Ephesus - Afrikaans

April 1, 2025

ÉFESE

Jakob Prasch se boek: “The Dilemma of laodicéa” bespreek die Sewe letterlike Kerke van Openbaring 2-3 wat gedurende die eerste eeu in die tyd van Johannes bestaan het.

Dit is ook sewe tipe kerke wat in enige tydperk van die Kerk geskiedenis kan bestaan; sewe algemene opvolgende tydperke van die kerk geskiedenis wat in die Laaste Dae tot en met die Wederkoms van Jesus sal bestaan.

Uit dit leer ons nie net ‘n les oor die kerk geskiedenis nie maar dit gaan ook oor hoe die geestelike patrone van elke kerk ‘n groter beeld en ook ‘n vooruitskouing is van die finale vervulling daarvan in die Laaste Dae soos in die karakter van Jesus se eie beskrywing van geboorte pyne. Hierdie boek is ‘n uitstaande hulpmiddel vir enige kerk of kerklike organisasie om hulle eie geestelike karakter op ‘n Bybelse basis te ondersoek.

Elke eeu van die Kerk word deur al sewe kerke verteenwoordig, nie net hulle unieke krag en swakhede nie, maar dit is ook ‘n beeld van hoe elke kerk reageer op geestelike aanvalle wat hulle goeie dade wil ondermyn. Omdat elke kerk in die Laaste Dae in die lig gebring sal word is dit belangrik vir elke Christen om te verstaan hoedat alles wat met hierdie sewe kerke in die geskiedenis gebeur het ook ‘n beeld is van wat vandag voor ons oë in die kerke wêreld afspeel.

- - - ÉFESE- “NIE VOORTDUREND”

--- Eerste eeu- “Skryf aan die engel van die gemeente in Éfese:

Dít sê Hy wat die sewe sterre in sy regterhand hou, wat wandel tussen die sewe goue kandelaars: Ek ken jou werke en jou arbeid en jou lydsaamheid, en dat jy slegte mense nie kan verdra nie; en dat jy dié op die proef gestel het wat sê dat hulle apostels is en dit nie is nie, en hulle leuenaars bevind het; en dat jy verdra het en lydsaamheid besit, en ter wille van my Naam gearbei en nie moeg geword het nie.

Maar Ek het teen jou dat jy jou eerste liefde verlaat het. Onthou dan waarvandaan jy uitgeval het, en bekeer jou en doen die eerste werke. Anders kom Ek gou na jou toe en sal jou kandelaar van sy plek verwyder as jy jou nie bekeer nie.

Maar dit het jy, dat jy die werke van die Nikolaïete haat, wat Ek ook haat. Wie 'n oor het, laat hom hoor wat die Gees aan die gemeentes sê. Aan hom wat oorwin, sal Ek gee om te eet van die boom van die lewe wat binne in die paradys van God is.” (Op. 2:1-7)

Die Éfese Eeu.

Efese verskil van die ander ses uit die sewe kerke omdat daar verwys word na die Apostoliese of die Efese eeu van die kerk tot en met die einde van die eerste eeu n.C. Let op dat in teenstelling met die ander ses kerke het dit geen toekomstige toepassing in ‘n ander eeu nie, hetsy in enige primêre of profetiese hoedanigheid, alhoewel die beginsels waarmee Christus beide aanbeveel en goedkeur van toepassing is op alle kerke in al die eeue. Die oorspronklike tyd raamwerk van Efese is die eeu waarin die kerk bestaan en wat Johannes gesien het. (Die skrywer glo aan ‘n klasieke Johannes outeurskap, maar die redes word nie hier bespreek nie.)

Éfese, ‘n Groot Stad-

Vandag is Efese ‘n Moslem dorp met die naam van Selsuk, ‘n gewilde plek om te besoek. Volgens tradisie en ‘n Evangeliese argeoloog uit die Verenigde State is dit die plek waar Johannes begrawe is na sy terugkeer van die eiland Patmos waar hy ‘n gevangene was.

Efese word in Johannes se brief beskryf as ‘n kerk met spesiale lamp- kandelaar- tussen die ander sewe goue kandelare wat nie een van die ander kerke gehad het nie, (Op.2:5) en as gevolg van die kerk se apostoliese assosiasies en sy Joodse wortels en vermoë om die Joodse Skrifte in hulle oorspronklike Joodse perspektief te verstaan, kon hierdie kerk dinge sien wat die ander kerke nie kon sien nie. Maar hierdie lamp of kandelaar is weggeneem. As jy vandag Efese of die dorp Selsuk besoek sal jy daar nie eers ‘n nominale Christen en nog minder ‘n weergebore Christen kry nie. Besoekers kan die bouvalle van die Tempel van Artemis bekyk, dit is waar die onluste in Paulus se bediening plaasgevind het. (Hand. 19:23-4)

Daar is plek wat geken word as “Maria se Huis” wat volgens die tradisie van die Griekse Ortodokse kerk die aftree plek van Maria en die apostel Johannes was. Vir £20 kan jy ‘n persoonlike toer reël. Maar alhoewel hierdie plek met Petrus en Paulus, Barnabas en Johannes en later met Polycarp verbind word- almal pilare van die Kerk- is daar vandag absoluut niks van enige vorm van Christelikheid te vinde nie. Dit is verstommend dat so iets in ‘n plek met so baie herinneringe aan God se Waarheid kon gebeur, hierdie geskiedenis het prakties oornag niks van geword nie.

In ongeveer 96 n.C. het Johannes die Boek Openbaring geskryf en in hierdie tyd was Efese die grootste hawe in Asië en alhoewel Pérgamus die hoofstad van die provinsie van Asië was het Efese die grootste populasie gehad- ongeveer 250,000 mense. Efese was na Rome, Alexandrië en Antiogië die vierde grootste stad in die Ryk. Daar was paaie vanaf Kolosse, Laodicéa en Galásië na die Mediterrane, en na Efese via Sardis, dus was Efese die snelweg na Rome. Efese het gespog met fabelagtige argitekture en spoggerige paaie en dinge soos ‘n 70 voet breë pad tussen boom lanings wat na die hawe toe geloop het.

Efese het ook ‘n teater met 25,000 sitplekke gehad en die Tempel van Diana (Artemis) was ook daar wat ook beskou was as een van die sewe wonders van die outydse wêreld. In die geheel gebou met marmer was dit die grootste gebou in die hele Griekse wêreld. 36 van sy 127 sestig voet hoë pilare was met goud oorgetrek, uitermatig weelderig vir die mense van daardie tyd.

Die beeld van Artemis in die teater was ‘n squat, ‘n swart veelborstige figuur, ‘n weelderige standbeeld wat in die Vatikaanse museum gesien kan word. Die beeld lyk baie soos die beelde van Maria, die moeder van Jesus. Wat ‘n feit is, is dat die Raad van Efese in die vyfde eeu hierdie Maria as die “Koningin van die Hemel” en die “Moeder van God” verklaar het, wat ‘n navolging is van die heidense aanbidding van Diana van Efese, ten spyte daarvan dat die Griekse term “Theotokos”- “Moeder van God” op geen plek in die Nuwe Testament gevind kan word nie. Lees Handelinge 15 en let op hoe heilig Artemis vir die Efésiërs was.

Hierdie selfde stad wat so intens geïdentifiseer was met die apostoliese kerk het later fundamenteel die heidense basis geword wat gesien het hoedat die hoofstroom Christendom verander het in ‘n heidense politieke Christendom.

Daar was ook tempels van keisers soos Claudius, Nero en Domitian, met ‘n standbeeld van Domitian wat vier keer groter was as normaal wat hom uitgebeeld het as Zeus- die heerser van die gode. ‘n Reuse voorarm van die beeld kan in ‘n museum gesien word.

Later toe Christene vanaf Asië ingebring was om in Rome vir die leeus gegooi te word, het Ignatius (c.35-c.110) die derde “Biskop van Antiogië”- wat self gemartel was, Efese die “Snelweg van die Martelare” genoem.

In die tyd van Keiser Domitian Pliny (c.61—c. 113) was daar gekla oor Domitian wat aangespreek was as: “Dominus et Deus Noster”— dit is: “Ons Here en ons God.” Die digter Staius het hom die “môrester” genoem, ‘n titel van die Here Jesus in die Bybel, alhoewel Lucifer ook geken wil word as die môrester. Vir hierdie rede het Domitian, wat ook gesien word as ‘n tipe van die Antichris, ‘n verpersoonliking van die duiwel- die Christene wreed vervolg.

Wat interessant is, om Domitian se aanspraak reg te stel, sien ons in die Evangelie van Johannes dat Thomas die Here Jesus aanspreek as: “My Here en my God” (Joh. 20:28) verder sien ons ook in die Openbaring van Jesus- die Here se laaste woorde: “Ek is die wortel en die geslag van Dawid, die blink môrester.” (Op. 22:16)

Daar was baie tekens van die einde van hierdie eeu in die eerste eeu. Toe Jakobus gemartel was het Simeon die senior pastoor van die Kerk in Jerusalem geword. Hy het onthou wat Jesus gesê het en hy het die gelowiges uit Jerusalem na ‘n plek wat Pella genoem was gelei. (Josephus) Al die gelowiges was gered omdat hulle gevlug het toe hulle die vervulling van al die tekens gesien het, dinge soos die tydelike onttrekking van Romeinse mag uit Jerusalem.

Maar die Jode wat agtergebly het met die besetting van Jerusalem deur Titus in 70n.C., het deur ‘n verskriklike groot verdrukking gegaan, hulle het mekaar se babas geëet- wat ook ‘n vervulling was van die waarskuwings in Deut. 28. Dit het voorheen ook gebeur toe Jerusalem deur Nebukatnessar beset was. (Eseg 5:10) Dit is ook ‘n beeld van wat weer gaan gebeur net voor Armageddon.

Vervolging.

Die keiser het mense verplig om hom op die dag van die Here te aanbid - (Op.1:10) een dag per jaar. Baie Christene het geweier om vir ‘n valse god te buig. Petrus en Paulus is doodgemaak en Rome was afgebrand. Dit is ‘n beeld van die twee martelare in Op. 11, ‘n woord wat ook “getuienis” beteken. Hierdie dinge wat werklik gebeur het is dinge wat weer aan die einde van die eeu gaan gebeur, dit is ‘n skaduwee van die finale vervulling wat kom. Efese as die middelpunt van Heidense aanbidding gee vir ons ‘n baie duidelike beeld van die vervolging wat in die Laaste Dae gaan kom.

In die promenade wat na die Agorra (mark) geloop het was daar ‘n hek met oorhoofse kennisgewing wat die keiser vereer het as die seun van god, dus om te koop en te verkoop moes daar ‘n de-facto (as werklik bestaande) erkenning van die godheid van die keiser wees.

Die Christene wat dit nie wou doen nie was uit die kommersiële lewe van die stad uitgesluit en hulle kon nie koop en verkoop nie. Meer nog, hulle was aan beide kante van die straat aan pale wat na die promenade gelei het vas gemaak en aan die brand geteek om as menslike straatligte te dien. Dit is ‘n skaduwee van wat die Antichris in die Laaste Dae kan doen, hy gaan mense se kapasiteit om handel te dryf verbind aan ‘n onuitgesproke erkenning van sy god status.

Voor die bestaan van denominasies was daar ‘n graad van eenheid in die kerk wat deur vervolging ontwikkel het, in die Laaste Dae gaan dit weer gebeur. In die vroeë kerk was daar baie gepraat oor die Laaste Dae. “Wanneer gaan Hy kom?” Dit is waarna Christene uitgesien het, en as dit nie gebeur het nie het mense moed verloor. Maar Jesus het deur Sy engel gesê: “Hy wat oorwin...wat volhard tot die einde...” (Op. 2:26) “Hoe lank, o heilige en waaragtige Heerser?, (Op. 6:10) “--en aan hulle is gesê dat hulle nog 'n klein tydjie moes rus totdat ook hulle medediensknegte en hulle broeders wat nog gedood sou word soos hulle, voltallig sou wees.” (Op. 6:11).

Dit is ‘n vreeslike gedagte, maar net soos wat daar in die vroeë kerk ‘n ernstige vervolging was, so sal dit in die Laaste Dae weer wees. Kyk wat gebeur vandag met Christene in Sjina of Noord Korea? Rome onder die keiser Nero het Christene verbrand—burgers van sy eie koninkryk! - En in die 16de eeu het die Roomse Kerk sy eie mense gebrand omdat hulle die Bybel gelees het. Die Laaste Dae gaan inderdaad ‘n groot lydsaamheid en geloof van die heiliges vra. (Op. 13:10)

Jesus die Hoë Priester

“Die openbaring van Jesus Christus wat God Hom gegee het--” (Op. 1:1) (God het dit vir Jesus gegee.) “Toe draai ek my om, om te sien watter stem met my gespreek het; en toe ek my omgedraai het, sien ek sewe goue kandelaars, en tussen die sewe kandelaars Een soos die Seun van die mens met 'n kleed aan wat tot op die voete hang, en gegord om die bors met 'n goue gordel. Sy hoof en hare was wit soos wit wol, soos sneeu, en sy oë soos 'n vuurvlam, en sy voete soos blink koper wat gloei soos in 'n oond, en sy stem soos die stem van baie waters.

En in sy regterhand het Hy sewe sterre gehou, en 'n skerp tweesnydende swaard het uit sy mond uitgegaan, en sy aangesig was soos die son wat skyn in sy krag.” (Op. 1:12-16

Let op Jesus verskyn geklee as die nuwe Hoë Priester wat die Joodse Hoë Priester van Eksodus 29 vervang. Die Hoë Priester was met bloed ingeseën en hy het ‘n spesiale kleed aangehad, maar sy seëninge en roeping was na sy seuns oorgedra. onthou Jesus is nou die Hoë Priester.

En net soos wat die seuns van Aaron priesters was wat die bediening van Aaron uitgedra het- so is alle volgers van Jesus priesters van Hom wat die Hoë Priester is. Meer spesifiek, Dit is ‘n priesters se bediening om offers te bring en vir mense in te tree. Volgens 1 Petrus 2:9 is alle gelowiges priesters. Daar bestaan nie iets soos ‘n Christen wat nie ‘n priester is nie, iemand wat nie ‘n priester is nie- is nie ‘n Christen of ‘n prediker nie. Priester beteken “dienskneg”. Die idee van ‘n geordende ‘Priester’ onder die Nuwe Verbond is uit en uit ‘n menslike uitvindsel, daarom is die hele debat oor vroue “priesters” ‘n hoop strooi. Hoedat ‘n hele instelling kan verdeel oor iets wat geen Bybelse basis het nie- is verstommend.

“--en tussen die sewe kandelaars Een soos die Seun van die mens met 'n kleed aan wat tot op die voete hang, en gegord om die bors met 'n goue gordel.” (Op. 1:13)

Jesus se voorkoms in Openbaring is ‘n beeld van die kleed van die Hoë Priester. Hy moes ‘n tipe van die borsplaat op Sy skouers dra en ‘n kleed wat Hy nie mag uittrek nie. Die kleed verteenwoordig die Kleed van saligheid. Die Mormone dra ‘n soort onderklere wat hulle nooit uittrek nie en die pous dra ‘n soort voorskoot of onderhemp (Scapular). Dit klink absurd, maar dit is waar die idee vandaan kom. En oor dit alles het Aaron ‘n borsplaat gedra met twaalf kentekens wat die twaalf stamme verteenwoordig.

Wanneer die Hoë Priester vir iemand se tandpyn gebid het was die gebed gebring en die taak was afgehandel. Alhoewel, die borsplaat verteenwoordig ‘n las, die las van intersessie wat die Hoë Priester dag of nag nie kon verwyder nie totdat die geveg gewen is.

Wanneer iemand die las van ‘n intersessor dra dan is dit ‘n las wat op sy hart gaan rus totdat dit beantwoord word of totdat die geveg gewen is. Dit is wat die Here Jesus nou doen; Hy dra die las van Israel en diegene wat deel geword het van Israel deur die werke wat Hy as die Hoë Priester van die Nuwe Verbond aan die kruis gedoen het. Maar let op dat hierdie kleed van Aaron aan sy seuns oorgedra moes word.

Alle gelowiges het ‘n mate van geloof van God ontvang- en “Sonder geloof is dit onmoontlik om God te behaag ” (Heb. 11:16) Maar almal het nie die gawe van geloof nie, daar is ‘n spesiale gawe van geloof (1 Kor.12:9), mense wat intersessors is het hierdie Godgegewe gawe van geloof vir ‘n sekere rede- soos wat Jesus wil. Maar elke gelowige moet nogtans ‘n lasdraer wees, nie net vir Israel nie maar ook vir die kerk--en die wat verlore is.

Val in die Gees

“En toe ek Hom sien, val ek soos 'n dooie aan sy voete; en Hy het sy regterhand op my gelê en vir my gesê: Moenie vrees nie; Ek is die eerste en die laaste.”(Ob.1:17)

Kontras dit met Sagaria 4:1: “En die engel wat met my gespreek het, het teruggekom en my gewek soos 'n man wat uit die slaap opgewek word.”

Hierdie gebeurtenis wat geken word as “Val in die Gees” kom baie keer in die Skrifte voor waar mense in God se teenwoordigheid op hulle aangesig neerval. Die term kom van Openbaring 1:17 waar Johannes soos ‘n dooie voor die voete van Jesus neergeval het. Ons sien dit ook in Daniël 10.

George Whitefield was baie ontsteld toe dit in ‘n diens van John Wesley gebeur het maar ‘n paar dae later het dit ook in sy eie gemeente gebeur. Vandag egter het dit in die meeste gevalle ontaard in ‘n emosionele hipnotiese manipulasie waar mense omgestoot word. Natuurlik sal daar vervalsings wees, maar die ware gebeurtenis is Bybels, dit gebeur.

“En hy het vir my gesê: Wat sien jy? Toe antwoord ek: Ek sien daar 'n kandelaar, heeltemal van goud, en sy oliekan bo-oor hom en sy sewe lampe op hom; telkens sewe aanvoerpype loop na die lampe wat bo-oor hom is. Ook twee olyfbome langs hom, een aan die regterkant van die oliekan en een aan die linkerkant daarvan.”

“Daarop het ek begin spreek en aan die engel wat met my gespreek het, gesê: Wat beteken dit, my heer? En die engel wat met my gespreek het, antwoord en sê vir my: Weet jy dan nie wat dit beteken nie? En ek het gesê: Nee, my heer.”

“Toe antwoord hy en sê vir my: Dit is die woord van die HERE aan Serubbábel, naamlik: Nie deur krag of deur geweld nie, maar deur my Gees, sê die HERE van die leërskare.

“Wie is jy, groot berg? Voor Serubbábel sal jy tot 'n gelykte word! En hy sal die sluitsteen te voorskyn bring onder uitroepe van: Genade, genade oor hom!”

“En die woord van die HERE het tot my gekom en gesê: Die hande van Serubbábel het die fondament van hierdie huis gelê, en sy hande sal dit voltooi; dan sal jy weet dat die HERE van die leërskare my na julle gestuur het.”

“Want wie verag die dag van klein dinge, terwyl daardie sewe--die oë van die HERE wat die ganse aarde deurloop--met blydskap die skietlood aanskou in die hand van Serubbábel? “Daarop het ek begin spreek en aan hom gesê: Wat beteken hierdie twee olyfbome aan die regterkant van die kandelaar en aan die linkerkant daarvan?”

“En ek het toe nogmaals gespreek en vir hom gesê: Wat beteken die twee olyftakkies aan die kant van die twee goue pype wat goud uit hulle laat uitstroom? Toe antwoord hy my en sê: Weet jy nie wat dit beteken nie? En ek het gesê: Nee, my heer. En hy sê: Dit is die twee gesalfdes wat by die HERE van die ganse aarde staan.” (Sag. 4:2-14)

Op ‘n manier reflekteer die fisiese tempel die waarheid van die hemel, en op ‘n manier reflekteer dit ‘n sekere waarheid oor die kerk. Dit is wat Openbaring probeer om bymekaar te bring, Sagaria 4 reflekteer die sewe kandelare (lampe) in Openbaring wat ook die sewe kerke is, en die twee gesalfdes sien ons weer in Openbaring 11. Mense sê hulle verteenwoordig Moses wat fisies gesterf het en Elia wat deur God opgeneem was; ander beweer dit is Moses en Henog, omdat Henog ook in die Hemel opgeneem is.

Dit is interessant dat die frase “seun van die mens” in Openbaring 1:13 voorkom. Waar dit in die Ou Testament voorkom leer dit ons iets oor Jesus. Daniël en Esegiël is tipes van Jesus.

Esegiël is ‘n hoof tipe van Jesus. En in Daniël 10:9 sê hy: “---en toe ek die geluid van sy woorde hoor, het ek bewusteloos op my aangesig, met my aangesig op die aarde, geval.” (Hy het ook geval)

Paulus skryf: “Dit is waarlik vir my nie nuttig om te roem nie, want ek sal kom tot gesigte en openbaringe van die Here. Ek weet van 'n man in Christus, veertien jaar gelede--of dit in die liggaam was, weet ek nie, of buite die liggaam, weet ek nie, God weet dit--dat so iemand weggeruk is tot in die derde hemel.

En ek weet van so 'n man--of dit in die liggaam of buite die liggaam was, weet ek nie, God weet dit-- dat hy weggeruk is in die Paradys en onuitspreeklike woorde gehoor het wat 'n mens nie mag uitspreek nie. Want as ek sou wil roem, sou ek nie 'n dwaas wees nie, want ek sou die waarheid praat; maar ek laat dit ná, sodat niemand my hoër mag skat as wat hy van my sien of wat hy van my hoor nie. En dat ek my oor die voortreflikheid van die openbaringe nie sou verhef nie, is my 'n doring in die vlees gegee, 'n engel van die Satan, om my met die vuis te slaan, dat ek my nie sou verhef nie.” (2 Kor. 12:1-7)

Dit is duidelik Paulus praat van homself, dit het heel moontlik gebeur toe hulle hom gestenig het en hulle gedink het hy is dood. (Hand. 14:9) Dit was ‘n tipe van die wegraping, op ‘n manier was hy weggeruk na die hemel. Dit het ook met Sagaria, Elia, Esegiël en Henog gebeur.

Al hierdie Skrif gedeeltes vertel ons iets oor wat gaan gebeur: “---en die wat in Christus gesterf het, sal eerste opstaan. Daarna sal ons wat in die lewe oorbly, saam met hulle in wolke weggevoer- (Rapturo / Latyn—dit is waar die woord Rapture in die AV vandaan kom)- word die Here tegemoet in die lug; en so sal ons altyd by die Here wees.” 1Thes. 4:16-17)

Met die Verheerliking van Jesus op die berg (Mat. 17) het Elia wat nie gesterf het nie, en Moses wat gesterf het- en niemand weet waar sy graf is nie- skielik verskyn. Maar elkeen van hulle was in ‘n wit kleed van heil en heerlikheid geklee.

Of ‘n gelowige sterf of nie sterf nie, almal sal dieselfde wees. Wat gaan met hulle gebeur wanneer hulle sterf? Dit is die groot vraag wat Openbaring verduidelik. Op ‘n manier sal gelowiges wat al vir eeue “slaap” opgewek en opgeneem word om verewig by die Here te wees. Mense soos Paulus en Johannes het ‘n voorsmaak daarvan gehad—“Onuitspreeklike dinge”. (2 Kor. 12:14)

Die Getroue Getuie met ‘n Nuwe Liggaam.

Volgende is die konsep van die Getroue Getuienis... “ en van Jesus Christus, die getroue getuie, die eersgeborene uit die dode en die Owerste oor die konings van die aarde! Aan Hom wat ons liefgehad het en ons van ons sondes gewas het in sy bloed.” (Op. 1:5)

Jesus word beskryf as “die Getroue Getuienis.” Maar in die Psalms... “Sy (Dawid se) nageslag sal vir ewig wees en sy troon soos die son voor My. Soos die maan sal hy vir ewig vasstaan, en die getuie in die hemel is getrou. Maar U het self verstoot en verag, U het toornig geword teen u gesalfde.” (U Messias) (Ps. 89:36-38) Maar in Openbaring word die getroue getuie beskryf as Jesus wat verwerp was maar wat lewe tot in alle ewigheid.

As ons in Openbaring na die Hemelse hof kyk dan kan ons sien hoe God hemelse of geestelike dinge gebruik om fisiese dinge te beskryf. “--en sy voete soos blink koper wat gloei soos in 'n oond, en sy stem soos die stem van baie waters.” (Op.1:15) Let op dat koper te doen het met oordeel.

“Ons ken dus van nou af niemand meer na die vlees nie; en al het ons ook Christus na die vlees geken, nou ken ons Hom tóg nie meer so nie.” (2 Kor. 5:16)

Paulus sê wat Johannes gesê het, hy het Hom in Sy verheerlikte gestalte gesien. Johannes het Jesus intiem beter geken as enige ander dissipel; met die Laaste Nagmaal hy het met sy kop teen Jesus se bors gelê. Maar toe Johannes Jesus in Sy Verheerlikte vorm sien was dit vir hom soos die verskil tussen ‘n wurm en skoelapper. Na ‘n lewens klimaks in die dood in ‘n kokon, wat die graf simboliseer, het die wurm ‘n gedaante verandering ondergaan na ‘n pragtige nuwe skepping. Gelowiges is bestem om Jesus te volg. Eendag sal alle gelowiges net so pragtig wees soos ‘n skoelapper wat uit ‘n larwe gekom het. Wanneer hulle in die hemel kom en in ‘n spieël kyk gaan hulle hulself nie ken nie.

Redding, Gered en Weergebore.

Let op daar is drie aspekte van redding: Ek was gered, ek is gered, en ek gaan gered word.

En ook: Ek was weergebore, ek is weergebore en ek gaan weergebore word. Die vorige aspek van redding word “regverdiging” genoem.

Almal het gesondig deurom te lieg en te steel, ens. Maar hulle is geregverdig—hulle was gered – omdat Jesus die prys vir hulle sondes betaal het, en hulle het bely en hulle bekeer en Hom gedank en opgehou om dit weer te doen. Maar tans word gelowiges nog steeds gered en hulle word nog steeds geregverdig—aanmekaar elke dag—

“En Hy sê vir almal: As iemand agter My aan wil kom, moet hy homself verloën en sy kruis elke dag opneem en My volg.” (Luk. 9:23)

“Ek is met Christus gekruisig, en ék leef nie meer nie, maar Christus leef in my. En wat ek nou in die vlees lewe, leef ek deur die geloof in die Seun van God wat my liefgehad het en Homself vir my oorgegee het.” (Gal. 2:20)

Elke dag in die lewe wat hulle nou lewe is hulle nog steeds gered. Die teenwoordige aspek van redding is “regverdiging.” En in die toekoms gaan hulle gered word. “Maar wie volhard tot die einde toe, hy sal gered word.” (Mat. 24:13)

Dis is verlossing wat met die einde van die eeu sal plaasvind, ‘n toekomstige gebeurtenis.

“En as hierdie dinge begin gebeur, kyk dan na bo en hef julle hoofde op, omdat julle verlossing naby is.” Luk. 21:28)

Kyk weer na die verbintenis tussen Genesis, Johannes en Openbaring en die herhaalde verskyning in die tuin en die “Boom van die Lewe.” Dit is hoekom die Boom van die Lewe in die Brief aan Efese genoem word. “--Aan hom wat oorwin, sal Ek gee om te eet van die boom van die lewe wat binne in die paradys van God is.” (Op 2:7) Wat in die Tuin verlore gegaan het sal terug gegee word.

Daar is ‘n drieledige parallelle gebeurtenis hier:

  1. Skepping- Dit was in Genesis.
  2. Nuwe Skepping—Dit is die Evangelie, ‘n nuwe lewe in Christus—nou.
  3. Herskepping—Wat volgens Openbaring sal gebeur.

Die drie gaan saam. Dit is waarom dieselfde figure, dieselfde simbole, dieselfde taal herhaaldelik in die Skrifte voorkom. Byvoorbeeld, wat sien ons in Openbaring 6:9? Die martelare onder die altaar roep uit, hulle is gedood as gevolg van die Woord van God en die getuienis waarvoor hulle gestaan het.

En wat is onder die altaar? Dit is waar die bloed afloop in die grond. Wat word uitgelig in Genesis? Abel se bloed roep uit die aarde. En in Johannes? Die bloed van Jesus vloei uit Hom op die grond.

Of ook- met die skepping in Genesis skei God die lig van die duisternis. In Johannes se Evangelie skei God die lig van die duisternis in die nuwe skepping. In Johannes se Evangelie het Jesus gekom as die Lig van die wêreld, maar die mens het die duisternis verkies omdat hulle dade boos was. (Joh. 3:19)

Onbekeerde sondaars verlang nog steeds na duisternis, en baie sonde word nog steeds onder die dekmantel van die duisternis gedoen. Maar God kan in die donker sien, Hy weet alles en sondes wat bely is- is uitgevee. Gelowiges moet leer om altyd in die Lig te loop. En laastens, met die herskepping in Openbaring is die Lam die lamp- en die heerlikheid van God is die Lig. (Op.21:23)

Wat Jesus vir die Efesiërs gesê het.

Daar is drie spesifieke dinge in die Brief aan Efese wat ons ernstig na moet kyk: Eerstens, valse apostels; Tweedens, hulle eerste liefde wat hulle verloor het; Derdens, die werke van die Nikolaïete.

Jesus was aan elke kerk voorgestel met sekere aspekte van die gesig wat die Goddelike Jesus aan Johannes in Hoofstuk 1 gegee het. Aan Efese, die kerk wie se naam “nie voortdurend” beteken, Jesus was beskryf as “Die Een wat tussen die sewe goue kandelare wandel”, en in Op.1:20 sien ons dit is die sewe kerke.

Op ‘n manier is Jesus in al hierdie kerke teenwoordig. Dit is belangrik- omdat Efese ‘n kerk was wat sy eerste liefde verloor het. Hulle skaar hulle by ‘n Griekse mentaliteit met die idee dat die hemel daarbo is en die aarde daaronder - afgeskei van die hemel, so- die mens is geskei van Jesus.

Efese moet daaraan herinner word dat Hy altyd tussen die kandelare, die kerke beweeg. Hy is altyd saam met die gelowiges al kan hulle Hom nie sien nie. Dit is merkwaardig dat Jesus altyd met woorde van lofprysing begin. (Paulus doen dit in sy briewe en dit is ook ‘n goeie beginsel vir ons.)

“Ek ken jou werke en jou arbeid en jou lydsaamheid, en dat jy slegte mense nie kan verdra nie; en dat jy dié op die proef gestel het wat sê dat hulle apostels is en dit nie is nie, en hulle leuenaars bevind het; en dat jy verdra het en lydsaamheid besit, en ter wille van my Naam gearbei en nie moeg geword het nie.” (Op. 2:2-3)

Jesus beklemtoon hulle getrouheid en die feit dat hulle valse apostels nie kon verdra nie. Let op hoe Hy hulle prys omdat hulle hierdie mense op die proef gestel het.

“Want ek is jaloers oor julle met 'n goddelike jaloersheid, want ek het julle aan een man verbind, om julle as 'n reine maagd aan Christus voor te stel.” (2 Kor. 11:2)

‘n Ware apostel se sentrale doel is om hom as ‘n reine maagd aan die bruidegom voor te stel— “Maar ek vrees dat, net soos die slang Eva deur sy listigheid bedrieg het, julle sinne so miskien bedorwe kan raak, vervreemd van die opregtheid teenoor Christus.”

Let op dat in Openbaring is daar ‘n slang en ‘n draak—Die twee vorms van Satan. Die draak vervolg die kerk en die slang verlei die kerk.--

“ Want as iemand kom en 'n ander Jesus verkondig as wat ons verkondig het, of as julle 'n ander gees ontvang as wat julle ontvang het, of 'n ander evangelie as wat julle aangeneem het, laat julle jul dit goed geval. Want ek reken dat ek niks agterstaan by dié uitnemende apostels nie. En al is ek ook onbedrewe in woord, dan tog nie in kennis nie; maar ons het ten volle in alle opsigte openbaar geword by julle.” (2 Kor. 11:4-6)

Kyk wat sê Paulus: “As iemand kom en ‘n ander evangelie preek” Maar wat is ‘n “ander” evangelie? Let op dit wat gepreek word is grootliks reg, alles klink reg, die feit is, as dit nie reg geklink het nie sal dit nie mislei nie. Maar dit sal altyd die een belangrike waarheid waarop al die ander waarhede gegrond is verdraai, en dit is: Christus gekruisig, Christus kom weer. Dit is die absolute waarheid en al die ander waarheid moet op hierdie waarheid gebaseer wees.

Christus wat gesterf het, Christus wat opgestaan het- dit is die absolute waarheid. Jesus is die Waarheid: Ons het Die waarheid van die kruis, Die waarheid van die leë graf, en Die Waarheid van die Olyfberg waar Hy sal terugkeer. Al die ander waarhede moet op hierdie drievoudige waarheid gebou word.

As iemand enige ander waarheid vat, alhoewel dit ‘n waarheid is, en daarvan ‘n sentrale waarheid maak dan verdraai dit die drievoudige sentrale waarheid van Christus, Hy as die gekruisigde, en Christus, Hy as die opgestane, en Christus, Hy wat weer kom. Dit verdraai nie net nie, maar dit verduister ook, en dit wat verduister word– word uit die beeld weggeneem.

Ondersteuners van die valse voorspoed geloof het ‘n waarheid, maar hierdie waarheid is alleen geldig as jy daarna kyk in die lig van die hoof geloof: Die kruisiging, opstanding en die beloofde wederkoms van Jesus. ‘Hierdie mense beklemtoon nie n gekruisigde lewe nie, hulle het nie die ou lewe afgelê nie, in plaas daarvan vat hulle die miljoene vir hulleself! So word die sentrale waarheid vervang met ander waarheid en hierdie alternatiewe waarheid verander in ‘n leuen.

Daar is mense wat God se eindtyd doelwit vir Israel en die Jode aanvaar het, en dit is inderdaad ‘n waarheid, maar hulle het gegaan en van Israel die sentrale waarheid gemaak inplaas van Jesus. En wat gebeur? Die boodskap van die kruis word verduister.

Daar is organisasies wat dit hulle prioriteit gemaak het om die Jode terug te bring na Israel, hulle is lief vir hulle en seën hulle so goed as wat hulle kan, maar- hulle het ‘n belofte afgelê om hulle nie te evangeliseer nie. Kan jy jouself indink dat Petrus, Johannes of Paulus so iets sou gedoen het?

Valse Apostels

“Maar wat ek doen, sal ek nog doen om die aanleiding af te sny vir die wat 'n aanleiding wil hê, sodat hulle in die saak waar hulle op roem, net soos ons bevind mag word.” (2 Kor. 11:12)

Met ander woorde dit mense wat as apostels gesien wil word. Jesus sê vir diegene in Efese wat ore het- hulle moet luister. “Ek ken jou werke-- dat jy dié op die proef gestel het wat sê dat hulle apostels is en dit nie is nie, en hulle leuenaars bevind het;” (Op. 2:2)

Paulus gaan verder en hy sê:

“Want sulke mense is valse apostels, bedrieglike arbeiders wat hulleself verander in apostels van Christus. En geen wonder nie! Want die Satan self verander hom in 'n engel van die lig. Dit is dus niks besonders wanneer sy dienaars hulle ook voordoen as dienaars van geregtigheid nie. Maar hulle einde sal wees volgens hulle werke.” (2 Kor.11:13-15)

En wat is die konteks waarin Paulus praat? “’n “Ander evangelie”. Hulle het hulle oë van Jesus en die kruis afgehaal- die sentrale boodskap, en dinge het verkeerd begin loop. Elke valse apostel maak op die een of ander manier dieselfde fout. Hulle haal hulle oë van die sentrale waarheid af, Christus en Hom die gekruisigde, die Opgestane en Hy wat weer kom en hulle beklemtoon ‘n ander waarheid en maak daarvan die sentrale waarheid.

Ware Apostels.

Daar is tenminste vier soorte apostels in die Nuwe Testament. Eerstens en die belangrikste is daar Jesus self. “Daarom, heilige broeders, deelgenote van die hemelse roeping, let op die Apostel en Hoëpriester van ons belydenis, Christus Jesus,.” (Heb. 3:1)

In Hebreërs en in Openbaring 1 word Jesus geken as die Hoë Priester. Maar in Grieks in Hebreërs 3:1 word Jesus beklemtoon as Die Apostel. Alle ander apostels kry hulle apostoliese gesag van Jesus af- “Die Apostel en Hoë Priester”.

Maar daar is drie ander tipes apostels. Eerstens was daar die oorspronklike twaalf, Jesus het twaalf aangestel (gemagtig)

“En toe dit dag geword het, het Hy sy dissipels na Hom geroep en twaalf van hulle uitgekies, wat Hy apostels genoem het..” (Lk. 6:13)

Dan was daar Paulus, hy was nie een van die oorspronklike twaalf nie, daar is mense wat vertel dat die apostels aanmatigend opgetree het toe hulle Matthías aangestel het, hulle moes vir Paulus gewag het, maar dit sou ‘n fout gewees het, kyk na Handelinge 1:21.

Toe Judas selfmoord gepleeg het- het hulle vir iemand gesoek om hom te vervang uit manne wat die hele tyd saam met hulle was toe die Here Jesus saam met hulle was, dit is vanaf die doop van Johannes. Die ander apostels was dissipels van Johannes die Doper en was heel moontlik deur hom gedoop voordat hulle dissipel van Jesus geword het. Paulus was nie.

So, daar was Jesus Die Apostel, die twaalf en die unieke geval van Paulus en laastens was daar manne soos Apollos en Barnabas wat in Hand. 14:14 ook apostels genoem was.

Die woord “apostel” beteken eenvoudig: ‘weg van sy pos’ of- “een wat gestuur is.”

Al soort apostel wat vandag in die kerk kan bestaan is kerkplanter sendelinge wat gestuur word deur hulle huiskerke. Waar kan die Bybelse model vir ‘n kerkplanter sendeling gesien word?

Handelinge 13, Paulus het geweet hy is ‘n apostel, God het dit vir hom deur Ananías in Damaskus gesê. “---hy is vir My 'n uitverkore werktuig om my Naam te dra voor nasies en konings en die kinders van Israel.” (Hand. 9:15)

Paulus was geroep as ‘n apostel vir die Heidene. Maar let op wat gebeur. Paulus het eers sewentien jaar later met sy bediening begin toe dit deur die Heilige Gees in die gemeente bevestig is. Eers toe en na dit het die kerk hom uitgestuur.

Vandag is daar baie Christene wat aanspraak maak dat hulle apostels is, (Die “Here het vir my gesê” tipe) maar hulle moet kyk wat staan in Hand. 13.

Paulus het nie as ‘n apostel uitgegaan voordat dit nie in die gemeente en aan hom bevestig was nie, maar let op, het God net vir Paulus gestuur? Nee, die Heilige Gees het gesê.

“Sonder nou Bárnabas en Saulus vir My af vir die werk waarvoor Ek hulle geroep het.”

Die Nuwe Testamentiese basis model vir kerkleiers is ‘n meervoudige stelsel. Al was Paulus ‘n kerkplanter sendeling was hy nog steeds gejuk en in onderdanigheid.

Mense wat vandag aanspraak maak op apostelskap is mense wat hulle eie koppe volg, outokrate op ‘n ego baan. Hulle mag miskien reg begin het maar hoogmoed en trots het hulle ingehaal. Baie kerke word vandag geken as so en so se kerk, dit is onbybels. Hulle staan nie onder gesag nie, hulle is nie onderdanig aan iemand nie. Paulus het altyd aan Antiochíë gerapporteer. Met leerstellige probleme in Handelinge 15 was hy onderdanig aan die gesag van die ouderlinge en die ander apostels, en hy het altyd Barnabas en Lukas saam met hom gehad, so was dit.

Daar is vandag baie kerkplanter bedieninge en predikers maar as hulle wettig is sal hulle Skriftuurlik optree. So, as jy mense sien wat hulleself apostels noem dan is dit ‘n Bybelse beginsel om hulle te toets of hulle ware apostels is. Jesus het die Efese gemeente geprys omdat hulle dit gedoen het.

Om jou Eerste liefde te verloën.

Die tweede ding wat Jesus vir Efese gesê het was dat hulle- hulle eerste liefde verloor het. Dit gebeur. Wanneer iemand tot redding gekom het dan dink mense om so ‘n nuwe gelowige dat hy of sy nie lekker is nie. Daar was ‘n geval waar ‘n nuwe gelowige aangekeer was omdat hulle gedink het hy was vol dwelms, hulle het sy geldkaart gebrand en hom uit sy privaat skool gesit en sy pa het dit goedgekeur, toe hy sy hart vir Jesus gegee het wou sy pa hom skiet!

Baie nuwe gelowiges dink hulle is die volgende Paulus, hulle mag miskien dom klink maar hulle het ‘n ywer. ‘n Kerk moet bedryf word deur die wysheid van die ou skape maar met die ywer van ‘n nuwe bekeerling. Maar helaas, vandag vat die lou warm kerk ‘n nuwe weergebore Christen en maak van hom ‘n lou warm Christen. Hulle het hulle eerste liefde verloor. Maar mense wat nog steeds hierdie geesdriftige eerste liefde het- intimideer ander mense deur die krag, blydskap en passie van die Heilige Gees wat in hulle is.

Die eerste eeu se apostoliese kerk word in baie gevalle gereken as die ideale kerk, en op ‘n manier is dit waar, maar die gelowiges in daardie tyd het ook maar hulle probleme gehad! Hulle probleme was in baie gevalle dieselfde as vandag.

Hipper-charismaties- Charismatiese ekstremiste, die Korinte tipe, mense in Thessaloníka met ‘n verdraaide idee van die Laaste Dae, wettiese Christene in Galásië wat reëls by die Evangelie wou byvoeg, dit het daardie tyd gebeur en dit gebeur vandag nog. Daar is niks nuut onder die son nie.

Maar waar het hulle probleme begin? Die manier waarop probleme nog altyd begin. Wat gebeur in ‘n huwelik? ‘n Persoon wat sy eerste liefde verloor!

Wanneer my vrou op my senuwees begin werk dan dink ek terug hoe ons hand aan hand op die Dooie See se strand geloop het, ek saam met hierdie Israeliese meisie waarvan ek nie my oë kon afhou nie—hierdie meisie wat ek in die strate van Jerusalem na Jesus gelei het. Ek onthou toe ek saam met haar by die see van Galiléa geloop het en vir haar van die basiese waarhede van die Bybel vertel het. Dit is die persoon op wie ek verlief geraak het en dit is die persoon, wat ek in my hart van harte nog steeds lief het. As jy getroud is, dink terug aan daardie tyd, en manne wees lief vir haar. Om jou eerste liefde te vergeet is ‘n natuurlike tendens, maar elke persoon is veronderstel om sy eerste liefde vir Jesus te onthou, dit is wat Jesus vir die Efesiërs gesê het.

Wanneer daar ‘n ware herlewing in ‘n kerk kom dan is almal vol lewe en vrees in die heiligheid van God- maar na ‘n tyd begin hierdie eerste liefde verflou- en wat gebeur na ‘n tyd?

Daar is twee dinge wat gebeur wanneer mense begin om hulle eerste liefde te vergeet:

  1. Die kwaliteit en kwantiteit van hulle gebeds lewe begin afneem.
  2. Hulle verloor hulle evangeliese ywer.

Hulle het nie meer dieselfde begeerte om vir mense te vertel wat Jesus vir hulle gedoen het nie. Baie mense se verskoning is dat hulle nie Evangeliste is nie. Ja dit is waar, almal van ons is nie evangeliste nie, maar almal van ons kan getuig. Jesus sê: “Julle sal My getuies wees” (Hand. 1:8)

Daar is niemand wat nie ‘n traktaatjie kan uitgee nie, of wat aan deure kan klop om ‘n verhouding vas te stel nie. Die Here Jesus het ‘n bediening vir elke gelowige, as jy nie weet wat dit is nie, vra Hom wat jy vir Hom kan doen. Daar is nie ‘n Christen wat nie geroep is om ‘n Christen getuie te wees nie.

Die werke van die Nikolaïete.

“Maar dit het jy, dat jy die werke van die Nikolaïete haat, wat Ek ook haat. (Op 2:6)

Laastens, Jesus het die Efesiërs geprys omdat hulle die werke van die Nikolaïete gehaat het wat Hy ook haat.

Die Bybel verklaar homself en die woorde “Nico” en Laite saam- beteken “onderdrukkers van mense” of “heersers van die leke”. Dit impliseer ‘n geestelike leiers klas soos die Levitiese priesters wat soos ‘n god oor hulle broers heers.

Voordat Satan heidense praktyke in ‘n kerk vestig gaan hy probeer om van hulle Jode te maak. Wat het in Galasië gebeur? Hulle wou die Griekse bekeerlinge besny, hulle het die evangelie van Jesus verkondig en dinge soos die besnydenis bygevoeg. Vandag is dieselfde, daar is die Sewende dag Adventiste wat glo jy mag nie op ‘n Sondag werk nie, hulle voeg ‘n gedeelte van die Wet by.

So, in plaas van ‘n priesterorde van alle gelowiges het die Nicolaïte gegaan en ‘n ander priester orde saamgestel, ‘n heersende klas. Dit kom uit ‘n gedeeltelike Gnostiese invloed met die idee dat daar ‘n spesiale geheime kennis of krag aan sekere spesiale uitverkose of geleerde mense gegee is. Ja daar is leiers; ja daar is ouderlinge, apostels, profete, evangeliste, leraars, daar is herders, bewaarders van ons siele, en- dank God daar is. Maar ‘n uitverkore “priesterorde”? Heersers oor die laite- leke? Moet ons hierdie mense verdra? Is daar geen redding vir iemand wat nie onder die gesag van hierdie mense wil staan nie? Dit is wat hierdie leiers wil hê en die gewone mense moet dit glo!

Wanneer mense op ‘n een of ander soort apostoliese gesag aanspraak maak en ‘n vermoë het om mense se lewe te beheer, dan is daar net een oplossing en dit is: Toets hulle!

Voldoen hulle aan die Bybelse voorskrifte van ‘n apostolies gesag? Is hulle self gebonde en onder gesag soos Paulus en Barnabas, rapporteer hulle terug aan Antiogië of ontmoet hulle ander apostels en ouderlinge in Jerusalem om sekerheid te verkry oor die evangelie wat hulle verkondig? Of is hulle Nicolaïte? Jesus sê baie duidelik Hy haat hulle werke.

Wanneer daar ‘n Nikolaitiese priester orde of priesterskap ontwikkel dan gaan mense uitgesluit word en hulle gaan geestelik en sielkundig seerkry.

In Ierland is daar ‘n priester in elke dorp, maar dit is ook ‘n land met die hoogste alkoholisme en skisofrenie getalle in die wêreld. Maar dit word ook in nuwe kerke gesien. Dit wat hulle “Apostoliese gesag noem—al is dit van ‘n pous of ‘n swaarhand pastoor of predikant—kan ook ‘n teken wees van ‘n Nicolaït.

Samevatting

Dit moet elke gelowige se hartsbegeerte en gebed wees, dat die kerk van ons dag sal terugkeer na haar eerste liefde. Wanneer ons Jesus weer sal liefkry soos toe ons tot bekering gekom het, en ons weer sal glo soos ‘n kind, en Hom altyd so sal liefhê, dan kan niks verkeerd gaan nie. Hy sal die wat Hom so liefhet bewaar.

Jacob Prasch

11/2012

1ste >>> 5de Eeu-----Apostoliese kerk---Pre-Nisiaanse Kerk----- 4de >>> 12de eeu------Opkoms van die Institusionele Kerk---- 11de >>> 16de eeu------Die Donker Eeue----

15de >>> 18de eeu------Die Reformasie--- 17de >>> 20ste eeu----Groot Ontwaking----

20ste eeu>>> Die Afvallige Kerk>>>


By David Passmore May 30, 2026
Staying The Course Amidst Isolation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Living in Israel one gets the feeling that the metaphorical walls are closing in. Israel's reputation is being tarnished all over social media and the mainstream media, and this is reflected in massive public disdain towards this country. We are constantly told that there is near consensus amongst academics and commentators that a genocide was committed in Gaza. The very legitimacy of the state is brought into question. The majority of Americans are now hostile towards Israel. There is real fear that the next U.S. administration will turn against Israel. Even if this were to happen passively, by the U.S. refraining from exercising its veto power towards Security Council Resolutions condemning Israeli actions this could be catastrophic. Internally it is a fractured society leaning increasingly right wing which further alienates Israel from world opinion. An example in point is how Ben Gvir mocked the most recent participants of a global aid flotilla to Gaza. Such conduct further agitates outrage at Israel. The left-wing media presents the ruins of Gaza as a mortal wound in Israel's side. When the world observes this level of carnage no degree of public relations can ameliorate the sense of indignation towards Israel. We can liken the situation of Israel to that of a depressed person. All he sees is hopelessness and gloom. But this isn't the first time that the Jewish nation has been faced with such darkness. Things change and we don't know how the geo-political map will reconfigure in the future. We need to ride out this storm and keep going. On a historical note, the situation is reminiscent of what our ancestors faced when we returned from the Babylonian exile to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. Nehemiah was faced with constant lies and conspiracies designed to entrap him by hostile actors: Sanballat the Horonite, Tobiah the Ammonite and Geshem the Arab. They employed deception, slander and ridicule in order to maintain their political eminence. There was also a certain sense of abandonment amongst the Jews in Israel then as in our own day. We read in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah about the anguish of the leadership in Israel concerning the lack of assistance from the Babylonian diaspora towards the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem and the Temple. Only 20% of the exiles returned to the land. It was largely the poor who returned. Most of the affluent, established Jews remained in Exile. This is a continuing theme in Jewish history. It is also important to observe that from its very beginnings there were bible believing Christians who spearheaded the return of the Jews to their land. The idea of organizing a return of the Jews to Israel began as a Protestant Restorationist objective that can be traced to 17th century Puritan England. The protagonists of the Cromwellian Republic viewed themselves as the new Israel fighting the Papist forces of Satan. Alongside this, interest grew in the notion that biblical prophecies pertaining to the return of the Jews to Israel were a necessary precursor for the return of Christ. The growth of the British Empire in the 19th century lent political clout to Christian Restorationism with specific missions to the Jews established. Although there had been a longing to return to Israel as written in the thrice daily Amidah prayer, Jewish Zionism arose in the midst of mid nineteenth century nationalism and was further fermented by European antisemitism. It was an altogether secular enterprise. Although Israel's situation appears rather stark, we can draw strength from the Providence afforded to our ancestors in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah when they too were faced with defamation. This is also an opportunity to grow closer to our natural allies in the evangelical world who from the beginning of Zionism were steadfast supporters of the project to establish a Jewish homeland in Israel.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 25, 2026
Signs of the Times Tony Pearce ‍ ‍ Left, right or center – is our democracy in danger “Things fall apart, the center does not hold. Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.” W.B Yeats ‘The Second Coming. ’ ‍ ‍ Labour’s losses in the council elections and the battle for succession to their unpopular leader Kier Starmer have raised the possibility that we may soon have our seventh Prime Minister in ten years. Local elections saw Reform and the Greens make sweeping gains, leading Green Party leader, Zack Polanski to say that we are seeing ‘the end of the old two party system’. Maybe we are. In which case what comes next? Will we head to the far left, the far right or will the center hold on to power? Or will it end with ungovernable chaos as unqualified people take control of local and national government? Behind all this there are fundamental questions, ‘What is government for? Who does it represent and where is it going?’ ‍ ‍‍ ‍ According to the Bible (Romans 13) the purpose of government is to promote good and restrain evil. The government has the right to raise taxes for the common good of society and people should pay them. In 1 Timothy 2 Paul encourages us to pray for the government that ‘we may live a godly and peaceable life’. In other words, pray that the government will create an orderly and peaceful society and not interfere with our right to set up communities that teach and preach the Word of God. The situation becomes more difficult when we see government promoting things which are harmful and restraining things which are good and clamping down on freedom of speech with a threat to our ability to live a ‘godly and peaceable life’ ‍ Since becoming a Christian in my early twenties, I have wrestled with the question of how our faith applies to contemporary political issues. I started this quest on the left politically after leaving university and working as an English teacher with sympathies for Marxism. I then became a born again Christian in 1970, and joined my late wife Nikki in evangelizing the radical left, by handing out leaflets at their marches and demonstrations in London and attending their meetings to discuss matters of faith and politics with them. ‍ ‍‍ ‍ We had some good discussions with people and hope we made some consider the Christian alternative. However as we looked at Marxism from a Christian point of view and its practice in Communist countries, we understood that behind this ideology there is a strong anti-christian spirit. It denies the existence of God and promotes the idea of human perfectibility by our own effort. This is exemplified in the words of the Internationale, the socialist battle hymn, ‘No saviour from on high delivers, no faith have we in prince or peer, our own right hand the chains will shiver, chains of hatred, greed and fear.’ This Antichrist spirit led to the persecution of Christians in the Communist countries of eastern Europe, the Soviet Union and China. Far from creating the socialist paradise on earth that Lenin wrote about in ‘Socialism and Religion’, it created a society ruled by hatred, greed and fear, controlled by secret police, prison camps and responsible for the death of millions. ‍ ‍ In western society we have witnessed the growth of ‘cultural Marxism’ a movement aimed at infiltrating and changing society from within, rather than fomenting the workers’ revolution. Labour’s Fabian Society, with its (now discarded) logo of the wolf in sheep’s clothing, has been engaged in this process since the beginning of the 20th century. Social change really took off with the permissive society in the 1960s, which succeeded in changing traditional values, especially in the area of sex and the family. It replaced biblical values with a new ‘morality’ that is fundamentally anti Christian. These ideas have permeated large swathes of our society including the education system, the judiciary, the Civil Service, much of the media, mainstream political parties (including even the Conservative ‘wets’ and parts of the established church). ‍ ‍ Melanie Phillips describes the results of this in her book, ‘The Builder’s Stone.’ ‘Having decided that the West was rotten to the core, western elites set out to create a new culture that would usher in the brotherhood of man and eradicate hatred, prejudice, and war. Their Brave New World junked biblical religion with all its constraints on behaviour and revolved instead around self gratification. Everybody had the right to live as they wanted; nobody could say that their way of life was better or worse than anyone else’s; no one had the right to say that their culture was better than any other culture. That was ‘racism.’ At the heart of all this was the doctrine that there was no such thing as objective truth. Everything was relative; everything was a matter of opinion. Because there was no truth feelings became more important than facts. So the West abandoned the codes of morality, conscience, truth and lies, personal responsibility, and duty to others in favour of a culture of the self. In the process it junked its inherited traditions and biblical codes on which western culture was based.’ ‍ Britain changed from being a society that respected values based on the 10 Commandments and the teaching of Jesus Christ to one that discarded them for relative values. Ideas of ‘diversity, inclusion and equity’ became the norm, together with and a form of ‘tolerance’, that is really very intolerant if you oppose it. This ‘tolerance’ means accepting the virtues of multiculturalism and humanism and believing that all gods are equally valid or true (or none are). We must also accept that all lifestyles and family arrangements including homosexual and transsexual ones are just as valid as traditional two parent heterosexual families, with a father and mother committed to each other in lifelong matrimony looking after their own children. ‍ As society accepts this radical change in how we view culture, morality and religion, we are told not to criticize other cultures and world views or imply that they are anything less than equal to the culture, morality and faith derived from the Bible. ‍ All this has not improved society. Instead we have a collapse of values with no central idea to hold it together, just a group of competing ‘communities’ which are often only united in opposition to the traditional values and culture of Great Britain. A good example of this is the ‘red – green alliance’ of radical leftists and Islamists who come together to denounce Israel and campaign to ‘globalise the Intifada’. In practice this means a world wide war against Israel and Judaeo-Christian society and a desire to replace it with their version of either Islamism or Communism. However if one of them were to come to power, you can be sure that the Islamist’s would get rid of the leftists or vice versa. In fact that happened in Iran’s 1979 revolution, when Islamist supporters of Khomeini and Communists came together to get rid of the Shah. Then the Islamists seized power, turned on the Communists and wiped them out. ‍ Alisteir Heath wrote in the Daily Telegraph: ‘Ruined by decades of political vandalism, the Britain we knew and loved, a land of stability, pragmatism, and ancient freedoms, is no more. Today’s UK is uglier, impoverished, volatile and disorderly. We’ve lost our level-headedness. Anger and frustration have become our defining emotions. Our institutions have wasted away, and we have been taught to despise our history. The decline of family, community and faith have led to alienation, dependence on welfare and the rise of novel ideologies, mostly secular but also sectarian, turbocharged by social media. While the state becomes unnervingly authoritarian, the air reeks of insurrection and every variety of extremism. The British public’s sense of betrayal is as well-founded as it is dangerous. The machinery of state is incompetent and self-serving, a vehicle for social engineering in the global interest.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ Criticism of this process now risks being classed as ‘hate crime’ with a growing authoritarian society monitoring social media posts and public teaching of alternative ideas in ways which risk shutting down free speech in our society. A Christian teacher Enoch Burke is currently in prison in Dublin after he was suspended from his job and jailed after refusing to accept and teach transgenderism in the school. ‍ ‍ ‍ Nick Timothy, Shadow Secretary of State for Justice, got into trouble when he questioned mass Muslim prayer in Trafalgar Square. He wrote: ‘Mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. The adhan – which declares there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger – is, when called in a public place, a declaration of domination. The domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook.” He is right in this. Allah hu Akhbar actually means Allah is greater, greater than your God, Muhammad is greater than Jesus and the Koran is greater than the Bible. ‍ ‍ ‍ Tim Dieppe of Christian Concern for our Nation wrote: “The fact that we have mass Islamic prayer in Trafalgar Square at all is indicative of the massive culture change that we have seen in the last few decades. A culture change that was not voted for or ever agreed to by the British people. And, a culture change that can hardly be described as having been entirely beneficial to our culture as a whole. I only need to mention grooming gangs involving mostly Pakistani Muslim men , sharia courts, honour crimes, terror attacks, the assassination of an MP, an attempt to blockade Parliament, mass antisemitic marches through London, a convicted terrorist standing for local elections, sectarianism, and many other examples to make the point. Earlier this month, the Government gave Muslims special protection with the adoption of an official definition of anti-Muslim hostility .” ‍ ‍ ‍ You are not really supposed to question this in public life today. A message circulating on social media is an apt commentary on all this. ‘First they overlook evil, then they permit evil, then they legalise evil, then they promote evil, then celebrate evil, then persecute those who call it evil.’ Soviet dissident Solzhenitsyn wrote: ‘A Communist system can be recognised by how it spares criminals and criminalises its opponents.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ The root cause of all this is the rejection of God and biblical values. The 18th-century French philosopher Joseph de Maistre coined the phrase "people get the government they deserve." David Pawson followed up on this idea, arguing that in democratic societies like ours, the moral and spiritual condition of a nation's citizens is directly reflected in the leaders they elect. If the general public abandons moral truths, they will inevitably vote for governments that reflect those same compromises. David Pawson taught that God may use governmental leadership to judge or bless a nation, depending on the people's obedience. He noted that Hebrew prophets saw wicked rulers as a form of divine judgement on a society that has strayed from God's laws. Therefore a nation's ultimate hope rests on repentance rather than just political change. His conclusion is that Christians should actively stand for moral truth in society. He believed that the church is meant to influence culture upward, and that a decline in national morality inevitably leads to deteriorating governance. ‍ ‍ ‍ Sadly much of the church today has become the ‘salt that has lost its savour’ through compromise with antichristian forces in society and government. It may be too late to save our country and western democracy as social and economic pressures create a collapse of democracy and push us either towards anarchy or dictatorship. ‍ ‍ ‍ Yeats’ poem quoted at the beginning of this article ends with the enigmatic line ‘Some rough beast slouches towards Bethlehem to be born.’ Most likely he is referring to the coming anti-Messiah who is labelled the Beast in the book of Revelation. Many believe his is now waiting in the wings to replace the true Messiah (born in Bethlehem) and bring in the dictatorship prophesied in Revelation 13. The Bible indicates that the Beast or Antichrist will have power for a moment, but it will be short lived and doomed to destruction at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to the earth. Then the kingdoms of this world will become the kingdom of our God and of His Messiah and He shall reign forever and ever (Revelation 11.15) and the ‘government shall be on His shoulder’ (Isaiah 9.6). ‍ ‍ ‍ Maranatha come Lord Jesus. ‍ ‍ ‍ Water, water nowhere and not a drop to drink. (Apologies to the Ancient Mariner) ‍ ‍‍ ‍ While nations worry about supply of oil and gas as a result of the war in the Gulf and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a much more vital commodity for human survival is water. And it is in short supply in a growing number of nations. ‍ ‍ As of 2026, over 25 countries face extremely high water stress, with the most severe crises located in the Middle East and North Africa. This region is home to the world's most water-stressed nations, including Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Yemen, and Libya. India and Pakistan face critical water scarcity due to overexploitation of aquifers and population density. Much of Africa , Somalia and Ethiopia in particular are facing severe shortages due to drought and climate change. Mexico and parts of the United States (particularly Texas and the west coast) are experiencing significant water shortages and declining groundwater levels. ‍ ‍ ‍ Iran is facing a severe, multi-year water crisis as of May 2026, with major cities like Tehran, Mashhad, and Karaj approaching the point where taps could run dry due to depleted reservoirs. Groundwater is depleted across most of the country, and nineteen provinces are experiencing severe drought. The crisis is driven by a combination of climate change and decades of poor water management, including excessive dam construction and inefficient, water-intensive agriculture. China is facing a severe, multi-faceted water crisis defined by extreme scarcity in the north, widespread pollution, and mismanagement, threatening its food supply and economic growth. ‍ ‍ ‍ Several countries are significantly affected by upstream dam construction that reduces downstream water flow, causing, environmental, and diplomatic crises. These countries include Iraq, heavily impacted by dams built on the Tigris and Euphrates rivers by Turkey and Iran, leading to reduced water for agriculture, destruction of forests, and increased sandstorms. Egypt and Sudanface significant water security risks due to the Ethiopian Grand Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile. Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Laosare affected of dams built by China on the upper Mekong River ‍ ‍ One country which bucks this trend is Israel. Israel manages its water resources by transforming a chronic shortage into a surplus through large-scale desalination, extensive wastewater recycling, and a centralised national water carrier system. The agriculture sector has shifted away from freshwater, using treated effluent instead. Advanced drip irrigation technologies are widely used to minimise waste. Israel has exported its water technologies to countries around the world, particularly Africa where it has given advice on how to use limited water resources to great effect. ‍ ‍ ‍ Without water no society on earth can survive. Bible prophecies indicate that water shortage and pollution will be a global problem in the last days. Most obviously no water equals no food, so famine is an inevitable result of water shortages. Jesus warned of this as a sign of the last days in Matthew 24.7. Revelation 8.10-11 speaks of something called ‘Wormwood’ falling on rivers and springs of water causing it to become bitter and many to die from drinking it. ‍ ‍ Prophecy speaks of the two great rivers of the ancient world, the Nile and the Euphrates, being affected by a crisis causing the Euphrates to dry up (Revelation 16.12) and the Nile to become contaminated and its waters turn foul (Isaiah 19.5-11). Isaiah 24 speaks of a curse devouring the earth in the last days causing the earth to be ‘defiled (or polluted) under its inhabitants.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ According to the New Scientist, there are massive amounts of water hidden deep beneath the Earth's surface. Scientists have found evidence of a reservoir of water three times the volume of all surface oceans combined, located roughly 250–400 miles underground within the mantle. ‍ ‍ ‍ It may be that the Lord will release this water to replenish and clean up the earth in the Millennial kingdom when ‘waters shall burst forth in the wilderness, and streams in the desert. The parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water.’ Isaiah 35. Zechariah 14.8-9 says, ‘In that day it shall be that living waters shall flow from Jerusalem, half of them toward the eastern sea and half of them toward the western sea; In both summer and winter it shall occur. And the Lord shall be King over all the earth.’ Zechariah 14.8-9. See also Ezekiel 47. ‍ Rethinking Russia ‍ Things are not going well for Vladimir Putin in his ‘special military operation’. Four years after invading Ukraine in February 2022, Russia is not making advances and actually losing ground. Russia is losing as many as 25,000- 35,000 casualties a month and over 1.2 million have been killed and wounded since the war began. Ukrainian skills in drone warfare have destroyed large quantities of Russian equipment, tanks, armoured personnel carriers, artillery and rocket systems, helicopters, and naval vessels. ‍ ‍ Russia is spending an estimated 40% of the entire federal budget on the war effort. As a result of this and western sanctions, Russia is increasingly unable to fix chronic infrastructure problems at home. During the bitter Russian winter thousands of people were left without heat, light, or even water. All forms of transport, trains, trucks and planes, are facing logistical problems, making it difficult to transport goods and people across the vast Russian regions. Russia is on the way to an infrastructure collapse that will likely take decades to recover. ‍ ‍ Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov warned the State Duma that Russia's faltering economy risks stoking a 1917-style revolution. He demanded urgent financial and economic measures by autumn to avert a potential economic collapse. This raises the danger of the Russian Federation fracturing. The Caucuses are restive, the far east is looking to China and Siberia is facing an acute problem as a result of melting permafrost, causing buildings, bridges and pipelines to collapse. ‍ ‍ In the present circumstances it is hard to see how Russia could lead the Gog and Magog invasion of Israel (Ezekiel 38-39). Some have said that it is more likely that Turkey is the lead power in the War of Gog and Magog. They say that Meshech and Tubal are not Moscow and Tobolsk, but regions of modern Turkey. Erdogan’s Turkey is backed by an Islamist world view hostile to Israel, seeking the recovery of its Ottoman Empire. He has his eyes on taking control of Jerusalem. Turkey is possession of a large land army already stationed in the region, some of it occupying part of Syria. ‍ ‍ The alternative is that the War of Gog and Magog is some way off, possibly part of Armageddon, giving time for Russia to recover from its present distress. We wait and see, but meanwhile spare a thought and a prayer for the people of Ukraine and Russia, suffering as a result of Putin’s futile war, oppressed by his corrupt dictatorship and facing an economic and social collapse caused by his failed policies. ‍ ‍
By David Passmore May 25, 2026
Trump's Visit with Xi Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The tempest path of Sino-U.S. tensions came to a head during Trump's first term in office with the outbreak of Covid. Many commentators believed that the deterioration in relations was in terminal decline and that a major confrontation in the straits of Taiwan was fast looming. Trump held China responsible for the spread of Covid, insisting that he would pursue reparations. The election of Biden halted this commitment. Biden sought a non-confrontational policy towards Beijing. In the aftermath of the disastrous premature withdrawal from Afghanistan handing that country over to the Taliban and the Russian invasion of Ukraine under his watch, Biden became too preoccupied to assertively engage with China. Chinese State media portrayed Trump's visit as being rather unremarkable in the context of other foreign dignitaries lining up to meet Xi, pointing out that just a week later Putin would arrive in Beijing. China manifests that it is winning the trade war that Trump began in 2018, beating America at its own game of capitalism. They frame the U.S. as being in a position of weakness because China is able to source whatever products they buy from the U.S. elsewhere like oil from Canada, and soybeans from Brazil. The oil, soybeans and 200 Boeing's Xi agreed to purchase from Trump were presented as a mere gesture to placate Trump as China has already bought 350 Air Buses in the last year. China would have the world believe that it is only semi-conductors where America has the edge. Here China hints that it is not likely to buy H200 Invidia Chips because it would mean that China will always lag behind the U.S. in building their AI tech. China's major contention and concern is that the U.S. may impose export controls to contain China. China's strategy instead is to invest massively on indigenous innovation. China wants to become an innovation powerhouse that will export its own Chips to the Global South. China is fast catching up with America's lead in AI with the launch of Deep Seek and they claim similar progress with Chip making. China is now ostensibly only eight months behind the U.S. on Large Language Models. Running contrary to this narrative Trump insists that China is desperate to trade with America. China's economy has now peaked. Emblematic of this stagnating growth is rising youth unemployment. China is no longer America's biggest trading partner. Trump has shifted manufacturing back to the U.S. and Trump believes that China can't revive its economy without America. Lined up to meet Xi with Trump were the heads of some of America's biggest Tech Corporations. Corporations like nvidia seek a relaxing of export controls for Chips as they want short term profits, ignoring the risk that China will reverse engineer this technology. More broadly, China and the U.S. are playing a geopolitical chess game spanning the globe. Trump outmaneuvered China in Latin America with the removal of Maduro from power in Venezuela. China is exploiting its influence on Iran in order to get Trump to refrain from taking more active steps towards the defense of Taiwan. Indeed, Trump didn't say anything about Taiwan during his visit. Trump's instincts are of a transactional approach towards alliances, where he is only willing to underwrite defense assistance if allies pay up as an insurer would. It is also important to note that saber rattling the Taiwan card also serves the CCP agenda to distract internal dissent concerning the state of the Chinese economy. Most imminently Trump needs China to pressure Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz and get oil prices down before the midterm elections. China has largely insulated itself from the Gulf energy impact due to stockpiles. Trump would also like China to stop providing Iran with GPS for its missiles. Other Chinese weapons systems and technology sold to Iran have failed to perform well against U.S. and Israeli military hardware. Matters boil down to a leverage between whatever Trump can do on Taiwan, China can do on the strait of Hormouz with Iran. Human Rights concerns, espionage and the alarming rate of Chinese acquisition of U.S. land have been placed on the back burner for the time being.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 17, 2026
Moriel & Jacob Prasch request prayer for Phil Malone and family “Please keep me and my family in prayer. My mum passed away on 13th May at the age of 93. It's a time of mourning, but may it be a time for the Gospel of Christ to be preached to my unbelieving family, especially my brother.”
By Mea Fredrickson May 13, 2026
Moriel & Jacob Prasch request prayer for Sister Joanne Rizzetto, wife of Pastor Dave Rizzetto of Church of The Open Door in New York City. Joanne has developed painful complications and adverse side effects from medications following knee surgery. May The Lord intervene for healing and give guidance to her physicians. Lord, we humbly ask you to intervene in the life of our dear sister. We know you can do all things and that you hear our prayers and consider your servants. Please put a stop to the adverse reaction. Restrain and reverse its effects and restore our sister so that she can continue to serve you in the ministry that you have called them to. We do glorify Your Name. We don't ask as those who treat you as our debtor, but as those who have tasted your goodness and found such mercy and compassion at your feet. Grace and peace and mercy be with Joanne and Pastor Dave.
By David Passmore May 5, 2026
Will Lebanon miss its golden opportunity? Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Converging new facts on the ground have transformed the political landscape in Lebanon. With Assad removed from power in Syria, a vital lifeline of arms supplies for Hezbollah originating in Iran has diminished. Hezbollah suffered considerable losses in its last round of fighting with Israel. The decapitation of its leadership with the targeted pager attack inflicted a severe blow. Hezbollah's new leader Naim Qassem is a weak substitute for the charismatic Nasrallah who was assassinated by Israel in 2024. Hezbollah in its frail state foolishly fell into line with Iran's instruction to join the fighting against Israel following the recent American-Israeli war with Iran. This was contrary to the wishes of the Lebanese government which was fearful of the inevitable destruction that would be wreaked by the Israeli response. The differing attitudes to Israel amongst Lebanon's population is reflective of its ethnic composition. The predominant groups in order of plurality are Christians, Shia Muslims and Sunni Muslims with a smaller minority of Druze. The major concern of most Christians in Lebanon is the dire state of their economy. They have no appetite to further their plight by invoking Israel's rage. During the colonial inter war period the French envisaged the demarcation between Lebanon and Syria as carving out enclaves for Christian and Druze control. Within Lebanon there would be a shared government that by convention would have the Executive power split between a Christian President, a Sunni Prime Minister and Shia Speaker of Parliament. The Christians in southern Lebanon (particularly Maronite Catholics) saw themselves as being anthropologically descendants of ancient Phoenicians as opposed to an Arab identity where the Arab Christians were largely Eastern Orthodox. The schism between the Maronites and the Arab Eastern Orthodox dates back to the time of the Crusades. The Maronites were culturally French, speaking French as their main language and held precedence in much of the Lebanese economy. The first threat to Lebanese stability and cohesion was settled by the U.S. Eisenhower administration in 1958 which landed Marines in an amphibious operation. A repeated attempt at this by the Reagan administration in 1983 ended in a military disaster for the U.S. due to suicide bombings by Iranian controlled terrorists. Israeli efforts to bring in stability during the Lebanese Civil War in conjunction with its Lebanese Christian allies led by Major Saad Haddad likewise came to calamity when the Sabra and Shatila revenge attacks took place following the assassination of Lebanese leader Bashir Gemayel. The ''Good Fence'' policy of an Israeli friendly free Lebanon zone in Southern Lebanon eventually ended badly following Menachem Begin's second incursion into Lebanon called ''Shalom HaGalil'' aimed at stopping the PLO rocket attacks on Israeli border communities like Metulla, Kiryat Shmona, Naharya, Rosh Hanikra, Tzfat and Carmiel. The proxy Israeli occupation from the Israeli border to the Litani river became an imbroglio that many in Israel viewed as Israel's Vietnam with widespread domestic protest and a collapse of morale within the IDF. Eventually Israel absorbed Christian war refugees from Lebanon, while the Vatican and most of the Christian world turned their backs on the Lebanese Christians. Lebanon was then saddled with two states within a state. The first was in the aftermath of Black September in 1970 when King Hussein of Jordan defended his Hashemite throne and government from Yasser Arafat's attempt to take over Jordan due to Jordan having a 70% Palestinian Arab demographic majority. The Jordanian legion drove tens of thousands of its pro Arafat Jordanian citizens into Lebanon, creating a population base for the first state within a state under Arafat. However the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and other factions had their niche interests. Courtesy of the Israeli Air Force Arafat relocated what he saw as his government in exile to Tunisia. This was a missed opportunity by the Lebanese government to assert its autonomy and full territorial control by making a Camp David type peace with Israel inclusive of economic and mutual security provisions. Instead an Iranian backed Syrian intervention replaced Arafat's state within a state with a new one that morphed into Hezbollah. The fall of the Assad regime and the Israeli counter-offensive against Hezbollah re-presents Lebanon with the opportunity that it once lost. The predominantly Christian controlled Lebanese military could and should operationally coordinate with the IDF, to obliterate and remove Hezbollah as the Israelis relieved Lebanon of Arafat's state within a state. Such a rapprochement would likely have strong American and possibly French and British support, allowing Lebanon to be at a non-combative peace with Israel along the lines of Egypt and Jordan, and now some of the Emirates. The natural comradery of the Lebanese Druze community with the Israeli Druze and the pro-Israeli Druze of Syria would additionally re-enforce a regional harmony, as would the Maronite Christian community in Israel with their co-coreligionists in Lebanon.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 5, 2026
PASTOR JOHN ANGLISS It is with profound sadness that we learned of the temporary separation from our friend and brother Pastor John Angliss. We look forward to being reunited with John in the millennial reign of Christ and indeed in God's Eternal Kingdom. Jacob Prasch visited John a few weeks ago in the UK while John was in hospice care having been diagnosed preterminal in his illness. While medically correct, it was of course a misdiagnosis. John is now cancer free and is alive and well in the presence of Jesus awaiting us in glory while his mortal body is being renewed for resurrection and immortality. In the meanwhile, during this temporary season of bereavement we do request prayer for his beloved wife Mary and for his congregation, The Ark Fellowship in England near Reading, England. Because he has recently arrived in the USA and is scheduled to address the Moriel Canada branch conference in Winnipeg, Jacob Prasch will regrettably not be able to attend the memorial service in Britain. Our condolences however are very much with Mary and our brethren in the UK who like us knew and loved Pastor Angliss. John was one of a minority of faithful voices who upheld a traditional biblically based Pentecostalism in the era of counterfeit revivals and apostasy that overtook most of British Pentecostalism. John was a faithful friend of Israel & The Jews standing on the prophetic purposes of God for Israel and the salvation of the Jews. John was a loyal friend to Moriel and Jacob Prasch and a colleague of David Pawson and Derek Prince, both of whom likewise stood by God's promises to Israel. John was also a founding leader of CMFI - the Christian Ministerial Fellowship International, former pastor of Three Mile Cross fellowship , and former board member of Focus On Israel (a Pentecostal Ministry to the Jews). While this separation is temporary, John's eternal gain will be our temporary loss. O GRAVE - WHERE IS THEY VICTORY, O DEATH WHERE IS THY STING ? Hosea 13:14 / 1 Corinthians 15: 55-57
By David Passmore April 28, 2026
We made it this far: Israel at 78 Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Since the last anniversary milestone of Israel at 75, we have been embroiled in relentless wars. Citizens had little respite to enjoy this year's festivities, coming on the heels of a lull in fighting on the Iranian and Lebanese fronts. We are constantly waiting for a breakthrough on the horizon that will normalize our relations with our neighbors and secure our position on the world stage. It is acutely exhausting to be the focus of the world's attention. But also there is a sense of inevitability accompanying the Zionist project. Specifically that Israel is destined to be central in the wider region and global affairs. Why is this? Is it due to it being a western transplant? Being geographically positioned on the crossroads of three continents? Religious believers would point to prophetic fulfillment. It is short sighted to only look at how our problems are rooted in today’s' reality. Greater forces are at work that will dictate the direction that Israel is heading. The Jewish diaspora will likely find itself in a growing precarious position that will lead to increasing Aliyah (immigration to Israel) and will perhaps ferment the emergence of a second Jewish commonwealth that will not need to heed international pressure in the same way that todays' polity finds itself doing. In this light it is interesting to ponder how our posterity would view our predicament and gains. And I frame matters in these terms with intentionality. We are enmeshed in a seemingly intractable conflict with the Palestinians, and yet Israel has made great gains particularly in the technological fields. There is a current of thinking that perceives Israel's way out of its quagmire is by making itself indispensable to technological advancements. We don't know how tomorrows' world will be shaped by the rapidly advancing AI revolution but so far Israel has proven to be uniquely adaptable and innovative to technological change. This has proved to be a boon to Israel's economy, as have offshore natural gas discoveries being developed in concert with Greece, Greek Cypriot and American energy interests that are geographically and strategically removed from any Straits of Hormuz shipping impediments that strangle the Persian Gulf deposits shared by Qatar and Iran. On another note we should contextualize the situation. How different are Israel's challenges from other nations? Is Israel any less stable than other countries (particularly in the region)? Israel doesn't find itself uniquely challenged to define its identity (most European countries do also, particularly in light of immigration). Nor does the government experience any more volatility than other comparable democracies. Israel's real problems lay in the nature of how its Jewish citizens desire to govern themselves. It is arguable whether the judicial reform protests that occupied public discourse in pre-October 7th Israel would have led to serious civil strife. But it is without doubt that this impasse was allayed by the external attack. The underlying tensions remain unresolved and there are many ways that they could play out. It has been framed as a battle for Israel's soul. Israel's enemies predict that Zionism is imploding and that the State won't survive another 5-10 years. Supporting this claim, they point to Israel's increasing alienation and growing pariah status on the international stage. Our Prime Minister has been indicted for war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Even public opinion in our staunchest ally the U.S. has turned sharply against Israel. With 80% of the Democratic Party being anti-Israel in a growing climate of anti-semitism we have even witnessed the shift of Alan Dershowitz to the Republican Party which must be seen as emblematic of a trend. There is apprehension in Israel of a post-Trump America dominated by the Democrats. However, these seeming incontrovertible facts may be offset by other measures of fortitude. This may be partially countered by the high investment by Silicon Valley in the Israeli Hi-tech sector, making Israel an asset for purposes of Research and Development in America's AI race against China. New opportunities for economic relations have also been opened with Arab nations through the Abraham Accords and with the powerhouse India. Furthermore, it is difficult to imagine a world in which Israel's technological prowess will not carry the sway of western decision makers in the long run. Israel's 78th anniversary is a moment to take pause and not catastrophize what the future may behold. The entire world is currently in a state of transformation and Israel is not an outlier in this context.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore April 23, 2026
Please click this link:https://mailchi.mp/christianconcern.com/action-alert-street-preaching-22-04-26?e=f1df30be3f
By David Passmore April 14, 2026
A critical juncture in NATO'S future Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM NATO was originally established in 1949 to keep the Russian hordes at bay from toppling those European countries not forked over to the Soviet sphere of influence at the Potsdam conference. Europe lay in ruins. Britain had passed on the torch of global hegemony to the U.S. by tacitly acquiescing to the decolonization of its Empire when Churchill and Roosevelt agreed terms of the Atlantic Charter for the post-war new world order in 1941. So from its start NATO was very much an American driven endeavor. American money with the Marshall plan was propping up western European economies and its military might was forming the bulk of their defensive capabilities. The lopsided nature of this dynamic has informed how tensions have persisted and recently erupted in the Alliance. During the Cold War the U.S. felt obligated to shoulder the costs of underwriting Europe's security in light of the broader interests to keep the Soviet's in check. Following the fall of the Iron Curtain European complacency became a sticking point with the 'peace dividend' further exploiting American largesse. European NATO allies spent ever smaller percentages of their GDP on defense expenditure at U.S. expense. Now in a multi-polar world U.S. and European perceived threats are less aligned. This was first tested in the aftermath of September 11th when for the first time NATO elected to trigger its article 5 collective defense protocol. And since then the U.S. has sought to continue to expand the traditional theatre of operations beyond Europe's borders. No longer is Russia perceived by America as being a proximate existential threat to its interests, but rather containing Chinese expansion in the Pacific arena. Parallel to NATO a discrete 'five eyes' intelligence sharing alliance comprising the Anglo-sphere (the U.S., U.K., Canada and New Zealand) emerged. This stands at the center of the U.S. – U.K. 'special relationship'. A relevant question would be can this signals intelligence (NSA-GCHQ) partnership persist should the U.S. withdraw from NATO? Conventional thinking would have led one to believe that with Brexit the U.K. would naturally pivot towards closer U.S. relations but under Starmer the U.K. is distancing itself. European powers misrepresent the present conflict as an aggressive, rather than defensive U.S. adventure while they themselves are more likely to be at risk. In this the Starmer government resembles the Labor party led committee for nuclear disarmament in the 1980's. It opposed the Thatcher supported deployment of U.S. cruise missiles in response to the Soviet SS20's pointed at Britain's cities. The British left branded their response to Soviet strategic escalation to U.S. aggression. This time however there is for the moment no Thatcher to bring common sense into an equation dominated by emotionally driven ideologies in the face of an aggressor with definite aims. In terms of the Russian-Ukraine conflict we are reverting to the old question dating back to the Napoleonic war era: to what extent is London happy with the European nations fighting it out alone for dominance of the continent. Britain was never willing to accept a single power in control. Many variables will dictate what kind of world emerges from the current conflicts in Ukraine and Iran. How will power be extracted from potential gains? What will be the strategic impact of this? What is sure, in the age of Trump this pattern of reliance on U.S. muscle is becoming quickly exhausted. Dating back to the Roman Empire, a factor in the decline of major powers has always been astronomical military spending, a budgetary demand that the U.S. under Trump is no longer willing to shoulder alone. (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).