Mezuzot Part 2 - Japanesee

April 3, 2025

メズザー(門柱)2

のりは洗い流せます。しかし、瞬間接着剤は削り取ることはできますが、洗剤や溶剤では落ちません。高分子化合物は表皮の上部を角質化して結合します。言い換えると、それがはがれるとき、接していた自分の一部は共に取れ、そこにあるはずがないしるしを残すのです。そのような結合は結婚を保つうえで、神さまが用いたものです。しかし、結婚関係以外において、それは良いものではありません。神はその罪を赦されるのでしょうか?もちろん。ではよみがえりやイエスが戻ってきたときにそれは問題となるのでしょうか?そんなことはありません。しかし、現在そのしるしは残ったままなのです。この結合には相互の弱さがあります。それはサムソンを感情的にし、デリラから霊的に影響を受け易くしたものなのです。

続けて見てみましょう。サムソンは愚かにも、彼の力の源がその髪の毛と関係するということをデリラに教えてしまいました。彼は主に関しての事柄を、主を信じていない者と共有してしまったのです。

『彼が深く眠っているとき、デリラは彼の髪の毛七ふさを取って、機の縦糸といっしょに織り込み、それを機のおさで突き刺し、彼に言った。「サムソン。ペリシテ人があなたを襲ってきます。」すると、サムソンは眠りからさめて、機のおさと機の縦糸を引き抜いた。』(士師記 16 章 14 節)

彼は自分が引き起こした悲運のどん底にいかに近づいているかを知らずに、もう一度うまくやってのけれるのだと思っていました。

15 節『あなたの心は私を離れているのに、―次に注目してください―どうして、あなたは『おまえを愛する』と言えるのでしょう。』

「あなたは私を愛してない!もし愛してるなら殺させてくれるでしょう。あなたは本当には愛してない。愛してるなら、あなたを襲いお金をいただくのに!」サムソンはどんなに愚かになったのでしょうか!彼が能なしのようにふるまったわけが分かります。この男は本当に狂っていました。そして、私も狂っていて、あなたも狂っているのです。罪は簡単にまつわりつきます。

この状況を理解しましょう。これは旧い契約のもとで起こりました。今、聖霊はすべて信

じる者のうちにあるのですが、当時はそうではありませんでした。旧い契約のもとでは、

ある特定の時期、ある特定の目的で、大祭司や預言者、王、族長、さばきつかさのような 人たちにしか聖霊は与えられませんでした。サムソンはそのとき、地上で唯一聖霊を与え られていた人であったかもしれません。彼はイエスの象徴として奇跡的に母の胎に宿りま した。また、主の使いが両親に現れ、その子の誕生を告げ、キリストが十字架を運びその 上に死んだように、サムソンも柱を運び柱をつかんで死にました。このように、旧約聖書 の中のすべての象徴が何らかのかたちでそうあるように、サムソンはキリストの象徴でし た。彼はその生まれる前から神に召されていた者であり、神が力を与えた者でした。彼は 神の御名のためにその御手が置かれている者であり、それは神の民の救いのためでもあり ました―サムソンはイスラエルのさばきつかさであったのです!神に召され、力づけられ、油注がれ、神によって雄々しく用いられました。しかし彼は絶えずその同じ愚かな罪にま いもどって行ったのです。

同じように、あなたは福音を証し、人々をイエスに導き、人の上に手を置けばその人が癒されるのを経験するかもしれません。神は御手をあなたの上にのべ、御霊に満たし、あなたを真に用いることができるのです。しかし、いまだあなたは同じ古い事柄に陥ることも可能なのです。サムソンはそうであり、私もそうであり、あなたもです―私たちすべてがそうです。神がこのジェイコブ・プラッシュのような者をなぜ忍耐しておられるかなんてことを聞かないでください―私も分かりません。幸いにも、私は神ではありません。なぜならもし私が神なら、ジェイコブ・プラッシュはどうなっているか分かりません。神が神であり、私が私であることに感謝しましょう。もし、私が神なら私はここにはいないからです。

次にサムソンがデリラに言ったことは罪が持つ欺く力と、結婚関係の中のみで保たれるべきそのようなつながりが生む弱さを示しています。16 節を見てみましょう、

『こうして、毎日彼女が同じことを言って、しきりにせがみ、責め立てたので、彼は死ぬほどつらかった。』

彼はなぜこのような口うるさい女を我慢していたのでしょうか。そのような関係にある男は誰でもおかしくなるものです。箴言は、争い好きな女と一緒に住むことは雨漏りしている場所で寝ようとすることだと表現しています。サムソンは彼のイスラエルのさばきつかさという地位のために、彼の望むどんな妻でもめとることができました。しかし、サムソンはデリラと固く結びついて、

『それで、ついにサムソンは、自分の心をみな彼女に明かして言った。「私の頭に

は、かみそりが当てられたことがない。私は母の胎内にいるときから、神へのナジ

ル人だからだ。もし私の髪の毛がそり落とされたら、私の力は私から去り、私は弱くなり、普通の人のようになろう。」デリラは、サムソンが自分の心をみな明かしたことがわかったので、人をやって、ペリシテ人の領主たちを呼んで言った。「今度は上って来てください。サムソンは彼の心をみな私に明かしました。」ペリシテ人の領主たちは、彼女のところに上って来た。そのとき、彼らはその手に銀を持って上って来た。』(士師 16 章 17 節-18 節)

そこで、サムソンは全くのでたらめを信じたのです。彼は真実を告げました。

『彼女は自分のひざの上でサムソンを眠らせ、ひとりの人を呼んで、彼の髪の毛七ふさをそり落とさせ、彼を苦しめ始めた。彼の力は彼を去っていた。』(19 節)

ここでペリシテ人が彼を苦しめる前に、デリラが先にそうしたことに注意してください。誰もが自分の罪のために最初に裁かれるのではありません。罪への裁きが最初に起こることではないからです。いやむしろ、最初に起こることは罪による裁きなのです。罪自体があなたに敵対します。その後にその刈り取りが来るのです。

『彼女が、「サムソン。ペリシテ人があなたを襲ってきます」と言ったとき、サムソンは眠りからさめて、「今度も前のように出て行って、からだをひとゆすりしてやろう」と言った。彼は主が自分から去られたことを知らなかった。』(20 節)

彼の力は無くなり、神を去らせたのにサムソンはそれを知りませんでした。私たちの罪は聖霊を悲しませます。聖霊は望ましくない場所には留まりません。聖霊が立ち去るのではなく、私たちの悪い生活が彼を立ち去らせると言ったほうが正しいでしょう。多くの人が私に聞くよく質問は、どの時点で聖霊は悔い改めない背教者のもとを離れるのかということです。この質問には答えることができません。その人自身にも分からないし、知ることもできないのです。「サウルもまた、預言者のひとりなのか」―サウルは主が去られたときに気付かなかったように、サムソンも同じでした。しかし、その後に何が起こるかを私たちは知っています。

21 節『そこで、ペリシテ人は彼をつかまえて、その目をえぐり出し、彼をガザに引き立てて行って、青銅の足かせをかけて、彼をつないだ。こうしてサムソンは牢の中で臼をひいていた。』

神の霊が去られたときに何が起こったのでしょうか?見ることができなくなり、力を失い

ます。それは霊的にも盲目になり、自分の十字架を負うための力を失うということです。

この時点ではもはや何もできません。なぜなら、もう手遅れなほどに行き過ぎてしまったからです。

神の霊はサムソンを去りました。盲目になり力を失いました。それが彼に起こったことであって、もし私たちも注意深くしていなければ、同じ事が私たちにも起こりえるのです。これは誰も免れることはできません。

続けて見てみると、22 節『しかし、サムソンの頭の毛はそり落とされてから、また伸び始めた。』ローマ 11 章 29 節には『神の賜物と召命とは変わることがありません。』とあります。神は一度与えられたものを取り去られはしません。私たちが“頭の毛”を失うことは一瞬ですが、伸びるには時間がかかるのです。それを一晩で失ってしまうかもしれませんが、取り戻すのは容易ではありません。信仰を失ってしまった背教者は、その分ゆっくりとしか回復しないのです。そのような者は盲目になり、力を失い、信仰の破船に遭ってしまったのです。

  1. 節『さて、ペリシテ人の領主たちは、自分たちの神ダゴンに盛大ないけにえをさ さげて楽しもうと集まり(ダゴンとは魚の姿をした古代ペリシテ人の神です。ロー マ・カトリックの主教が被っている長い帽子は元々ダゴン礼拝に起源があります)、そして言った。「私たちの神は、私たちの敵サムソンを、私たちの手に渡してくだ さった。」』
  2. 古代中近東の考えでは、実際の敵との戦いは、単純に霊の戦いの延長線上にありました。それはダニエル書や黙示録ではっきりと確認できることです。また、他の説教でもそのことを説明しています。それゆえサムソンを捕らえたことは、ペリシテ人の頭の中では、ただ彼に力が勝ったということだけではなく、彼らの神がサムソンの神よりも強いということを意味していたのです。しかし、神は御名の栄光を現わさずにいることはありません―ご自身の栄光を他の誰にも渡しはしないのです。
  3. 節『民はサムソンを見たとき、自分たちの神をほめたたえて言った。「私たちの神は、私たちの敵を、この国を荒らし、私たち大ぜいを殺した者を、私たちの手に渡してくださった。」』

しばしば、神はその御名のために、ご自分の民が不信仰であっても祝福を与えます。私たちはそのことを見落としがちです。

『彼らは、心が陽気になったとき、「サムソンを呼んで来い。私たちのために見せ

ものにしよう」』

神に背く者はいつもはずかしめを受ける状態になります。イザヤ 30 章で『しかし、パロの保護にたよることは、あなたがたの恥をもたらし、エジプトの陰に身を隠すことは、侮辱をもたらす。』(イザヤ 30 章 3 節)と書かれてある通りです。

『サムソンを牢から呼び出した。彼は彼らの前で戯れた。彼らがサムソンを柱の間に立たせたとき』(16 章 25 節)

ここでの“柱”という言葉はその町の柱を示しているようです。ペリシテ人はある間違いを犯しました。サムソンは十字架のもとに行く事ができなかったが、十字架を彼のもとに持ってきてしまったのです。

『サムソンは自分の手を堅く握っている若者に言った。「私の手を放して、この宮をささえている柱にさわらせ、それに寄りかからせてくれ。」宮は、男や女でいっぱいであった。ペリシテ人の領主たちもみなそこにいた。屋上にも約三千人の男女がいて、サムソンが演技するのを見ていた。サムソンは主に呼ばわって言った。

「神、主よ。どうぞ、私を御心に留めてください。ああ、神よ。どうぞ、この一時でも、私を強めてください。私の二つの目のために、もう一度ペリシテ人に復讐したいのです。」そして、サムソンは、宮をささえている二本の中柱を、一本は右の手に、一本は左の手にかかえ、それに寄りかかった。そしてサムソンは、「ペリシテ人といっしょに死のう」と言って、力をこめて、それを引いた。すると、宮は、その中にいた領主たちと民全体との上に落ちた。こうしてサムソンが死ぬときに殺した者は、彼が生きている間に殺した者よりも多かった。』

ここでもサムソンはキリストの象徴です。完全に敗北したと思われたときに、その広げた腕はかつてない勝利をもたらしたのです。どうしようもないと思われたときに、犠牲を払いながらも相手を倒しました。

31 節『そこで、彼の身内の者や父の家族の者たちがみな下って来て、彼を引き取り、ツォルアとエシュタオルとの間にある父マノアの墓に彼を運んで行って葬った。サム ソンは二十年間、イスラエルをさばいた。』

サムソンは 60 年間イスラエルをさばいていても不思議ではありませんでした。しかし、たっ た の 20 年間であったのです。私は 無条件の “ 一度救われたら滅びな い

(once-saved-always-saved)”という教えを信じません。カルヴァン主義はキリスト教を歪めてしまいました。また、私は神が人々を失うために救うといったことも信じません。新約聖書で語られている“あなたを守ることのできる方”を知るためには、カルヴァン主義の間違った解釈とその真実を崩壊させた考えは必要ではないのです。「神の賜物と召しとは悔い改めなしにやって来る」と初期の時代に引用されました。

このことを理解するために、新約聖書の並行記事を見る必要があります。私たちは旧約聖書をイエスの現れである新約聖書に照らして解釈します。

1コリント 5 章『あなたがたの間に不品行があるということが言われています。しかもそれは、異邦人の中にもないほどの不品行で、父の妻を妻にしている者がいるとのことです。』

―異邦人とは異教徒のことです。たいていギリシア語の学者たちは父の妻とは、その男の義母であったのではないかと考えます。いずれにしても、信者である人がその義母と近親相姦的な関係を持っていたなんて!パウロは「あなたがたの間に」と言っていることに注意してください。パウロはこのことをとんでもないことであり、醜く、道徳的に嫌悪感を持つほどで、異邦人でもしないことだと言っているのです。異邦人ですら、そんなことをする道徳観を持ち合わせていないのです。パウロは続けて

『それなのに、あなたがたは誇り高ぶっています。そればかりか、そのような行ないをしている者をあなたがたの中から取り除こうとして悲しむこともなかったのです。』

と言います。不品行に対して断固とした態度を取る者を、見かけだけ正しく、妥協しており、半分堕落した現代風の教会は高慢だと言います。それに対して神は、正しくないこと許す者が高慢だと言われるのです。

レイ・マッコーリー(南アフリカのペンテコステ派の説教者)は既婚者だった女性と結婚するために信者の妻と離婚しました。しかし、そのことに対して立ち上がって間違っていると言う者は、神の定める義の基準を守るために非難されるでしょう。教会内の不品行に対して立ち上がったのに、高慢だと言われるなら、あなたは不品行に対して何も言わない者を神のことばから高慢だと言えるでしょう。神は明らかな悪に立ち向かわない者を高慢だと言います。

パウロは 3 節で

『私のほうでは、からだはそこにいなくても心はそこにおり、現にそこにいるのと

同じように、そのような行ないをした者を主イエスの御名によってすでにさばきました。あなたがたが集まったときに、私も、霊においてともにおり、私たちの主イエスの権能をもって、このような者をサタンに引き渡したのです。それは彼の肉が滅ぼされるためですが、それによって彼の霊が主{イエス}の日に救われるためです。』(1コリント 5 章 3 節-5 節)

これは誰でも自分の判断でできるものではありません。またつなぐことと解くことに似ています(マタイ 18 章 18 節参照)。どちらも動詞が現在進行形で表されるギリシア語本文を見ると、その言おうとしていることはさらに理解できます。天でつながれているものだけを地上でつなぐことができ、天で解かれているものだけを地上で解くことができるのです。(このことは特定の場所を支配していると言われているような悪霊とは何の関係もありません)同じように、上で読んだ1コリント 5 章に基づいて、パウロはこの人をサタンに渡すように導かれたのです。

ここで注目してほしいことはパウロは宗教改革者のようではなかったということです。彼はカルバン主義者ではありませんでした。パウロはカルバン主義者が言うように、この男は信仰を失い父の妻と寝たのだから、最初から救われていなかったという証拠ではないかとは言わなかったのです。またパウロは無条件に滅びないという考え(一度救われたら永遠に救われるというもの)を支持することは何も言いませんでした。この男がそのような堕落した状態にいながら、救いの確信を持っていられるとはほのめかしもしなかったし、そう考える余地さえ残さなかったのです。むしろ、この男が地獄に落ちる恐れがあるとはっきりと宣言しているのです。

もう一度言いますが、主は誰かを失うために救うことはしません。パウロが言っていることはこれです。もし、この男がこの長い間、習慣的に肉のために種を蒔き、悔い改めないなら敵は彼をほしいままにするということです。そのような状態なら、私たちは彼をサタンに渡し、いのちは失うが終わりに神を恐れ、悔い改めさせるようにするのです。多くの親が自分の子どもは大学に行くまではとても良い子で、信仰心のある子どもであったと言います。しかしその後に男の子は彼女と同棲し始め、女の子なら彼氏と同棲し、悔い改めることをしなくなるのです。(私の子どもたちはちょうどその年頃で、神がその罪から守ってくださるように祈っています)しかし、ある日そのわがままな子どもは家に帰って来て、ドアをノックして言います、「お母さん、お父さん。僕 HIV 陽性なんだ。一緒に祈ってくれない?」「僕カポジ肉腫にかかったんだ。もう余命は長くないって診断されて…。一緒に祈ってくれない?」これほどひどいことはありません!しかし、地獄で火に投げ込まれるよりはましなのです。

私は子どもが妻のお腹にいるときからその救いのために祈っていました。誰もが自分の子

どもを言い表せないほど愛しているように、私も愛していたので、メシアであるイェシュア(イエス)から永遠に離されているよりかは、生まれる前に死ぬほうが良いと実際に神に祈りました。

いのちは失うが、たましいは救われるのです。サムソンはもっと長い間、数十年実りある奉仕をするはずでした。罪は人を殺すことができます。ここで誤解してほしくはないのですが、すべての病気が何らかの個人的な罪の結果であると言っているのではありません。病気は人類の堕落の結果として引き起こされるという意味において、罪の結果です。しかし詩篇 32 篇やヤコブの手紙が言うように、罪は病気の原因となり得ます。現に1コリント

11 章では、主の食卓で心に秘めた罪があるとその飲み食いが私たちをさばくことになるとパウロは書いています。この箇所では主の食卓に対して罪を犯した信者は“死んだ”ではなく“眠った”と書かれているので、彼らがそのために地獄に行ったのではないことが分かります。信者は眠りにつき、未信者は死にます。同様に、父と母の世話をしなければ長生きできないことを新約聖書は明らかにしています。罪は実際に殺すことができるのです。1コリント 5 章やサムソンの生涯でもそれが分かります。私たちや子どもたちに起こってはならないことなのですが、地獄の炎の中で苦しむよりかは良いことなのです。神は失うために救いはしません。

サムソンは敬虔な妻をめとり、より長い期間イスラエルをさばくはずでした。神が備えら れていた恵みをすべて、サムソンは失ってしまったのです。彼はその召し、目、力、恵み、地上でのいのちまでも失ってしまったのです。何という悲劇なのでしょうか。しかし、ヘ ブル 11 章はサムソンのたましいは最後に確かに救われたと明らかにしています。サムソン はまつわりつく罪に倒れされました。それでもなお、神の恵みは勝ち誇るのです。

私が思うに聖書の中で最も難解で、痛ましい本はエレミヤが書いた哀歌です。その終わることのない頑なさや悔い改めることのない罪、国や首都、国民、子どもたちによる神への反抗に対しての報いが詳しく書かれています。聖書の中でも最も痛ましく、重苦しい書のちょうど真ん中にはこう書いてあります。『私たちが滅びうせなかったのは、主の恵みによる。主のあわれみは尽きないからだ。それは朝ごとに新しい。「あなたの真実は力強い。』―哀歌 3 章 22 節-26 節を読んでください。

あなたは最悪の試練の真っ只中にいるかもしれません。しかし、主の確固たる愛は尽きることがありません。

あなたはクリスチャンであってもイエス・キリストを十分愛せていないかもしれません。

しかし、イエスさまがあなたを愛するのを止めることはできません。

確かにサムソンに起こったことは悲劇であり、1コリント 5 章に出てくる名も無き人に起こったことも悲劇、今日私たちに起こることも悲劇ではあるでしょう。あってはならないことなのですが、まとわりつく罪のために起こることがあり、実際に起こっています。今あなたが罪の中にいるのなら、もたもたせずに今そこから出なさい。罪は後にはあなたに歯向かうことが分かっているでしょう。その泥沼に陥るには方法はいくらでもあり、崩壊に向かうことは容易なのです。しかし、ひとつしか出てくる方法はありません。それはイエス・キリストの十字架です。

ジェイムズ・ジェイコブ・プラッシュ



By David Passmore August 21, 2026
Don't bite the hand that feeds you - Irish hypocrisy towards Israel Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Amongst European nations, Ireland in recent years has gained the reputation as being the leading anti-Zionist country. The Irish Republic has never been favourably inclined to Israel. It only established an Embassy in Tel Aviv in 1996. In poll after poll the vast majority of the Irish public have indicated hostility towards Zionism and strong support for Palestinian Statehood. The curious aberration to this is that in British Ruled Northern Ireland support is demarcated along sectarian lines. Catholic Republican areas predictably tend to ardently support the Palestinian cause, while Protestant Unionist communities are overwhelmingly pro-Israel. Perhaps some credence can be given to sentiments of traditional Catholic antisemitism hardwired into the Irish psyche as contributing towards this disposition. It was certainly odd that the Irish government promptly sent a delegation to the Nazi German Ambassador in Dublin to convey condolences after news of Hitler's suicide broke at the end of WW2. But more concretely if you were to ask the average Irish protester on a pro-Palestine march the basis of their empathy for the Palestinian cause, they would point to the ostensible parallels between the Irish experience of fighting for independence from British colonial oppression to the plight of Palestinians living under Israeli occupation. Further remonstrations on a diplomatic level concern the actions of the IDF interreacting with Irish Peace Keepers in Southern Lebanon that have caused the deaths of several Irish Peace Keepers over the decades in friendly fire incidents. Ireland has contributed the most peace keepers to this mission per capita and the government has condemned Israel for these deaths that they view as avoidable. This animosity towards Israel is unbalanced. There are reasons to consider that Ireland and Israel have a shared experience of national liberation. Both countries fought the British in the pursuit of independence. Both countries made great efforts to resurrect their ancient languages for modern wide scale use. Both the Irish and Jews form major diaspora communities in New York. Despite all this Ireland ranks as Israel's second largest export market after the US. The preponderance of Israeli exports to Ireland comprises electronic integrated circuits, micro-assemblies, and tech manufacturing components. American multinational colossal tech corporations like Intel are substantially engrossed in this trade through the chain of supply. Ireland and Israel are hubs for design and manufacture of high-tech hardware components for US corporations. So, due to the nature of the most prosperous and competitive sectors of their respective economies, Israel and Ireland are inextricably bound in bilateral trade ties. Resolutions from the Irish government to impose sanctions on West Bank originating produce is merely perfunctory rhetoric. Such actions amount to a drop in the bucket in terms of impact to overall trade. The stark reliance of Ireland on advanced Israeli aviation equipment recently caused a spectacle when Ireland's new government jet struggled to land in heavy fog due to it being ordered without an advanced Israeli made navigation system. This was directly due to a short-sighted government decision not to buy Israeli military technology. There is a marked disparity between the official position of the Irish government designed for domestic public consumption and the economic policies that it actually pursues towards Israel. The government is acutely aware that the US is massively invested in the Irish economy and they don't want to do anything to jeopardise this. Washington demands that their enterprises in Dublin are intertwined with operations in Israel. The Irish government dare not even prevent US military supply flights refuelling at Shannon Airport on their way to Tel Aviv. The Irish government knows that times change and now the gripping social issue is the anti-immigrant/anti-Islam popular street protests. Soon the anti-Israel protests could become a mere side show only really promoted by Sinn Fein given the pressing ramifications of mass migration. So, in the meantime certain politicians will rile against the occupation, purported genocide and pass paltry sanctions against insignificant produce from the West Bank. All the while making hand over fist in money with the Israelis where it really matters in tech.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore July 31, 2026
The Tide Has Changed Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The America that Netanyahu touched down on is a changed America. The death of Lindsey Graham represents a changing of the guard. Graham was a staunch Israeli ally who will most probably become an increasingly rare breed in Washington. Sixty percent of Americans now hold a unfavourable view of Israel which politicians are finding difficult to ignore. It was once unthinkable to believe that New York City with such a strong Jewish electoral base and influence on all sectors of economic and cultural life would have a mayor that is so hostile to Israel to such an extent that he is calling for the arrest of its Prime Minister. From all accounts Netanyahu was cordially welcomed at the White House. The official press release stated that the talks were constructive. What is more telling is what was left unsaid particularly concerning the proposed sale of F35's to Israel's new regional adversary -Turkey. Trump is keen to find a swift resolution to the Iran War, while Netanyahu is opposed to a premature departure. When the US and Israel initiated their attacks on Iran over five months ago, Trump and Netanyahu appeared united in the War's goals and purpose. But as the protracted conflict has staggered to topple the Iranian regime fractures have emerged. Much has been said about the imminent political realities both leaders face. The Republicans could take a big hit in the November midterm elections should the war continue and global energy markets be negatively impacted. Netanyahu is anxious to demonstrate a big win to the Israeli public with the upcoming October election. In Israel, the Iran War is not viewed in isolation, but rather as an extension of the response to the colossal disaster of the October 7th massacre. Netanyahu must rehabilitate his reputation as a competent steward of national security having had the greatest loss of civilian life in an attack happening under his watch. Aside from the Iran issue, Trump is being pressured by Erdogan to insist upon Israeli withdrawal from Syrian territory pre-emptively seized by Israel following the toppling of Assad. Trump has also indicated disapproval of the extent of continuing Israeli measures against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, questioning the proportionality employed. Netanyahu is not in an envious position. Throughout his tenure and political career, he lauded his ability to engage successfully with the American public by zealously advocating Israel's position. Yet under his government Israel's reputation has plummeted in the US. Trump may be the last US President to extend such overwhelming bilateral support to Israel. The days of politicians like Lindsey Graham are fast ending. While John Fetteman and Marco Rubio appear to be remaining more solid, even some of the most warmly inclined leading Republican and Democrat voices like Donald Trump and Rahm Emanuel have nuanced their support for Israel. The tide has shifted and will at best level off if not continuing to shift further.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore July 24, 2026
The Saudi Nuclear Deal: An attempt to alter the Regional Balance of Power Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The initiative to develop a civilian nuclear program in Saudi Arabia with US assistance isn't new. There were concrete plans discussed towards these ends during the first Trump Administration. The recent announcement to actualize this deal follows the geo-political regional tumult in the wake of the Iran War. Several dimensions of motivation underlie the US decision. An overarching US strategic agenda is to keep the Saudis firmly in the American sphere of influence. Washington knows all too well that the Chinese and Russians are eager to offer their nuclear technical assistance to the Saudis in order to draw them closer to their camp. On a personal note, the nuclear agreement is a significant achievement for Bin Salaman. The Saudis have long had designs to diversify their energy supplies. Having a civilian nuclear program also adds prestige to Saudi Arabia as an emerging market economy. For the US, a monopoly on contracting companies for the requisite construction offers lucrative economic opportunities. Although the Civilian Nuclear deal does not allow the enrichment of Uranium, the Saudis will be in a position to do so if Washington gives the green light. This will act as a counterbalanced threat hanging over the Iranians. After the recent flare up of renewed fighting with Iran due to their lack of adherence to the moratorium of understanding, something had to budge in Trump's estimation. A reconfiguration of the power balance in the Gulf by introducing the potential of Saudi Arabia to be able to acquire nuclear weapons shifts the dynamic and places further pressure on Iran to strictly abstain from nuclear proliferation. Despite Israeli concerns about the agreement, Trump sought to assuage their alarm by making it contingent upon Saudi Arabia normalizing relations with them. Given the inherently unstable nature of an autocratic Saudi regime Israel views a diplomatic relationship with the Saudis as being on precarious footing in the long term. Israel is already forced to contend with the implications of one nuclear armed Muslim state - Pakistan and it will further weaken its own deterrent capability if another similarly capable hostile neighbour were to emerge in the future. The roles of Turkey and Qatar in all this foray are a wild card. Officially Turkey is served under the NATO nuclear umbrella for defence that is subject to US control. However, its civilian nuclear program remains in its infancy. Now with the Saudi deal, Erdogan may be inclined to exert pressure on the US to help accelerate his own nuclear program. Just as Erdogan's efforts to acquire F35 fighter jets from the US greatly disturbed Israeli military planners, a heightened Turkish nuclear ability will intensify this fear. Qatar views itself as pursuing its own independent foreign policy that has managed to remain rather neutral during the current war, thereby escaping the ire of Iran's strikes on US regional assets. Overall, the Qatari government has grown closer to the Turkish vision for the region and so likely isn't particularly amiable to the Saudi agreement. Ultimately the Saudi deal is a gamble. Many will see it as throwing more fuel on the fire which will further imperil the tinder box region and heighten tensions. But Trump finds himself at a continuing impasse with a stubborn regime in Tehran that is leveraging their geographic hold on the straits of Hormuz to inflict damage on the global energy markets. Iranian strikes upon US Arab regional allies have underscored the de facto alliance between Israel and the Arabs against Iran and its Shia proxies. The US hopes to use the Saudi nuclear deal as a means of making this alliance official by having Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords as a pre-condition.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore July 14, 2026
Circling the wagons Ruben Rothler LLB, LLM Israel is a society riddled with tension and division. It is sociologically, if not politically miraculous that a country drawing Jews from all over the world is able to exist at all. The army affords a degree of integration as a melting pot. But this is only a marginal source of national unity in the overall scheme of things. More so are the myriads of external threats that face this small country. In the former generation the Ashkenazi (Jews of European descent) - Sephardic (Jews of Oriental descent) divide was far more pronounced. The dominant Ashkenazi establishment held the reins of political and economic power which was resented by the Sephardim. However, due to a combination of inter-marriage and political accommodation much of the chasm that separated these distinct groups was forged. Menachem Begin (an Ashkenazi politician) in 1970 successfully ran on the Likud Party ticket with a campaign that brought Sephardic Jews under his conservative political umbrella. Later the immigration of Russian Jews following the end of Communism would add a whole new dimension to the Israeli demographic milieu. The younger generation of these immigrants tended to adapt well to Israeli society and contributed much to the economy. The wider division in Israeli society that crosses ethnic lines concerns that between religious and secular Jews. This can be further bifurcated to the clash between the secular and specifically ultra-orthodox Jews (Haredim) as distinguished from the national religious Jews (Dati Leumi). The Secular and the Religious generally part on what they envisage a Jewish State to entail. Religious Jews desire the State to strictly adhere to the stipulations of Jewish Law (Halacha), while at present Halakhic influence is largely limited to certain areas of Family Law concerning Jewish citizens. Wider considerations of promoting a socially conservative political agenda would also be forefront amongst the religious mindset broadly. Secular Jews view the imposition of such proposed measures as a serious infringement of their civil rights. With regard to the Haredim, the bone of contention looms larger, in that this group is fundamentally opposed to participating in society at large. This is acutely manifested in diminished contribution to the work force and a refusal to be conscripted into the army. The 2023 judicial reform protests posed a significant threat to social civil order. The nation appeared to be bitterly divided into two opposing camps. This split reflected broader divisions concerning visions of how the country should be governed. The judicial reforms would have weakened the Supreme Court's ability to render the Executive branch accountable. However, the Supreme Court was also accused of using its considerable powers to promote a socially liberal agenda. Left wing secular Israelis tended to oppose the proposed reforms while those on the right (which included the majority of Religious Jews) supported the reforms. Every weekend droves of protesters were brought onto the streets causing major disturbances to traffic. The polarising nature of this impasse threatened the future of Israeli democracy. It was the October 7th attack that brought a swift end to this public debate and civil strife. The nation instinctually united in response to this common existential threat. The judicial reforms were shelved for a future point when the urgent security threats subsided. However, as the war dragged on the enduring issue of Haredi refusal to conscript into the army became more pronounced. Mounting casualties combined with ever increasing manpower demands to field troops on the multiple theatres of action on which the IDF is engaged has depleted the ranks, and the army is now in much need of fresh conscripts. Haredi belligerent refusal to participate in the pressing national defence has escalated from being a political debate to a matter of very practical vital importance. Overall we can observe that the challenges to national unity in successive generations since the establishment of Israel has recurrently been ameliorated by the common necessity of defence towards outside threats. Most recently we can see this happening with regard to the global anti Semitism and anti-Zionism that has been raging since the October 7th atrocities. These hostile attitudes have paradoxically acted as a force which promotes nationalism and a sense of national cohesion in Israel that otherwise might not functionally exist.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore July 8, 2026
A Divided Nation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The Haredi community has had a complicated, paradoxical relationship with the State since its founding. Rooted in a Talmudic precept that the Jews are forbidden to resettle the land of Israel en masse by force before the coming of the Messiah, the secular democratic State of Israel presents itself as blasphemous by its mere existence. Yet due to practical considerations such as the need to obtain funding for its religious academies the Haredi leadership reached a settlement with the State's founders that exempted Haredi men from being conscripted for military service. This was at a time when the Haredi population in Israel was relatively small. Over the past decades this demographic ballooned until the point that soon the majority of Jewish children in Israel will be born into Haredi families. Such a situation is clearly unsustainable. Recently the Knesset's (Parliament's) Haredi parties have pressured their coalition partners in government to codify Torah Study as part of the Country's Basic Laws. This was purposefully done to elevate the status of their institutions to be on parity with service in the IDF. Israel is yet to promulgate a written Constitution, so legislation classed as a Basic Law holds Constitutional status for all intents and purposes. These moves by the religious parties represent a back door power grab to enshrine in law very significant hurdles to prevent the enlistment of Haredi men. The burden of Israel's defence is comparatively massive for a country its size and it is vastly disproportionately shouldered by the secular population. Until now there have been political initiatives to conscript the Haredim. But given the huge manpower shortages emerging in the wake of near continual conflict on multiple fronts since the events of October 7th this matter has become urgent and not merely a theoretical discussion of what is fair and equitable. It is important to draw a distinction between the Haredim and national religious Jews (Dati Leumi). The Haredim adhere to a lifestyle entirely committed to observance of Jewish Law and Talmudic study. This is embraced to the exclusion of gainful employment and participation in wider society. They are either outrightly opposed to Zionism or consider themselves non-Zionist. Conversely, followers of the national religious movement in Israel although being observant of Jewish law and learning would alongside this pursue secular professions. Furthermore, they are ardently Zionist and disproportionately serve in IDF combat units. This is often done within the framework of a program called Hesder Yeshiva that combines religious learning with military service. Efforts to cater a similar model for accommodating Haredi participation in the IDF have so far failed to make substantial gains. Such measures designed to override Haredi objections to service based upon modesty concerns by strict segregation of the sexes in these specially formed units have failed to appease the Haredi leadership. For them, any form of military service is considered a dereliction of their duty to fully devote themselves to a Torah lifestyle. They argue that their Talmudic learning and prayers are in itself a form of national service and act to protect the Jewish people spiritually from enemy attack. It is as if two parallel societies exist within Israel. And the trajectory of separation between the two is only growing. The Haredim are cloistered away in their Yeshivas, immersed in lives devoted to adhering to the stipulations of Jewish law. While the particulars of actually running the State is left to the Secular. The Haredim desire all the benefits of subsidizing their lifestyle without contributing to society. What we really have going on here at source is two profoundly different and opposing ideological visions of what is important in life and what is the purpose of a Jewish State. At the State's founding these divergent perspectives were more manageable. Ben Gurion only had to contend with one religious party –the National Religious Party. Later in 1970 Begin aligned with the NRP to form a coalition government that also brought Sephardic Jews under the Likud umbrella which had the effect of bringing unity to the country by bridging the Ashkenazi-Sephardi divide. However, over time Israeli politics has seen a proliferation of religious parties, gaining further leverage as king brokers in forming governments due to the proportionate representation voting system which secular Israelis not uncommonly view as political blackmail. (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
P
By Mea Fredrickson June 23, 2026
New Paragraph
By David Passmore June 22, 2026
THE CAPTION AT THE HEAD OF THE POSTER IMAGE FOR THE MOVIE ‘DISCLOSURE DAY’ BOLDLY DECLARES ‘WE DESERVE TO KNOW’ Indeed, we do need to know the truth. But will we find it in Stephen Spielberg’s new movie ‘Disclosure Day’? Could it just as well be entitled ‘DECEPTION DAY’? In an interview with USA Today Spielberg says that evidence of non-human contact has become “overwhelming” to him. He has suggested that his film could raise significant theological questions for Christians. But will it? For us Christians - No, not on our watch! The movie raises no questions for those who accept the proven accuracy of God’s Word, the Bible. The film, which is capturing the imagination of the public, only confirms exactly what scripture tells us about what are in fact extra-dimensional beings. ALIENS OR FALLEN ANGELS? God inhabits the heavenly realm along with a vast array of angels. Because Lucifer, a created angel, wanted to usurp God as ruler of the universe, he was expelled to another realm outside of our time and space, along with one third of the angels who rebelled with him. These fallen angels manifest themselves as demons who can appear on earth and disappear at will. Spiritual hosts of wickedness exist in heavenly places, wherever this realm is, it is not the place where God dwells. ARE ALIENS BENEVOLENT? In the movie, the ‘aliens’ are portrayed as friendly beings who want to help mankind in a time of crisis. If the aliens are really demons, not visitors from outer space, this is a dangerous delusion. Whitley Striber in his book ‘Communion’ writes on encountering ‘aliens’; ‘I felt an indescribable sense of menace. Whatever was there seemed so monstrously ugly, so filthy, so dark and sinister. Of course they were demons. They have to be.’ Many others have reported similar malevolent experiences. During the movie, Daniel claims to have had an encounter with extra-terrestrials during which he received a special gift of empathy, which is regarded by him as the ultimate superpower. However, there is only One who completely understands our human frailty. We read this concerning Jesus: ‘For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathise with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are - yet he did not sin.’ (Hebrews 4 v 15). Jesus said: “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.” (Matthew 11 v 28) END TIMES DECEPTION Before he was crucified, Jesus warned his disciples about these last days in which we are living. The first words he used in this context were: “Watch no one deceives you. For many will come in my name saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many.” Deception was top of the list! Later, the Apostle Paul wrote about these days: ‘The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved.’ (2 Thessalonians 2 v 9) Have you received the love of the truth? Have you received Jesus who is the way, the truth and the life? If not, you are in great danger. Perilous times are here and they are only going to get worse as man turns more and more away from his maker. Things will only change when Jesus returns soon to establish his own Kingdom on earth, where justice and peace will rule. JESUS, OUR ONLY HOPE! The Bible says all human beings are sinners. The message of Jesus is simple; repent and believe the good news, that God wants humanity, his highest creation, to be reestablished in relationship with him. His plan was simple: to give his life in unconditional love for every human being that has and ever will live, by shedding his blood on a Roman cross. In doing this, we can receive forgiveness of sins. Our old life will then be buried with him, giving us new life with the hope of an eternal future of true peace, love and joy, with freedom from pain and tears. Why ignore such a great gift of salvation? If you do, your fate will be sealed for eternity in hell, which is a real place without God, and thus without love, to face only eternal consequences of punishment. We condemn ourselves to such a fate. REPENT AND BELIEVE THE GOSPEL BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE! Jesus loves you and asks that you repent and believe in him. It would be the best and safest decision of your life! If you commit your life to him, he will give you a new heart, you will be a new person inside. You will also gain a new desire for all that is right and true. And his Holy Spirit will give you an ability to discern the lies of the age we are living in. ‘For God so loved the world, that he gave us his only son, that whosoever believes in him, will not perish, but have eternal life.’ (John 3:16) FINALLY, A RECOMMENDATION  All that is described in this leaflet has been open, in the light for millennia. On the other hand, the theory of extra-terrestrial life has been hidden in darkness, awaiting ‘Disclosure Day’. Which would you prefer to believe, the Word of God, or the word of Stephen Spielberg? I made my choice years ago, and have never regretted it! If this message has spoken to you, just call upon Jesus in a short prayer. Confess to him that you are a sinner in need of salvation. Ask him in sincerity to forgive you and to fill you with his Holy Spirit. You will then become what the Bible describes as being ‘born again’. (John 3 v 7) Then you need to seek a Bible believing church where you can be baptised and become part of a group of believers who can help you get to know Jesus more and more fully. “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8 v 32)
By David Passmore June 20, 2026
Prayer request for Teerth Sond Petitioned Prayer-Supplication/Personal Prayer/ Collective Prayer/Thanks Giving Prayer Our Dear brethren in Yeshua, my family & myself Teerth request your prayers in The Spirit that the latest drugs Ramicirumab & Pacilitaxel will destroy the cancer cell in the Authority Of The Lord Yeshua in The Power of The Holy Spirit. Targeted Petition: Please stand with us in prayer & fasting; The Lord will target the 2cm legion & that it will be cast out of my Liver in the love (agape), compassion, kindness, grace, mercy of God. I do not deserve it because of me- but By His Stripes we are healed for His Glory. This will allow the main operation to go ahead (which should have been done 18 months ago). Step by Step in the leading of The Holy Spirit and the in the Lord Step by Step, as our beautiful sister Beryl said, has worked on my Spiritual man- thank you Lord for waking me up. Lord raise me up for your glory forever because of your love to me, the family & fellowship- an unworthy sinner saved by your grace & love. Email sent to my Oncologist & my Local MP: Greetings Natasha & Dr Mano Joseph Hope All Is Well Thank you for our meeting today. At our meeting we discussed my MRI & CT scans which were done in May 2026. We discussed the operation on my oesophagus which I believe is the best option. (This should have been done 18 months ago). My Kidney operation will be done- non evasive- Lord willing within the next month. Will you be talking to Mr Chacravaty about this? The liver must be targeted first- this is wisdom and the latest radiotherapy treatments available- proton therapy-radiotherapy atezolizumab and bevacizumab sorafenib lenvatinib regorafenib cabozantinib durvalumab and tremelimumab At the meeting we discussed the next CT & MRI scans to be held end off July. Wouldn't it be to better to have them in August so by then I've had 4 full treatments on the latest medication. Also we have Zolbetuximab on compassionate usage- all glory to The Lord. After all the past wrongs I have no doubt now Dr Joseph you will pursue the best for me and family. Dear brethren- King Manasseh, David, Hannah, The Church For Peter, James, The Lord Jesus Christ for example made petitions onto the Lord. We pray as one body to cast off the illness in the Power of The Holy & The Authority Of Yeshua. The Great Physician who came for the ill. To lay out raised hands 🙌🏽 upon the head of our Lord. ABBA/Daddy/Lord in your mercy have mercy on us. Love you all in Yeshua our Lord & God. Teerth, Family & Fellowship
By David Passmore June 19, 2026
The End of an Extended Honeymoon – Are Trump and Netanyahu Parting Ways? Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM  The Israeli public had high hopes for Trump. Unlike his predecessors, he consistently endorsed Israeli measures of self-defence in the different theatres of conflict in which it had to contend. Further to these ends Trump shared in Netanyahu’s determined agenda of preventing the Iranians from pursuing the proliferation of nuclear weapons. During Trump's first term he tore up Obama's negotiated settlement with the Iranians concerning enriched Uranium, echoing Netanyahu’s position that it didn't go far enough. Now in his second term Trump partnered with Israel in a war with Iran that turned out to lack clearly defined goals. The campaign required resolve on the part of America that it wasn't willing to commit. After an initial lightning blitzkrieg that decapitated the Iranian leadership, the Persians dug in and the conflict became a protracted war of attrition hinging on Iran's stranglehold on the straits of Hormuz that could only be realistically lifted by placing boots on the ground or an intensified air war directed against Iranian coastal positions and the destruction of Kharg island, or at least the viable threat to obliterate Kharg island if Iran did not acquiesce. It transpired that Trump and Netanyahu underestimated the resilience of the Iranian regime, thinking that it had already received a near mortal blow during the prior popular demonstrations. So now we are left with a situation where Trump is exasperated with this protracted endeavour and appears to be aiming his frustration towards Netenyahu. A sticking point is Israel's continued occupation of Southern Lebanon. Iran is insistent that Israel withdraw its forces from there as a precursor to fully committing itself to a final status agreement with the U.S. to put an end to its nuclear aspirations. With the midterm elections looming Trump seems to be desperate for an exit strategy from this war. From Israel's perspective the fight against Hizbollah is an inextricable part of the Iranian equation. The IDF has invested massive resources and personnel in the hopes of quashing the Iranian proxy once and for all. Netanyahu is determined to build on the momentum achieved after the spectacular pager attack in 2024. After the catastrophic Hamas massacres of October 7th, the majority of the Israeli public is unwilling to tolerate a capable hostile force on its borders. Trump's proposed solution to this dilemma unrealistically suggests that Syria should take on the role of disarming and removing Hizbollah from Lebanon. In the ultimate reckoning of international relations, America doesn't have iron clad allies, but rather interests like any other nation. If, (as appears to be occurring now) U.S. and Israeli interests fail to align the two countries will cease to act in unison and there may be a rupture in relations on the not-too-distant horizon. Trump has indicated that Israel owes him big time. He has asserted that were it not for his decisive actions they would have been obliterated by Iran's missiles. This is nothing to say of the robust diplomatic support Trump has lent Israel in such forums as the United Nations Security Council and sanctioning officials of the International Criminal Court. Netanyahu is acutely aware of what may be next after Trump. The way public opinion is turning against Israel it is unlikely that the next administration is going to be any way near as friendly as Trump has been thus far to Israel. Trump too of course is mindful of this turning tide opposing Israel. The Iran war has been unpopular to his domestic audience, and the President has been caricatured as Netanyahu’s stooge doing Israel's bidding. Another major consideration for Trump is the colossal impact that the war has had on his other major regional allies: the Gulf States and Saudi Arabia. They have received the brunt of the Iranian backlash that has effectively targeted their energy infrastructure and trading routes. They, along with the Europeans have been exerting pressure on Trump to end the conflict and reopen the Straits of Hormuz regardless of whether the most favourable terms of Iranian capitulation are achieved. Israel, however important a strategic asset and technological powerhouse will not override these broader concerns that are endangering global energy markets. An unspoken factor is Trump's propensity for a belligerent severing of his relationship with allies in the political sphere. His public displays of hostility with former political allies such Senator Ted Cruz, Governor Ron Santos and Elon Musk demonstrate a temperament that the same kind of falling out could invoke with strategic allies as well as those political. Both Trump and Netanyahu are approaching the sunset of their political careers and are naturally inclined to deeply consider the legacies they will leave behind. In the international sphere Trump projected himself as a peacemaker from a position of strength. But as many commentators have pointed out, the war with Iran demonstrated the limits of U.S. power. Trump appraised Iran as low hanging fruit that could be swiftly toppled like Venezuela. However, when push came to shove and the only prospect of landing a decisive blow demanded a massive ground offensive on the scale of the Iraq war, he bottled out and sued for a premature peace that will leave Netanyahu in the cold. Netanyahu is anxious to rehabilitate the injury inflicted on his reputation of the greatest disaster to have occurred in Israel's history having happened on his watch. Eliminating Iran as the great regional adversary pulling the strings of its proxies would have done much in this regard. Neither leader is able to craft their legacies as they would have wanted. Trump is choosing the perceived option of mitigating the damage done to his legacy in foreign affairs. He is trying hard to sell his Iran deal as being more than what Obama bargained in terms of guaranteeing a nuclear free Iran. But as further details of his proposal are leaked this is becoming a tall order. Netanyahu is faced with October elections and he may decide to stay the course in Lebanon as otherwise he will seem weak to most voters. Should this happen, we will be in uncharted waters as it will thwart Trump's designs for an immediate end to this affair.