins of political and economic power which was resented by the Sephardim. However, due to a combination of inter-marriage and political accommodation much of the chasm that separated these distinct groups was forged. Menachem Begin (an Ashkenazi politician) in 1970 successfully ran on the Likud Party ticket with a campaign that brought Sephardic Jews under his conservative political umbrella. Later the immigration of Russian Jews following the end of Communism would add a whole new dimension to the Israeli demographic milieu. The younger generation of these immigrants tended to adapt well to Israeli society and contributed much to the economy. The wider division in Israeli society that crosses ethnic lines concerns that between religious and secular Jews. This can be further bifurcated to the clash between the secular and specifically ultra-orthodox Jews (Haredim) as distinguished from the national religious Jews (Dati Leumi). The Secular and the Religious generally part on what they envisage a Jewish State to entail. Religious Jews desire the State to strictly adhere to the stipulations of Jewish Law (Halacha), while at present Halakhic influence is largely limited to certain areas of Family Law concerning Jewish citizens. Wider considerations of promoting a socially conservative political agenda would also be forefront amongst the religious mindset broadly. Secular Jews view the imposition of such proposed measures as a serious infringement of their civil rights. With regard to the Haredim, the bone of contention looms larger, in that this group is fundamentally opposed to participating in society at large. This is acutely manifested in diminished contribution to the work force and a refusal to be conscripted into the army. The 2023 judicial reform protests posed a significant threat to social civil order. The nation appeared to be bitterly divided into two opposing camps. This split reflected broader divisions concerning visions of how the country should be governed. The judicial reforms would have weakened the Supreme Court's ability to render the Executive branch accountable. However, the Supreme Court was also accused of using its considerable powers to promote a socially liberal agenda. Left wing secular Israelis tended to oppose the proposed reforms while those on the right (which included the majority of Religious Jews) supported the reforms. Every weekend droves of protesters were brought onto the streets causing major disturbances to traffic. The polarising nature of this impasse threatened the future of Israeli democracy. It was the October 7th attack that brought a swift end to this public debate and civil strife. The nation instinctually united in response to this common existential threat. The judicial reforms were shelved for a future point when the urgent security threats subsided. However, as the war dragged on the enduring issue of Haredi refusal to conscript into the army became more pronounced. Mounting casualties combined with ever increasing manpower demands to field troops on the multiple theatres of action on which the IDF is engaged has depleted the ranks, and the army is now in much need of fresh conscripts. Haredi belligerent refusal to participate in the pressing national defence has escalated from being a political debate to a matter of very practical vital importance. Overall we can observe that the challenges to national unity in successive generations since the establishment of Israel has recurrently been ameliorated by the common necessity of defence towards outside threats. Most recently we can see this happening with regard to the global anti Semitism and anti-Zionism that has been raging since the October 7th atrocities. These hostile attitudes have paradoxically acted as a force which promotes nationalism and a sense of national cohesion in Israel that otherwise might not functionally exist.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore • July 8, 2026
A Divided Nation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The Haredi community has had a complicated, paradoxical relationship with the State since its founding. Rooted in a Talmudic precept that the Jews are forbidden to resettle the land of Israel en masse by force before the coming of the Messiah, the secular democratic State of Israel presents itself as blasphemous by its mere existence. Yet due to practical considerations such as the need to obtain funding for its religious academies the Haredi leadership reached a settlement with the State's founders that exempted Haredi men from being conscripted for military service. This was at a time when the Haredi population in Israel was relatively small. Over the past decades this demographic ballooned until the point that soon the majority of Jewish children in Israel will be born into Haredi families. Such a situation is clearly unsustainable. Recently the Knesset's (Parliament's) Haredi parties have pressured their coalition partners in government to codify Torah Study as part of the Country's Basic Laws. This was purposefully done to elevate the status of their institutions to be on parity with service in the IDF. Israel is yet to promulgate a written Constitution, so legislation classed as a Basic Law holds Constitutional status for all intents and purposes. These moves by the religious parties represent a back door power grab to enshrine in law very significant hurdles to prevent the enlistment of Haredi men. The burden of Israel's defence is comparatively massive for a country its size and it is vastly disproportionately shouldered by the secular population. Until now there have been political initiatives to conscript the Haredim. But given the huge manpower shortages emerging in the wake of near continual conflict on multiple fronts since the events of October 7th this matter has become urgent and not merely a theoretical discussion of what is fair and equitable. It is important to draw a distinction between the Haredim and national religious Jews (Dati Leumi). The Haredim adhere to a lifestyle entirely committed to observance of Jewish Law and Talmudic study. This is embraced to the exclusion of gainful employment and participation in wider society. They are either outrightly opposed to Zionism or consider themselves non-Zionist. Conversely, followers of the national religious movement in Israel although being observant of Jewish law and learning would alongside this pursue secular professions. Furthermore, they are ardently Zionist and disproportionately serve in IDF combat units. This is often done within the framework of a program called Hesder Yeshiva that combines religious learning with military service. Efforts to cater a similar model for accommodating Haredi participation in the IDF have so far failed to make substantial gains. Such measures designed to override Haredi objections to service based upon modesty concerns by strict segregation of the sexes in these specially formed units have failed to appease the Haredi leadership. For them, any form of military service is considered a dereliction of their duty to fully devote themselves to a Torah lifestyle. They argue that their Talmudic learning and prayers are in itself a form of national service and act to protect the Jewish people spiritually from enemy attack. It is as if two parallel societies exist within Israel. And the trajectory of separation between the two is only growing. The Haredim are cloistered away in their Yeshivas, immersed in lives devoted to adhering to the stipulations of Jewish law. While the particulars of actually running the State is left to the Secular. The Haredim desire all the benefits of subsidizing their lifestyle without contributing to society. What we really have going on here at source is two profoundly different and opposing ideological visions of what is important in life and what is the purpose of a Jewish State. At the State's founding these divergent perspectives were more manageable. Ben Gurion only had to contend with one religious party –the National Religious Party. Later in 1970 Begin aligned with the NRP to form a coalition government that also brought Sephardic Jews under the Likud umbrella which had the effect of bringing unity to the country by bridging the Ashkenazi-Sephardi divide. However, over time Israeli politics has seen a proliferation of religious parties, gaining further leverage as king brokers in forming governments due to the proportionate representation voting system which secular Israelis not uncommonly view as political blackmail. (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).