Geklee en gereed (Dressed and Ready)

March 31, 2025

Luk. 12:35-53: “Laat julle heupe omgord wees en julle lampe aan die brand. En julle moet wees soos mense wat op hulle heer wag wanneer hy van die bruilof terugkom, sodat hulle dadelik vir hom kan oopmaak as hy kom en aanklop. Gelukkig is daardie diensknegte vir wie die heer wakker sal vind as hy kom. Voorwaar Ek sê vir julle, hy sal hom omgord en hulle aan tafel laat gaan en hulle kom bedien. En as hy in die tweede of in die derde nagwaak kom, en dit so vind gelukkig is daardie diensknegte.


Maar weet dit: as die huisheer geweet het in watter uur die dief sou kom, sou hy gewaak het en nie in sy huis laat inbreek het nie. Julle moet dan ook gereed wees, omdat die Seun van die mens kom op 'n uur dat julle dit nie verwag nie. Toe sê Petrus vir Hom: Here, vertel U hierdie gelykenis vir ons of ook vir almal? En die Here antwoord: Wie is dan die getroue en verstandige bestuurder wat die heer oor sy diensvolk sal aanstel om hulle rantsoen op tyd te gee? Gelukkig is daardie dienskneg vir wie sy heer, as hy kom, só besig sal vind. Waarlik, Ek sê vir julle, hy sal hom oor al sy besittings aanstel.


Maar as daardie dienskneg in sy hart sê: My heer talm om te kom, en hy die diensknegte en diensmaagde begin slaan, en begin eet en drink en dronk word, dan sal die heer van daardie dienskneg kom op 'n dag dat hy dit nie verwag nie, en op 'n uur dat hy dit nie weet nie, en sal hom pynig en hom 'n deelgenoot maak van die ontroues. En daardie dienskneg wat die wil van sy heer geken het en nie klaargemaak of volgens sy wil gedoen het nie, sal met baie slae geslaan word; maar hy wat nie geweet het nie en gedoen het wat slae verdien, sal met min slae geslaan word. En elkeen aan wie veel gegee is, van hom sal veel gevorder word; en aan wie hulle veel toevertrou het, van hom sal hulle oorvloediger eis.


Ek het gekom om vuur op die aarde te werp, en hoe wens Ek dat dit al aangesteek was! Maar Ek het 'n doop om mee gedoop te word, en hoe benoud word Ek totdat dit volbring is! Dink julle dat Ek gekom het om vrede op die aarde te gee? Nee, sê Ek vir julle, maar eerder verdeeldheid. Want van nou af sal daar vyf in een huis verdeeld wees, drie teen twee en twee teen drie. Die vader sal verdeeld wees teen die seun en die seun teen die vader, die moeder teen die dogter en die dogter teen die moeder, die skoonmoeder teen haar skoondogter en die skoondogter teen haar skoonmoeder.”


Die Olyfberg Rede is die kern van wat Jesus sê wat in die laaste dae gaan gebeur voor Sy tweede koms. Hy praat van Sy terugkeer, die Parousia, die Tweede Koms in die Olyfberg Rede. Ons het ’n beknopte weergawe in Markus 13 maar die mees uitgebreide weergawe is wat ons lees in Mattheus 24 en 25.


Lukas is ’n bietjie anders. Lukas is ’n Sirofenisiese bekeerling in Judaïsme wat skryf is vir ’n Heidense leserskring; en hy omskep die Olyfberg Rede. Hy deel nie daarmee net in een plek nie, hy deel met die Olyfberg Rede in vier verskillende plekke. Dit is dieselfde leer van Jesus, dieselfde woorde van Jesus, maar hy verander die formaat. Mattheus se Evangelie, soos Johannes se evangelie is meer Hebrais, hulle is eerstens geskryf vir ’n Joodse leserskring. Lukas is anders, dit is geskryf aan ’n Grieks Romeinse leserskring.


In Lukas is daar Joodse materiaal wat jy nie in Mattheus of in Johannes sal kry nie, maar, dit is net omdat hy dinge aan die Heidense moet verduidelik terwyl die Jode dit alreeds weet. Wanneer jy Joodse materiaal in Lukas kry dan is dit iets wat hy aan die Heidene wil verduidelik, dinge wat die Jode alreeds weet. Een voorbeeld is in Lukas 21:24, waar Jesus sê:---“ en Jerusalem sal vertrap word deur die nasies totdat die tye van die nasies vervul is.” Die Jode weet daarvan uit die Boek Daniël maar hy moes dit spesifiek vir die Heidene sê.  Alhoewel, ons kan dit op so ’n manier verstaan.


    Mattheus is ’n fanatiek wanneer hy ’n tema ontwikkel; Lukas is omvattend. Hy skryf dit op ’n manier vir die Griekse mentaliteit waar dit ’n liniêre wêreld visie is, ’n liniêre vorm van rasionalisme, ’n baie logiese, liniêre benadering van geskiedenis. Dit is ’n formaat aanpassing; maar dieselfde leer, ons kyk na Lukas se weergawe van die idee om geklee en gereed te wees.


Een verwysing hier is in 1 Pet. 1:13:


“Daarom, omgord die lendene van julle verstand, wees nugter en hoop volkome op die genade wat julle deel word by die openbaring van Jesus Christus.”


Onthou, wanneer daar gepraat word van Jesus Christus dan is dit altyd Hy wat na die aarde toe gekom het, en wanneer dit Christus Jesus is, dan is Jesus in die ewigheid. Wanneer die Messiaanse titel Christus Jesus eerste geplaas word dan is dit Jesus in die ewigheid. Dit kom direk ooreen met Seun van God en Seun van Mens. In die ewigheid is Jesus die Seun van God, maar waar daar gepraat word van Hom wat aarde toe gekom het dan is dit die Seun van Mens in ‘n menslike Gestalte en nooit as die Seun van God nie.


Jesus sal fisies en letterlik kom. “Daarom omgord die lendene van julle verstand.” Wees gereed om iets te doen. Een van die slegste dinge wat in die laaste dae kan gebeur is ’n bunker mentaliteit. Jesus vergelyk dit met die ontsnapping van Noag en sy familie in die ark. Totdat God nie met Sy eie hand die ark se deur toegemaak het nie moet ons aangaan en onsself voorberei om mense te waarsku. Ons gaan sit en sê: “Dit is dit, die wêreld se tyd is verby, die afval is met ons, die Antichris gaan kom, kom ons gaan kruip weg in ‘n bunker en wag daar vir die Here om te kom.” Dit is nie wat Jesus geleer het nie, daar is altyd ‘n aksie. Ons is veronderstel om te reageer op Bybelse profesie, ons is veronderstel om die kennis wat ons daarvan het in aksie te stel om mense te waarsku dat Hy gaan kom en dat ons voorbereid moet wees vir Sy koms.


Maar kyk wat sê Petrus, hy sê iets wat Jesus ook van gepraat het. Die woord in Grieks is sobrizo, om nugter te wees, bedaard. Dit is ‘n herhaaldelike tema in die Skrifte wat te doen het met die koms van Christus, nugterheid, sobrizo in Grieks. Ons sal terugkom hierna.


“Wees geklee en gereed en hou jou lamp aan die brand.” Hier in Lukas se evangelie stel hy dit in ’n Griekse term sodat die Grieke dit kultuurlik kan verstaan. Die man gaan weg na die bruilof en kom terug van die bruilof af, terwyl in Mattheus kom die meester vir die bruilof. Hy gebruik dieselfde taal maar hy stel dit op ’n manier dat die Grieke dit ook kan verstaan. Hy kom na hierdie bruilof fees, hy klop aan die deur en hy wil inkom. Hy verduidelik dit net eenvoudiger vir die Grieke soos wat Mattheus 25 dit meer breedvoerig verduidelik.


Mat. 25:1-12:1 “Dan sal die koninkryk van die hemele wees soos tien maagde wat hulle lampe geneem en uitgegaan het om die bruidegom te ontmoet. En vyf van hulle was verstandig en vyf dwaas. En toe die wat dwaas was, hul lampe neem, het hulle geen olie met hulle saamgeneem nie. Maar die verstandiges het olie in hulle kanne saam met hul lampe geneem. En terwyl die bruidegom talm om te kom, het hulle almal vaak geword en aan die slaap geraak. En middernag was daar 'n geroep: Daar kom die bruidegom; gaan uit hom tegemoet!


 


Toe staan al daardie maagde op en maak hulle lampe gereed. En die wat dwaas was, sê aan die verstandiges: Gee vir ons van julle olie, want ons lampe gaan uit. Maar die verstandiges antwoord en sê: Miskien sal daar nie genoeg wees vir ons en vir julle nie. Maar gaan liewer na die verkopers en koop vir julleself. En onderwyl hulle gaan om te koop, het die bruidegom gekom. En die wat gereed was, het saam met hom ingegaan na die bruilof, en die deur is gesluit. Later kom toe die ander maagde ook en sê: Meneer, meneer, maak vir ons oop! Maar hy antwoord en sê: Voorwaar ek sê vir julle, ek ken julle nie.”  Lukas vat hierdie hele gelykenis en verklein dit na een vers, hy skryf aan ‘n nie -Joodse leserskring. Hy klop, maak die deur oop vir die bruilof gaste en hulle is nie daar nie en hy waarsku hulle om olie in hulle lampe te hou.  Kom ons verstaan wat leer Jesus in die Lyding verhale. Die Here neem altyd die Machzor, die Joodse feeste liturgie, die Machzor.


     Daar is twee soorte Joodse liturgie (Voorgeskrewe gebede en liedere); die siddur vir Sabbat is die normale een, om in orde te stel; dit is die normale Joodse liturgie. Maar vir ’n heilige dag, iets soos die Pasga, het jy ’n Machzor met ‘n stel rituele. In die laaste week van Sy lewe, die Lydings Week, soos wat die Christene dit noem, het Jesus herhaaldelik na Ou Testamentiese Skrifte verwys wat in die Machzor gevind word, wat vandag nog in die Tempel en in sinagoges gedurende daardie week- Hag ha Mazot- en die week voor dit gebruik word.


Op Palm Sondag, was dit die Halel Raba: Psalm 113 tot 118: Baruch haba b’sheim Adonai, beirachnuchem mibeit Adonai. Hodu l’Adonai ki tov, ki l’olam chasdo.  “Geseënd is Hy wat kom in die Naam van die Here.” Dit word vandag nog in die sinagoges in die Machzor vir die Pasga gelees. Jesus het altyd dit wat gelees was geneem en dit Messiaans op Homself van toepassing gemaak. Wel, wat het hulle in die sinagoge op hierdie Saterdag, die Sabbat van Hag ha Mazot gelees? Die volgende Saterdag na Mattheus 25, het hulle Šîr HašŠîrîm, megillah Šîr HašŠîrîm, die Hooglied van Salomo- gelees, en tot vandag toe word dit nog in die sinagoges gelees.


Om die idee van die bruidegom te verstaan moet ons na die Hooglied van Salomo hoofstuk 3 gaan kyk. Ons weet uit die teks van Hooglied wat die bruid sing en wat die bruidegom sing, geslagtelik. Ons weet ook wat die getuienisse van die romanse is uit die getal, die sabaoth ta shemayim,  letterlik “die Gasheer van die Leërmag van die hemel.” Ons weet uit die Hebreeuse teks uit die geslag en uit die getal wat Salomo sing en wat Shulamite sing en wat die getuienisse van die verhouding sing. Hierdie romanse tussen Salomo en Sulamietise is ’n allegorie van die Messias se verhouding met Sy bruid.


Hooglied van Salomo: 3:1-5:-


“Op my bed snags [In Hebreeus is dit vroulik]


   “Het ek gesoek na my sielsbeminde,


    Ek het na hom gesoek, maar hom nie gevind nie.


    Ek wil dan opstaan en in die stad rondgaan,


    In die strate en op die pleine wil ek na my sielsbeminde soek;


    Ek het na hom gesoek, maar hom nie gevind nie.


    Die wagte wat in die stad rondgaan, het my aangetref.


    Het julle my sielsbeminde nie gesien nie?


    Skaars het ek van hulle af verder gegaan,


    Of ek het my sielsbeminde gevind;


    Ek het hom vasgehou en hom nie gelos,


    Voordat ek hom gebring het in die huis van my moeder,


    En in die binnekamer van haar wat my gebaar het nie.


    Ek besweer julle, dogters van Jerusalem,


    By die gemsbokke of by die takbokke van die veld,


    Om nie die liefde wakker te maak of op te wek,


    Voordat dit die liefde behaag nie.”


Hooglied van Salomo draai om twee drome. Die Hooglied wat in die week gelees was toe Jesus die boodskap van die olie, die lampe en die bruidegom gebring het, draai om twee drome. Die eerste is in hoofstuk 3: Sy verwag dat die bruidegom moet kom, in groot afwagting kyk sy uit vir hom, sy wag vir hom om te kom en toe hy kom was sy gereed om saam met hom te gaan. In Hooglied is dit haar beste droom wat waar geword het.


Sy is daar, hy kom, sy is gereed en sy gaan. Dit is die eerste droom. In die volgende hoofstuk sien ons iets anders.


           Hooglied 4:6--


    Totdat die aandwind waai,


    Een die skaduwees vlug,


    Sal ek gaan na die mirreberg,


    En na die wierookheuwel.


   Met Jesus se geboorte het die Magi Mirre gebring omdat Hy gesalf sou word vir ’n begrafnis. Goud, omdat Hy ’n Koning is, wierook omdat Hy die aanvaarbare offer sou bring, maar mirre is omdat Hy sou sterf. Die bruidegom gaan na die mirre berg, na die wierook hoogte om vir die bruid te sterf. Hy is gesalf vir ’n begrafnis en Hy gaan die aanvaarbare offer bring; dit is wat in hoofstuk vier gebeur.


Nou, let op die herhaling van woorde in die Hooglied. “Om nie die liefde wakker te maak of op te wek voordat dit die liefde behaag nie.” Nou, ons wag nie vir Jesus om terug te keer nie, Hy wag vir die bruid om gereed te wees. Lukas praat van “wanneer die oes gereed is dan volg die maaiers.”


Toe Jesus op die aarde was het Hy nie geweet wanneer hierdie dag sou kom nie, net die Vader het geweet. Maar nou, in die ewigheid, weet Hy. Dit is wanneer die graan gereed is. God weet alles, ook die toekoms, maar relatief tot ons is dit veranderbare. Ons kan letterlik Sy koms verhaas deur om gereed te wees vir Hom, om mense na Christus toe te lei, om dissipels te maak. Petrus sê ons kan Sy koms verhaas wanneer die oes dit toelaat. “Moenie my liefde opwek voordat my bruid gereed is nie.”


Bykans alle misleiding, elke leuen van die duiwel wat vandag op die Westerse kerkwêreld gerig is, is ontwerp om ons te mislei sodat ons op hierdie wêreld moet vertrou in plaas van op die koms van Christus. Koninkryk Nou, (Kingdom Now) teologie en Post Millennialisme se vertroue is op hierdie wêreld.


Glo dit, gryp dit, noem dit en eis dit, die Geloof in geloof wêreld se vertroue is op hierdie wêreld.


Dan is daar die sogenaamde ‘Peace Plan,’ vertrou op hierdie wêreld. Elke leuen wat op die kerk gerig word is ontwerp om ons op hierdie wêreld te laat vertrou in plaas daarvan om uit die wêreld gered te kan word.


Nou, ons is geroep om die sout en die lig te wees, dit is sekerlik ‘n getuie en ‘n getuienis. Maar die wêreld is in die mag van die bose, ons is nie geroep om daarop te vertrou nie. Elke leuen en misleiding is vandag op ons gerig om ons sovêr te kry om op hierdie wêreld te vertrou in plaas van op die koms van Jesus. “Moenie my geliefde opwek totdat sy gereed is nie.” In hoofstuk drie is sy geklee en gereed om te gaan.


Kom ons kyk na die volgende droom. Weereens is dit die bruidegom; die Hebreeuse teks is manlik.


Hooglied van Salomo 5:1-8:


“Ek het in my tuin gekom, my susterbruid, ek het my mirre met my balsem gepluk, ek het geëet van my heuningkoek met my heuning, ek het gedrink my wyn met my melk; eet, vriende, drink en word dronk, bemindes.


Ek het geslaap, maar my hart het gewaak. Hoor, my beminde klop: Maak vir my oop, my suster, my vriendin, my duif, my volmaakte! Want my hoof is vol dou, my haarlokke vol nagdruppels.


Ek het my kleed uitgetrek, hoe kan ek dit weer aantrek? Ek het my voete gewas, hoe kan ek dit weer vuil maak?


My beminde het sy hand deur die deuropening gesteek; toe het my binneste oor hom in beroering gekom; ek het opgestaan om vir my beminde oop te maak, terwyl my hande drup van mirre en my vingers van vloeiende mirre op die handvatsels van die grendel.


    Ek het vir my beminde oopgemaak, maar my beminde het weggedraai, verbygegaan; ek het my besinning verloor toe hy gespreek het; ek het na hom gesoek, maar hom nie gevind nie; ek het na hom geroep, maar hy het my nie geantwoord nie.


Die wagte (die polisie) wat in die stad rondgaan, het my aangetref; hulle het my geslaan, my gewond; die wagte by die mure het my mantel van my afgeneem. Ek besweer julle, dogters van Jerusalem, as julle my beminde vind, wat sal julle hom vertel? Dat ek krank is van liefde.”


Hy kom maar sy is nie geklee en gereed nie. Sy is in die bed van vlees soos wat Jesaja 28-29 teen waarsku.


Nie nou nie, moenie nou kom nie. Nou, Lukas sê (12:35)  “Laat julle heupe omgord wees en julle lampe aan die brand.” Hy verklein die hele gedeelte na net een vers, 35, wees geklee en gereed met julle lampe.


Die tweede keer wat die bruidegom kom, met die tweede droom, is sy nie gekleed nie. Dit is nag maar sy is nie gereed nie; dit word haar slegste nagmerrie. Let op, haar hande is vol mirre. Sy is gesalf vir ‘n begrafnis en dan begin die wagters haar slaan. Die wat nie weggeraap is nie gaan nie ‘n baie aangename tyd belewe as die bruidegom nie vir hulle kom nie.


Wyse en dwaase maagde, daar gaan kerke, Christene, wees wat gereed gaan wees vir Jesus se koms, en daar gaan die wees wat nie gereed gaan wees nie. Maar let op, teoreties verwag die hele Christendom dat die bruidegom, Jesus gaan kom, die Parousia- die wederkoms van Christus. Hulle verwag Hom teoreties, ten minste as ‘n saak van dogma maar dit is nie ‘n waarheid volgens die manier waarop hulle lewe nie, dit is nie wat hulle voorsien nie. Dit is hulle slegte nagmerrie. Wanneer Jesus kom gaan dit óf ons beste droom wees wat waar geword het óf ons slegste nagmerrie, die een of die ander. Dit is wat Hy in die Olyberg Rede vir ons wil leer. Met Sy koms gaan dit ons beste droom of ons slegste nagmerrie wees. In hoofstuk 3 is sy geklee en gereed.


Toe Adam en Eva gesondig het, het die Here in die tuin ingekom—hulle was naak. Hulle het hulleself met blare bedek; Hy bedek hulle met die bloed versoening, die velle van diere. Oor die vyeblare in Openbaring lees ons van die genesing van die nasies deur die blare van die vyeboom. Vyeblare is beelde van goeie werke.


Ongeredde mense sal altyd probeer om hulle naaktheid met hulle goeie werke weg te steek. Hulle sal altyd probeer om hulleself te regverdig met goeie werke.


Ja, ons gee om vir die armes en die siekes; maar al ons geregtighede is soos 'n besoedelde kleed. (Jes. 64:6) Daar moet ’n bloed versoening wees. Die kleed van geregtigheid moet daar wees. Pasop vir ’n sosiale evangelie.... ons moet werk vir vrede, ons moet omgee vir die siekes, ons moet omsien na die armes, maar Christene doen hierdie dinge omdat hulle gered is en nie om gered te word nie.


In ons bediening het ons kinderhuise in Afrika vir VIGS babas. Ons doen dit nie om gered te word nie, maar omdat ons gered is. Dit is die geregtigheid van Jesus in ons en deur ons, dit is nie ons geregtigheid nie. As dit net ons is wat dit doen dan sou dit vyeblare gewees het. Vyeblare is nie goed genoeg nie; jy moet geklee en gereed wees om te kan gaan. Wanneer die Here kom sal Hy jou of geklee of naak vind, die vyeblare het nie die eerste keer gewerk nie, dit gaan nooit werk nie. Die getroue bruid is gereed soos ‘n getroue kerk. Dit is die Joodse agtergrond waarvan Jesus gepraat het. Maar dan praat Hy in Lukas en in Mattheus van olie in die lampe.


Psalm 119:105: “U Woord is ‘n lamp vir my voete en ‘lig op my pad.”


In Bybelse tipologie tipifiseer verskillende vloeistowwe die Heilige Gees in verskillende aspekte van Sy Persoon en bediening. Mayim chayim, lewende water is die uitgestorte Heilige Gees. Nuwe wyn is die Heilige Gees in aanbidding, maar shemen zayit, olyf olie wat in die lampe gebruik word is in die Skrifte die verligting van die Heilige Gees.


    Daar is ‘n baie groot voordeel om Grieks en Hebreeus en literêre kritisisme te ken, maar ‘n intellektuele kennis van die Skrifte, alhoewel God dit kan gebruik, sal nooit genoeg wees om te verduidelik wat dit werklik beteken nie. Iemand met geen opleiding in Grieks en Hebreeus kan deur die Heilige Gees verlig word om dit te verstaan. Daar is geen tekort aan mense met ‘n Ph.D. van die -Yale Divinity School- wat nie eers weergebore is nie wat Griekse woorde kan ontleed.


Ek skryf nie teologiese opleiding af nie, ek sê net, dit is die verligting van die Heilige Gees wat saak maak.


Nou, wanneer iemand wat teologiese opleiding gehad het gered word dat is dit iets anders. Jesus sê: “Daarom is elke skrifgeleerde wat 'n leerling geword het in die koninkryk van die hemele, soos 'n huisheer wat uit sy skat nuwe en ou dinge te voorskyn bring.” (Mat. 13:52)


Wanneer iemand met ‘n teologiese opleiding weergebore word en hy word ’n dissipel van Jesus dan kan so ‘n persoon deur God gebruik word. Dit is waarom Petrus in sy Briewe na Paulus toe gegaan het om die moeilike dinge te hanteer, hy was ‘n rabbi uit die skool van Hilel.


Akademiese kwalifikasies op sig self sal nie die Woord van God verlig nie, dit moet iemand wees wat olie in sy lamp het. Jehovah se Getuies het almal Bybels by hulle as hulle aan jou deur klop, maar daar is nie olie in hulle lampe nie, die feit is dit is ‘n gebreekte lamp. As jy ‘n Message, die Boodskap lees kry vir jou ‘n goeie Bybel vertaling, ‘n goeie lamp. Daar is geen getrouheid teenoor die oorspronklike Grieks en Hebreeuse teks in hierdie boeke nie.


Hulle sou olie moes hê voordat die bruidegom kom, hulle het olie nodig om mee te begin. Maar iets het gebeur. In ‘n tyd wat ons al dieper in die Woord van die Here behoort te gegaan het, het toegewyde Bybel studie al meer en meer agteruit begin gaan. Sekere dinge is aan ons vertel, daar is vir Daniël gesê om hierdie dinge te verseël tot met die einde wanneer die Heilige Gees hierdie geheimenisse sal openbaar. Dinge in Esegiël, Sagaria, Daniël en Openbaring sal in plek begin kom maar ons sal hierdie dinge nie ten volle verstaan voor die regte tyd nie, hoe nader ons aan die wederkoms van Christus kom, hoe duideliker sal dinge word.


Wees versigtig vir mense wat deur dinge soos kaarte vir jou wil wys hoe dinge gaan gebeur. Hoe nader ons kom aan die terugkeer van Christus hoe duideliker gaan dinge begin word. Jesus se Eerste koms is soos Sy Tweede koms. Byvoorbeeld, die Wet is ‘n skaduwee, maar jy kan God nie deur die Wet van Moses ken nie. Die Wet van God kan jou dinge oor God leer as jy dinge van God uit die Ou Testament geweet het, maar dit is net deurom Jesus te ken dat ons God kan ken. Met die Wet kan jy dinge oor God weet, maar wanneer Jesus kom dan kan jy God ken. Jehovah sal redding bring deur sy regter hand. Die Wet is ‘n skaduwee. Hoe nader die Jode aan die eerste koms van Christus beweeg hoe duideliker word die definisie; die apostels het Jesus herken, Maria en Martha kon Hom herken. Let op die hoëpriester wou dit nie doen nie, dit sal weer so wees—hoe nader ons aan die koms van Jesus kom hoe duideliker word die definisie as jy olie in jou lamp het.


Toe ek tot redding gekom het vroeg in 70’s toe Calvary Chapels begin het, was daar baie mense wat boeke gelees het oor die koms van Jesus. Van hierdie boeke was goed ander nie; “Late Great Planet Earth,” ens. Maar baie mense het daaroor gepraat, gedink, gebid en boeke oor dit gelees. Nou 35+ jaar nader aan Jesus se koms is daar baie minder belangstelling oor die wederkoms van Jesus.


Die “doel gedrewe” mense sê: “Vergeet profesie, dit is ‘n misleiding.” Dit is wat hulle verkondig, Jesus sê: “Pas op, waak en bid, want julle weet nie wanneer die tyd daar is nie.” (Mark 13:33).


Ek was by Calvary Chapel met ‘n herder  vergadering toe hoor ek iemand sê- “Ek weet nie van julle manne nie, hoekom verkondig julle nog profesie?” Wel Jesus het gesê as mense nie olie in hulle lampe het nie dan sal hulle ook nie gereed wees as die bruidegom kom nie, hulle sal die Skrifte nie verstaan nie.


    Hoekom raak mense betrokke in Vervangings Teologie? Hulle het nie olie n hulle lampe nie. Hoekom ken mense nie die verskil tussen die Ekumeniese Beweging en die eenheid van die Gees nie? Daar is nie olie in hulle lampe nie. Hulle het ‘n Bybel maar daar is nie olie in nie, die lig van die Heilige Gees is nie daar nie.


Jesus sê wanneer ons hierdie dinge sien gebeur… Diegene wat olie het sal dit sien gebeur. Ons moet besef ons het olie nodig om in die nag te kan sien.


‘Nag’ is die mees algemene metafoor in Bybelse tipologie vir die groot donkerte wat gaan kom aan die einde van die wêreld met die Groot Verdrukking. Dinge raak progressief al donkerder.


“Wagters, wagters hoe vêr is die nag? Gaan Hy kom in die tweede nagwaak of met die derde? Werk terwyl nog die lig het, en Ek sal kom wanneer niemand kan werk nie. Hy kom soos ‘n dief in die nag.”


In Hooglied kom die bruidegom vir sy bruid in die nag. In Mattheus 25 kom hy in die nag. Dinge word al donkerder, hoe donkerder dinge word hoe meer olie het jy nodig vir die lamp.


Kom ons gaan terug na die dae van Eli die hoë priester. Die lamp het al flikkerend dood gegaan. Eli die priester se seuns was korrupte geestelike leiers. Vandag in die Westerse wêreld is dit weer so. Onthou jy die seuns van Levi? Hulle was net daar vir die geld. Hulle was seks wolwe en die lamp het al flikkerend dood gegaan. In die Laaste Dae gaan dit weer gebeur, die getroues gaan olie in hulle lampe hê, hulle sal in staat wees om te kan sien wanneer dit begin donker word.


Terwyl die getroue maagde olie gaan haal het, het die ander geslaap. “Vergeet profesie…vir wat bestudeer jy dit, dit is ‘n mors van tyd!” Daar gaan ‘n tyd kom wat hulle gaan besef hulle is verkeerd. Die dwase maagde gaan naarstigtelik rond skarrel om die olie te kry maar dit gaan te laat wees. Hulle gaan mislei word, en die feit is hule is alreeds mislei. Ou Pinkster was reg, “Gee my olie in my lamp en hou dit brandend.” Hulle was reg! Ongelukkig was dit die ou Pinkster geslag. Die nuwer geslag het die lamp laat doodgaan. In Lukas 12 waarsku Jesus ons oor hierdie dinge; kom Hy met die tweede waak of met die derde? Hy kom soos ‘n dief in die nag-- en al hierdie dinge. Hy waarsku oor die idee van die dienskneg wat goeie voedsel op die regte tyd moet kry.


Sal hy goeie voedsel op die regte tyd kry of sal hy sê- “My Meester talm om te kom,” Hulle gaan op ‘n gefuif en slaan hulle mede slawe? Jesus waarsku spesifiek oor twee dinge wat met die leierskap in die laaste dae gaan gebeur. Daar sal getroue diensknegte wees wat goeie voedsel op die regte tyd sal gee. Wanneer hierdie wêreldgebeure in die Midde- Ooste begin ontvou ens. Dan sal daar diegene wees wat sal sê: “Kom ons kyk gou na Esegiël 38 of 39 en na Daniel 12.”  Ander sal sê: “Profesie, dis ‘n mors van tyd, ons het dit nie nodig nie.”


Maar waarin raak hulle betrokke?


Dronkenskap en aanranding van hulle mede diensknegte, dieselfde as in Mat. 24. Dronkenskap in plaas van nugterheid. Ons word herhaaldelik teen dit gewaarsku. ‘n Paar jaar terug was daar mense wat gesê het hulle gaan vir ‘n herlewing wat gebaseer sou wees op dronk in die Heilige Gees. Baie mense het op vliegtuie gespring na Toronto, Kanada, Florida. Ek het dit op videos gesien. Hulle het geval asof hulle werklik dronk was en hulle het gesê dit was die Heilige Gees, ten spyte van die feit dat die Woord van die Here sê die vrugte van die Gees is selfbeheersing, om nugter te wees.


Hulle sê: “Nee ons is buite beheer, dit moet God wees, ons is dronk in die Gees.” En hulle sing die koortjie "Drinking at Joel's Place.” Wel, van watter Joel het hulle gepraat? Hulle praat van die uitstorting van die Gees in Joel. “Ons drink by Joel se kroeg.” Dit was n man uit Suid Afrika. Maar wat sê Joel?


Joel 1:5: “Word wakker, julle dronkaards, en ween!”  Nee! word dronk en lag! Bybels en histories het elke herlewing in die geskiedenis van Israel, elke herlewing van die kerk begin met mense wat gehuil het, nie een herlewing het begin met ‘n gelag van mense nie. Hierdie mense het gelieg, godsdienstige leuen predikers.


Hulle het hulle ore gestreel deur om die leuen te glo.


     2 Tim. 4: 3-4:  “want daar sal 'n tyd wees wanneer hulle die gesonde leer nie sal verdra nie,”


Daar sal ’n tyd kom wanneer mense eksegese en die waarheid nie sal verdra nie, ’n tyd wat hulle die ware betekenis van God se Woord nie sal verdra nie.   “--maar, omdat hulle in hul gehoor gestreel wil wees, vir hulle 'n menigte leraars sal versamel volgens hulle eie begeerlikhede, en die oor sal afkeer van die waarheid en hulle sal wend tot fabels.”


Hulle dink hulle kan bestuur maar hulle kan nie, hulle dink hulle kan enigiets doen maar hulle kan nie. Hulle spog met ‘n valse gevoel van self versekerdheid, ‘n valse gevoel van ‘n self potensiaal en ‘n self verwerkliking. Hulle raak oorstelp, mislei en verswak soos deur alkohol. Maar Jesus sê iets soos dit gaan geestelik in die laaste dae gebeur. Mense gaan, soos wat dit is, beskonke raak deur kranksinnige geeste. Julle, wees nugter! Dan sê Hy hulle gaan hulle mede diensknegte begin slaan. Dit raak al slegter en slegter, die verskynsel van swaar hand herders.


Eseg. 34: 2-5: “Mensekind, profeteer teen die herders van Israel; profeteer en sê vir hulle, die herders: So spreek die Here HERE: Wee die herders van Israel wat aan hulleself weiding verskaf! Moet die herders nie die skape laat wei nie? Julle eet die vet en beklee julle met die wol; julle slag die vettes, maar die skape laat julle nie wei nie; julle versterk die swakkes nie en maak die siekes nie gesond nie en die wat gewond is, verbind julle nie en wat weggedryf is, bring julle nie terug nie en wat verlore is, soek julle nie; maar met strengheid heers julle oor hulle en met hardheid. So het hulle dan verstrooid geraak, omdat daar geen herder was nie; en hulle het die voedsel geword vir al die wilde diere van die veld en het verstrooid geraak.”


Die skape word geplunder. Wat word hier gesê? Ek ken baie goeie en ware herders maar ek ken ook baie herders soos hier bo. Ek is jammer om te sê, ek self het ’n Pinkster agtergrond.


Heel dikwels vandag in die bediening, spesifiek onder my mede Charismate en Pinkster, maar nie net hulle nie, het dit ‘n kaartjie vir finansiële sukses geword vir mense wat dit nie in die sekulêre besigheid wêreld kan maak nie. Dink jy hierdie manne sou dit in die mediese of regterlike wêreld of in die siviele ingenieurs wêreld gemaak het ? Baie van hierdie manne is onopgevoed, hulle weet bitter min van die Skrifte af!


Ek praat nie van Grieks en Hebreeus nie, hulle verdraai Skrifte buite konteks. Hulle vertel meer en meer stories, meer en meer verhaaltjies en, natuurlik wanneer jy hulle aanvat dan verweer hulle hulself met die idee van: Jy mag nie God se gesalfdes aanraak nie.” Maar as hulle dit in konteks lees sal hulle uitvind dit is nie wat gesê word nie. Nee, Dawid sou nie sy hand aan Saul geslaan het nie, Saul was God se gesalfde maar dit het Dawid nie gekeer om die waarheid oor Saul te praat nie, dat hy ‘n terug gevalle moordenaar was nie. Dit beteken nie jy mag nie ‘n terug gevalle kerk leier kritiseer nie.


In die laaste dae gaan verdrukking van die skape ‘n groot probleem word. “Wie is jy om ons te betwyfel? Jy het ‘n rebellie gees.” “Ja maar dit wat jy doen is nie Skriftuurlik nie.” Jesus verwys na die Nicolaïte. Ons weet nie wie hulle was nie maar ons weet wat die woord beteken: Niko-laity, onderdrukking van mense.


Hulle maak vir hulle sekere korrupte leiers bymekaar wat op die skape teer, dieselfde wat die Sanhedrin met die Jode gedoen het. Jesus het die dade van die Nicolaïte gehaat, vandag is dit dieselfde. In Johannes 10 praat die Here herhaaldelik oor hierdie probleem.


Daar is drie soorte pastore: Daar is goeie herders, hulle is soos Jesus. Hulle sal hulle lewe gee vir die skape as dit daarop neerkom. Dan is daar die wolwe in skaapsklere. Hulle teer op die skape, hulle probeer om soos gelowiges te lyk maar hulle is niks anders as swendelaars nie. Die meeste pastore van vandag is nie goeie herders nie en die meeste van hulle is ook nie wolwe in skaapsklere nie. Die meeste van hulle is wat Jesus sê- ‘huurlinge’, dit is hulle werk. Die Christelike bediening is nie meer hulle roeping nie maar hulle beroep.


     Dit is hoekom hulle kerkgroei modelle gebaseer word op bemarking en sielkunde. Hulle is opgelei om besighede en ondernemings te bedryf.  Dit is die huurling gees. Huurlinge hardloop weg wanneer die wolwe kom. Hoe ken jy ‘n huurling? Dit is ‘n huurling wat nie sy skape teen die wolwe beskerm nie; net ‘n goeie herder sal dit doen. Dit is dinge wat ‘n groot probleem gaan word.


Sal hy die regte voedsel op die regte tyd gee? Jesus sê daar is ‘n groot beloning vir hulle wat dit doen maar Hy waarsku dat daar diegene gaan wees wat oorgegee is aan dronkenskap en verkwisting. “My meester talm, hy gaan nie terug kom nie.” “Vergeet dinge oor profesie, vergeet Jesus se wederkoms.” Dan begin hulle die bediening misbruik vir hulle eie verryking. Hulle begin hoereer met die Woord van God om hulle sakke vol te maak. Miskien sien jy dit nie omdat jy ‘n plek soos Calvary Chapel besoek; die meeste Calvary geledere is nog heel veilig maar glo vir my as jy na baie van hierdie ander kerke kyk dan sal jy presies weet waarvan ek praat.


As jy my nie glo nie kyk vir 10 minute na die idioot kassie. Baie van hierdie mense het geen idee dat Jesus met hulle praat nie.


Die Here Jesus sê: Luk 12:49-50: ”Ek het gekom om vuur op die aarde te werp, en hoe wens Ek dat dit al aangesteek was! Maar Ek het 'n doop om mee gedoop te word, en hoe benoud word Ek totdat dit volbring is!”


Jesus wou met Sy eerste koms alle boosheid vernietig maar as gevolg van Sy groot liefde het Hy vir ons onthalwe deur Sy doop van die dood gegaan sodat Hy nie die boosheid saam met ons sou vernietig het nie.


Wanneer ongeredde mense spot met: As jou God so liefdevol groot en kragtig is waarom laat Hy al hierdie booshede toe? Hoekom laat hy kinder molesteerders toe? Hoekom al hierdie hongersnode en aardbewings? As jou God so groot en liefdevol is, hoekom al hierdie oorloë? Wat van die Vigs in die derde wêreld?


Die antwoord is eenvoudig. “ Moenie skrik nie, Hy kan nie wag om dit te doen nie, laat ek jou vertel wat hou Hom terug om dit vandag te doen. As Hy vandag alle boosheid vernietig dat moet hy jou saam met dit vernietig, daarom kry jy nou nog ‘n kans om jou lewe reg te maak voordat Hy dit gaan doen.


Hy sê: “Ek het gekom om vuur op die aarde te werp, en hoe wens Ek dat dit al aangesteek was! Maar Ek het 'n doop om mee gedoop te word, [Om redding te bring] en hoe benoud word Ek totdat dit volbring is!” Dink julle dat Ek gekom het om vrede op die aarde te gee? Nee, sê Ek vir julle, maar eerder verdeeldheid.” (Luk 12:59-51)


Daar is twee redes waarom ongeredde Jode in die algemeen Yeshua, Jesus as die Messias verwerp. Die eerste rede is die geskiedenis van Christen anti-Semitisme, dit is een probleem. Dit is ‘n emosionele aangeblaasde argument en maklik om op te los en ek deel baie daarmee.


“Wil jy my vertel dat my Joodse grootvader, wat die Shema opgesê het, wat elke Sabbat gaan shul, wat kosher onderhou, wat ‘n regte Tzadik was en hoe julle Christene hom in ‘n oond laat sterf het terwyl hy die Shema opgesê het omdat hy nie julle Jesus wou aanvaar nie, julle het hom in die naam van julle Jesus dood gemaak, nou wil jy my vertel hy is Hel toe omdat hy nie julle Jesus in wie se naam julle hom vermoor het wou aanvaar nie?” Dit is ‘n groot vraag.


Wel, eerstens, jy het jou skoen aan die verkeerde voet. Iemand wie se Pools, Iers of Italiaans grootvader wat nie jou Jesus aanvaar nie is die een wat Hel toe gaan. Ons vra jou nie om ons Jesus te aanvaar nie, jy het jou skoen aan die verkeerde voet om mee te begin. Maar kom ek vertel jou die hele verhaal.


Nie baie jare gelede het ‘n Ortodokse Jood ‘n Yarmulke, ‘n kippah, op sy kop gesit en met ‘n 9mm Yitzhak Rabin in die rug geskiet, hulle het hom in die naam van Moses en die Torah vermoor.


    Kan ek die Jood Moses daarvoor verantwoordelik hou? Kan ek Moses en die Torah blameer vir die sluipmoord op Yitzhak Rabin. Moses het nooit moord goedgekeur nie, hy was teen dit. Ek kan nie Moses blameer vir die feit dat ‘n Ortodokse Jood Yitzhah Rabin in die naam van Moshe Rabbeneu vermoor het nie, en ek kan ook nie die Jood Yeshua blameer vir wat valse Christene in Sy naam gedoen het nie. Jesus het nooit moord goedgekeur nie. Maar dan, as Jesus die Messias is, hoekom het Hy nie vrede op die aarde gebring nie?


Wel, as hulle die Boek Daniël verstaan het sou hulle geweet het dat dit Jesus se doel is met Sy tweede koms, en nie met die eerste koms nie. Oorloë en verwoesting sal volgens Daniel 9 met ons wees tot die einde toe. Dit is wat Jesus vir hulle gesê het. “Moenie dink Ek het vrede gebring nie.” Alhoewel, Lukas vat dit en pas dit aan vir ‘n Heidense leserskring.


Jesus gaan vêrder, in die Laaste Dae sal mense sê “vrede en veiligheid terwyl daar nie vrede sal wees nie.”


Wat lees ons in Thessalonicense (1Tes.5:3) “Want wanneer hulle sê: Vrede en veiligheid--dan oorval 'n skielike verderf hulle..” [dan kom die einde] Moenie vrede met shalom verwar nie. Vrede is ‘n Griekse konsep- eiréné, dit is waar die meisie naam Irene vandaan kom. Dit beteken ‘n afwesigheid van konflik. Shalom is iets anders. Jesus sê: “My vrede gee Ek vir julle, nie soos die wêreld nie.”


Shalom kom van die onbepaalde Hebreeuse woord lashalem, om te betaal, te vul of vervul. Ons het shalom omdat die Messias gekom het om die prys te betaal vir ons sonde, om die Tora te vervul wat geen Jood kan onderhou nie. Om ons met Sy Gees te vul. Uiteindelik sal Jesus se shalom die afwesigheid van konflik insluit. In die Millennium heerskappy van Christus sal die nasies sekerlik hulle spiese verander na landbou gereedskap. Uiteindelik sal dit so wees maar dit is nie wat dit nou is nie. Jy kan in die grootste konflik van jou lewe wees en shalom hê. Jy kan in die grootste krisis van jou lewe wees en shalom hê omdat die Messias gekom het om te lashalem, te betaal, om te vul of te vervul. “Moenie dink Ek het gekom om vrede te bring soos wat die wêreld dink nie.”


Huidiglik verkondig ons vredes planne, Christelike vredes planne gebaseer op sosiale evangelies, opleiding, om die siekes te ondersteun, omgee vir die armes. Natuurlik glo ek aan hierdie dinge, maar die Evangelie kom eerste. As daar geen vernuwing, geen bekering, geen weergeboorte is nie dan sal daar ook nie shalom wees nie. Vasgestelde oorloë en verwoesting sal daar wees tot die einde toe. Dit is siek om te sien hoedat weergebore Christene aansluit by hierdie wêreldwye vrede prosesse. Hulle spring in die bed met die Dalai Lama, ‘n man van vrede. Maar hulle vertel jou nie hoedat die Tibettaanse Boeddhiste Christene vervolg het voordat die Sjinese kommuniste hulle vervolg het nie.


Jesus sê verder. “Ek het gekom om skeiding te bring .” ‘n Valse eenheid is iets waarteen Jesus gewaarsku het.


Jesus bid dat ons een sal wees soos wat Hy en die Vader Een is sodat die wêreld sal glo. Maar ek wens mense wil dit in konteks lees. Jesus stel dit in die lig van Sy Hoë Priesterlike gebed deur om te sê: “Vader, heilig hulle in die Waarheid, U Woord is die Waarheid.”  Daar kan nie ‘n eenheid in die Gees wees wat op ‘n leuen gebaseer word nie, jy kan nie ‘n eenheid in die Gees hê wat gebaseer word op kettery of valse leerstellings nie, of om in ’n kompromie daarmee te wees nie.


Die Ekumeniese beweging is nie ’n eenheid van die Gees nie, dit is ‘n snelweg na Babilon. Ons is gewaarsku teen dit. “O, jy is so strydlustig.” “Nee, Jesus is strydlustig,” dit is wat Hy sê. Maar dan gaan Hy verder en Hy sê dit gaan ‘n effek en aanslag op families hê, en dit het. Ek het Joodse vriende, ortodokse Jode wat gered is. Hulle families het vir hulle begrafnisdienste gehou. Hulle het letterlik vir hulle Shiva gereël asof hulle dood is.


   Ek het twee Joodse vriende, al twee ortodoks, hulle families het letterlik vir hulle begrafnisse gehou. Ek ken Moslems, en dit is die waarheid. Daar was ‘n meisie van Algerië, ‘n Moslem wat in Engeland tot bekering gekom het. Sy sê, “Die Here het vir my gesê ek moet huis toe gaan en vir my ouers die evangelie vertel.” Drie mense van die kerk in London het saam met haar na Heathrow lughawe gegaan, en sy het hulle gegroet met: ek sal julle sien met die Opstanding.” Haar vader het haar doodgemaak. Dit is realiteit. Dit is die realiteit waarvan Jesus ons vertel wat al meer duideliker, al meer akuut na vore begin kom voordat Hy kom.


Wees geklee in gereedheid en hou jule lampe aan die brand.


Wanneer mense vir jou sê om profesie te vermy, vlug weg van hulle af! Wat is die nut van ‘n flitslig sonder batterye? Dis nutteloos. Daar is niks verkeerd daarmee nie maar dit werk nie. Jy het goeie batterye nodig.


Wat is die nut van ‘n Bybel sonder die Lig van die Heilige Gees? Hoekom lees mense parafrases? Boeke wat nie met die Skrifte ooreenstem nie? Ek kom altyd terug na dit—Ek haat dit om dit altyd te herhaal, maar dit ontstel my om daaraan te dink. Toe ek tot redding gekom het was daar boeke in boekwinkels soos van A.W. Tozer, F.B. Meyer, The Pilgrims Progress, goeie boeke, wat kry ons vandag? Seven Steps to Prosperity, Five Keys to Victory... alles sielkundige en programmatiese snert. Dit werk nie, dit is Bybels nie, dit is sielkunde onder die masker van Christelikheid. Hulle het nie eers ‘n lamp nie wat nog van olie? Kry jou lamp en hou dit brandend. Onthou Jesus gaan kom en wanneer Hy kom gaan dit of die beste droom wees of die slegste nagmerrie.


Gaan die beste droom waar word of gaan die slegste nagmerrie waar word? Pasop vir swaar hand herders. Pasop vir dronk in die Gees mense in plaas van nugter in Gees. Pasop vir mense met ‘n valse vrede agenda, dit is nie van die Here nie, met skoene aan jou voete met die Evangelie van vrede. Pasop vir diegene met ‘n valse idee van ‘n eenheid wat nie van God is nie. Pasop vir diegene wat betrokke is in swaar hand leierskap wat op die skape teer, pasop, Jesus sê ons moet waak dat die dag ons nie verbygaan soos ‘n dief nie. (be alert lest that day overtake you like a thief) “Lest” in Grieks as dit vertaal word wys op ‘n subjektiewe gemoed in Grieks. Dit beteken dit is nie veronderstel om ons nie verby te gaan soos ‘n dief nie. Nee, ons weet nie wanneer die dag en die uur sal wees nie maar ons weet Hy gaan gou kom.


Hou olie in jou lamp, wees geklee en gereed om te gaan. Wat sê Jesus, dit gaan of ons beste droom wees of ons slegste nagmerrie. My gebed vir elkeen van ons en ons families is, wanneer Jesus kom, asseblief Here, laat ons beste droom waar word.


Groete in Jesus.


Deur James Jacob Prasch


By David Passmore May 30, 2026
Staying The Course Amidst Isolation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Living in Israel one gets the feeling that the metaphorical walls are closing in. Israel's reputation is being tarnished all over social media and the mainstream media, and this is reflected in massive public disdain towards this country. We are constantly told that there is near consensus amongst academics and commentators that a genocide was committed in Gaza. The very legitimacy of the state is brought into question. The majority of Americans are now hostile towards Israel. There is real fear that the next U.S. administration will turn against Israel. Even if this were to happen passively, by the U.S. refraining from exercising its veto power towards Security Council Resolutions condemning Israeli actions this could be catastrophic. Internally it is a fractured society leaning increasingly right wing which further alienates Israel from world opinion. An example in point is how Ben Gvir mocked the most recent participants of a global aid flotilla to Gaza. Such conduct further agitates outrage at Israel. The left-wing media presents the ruins of Gaza as a mortal wound in Israel's side. When the world observes this level of carnage no degree of public relations can ameliorate the sense of indignation towards Israel. We can liken the situation of Israel to that of a depressed person. All he sees is hopelessness and gloom. But this isn't the first time that the Jewish nation has been faced with such darkness. Things change and we don't know how the geo-political map will reconfigure in the future. We need to ride out this storm and keep going. On a historical note, the situation is reminiscent of what our ancestors faced when we returned from the Babylonian exile to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. Nehemiah was faced with constant lies and conspiracies designed to entrap him by hostile actors: Sanballat the Horonite, Tobiah the Ammonite and Geshem the Arab. They employed deception, slander and ridicule in order to maintain their political eminence. There was also a certain sense of abandonment amongst the Jews in Israel then as in our own day. We read in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah about the anguish of the leadership in Israel concerning the lack of assistance from the Babylonian diaspora towards the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem and the Temple. Only 20% of the exiles returned to the land. It was largely the poor who returned. Most of the affluent, established Jews remained in Exile. This is a continuing theme in Jewish history. It is also important to observe that from its very beginnings there were bible believing Christians who spearheaded the return of the Jews to their land. The idea of organizing a return of the Jews to Israel began as a Protestant Restorationist objective that can be traced to 17th century Puritan England. The protagonists of the Cromwellian Republic viewed themselves as the new Israel fighting the Papist forces of Satan. Alongside this, interest grew in the notion that biblical prophecies pertaining to the return of the Jews to Israel were a necessary precursor for the return of Christ. The growth of the British Empire in the 19th century lent political clout to Christian Restorationism with specific missions to the Jews established. Although there had been a longing to return to Israel as written in the thrice daily Amidah prayer, Jewish Zionism arose in the midst of mid nineteenth century nationalism and was further fermented by European antisemitism. It was an altogether secular enterprise. Although Israel's situation appears rather stark, we can draw strength from the Providence afforded to our ancestors in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah when they too were faced with defamation. This is also an opportunity to grow closer to our natural allies in the evangelical world who from the beginning of Zionism were steadfast supporters of the project to establish a Jewish homeland in Israel.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 25, 2026
Signs of the Times Tony Pearce ‍ ‍ Left, right or center – is our democracy in danger “Things fall apart, the center does not hold. Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.” W.B Yeats ‘The Second Coming. ’ ‍ ‍ Labour’s losses in the council elections and the battle for succession to their unpopular leader Kier Starmer have raised the possibility that we may soon have our seventh Prime Minister in ten years. Local elections saw Reform and the Greens make sweeping gains, leading Green Party leader, Zack Polanski to say that we are seeing ‘the end of the old two party system’. Maybe we are. In which case what comes next? Will we head to the far left, the far right or will the center hold on to power? Or will it end with ungovernable chaos as unqualified people take control of local and national government? Behind all this there are fundamental questions, ‘What is government for? Who does it represent and where is it going?’ ‍ ‍‍ ‍ According to the Bible (Romans 13) the purpose of government is to promote good and restrain evil. The government has the right to raise taxes for the common good of society and people should pay them. In 1 Timothy 2 Paul encourages us to pray for the government that ‘we may live a godly and peaceable life’. In other words, pray that the government will create an orderly and peaceful society and not interfere with our right to set up communities that teach and preach the Word of God. The situation becomes more difficult when we see government promoting things which are harmful and restraining things which are good and clamping down on freedom of speech with a threat to our ability to live a ‘godly and peaceable life’ ‍ Since becoming a Christian in my early twenties, I have wrestled with the question of how our faith applies to contemporary political issues. I started this quest on the left politically after leaving university and working as an English teacher with sympathies for Marxism. I then became a born again Christian in 1970, and joined my late wife Nikki in evangelizing the radical left, by handing out leaflets at their marches and demonstrations in London and attending their meetings to discuss matters of faith and politics with them. ‍ ‍‍ ‍ We had some good discussions with people and hope we made some consider the Christian alternative. However as we looked at Marxism from a Christian point of view and its practice in Communist countries, we understood that behind this ideology there is a strong anti-christian spirit. It denies the existence of God and promotes the idea of human perfectibility by our own effort. This is exemplified in the words of the Internationale, the socialist battle hymn, ‘No saviour from on high delivers, no faith have we in prince or peer, our own right hand the chains will shiver, chains of hatred, greed and fear.’ This Antichrist spirit led to the persecution of Christians in the Communist countries of eastern Europe, the Soviet Union and China. Far from creating the socialist paradise on earth that Lenin wrote about in ‘Socialism and Religion’, it created a society ruled by hatred, greed and fear, controlled by secret police, prison camps and responsible for the death of millions. ‍ ‍ In western society we have witnessed the growth of ‘cultural Marxism’ a movement aimed at infiltrating and changing society from within, rather than fomenting the workers’ revolution. Labour’s Fabian Society, with its (now discarded) logo of the wolf in sheep’s clothing, has been engaged in this process since the beginning of the 20th century. Social change really took off with the permissive society in the 1960s, which succeeded in changing traditional values, especially in the area of sex and the family. It replaced biblical values with a new ‘morality’ that is fundamentally anti Christian. These ideas have permeated large swathes of our society including the education system, the judiciary, the Civil Service, much of the media, mainstream political parties (including even the Conservative ‘wets’ and parts of the established church). ‍ ‍ Melanie Phillips describes the results of this in her book, ‘The Builder’s Stone.’ ‘Having decided that the West was rotten to the core, western elites set out to create a new culture that would usher in the brotherhood of man and eradicate hatred, prejudice, and war. Their Brave New World junked biblical religion with all its constraints on behaviour and revolved instead around self gratification. Everybody had the right to live as they wanted; nobody could say that their way of life was better or worse than anyone else’s; no one had the right to say that their culture was better than any other culture. That was ‘racism.’ At the heart of all this was the doctrine that there was no such thing as objective truth. Everything was relative; everything was a matter of opinion. Because there was no truth feelings became more important than facts. So the West abandoned the codes of morality, conscience, truth and lies, personal responsibility, and duty to others in favour of a culture of the self. In the process it junked its inherited traditions and biblical codes on which western culture was based.’ ‍ Britain changed from being a society that respected values based on the 10 Commandments and the teaching of Jesus Christ to one that discarded them for relative values. Ideas of ‘diversity, inclusion and equity’ became the norm, together with and a form of ‘tolerance’, that is really very intolerant if you oppose it. This ‘tolerance’ means accepting the virtues of multiculturalism and humanism and believing that all gods are equally valid or true (or none are). We must also accept that all lifestyles and family arrangements including homosexual and transsexual ones are just as valid as traditional two parent heterosexual families, with a father and mother committed to each other in lifelong matrimony looking after their own children. ‍ As society accepts this radical change in how we view culture, morality and religion, we are told not to criticize other cultures and world views or imply that they are anything less than equal to the culture, morality and faith derived from the Bible. ‍ All this has not improved society. Instead we have a collapse of values with no central idea to hold it together, just a group of competing ‘communities’ which are often only united in opposition to the traditional values and culture of Great Britain. A good example of this is the ‘red – green alliance’ of radical leftists and Islamists who come together to denounce Israel and campaign to ‘globalise the Intifada’. In practice this means a world wide war against Israel and Judaeo-Christian society and a desire to replace it with their version of either Islamism or Communism. However if one of them were to come to power, you can be sure that the Islamist’s would get rid of the leftists or vice versa. In fact that happened in Iran’s 1979 revolution, when Islamist supporters of Khomeini and Communists came together to get rid of the Shah. Then the Islamists seized power, turned on the Communists and wiped them out. ‍ Alisteir Heath wrote in the Daily Telegraph: ‘Ruined by decades of political vandalism, the Britain we knew and loved, a land of stability, pragmatism, and ancient freedoms, is no more. Today’s UK is uglier, impoverished, volatile and disorderly. We’ve lost our level-headedness. Anger and frustration have become our defining emotions. Our institutions have wasted away, and we have been taught to despise our history. The decline of family, community and faith have led to alienation, dependence on welfare and the rise of novel ideologies, mostly secular but also sectarian, turbocharged by social media. While the state becomes unnervingly authoritarian, the air reeks of insurrection and every variety of extremism. The British public’s sense of betrayal is as well-founded as it is dangerous. The machinery of state is incompetent and self-serving, a vehicle for social engineering in the global interest.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ Criticism of this process now risks being classed as ‘hate crime’ with a growing authoritarian society monitoring social media posts and public teaching of alternative ideas in ways which risk shutting down free speech in our society. A Christian teacher Enoch Burke is currently in prison in Dublin after he was suspended from his job and jailed after refusing to accept and teach transgenderism in the school. ‍ ‍ ‍ Nick Timothy, Shadow Secretary of State for Justice, got into trouble when he questioned mass Muslim prayer in Trafalgar Square. He wrote: ‘Mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. The adhan – which declares there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger – is, when called in a public place, a declaration of domination. The domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook.” He is right in this. Allah hu Akhbar actually means Allah is greater, greater than your God, Muhammad is greater than Jesus and the Koran is greater than the Bible. ‍ ‍ ‍ Tim Dieppe of Christian Concern for our Nation wrote: “The fact that we have mass Islamic prayer in Trafalgar Square at all is indicative of the massive culture change that we have seen in the last few decades. A culture change that was not voted for or ever agreed to by the British people. And, a culture change that can hardly be described as having been entirely beneficial to our culture as a whole. I only need to mention grooming gangs involving mostly Pakistani Muslim men , sharia courts, honour crimes, terror attacks, the assassination of an MP, an attempt to blockade Parliament, mass antisemitic marches through London, a convicted terrorist standing for local elections, sectarianism, and many other examples to make the point. Earlier this month, the Government gave Muslims special protection with the adoption of an official definition of anti-Muslim hostility .” ‍ ‍ ‍ You are not really supposed to question this in public life today. A message circulating on social media is an apt commentary on all this. ‘First they overlook evil, then they permit evil, then they legalise evil, then they promote evil, then celebrate evil, then persecute those who call it evil.’ Soviet dissident Solzhenitsyn wrote: ‘A Communist system can be recognised by how it spares criminals and criminalises its opponents.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ The root cause of all this is the rejection of God and biblical values. The 18th-century French philosopher Joseph de Maistre coined the phrase "people get the government they deserve." David Pawson followed up on this idea, arguing that in democratic societies like ours, the moral and spiritual condition of a nation's citizens is directly reflected in the leaders they elect. If the general public abandons moral truths, they will inevitably vote for governments that reflect those same compromises. David Pawson taught that God may use governmental leadership to judge or bless a nation, depending on the people's obedience. He noted that Hebrew prophets saw wicked rulers as a form of divine judgement on a society that has strayed from God's laws. Therefore a nation's ultimate hope rests on repentance rather than just political change. His conclusion is that Christians should actively stand for moral truth in society. He believed that the church is meant to influence culture upward, and that a decline in national morality inevitably leads to deteriorating governance. ‍ ‍ ‍ Sadly much of the church today has become the ‘salt that has lost its savour’ through compromise with antichristian forces in society and government. It may be too late to save our country and western democracy as social and economic pressures create a collapse of democracy and push us either towards anarchy or dictatorship. ‍ ‍ ‍ Yeats’ poem quoted at the beginning of this article ends with the enigmatic line ‘Some rough beast slouches towards Bethlehem to be born.’ Most likely he is referring to the coming anti-Messiah who is labelled the Beast in the book of Revelation. Many believe his is now waiting in the wings to replace the true Messiah (born in Bethlehem) and bring in the dictatorship prophesied in Revelation 13. The Bible indicates that the Beast or Antichrist will have power for a moment, but it will be short lived and doomed to destruction at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to the earth. Then the kingdoms of this world will become the kingdom of our God and of His Messiah and He shall reign forever and ever (Revelation 11.15) and the ‘government shall be on His shoulder’ (Isaiah 9.6). ‍ ‍ ‍ Maranatha come Lord Jesus. ‍ ‍ ‍ Water, water nowhere and not a drop to drink. (Apologies to the Ancient Mariner) ‍ ‍‍ ‍ While nations worry about supply of oil and gas as a result of the war in the Gulf and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a much more vital commodity for human survival is water. And it is in short supply in a growing number of nations. ‍ ‍ As of 2026, over 25 countries face extremely high water stress, with the most severe crises located in the Middle East and North Africa. This region is home to the world's most water-stressed nations, including Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Yemen, and Libya. India and Pakistan face critical water scarcity due to overexploitation of aquifers and population density. Much of Africa , Somalia and Ethiopia in particular are facing severe shortages due to drought and climate change. Mexico and parts of the United States (particularly Texas and the west coast) are experiencing significant water shortages and declining groundwater levels. ‍ ‍ ‍ Iran is facing a severe, multi-year water crisis as of May 2026, with major cities like Tehran, Mashhad, and Karaj approaching the point where taps could run dry due to depleted reservoirs. Groundwater is depleted across most of the country, and nineteen provinces are experiencing severe drought. The crisis is driven by a combination of climate change and decades of poor water management, including excessive dam construction and inefficient, water-intensive agriculture. China is facing a severe, multi-faceted water crisis defined by extreme scarcity in the north, widespread pollution, and mismanagement, threatening its food supply and economic growth. ‍ ‍ ‍ Several countries are significantly affected by upstream dam construction that reduces downstream water flow, causing, environmental, and diplomatic crises. These countries include Iraq, heavily impacted by dams built on the Tigris and Euphrates rivers by Turkey and Iran, leading to reduced water for agriculture, destruction of forests, and increased sandstorms. Egypt and Sudanface significant water security risks due to the Ethiopian Grand Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile. Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Laosare affected of dams built by China on the upper Mekong River ‍ ‍ One country which bucks this trend is Israel. Israel manages its water resources by transforming a chronic shortage into a surplus through large-scale desalination, extensive wastewater recycling, and a centralised national water carrier system. The agriculture sector has shifted away from freshwater, using treated effluent instead. Advanced drip irrigation technologies are widely used to minimise waste. Israel has exported its water technologies to countries around the world, particularly Africa where it has given advice on how to use limited water resources to great effect. ‍ ‍ ‍ Without water no society on earth can survive. Bible prophecies indicate that water shortage and pollution will be a global problem in the last days. Most obviously no water equals no food, so famine is an inevitable result of water shortages. Jesus warned of this as a sign of the last days in Matthew 24.7. Revelation 8.10-11 speaks of something called ‘Wormwood’ falling on rivers and springs of water causing it to become bitter and many to die from drinking it. ‍ ‍ Prophecy speaks of the two great rivers of the ancient world, the Nile and the Euphrates, being affected by a crisis causing the Euphrates to dry up (Revelation 16.12) and the Nile to become contaminated and its waters turn foul (Isaiah 19.5-11). Isaiah 24 speaks of a curse devouring the earth in the last days causing the earth to be ‘defiled (or polluted) under its inhabitants.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ According to the New Scientist, there are massive amounts of water hidden deep beneath the Earth's surface. Scientists have found evidence of a reservoir of water three times the volume of all surface oceans combined, located roughly 250–400 miles underground within the mantle. ‍ ‍ ‍ It may be that the Lord will release this water to replenish and clean up the earth in the Millennial kingdom when ‘waters shall burst forth in the wilderness, and streams in the desert. The parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water.’ Isaiah 35. Zechariah 14.8-9 says, ‘In that day it shall be that living waters shall flow from Jerusalem, half of them toward the eastern sea and half of them toward the western sea; In both summer and winter it shall occur. And the Lord shall be King over all the earth.’ Zechariah 14.8-9. See also Ezekiel 47. ‍ Rethinking Russia ‍ Things are not going well for Vladimir Putin in his ‘special military operation’. Four years after invading Ukraine in February 2022, Russia is not making advances and actually losing ground. Russia is losing as many as 25,000- 35,000 casualties a month and over 1.2 million have been killed and wounded since the war began. Ukrainian skills in drone warfare have destroyed large quantities of Russian equipment, tanks, armoured personnel carriers, artillery and rocket systems, helicopters, and naval vessels. ‍ ‍ Russia is spending an estimated 40% of the entire federal budget on the war effort. As a result of this and western sanctions, Russia is increasingly unable to fix chronic infrastructure problems at home. During the bitter Russian winter thousands of people were left without heat, light, or even water. All forms of transport, trains, trucks and planes, are facing logistical problems, making it difficult to transport goods and people across the vast Russian regions. Russia is on the way to an infrastructure collapse that will likely take decades to recover. ‍ ‍ Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov warned the State Duma that Russia's faltering economy risks stoking a 1917-style revolution. He demanded urgent financial and economic measures by autumn to avert a potential economic collapse. This raises the danger of the Russian Federation fracturing. The Caucuses are restive, the far east is looking to China and Siberia is facing an acute problem as a result of melting permafrost, causing buildings, bridges and pipelines to collapse. ‍ ‍ In the present circumstances it is hard to see how Russia could lead the Gog and Magog invasion of Israel (Ezekiel 38-39). Some have said that it is more likely that Turkey is the lead power in the War of Gog and Magog. They say that Meshech and Tubal are not Moscow and Tobolsk, but regions of modern Turkey. Erdogan’s Turkey is backed by an Islamist world view hostile to Israel, seeking the recovery of its Ottoman Empire. He has his eyes on taking control of Jerusalem. Turkey is possession of a large land army already stationed in the region, some of it occupying part of Syria. ‍ ‍ The alternative is that the War of Gog and Magog is some way off, possibly part of Armageddon, giving time for Russia to recover from its present distress. We wait and see, but meanwhile spare a thought and a prayer for the people of Ukraine and Russia, suffering as a result of Putin’s futile war, oppressed by his corrupt dictatorship and facing an economic and social collapse caused by his failed policies. ‍ ‍
By David Passmore May 25, 2026
Trump's Visit with Xi Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The tempest path of Sino-U.S. tensions came to a head during Trump's first term in office with the outbreak of Covid. Many commentators believed that the deterioration in relations was in terminal decline and that a major confrontation in the straits of Taiwan was fast looming. Trump held China responsible for the spread of Covid, insisting that he would pursue reparations. The election of Biden halted this commitment. Biden sought a non-confrontational policy towards Beijing. In the aftermath of the disastrous premature withdrawal from Afghanistan handing that country over to the Taliban and the Russian invasion of Ukraine under his watch, Biden became too preoccupied to assertively engage with China. Chinese State media portrayed Trump's visit as being rather unremarkable in the context of other foreign dignitaries lining up to meet Xi, pointing out that just a week later Putin would arrive in Beijing. China manifests that it is winning the trade war that Trump began in 2018, beating America at its own game of capitalism. They frame the U.S. as being in a position of weakness because China is able to source whatever products they buy from the U.S. elsewhere like oil from Canada, and soybeans from Brazil. The oil, soybeans and 200 Boeing's Xi agreed to purchase from Trump were presented as a mere gesture to placate Trump as China has already bought 350 Air Buses in the last year. China would have the world believe that it is only semi-conductors where America has the edge. Here China hints that it is not likely to buy H200 Invidia Chips because it would mean that China will always lag behind the U.S. in building their AI tech. China's major contention and concern is that the U.S. may impose export controls to contain China. China's strategy instead is to invest massively on indigenous innovation. China wants to become an innovation powerhouse that will export its own Chips to the Global South. China is fast catching up with America's lead in AI with the launch of Deep Seek and they claim similar progress with Chip making. China is now ostensibly only eight months behind the U.S. on Large Language Models. Running contrary to this narrative Trump insists that China is desperate to trade with America. China's economy has now peaked. Emblematic of this stagnating growth is rising youth unemployment. China is no longer America's biggest trading partner. Trump has shifted manufacturing back to the U.S. and Trump believes that China can't revive its economy without America. Lined up to meet Xi with Trump were the heads of some of America's biggest Tech Corporations. Corporations like nvidia seek a relaxing of export controls for Chips as they want short term profits, ignoring the risk that China will reverse engineer this technology. More broadly, China and the U.S. are playing a geopolitical chess game spanning the globe. Trump outmaneuvered China in Latin America with the removal of Maduro from power in Venezuela. China is exploiting its influence on Iran in order to get Trump to refrain from taking more active steps towards the defense of Taiwan. Indeed, Trump didn't say anything about Taiwan during his visit. Trump's instincts are of a transactional approach towards alliances, where he is only willing to underwrite defense assistance if allies pay up as an insurer would. It is also important to note that saber rattling the Taiwan card also serves the CCP agenda to distract internal dissent concerning the state of the Chinese economy. Most imminently Trump needs China to pressure Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz and get oil prices down before the midterm elections. China has largely insulated itself from the Gulf energy impact due to stockpiles. Trump would also like China to stop providing Iran with GPS for its missiles. Other Chinese weapons systems and technology sold to Iran have failed to perform well against U.S. and Israeli military hardware. Matters boil down to a leverage between whatever Trump can do on Taiwan, China can do on the strait of Hormouz with Iran. Human Rights concerns, espionage and the alarming rate of Chinese acquisition of U.S. land have been placed on the back burner for the time being.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 17, 2026
Moriel & Jacob Prasch request prayer for Phil Malone and family “Please keep me and my family in prayer. My mum passed away on 13th May at the age of 93. It's a time of mourning, but may it be a time for the Gospel of Christ to be preached to my unbelieving family, especially my brother.”
By Mea Fredrickson May 13, 2026
Moriel & Jacob Prasch request prayer for Sister Joanne Rizzetto, wife of Pastor Dave Rizzetto of Church of The Open Door in New York City. Joanne has developed painful complications and adverse side effects from medications following knee surgery. May The Lord intervene for healing and give guidance to her physicians. Lord, we humbly ask you to intervene in the life of our dear sister. We know you can do all things and that you hear our prayers and consider your servants. Please put a stop to the adverse reaction. Restrain and reverse its effects and restore our sister so that she can continue to serve you in the ministry that you have called them to. We do glorify Your Name. We don't ask as those who treat you as our debtor, but as those who have tasted your goodness and found such mercy and compassion at your feet. Grace and peace and mercy be with Joanne and Pastor Dave.
By David Passmore May 5, 2026
Will Lebanon miss its golden opportunity? Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Converging new facts on the ground have transformed the political landscape in Lebanon. With Assad removed from power in Syria, a vital lifeline of arms supplies for Hezbollah originating in Iran has diminished. Hezbollah suffered considerable losses in its last round of fighting with Israel. The decapitation of its leadership with the targeted pager attack inflicted a severe blow. Hezbollah's new leader Naim Qassem is a weak substitute for the charismatic Nasrallah who was assassinated by Israel in 2024. Hezbollah in its frail state foolishly fell into line with Iran's instruction to join the fighting against Israel following the recent American-Israeli war with Iran. This was contrary to the wishes of the Lebanese government which was fearful of the inevitable destruction that would be wreaked by the Israeli response. The differing attitudes to Israel amongst Lebanon's population is reflective of its ethnic composition. The predominant groups in order of plurality are Christians, Shia Muslims and Sunni Muslims with a smaller minority of Druze. The major concern of most Christians in Lebanon is the dire state of their economy. They have no appetite to further their plight by invoking Israel's rage. During the colonial inter war period the French envisaged the demarcation between Lebanon and Syria as carving out enclaves for Christian and Druze control. Within Lebanon there would be a shared government that by convention would have the Executive power split between a Christian President, a Sunni Prime Minister and Shia Speaker of Parliament. The Christians in southern Lebanon (particularly Maronite Catholics) saw themselves as being anthropologically descendants of ancient Phoenicians as opposed to an Arab identity where the Arab Christians were largely Eastern Orthodox. The schism between the Maronites and the Arab Eastern Orthodox dates back to the time of the Crusades. The Maronites were culturally French, speaking French as their main language and held precedence in much of the Lebanese economy. The first threat to Lebanese stability and cohesion was settled by the U.S. Eisenhower administration in 1958 which landed Marines in an amphibious operation. A repeated attempt at this by the Reagan administration in 1983 ended in a military disaster for the U.S. due to suicide bombings by Iranian controlled terrorists. Israeli efforts to bring in stability during the Lebanese Civil War in conjunction with its Lebanese Christian allies led by Major Saad Haddad likewise came to calamity when the Sabra and Shatila revenge attacks took place following the assassination of Lebanese leader Bashir Gemayel. The ''Good Fence'' policy of an Israeli friendly free Lebanon zone in Southern Lebanon eventually ended badly following Menachem Begin's second incursion into Lebanon called ''Shalom HaGalil'' aimed at stopping the PLO rocket attacks on Israeli border communities like Metulla, Kiryat Shmona, Naharya, Rosh Hanikra, Tzfat and Carmiel. The proxy Israeli occupation from the Israeli border to the Litani river became an imbroglio that many in Israel viewed as Israel's Vietnam with widespread domestic protest and a collapse of morale within the IDF. Eventually Israel absorbed Christian war refugees from Lebanon, while the Vatican and most of the Christian world turned their backs on the Lebanese Christians. Lebanon was then saddled with two states within a state. The first was in the aftermath of Black September in 1970 when King Hussein of Jordan defended his Hashemite throne and government from Yasser Arafat's attempt to take over Jordan due to Jordan having a 70% Palestinian Arab demographic majority. The Jordanian legion drove tens of thousands of its pro Arafat Jordanian citizens into Lebanon, creating a population base for the first state within a state under Arafat. However the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and other factions had their niche interests. Courtesy of the Israeli Air Force Arafat relocated what he saw as his government in exile to Tunisia. This was a missed opportunity by the Lebanese government to assert its autonomy and full territorial control by making a Camp David type peace with Israel inclusive of economic and mutual security provisions. Instead an Iranian backed Syrian intervention replaced Arafat's state within a state with a new one that morphed into Hezbollah. The fall of the Assad regime and the Israeli counter-offensive against Hezbollah re-presents Lebanon with the opportunity that it once lost. The predominantly Christian controlled Lebanese military could and should operationally coordinate with the IDF, to obliterate and remove Hezbollah as the Israelis relieved Lebanon of Arafat's state within a state. Such a rapprochement would likely have strong American and possibly French and British support, allowing Lebanon to be at a non-combative peace with Israel along the lines of Egypt and Jordan, and now some of the Emirates. The natural comradery of the Lebanese Druze community with the Israeli Druze and the pro-Israeli Druze of Syria would additionally re-enforce a regional harmony, as would the Maronite Christian community in Israel with their co-coreligionists in Lebanon.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 5, 2026
PASTOR JOHN ANGLISS It is with profound sadness that we learned of the temporary separation from our friend and brother Pastor John Angliss. We look forward to being reunited with John in the millennial reign of Christ and indeed in God's Eternal Kingdom. Jacob Prasch visited John a few weeks ago in the UK while John was in hospice care having been diagnosed preterminal in his illness. While medically correct, it was of course a misdiagnosis. John is now cancer free and is alive and well in the presence of Jesus awaiting us in glory while his mortal body is being renewed for resurrection and immortality. In the meanwhile, during this temporary season of bereavement we do request prayer for his beloved wife Mary and for his congregation, The Ark Fellowship in England near Reading, England. Because he has recently arrived in the USA and is scheduled to address the Moriel Canada branch conference in Winnipeg, Jacob Prasch will regrettably not be able to attend the memorial service in Britain. Our condolences however are very much with Mary and our brethren in the UK who like us knew and loved Pastor Angliss. John was one of a minority of faithful voices who upheld a traditional biblically based Pentecostalism in the era of counterfeit revivals and apostasy that overtook most of British Pentecostalism. John was a faithful friend of Israel & The Jews standing on the prophetic purposes of God for Israel and the salvation of the Jews. John was a loyal friend to Moriel and Jacob Prasch and a colleague of David Pawson and Derek Prince, both of whom likewise stood by God's promises to Israel. John was also a founding leader of CMFI - the Christian Ministerial Fellowship International, former pastor of Three Mile Cross fellowship , and former board member of Focus On Israel (a Pentecostal Ministry to the Jews). While this separation is temporary, John's eternal gain will be our temporary loss. O GRAVE - WHERE IS THEY VICTORY, O DEATH WHERE IS THY STING ? Hosea 13:14 / 1 Corinthians 15: 55-57
By David Passmore April 28, 2026
We made it this far: Israel at 78 Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Since the last anniversary milestone of Israel at 75, we have been embroiled in relentless wars. Citizens had little respite to enjoy this year's festivities, coming on the heels of a lull in fighting on the Iranian and Lebanese fronts. We are constantly waiting for a breakthrough on the horizon that will normalize our relations with our neighbors and secure our position on the world stage. It is acutely exhausting to be the focus of the world's attention. But also there is a sense of inevitability accompanying the Zionist project. Specifically that Israel is destined to be central in the wider region and global affairs. Why is this? Is it due to it being a western transplant? Being geographically positioned on the crossroads of three continents? Religious believers would point to prophetic fulfillment. It is short sighted to only look at how our problems are rooted in today’s' reality. Greater forces are at work that will dictate the direction that Israel is heading. The Jewish diaspora will likely find itself in a growing precarious position that will lead to increasing Aliyah (immigration to Israel) and will perhaps ferment the emergence of a second Jewish commonwealth that will not need to heed international pressure in the same way that todays' polity finds itself doing. In this light it is interesting to ponder how our posterity would view our predicament and gains. And I frame matters in these terms with intentionality. We are enmeshed in a seemingly intractable conflict with the Palestinians, and yet Israel has made great gains particularly in the technological fields. There is a current of thinking that perceives Israel's way out of its quagmire is by making itself indispensable to technological advancements. We don't know how tomorrows' world will be shaped by the rapidly advancing AI revolution but so far Israel has proven to be uniquely adaptable and innovative to technological change. This has proved to be a boon to Israel's economy, as have offshore natural gas discoveries being developed in concert with Greece, Greek Cypriot and American energy interests that are geographically and strategically removed from any Straits of Hormuz shipping impediments that strangle the Persian Gulf deposits shared by Qatar and Iran. On another note we should contextualize the situation. How different are Israel's challenges from other nations? Is Israel any less stable than other countries (particularly in the region)? Israel doesn't find itself uniquely challenged to define its identity (most European countries do also, particularly in light of immigration). Nor does the government experience any more volatility than other comparable democracies. Israel's real problems lay in the nature of how its Jewish citizens desire to govern themselves. It is arguable whether the judicial reform protests that occupied public discourse in pre-October 7th Israel would have led to serious civil strife. But it is without doubt that this impasse was allayed by the external attack. The underlying tensions remain unresolved and there are many ways that they could play out. It has been framed as a battle for Israel's soul. Israel's enemies predict that Zionism is imploding and that the State won't survive another 5-10 years. Supporting this claim, they point to Israel's increasing alienation and growing pariah status on the international stage. Our Prime Minister has been indicted for war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Even public opinion in our staunchest ally the U.S. has turned sharply against Israel. With 80% of the Democratic Party being anti-Israel in a growing climate of anti-semitism we have even witnessed the shift of Alan Dershowitz to the Republican Party which must be seen as emblematic of a trend. There is apprehension in Israel of a post-Trump America dominated by the Democrats. However, these seeming incontrovertible facts may be offset by other measures of fortitude. This may be partially countered by the high investment by Silicon Valley in the Israeli Hi-tech sector, making Israel an asset for purposes of Research and Development in America's AI race against China. New opportunities for economic relations have also been opened with Arab nations through the Abraham Accords and with the powerhouse India. Furthermore, it is difficult to imagine a world in which Israel's technological prowess will not carry the sway of western decision makers in the long run. Israel's 78th anniversary is a moment to take pause and not catastrophize what the future may behold. The entire world is currently in a state of transformation and Israel is not an outlier in this context.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore April 23, 2026
Please click this link:https://mailchi.mp/christianconcern.com/action-alert-street-preaching-22-04-26?e=f1df30be3f
By David Passmore April 14, 2026
A critical juncture in NATO'S future Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM NATO was originally established in 1949 to keep the Russian hordes at bay from toppling those European countries not forked over to the Soviet sphere of influence at the Potsdam conference. Europe lay in ruins. Britain had passed on the torch of global hegemony to the U.S. by tacitly acquiescing to the decolonization of its Empire when Churchill and Roosevelt agreed terms of the Atlantic Charter for the post-war new world order in 1941. So from its start NATO was very much an American driven endeavor. American money with the Marshall plan was propping up western European economies and its military might was forming the bulk of their defensive capabilities. The lopsided nature of this dynamic has informed how tensions have persisted and recently erupted in the Alliance. During the Cold War the U.S. felt obligated to shoulder the costs of underwriting Europe's security in light of the broader interests to keep the Soviet's in check. Following the fall of the Iron Curtain European complacency became a sticking point with the 'peace dividend' further exploiting American largesse. European NATO allies spent ever smaller percentages of their GDP on defense expenditure at U.S. expense. Now in a multi-polar world U.S. and European perceived threats are less aligned. This was first tested in the aftermath of September 11th when for the first time NATO elected to trigger its article 5 collective defense protocol. And since then the U.S. has sought to continue to expand the traditional theatre of operations beyond Europe's borders. No longer is Russia perceived by America as being a proximate existential threat to its interests, but rather containing Chinese expansion in the Pacific arena. Parallel to NATO a discrete 'five eyes' intelligence sharing alliance comprising the Anglo-sphere (the U.S., U.K., Canada and New Zealand) emerged. This stands at the center of the U.S. – U.K. 'special relationship'. A relevant question would be can this signals intelligence (NSA-GCHQ) partnership persist should the U.S. withdraw from NATO? Conventional thinking would have led one to believe that with Brexit the U.K. would naturally pivot towards closer U.S. relations but under Starmer the U.K. is distancing itself. European powers misrepresent the present conflict as an aggressive, rather than defensive U.S. adventure while they themselves are more likely to be at risk. In this the Starmer government resembles the Labor party led committee for nuclear disarmament in the 1980's. It opposed the Thatcher supported deployment of U.S. cruise missiles in response to the Soviet SS20's pointed at Britain's cities. The British left branded their response to Soviet strategic escalation to U.S. aggression. This time however there is for the moment no Thatcher to bring common sense into an equation dominated by emotionally driven ideologies in the face of an aggressor with definite aims. In terms of the Russian-Ukraine conflict we are reverting to the old question dating back to the Napoleonic war era: to what extent is London happy with the European nations fighting it out alone for dominance of the continent. Britain was never willing to accept a single power in control. Many variables will dictate what kind of world emerges from the current conflicts in Ukraine and Iran. How will power be extracted from potential gains? What will be the strategic impact of this? What is sure, in the age of Trump this pattern of reliance on U.S. muscle is becoming quickly exhausted. Dating back to the Roman Empire, a factor in the decline of major powers has always been astronomical military spending, a budgetary demand that the U.S. under Trump is no longer willing to shoulder alone. (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).