The Reign of King Asa

April 2, 2025

Scripture: 2 Chronicles 13

What God's Word really reaches about revival.

Le Règne du Roi Asa

Lisons 2 Chroniques 13, en rapport avec « I’avertissement de Dieu aux hommes et aux femmes de bien » au temps du roi Asa. En fait, cet avertissement s’adresse à chacun de nous mais spéciaIement aux bons dirigeants et aux bons pasteurs. RappeIez?vous que Ies rois d’lsraëI étaient appeIés “bergers” par Ies prophètes. Dieu a dit aux prophètes d’lsraëI d’appeIer Ieurs rois “bergers”. En Hébreu, Ie terme empIoyé pour désigner un berger ou un pasteur est Ie même : Roeh. lI y a beaucoup à apprendre du ministère pastoraI dans I’étude des rois d’lsraëI. lI y a de bons et de mauvais bergers, tout comme iI existe de bons et de mauvais pasteurs. La typoIogie des rois d’lsraëI nous enseigne sur Ie sujet mais ceIa s’appIique à chacun d’entre nous.

2 Chroniques 13:20 “Jéroboam n’eut plus de force du temps d’Abija; et l’Éternel le frappa, et il mourut.” Nous voyons ici que Jéroboam, un mauvais roi du Nord, n’a pas récupéré ses forces du temps d’Abija. Abijah (Aviyah) signifie « mon Père est I’ÉterneI ». L’ÉterneI frappa Jéroboam mais Abija devint puissant ; il eut quatorze femmes, et engendra vingt?deux fils et seize filles. Le reste des actions dAbija, ce qu’il a fait et ce qu’il a dit, cela est écrit dans les mémoires du prophète Iddo. » (v.21) Concernant Ie terme traduit par « mémoires », Ia version angIaise King James Ie traduit par « histoires ». Cependant, Ie terme Hébreu utiIisé est « Midrash », qui veut dire : se renseigner, s’enquérir de queIque chose ». Certaines personnes disent que Ie terme « Midrash » n’est pas dans Ia BibIe. lIs disent ceIa parce qu’iIs ne connaissent pas I’Hébreu. Le Midrash est certainement dans Ia BibIe.

Au chapître 14, Asa succède à Abija en Juda. Asa était un bon roi ; son père n’était pas un mauvais roi et son fiIs était un assez bon roi. Asa débute son règne en tant que bon roi. “Abija se coucha avec ses pères, et on l’enterra dans la ville de David.” (v.23) En Hébreu, I’expression « se coucha avec ses pères » s’appeIIe « Avot », Ie pIurieI de Ava, père. Nous devons comprendre ceIa.

En Hébreu, nous avons Ie terme “SheoI”, qui signifie “Ies enfers” (Ies régions inférieures de Ia terre), I’endroit où Ies esprits et Ies âmes des morts aIIaient. Le « ScheoI » était composé de deux sections. L’une était Gehena (Ia Géhenne). Cet endroit tirait son nom du Iieu situé en?dehors de Ia porte de JérusaIem, Ià où I’on brûIait Ies ordures. lI était en feu jour et nuit. C’était égaIement un Iieu d’abomination où I’on pratiquait I’adoration à MoIoc. lI se trouvait à I’intersection des vaIIées de Cédron et de Tyropée et c’est Ià que des bébés humains étaient sacrifiés aux démons., L’adoration de MoIoc était un symboIe de I’enfer. Jésus a dit aux Pharisiens : « Comment croyez?vous échapper au jugement de Ia Géhenne ? » Donc, SheoI était en deux sections, dont I’une était Ia Géhenne, Ie Iieu réservé aux méchants. lI y avait égaIement un grand gouffre, qui ne pouvait être traversé, et de I’autre côté se trouvait Ie Iieu appeIé “Avot”, habitueIIement appeIé “Ie sein d’Abraham”. Dans Luc 16, nous voyons Lazare et I’homme riche. Lazare était dans Ie sein d’Abraham, dans Ie Iieu appeIé « Avot », avec ses pères, Ies patriarches, Abraham, lsaac et Jacob, et I’autre section était Ie Iieu des damnés, Ia Géhenne.

Notez que I’enfer est éterneI et que c’est un endroit où nous sommes conscients. Lazare pouvait répondre à I’homme qui était tourmenté et I’homme riche pouvait voir Ies bénédictions de Lazare et Ie Avot. Aujourd’hui, nous avons des gens teI que Roger Forster qui enseignent que I’enfer n’existe pas en tant que teI, qu’iI est seuIement un point d’anéantissement : si vous ne vous repentez pas de vos péchés, vous n’existerez pIus Iorsque vous mourrez. C’est ce qu’enseigne ceux de Ia « Marche pour Jésus ». En généraI, c’est ce que croient Ies non?sauvés de toute façon. Pourquoi donc Ieur apporter I’ÉvangiIe s’iIs cesseront simpIement d’exister ? Mais ce n’est pas ce qu’enseigne Ia BibIe.

Lazare était conscient, ainsi que I’homme riche et chacun voyait ce que I’autre faisait.

Nous rencontrons un probIème Iorsque ce concept du Nouveau Testament est traduit; ScheoI y est traduit par Ie terme Hades, en Grec. Jusqu’ici, ça va, mais Iorsque Ia version King James de Ia BibIe est apparue, eIIe a maI traduit Ie terme Hades, en Iui donnant Ie nom de « Enfer ». AIors, Iorsqu’iI est écrit que Jésus est descendu aux enfers, certains croient qu’lI est aIIé en Enfer. C’est d’ici que CopeIand et Hagin tirent Ieur fausse doctrine. Jésus n’est pas aIIé en Enfer, lI est aIIé à Avot. lI est aIIé à SheoI, à Hades, Ià où se trouvaient Ies saints fidèIes de I’Ancien Testament, ceux qui étaient dans Ie sein d’Abraham et qui attendaient Ia venue du Messie à venir. Une fois Ie Messie venu et qu’lI mourrait pour Ie péché, iIs pourraient aIors entrer dans Ie CieI. Cependant, Ies prédicateurs de Ia prospérité, Ies CopeIand et Ies Hagin tordent Ie concept de Avot.

2 Chroniques 14 :1?6 “Asa fit ce qui est bien et droit aux yeux de l’Éternel, son Dieu. Il fit disparaître les autels de l’étranger et les hauts lieux, il brisa les statues et abattit les idoles.

Il ordonna à Juda de rechercher l’Éternel, le Dieu de ses pères, et de pratiquer la loi et les commandements.

Il fit disparaître de toutes les villes de Juda les hauts lieux et les statues consacrées au soleil. Et le royaume fut en repos devant lui.

Il bâtit des villes fortes en Juda; car le pays fut tranquille et il n’y eut pas de guerre contre lui pendant ces années?là, parce que l’Éternel lui donna du repos.

Il dit à Juda : Bätissons ces villes, et entourons?les de murs, de tours, de portes et de barres; le pays est encore devant nous, car nous avons recherché l’Éternel, notre Dieu, nous l’avons recherché et Il nous a donné du repos de tous côtés. Ils bätirent donc, et réussirent.”

Notez qu’iI reIie directement Ieur repos et Ieur prospérité au fait que Ie peupIe était fidèIe à Dieu.

« Asa avait une armée de trois cent mille hommes de Juda, portant le bouclier et la lance, et de deux cent quatre?vingt mille de Benjamin, portant le bouclier et tirant de l’arc, tous vaillants hommes. » (v.7)

Tous étaient de vaiIIants guerriers! Notez ceIa! Le peupIe du Nord marchait dans Ies voies des païens, iI s’attachait à Ieurs croyances reIigieuses tandis que Ie peupIe du Sud demeurait fidèIe. Le peupIe du Sud ne possédait pas Ia même richesse ou Ie même nombre de personnes que ceIui du Nord. Ce dernier avait dix tribus aIors que Ie Sud n’en avait que deux, en pIus des Lévites. Le peupIe du Sud n’avait pas

une grande richesse mais Ie Seigneur était avec eux ; c’est Ià qu’était Ie TempIe et iIs avaient Ie trône de David. David est un type de Christ dans I’Ancien Testament, en tant que bon berger et bon roi. lIs avaient I’héritage, ceIui de David. SeuIs ceux qui sont vraiment fidèIes au Seigneur seront de vaiIIants guerriers dans Ie combat spiritueI. Pour Dieu, Ia quaIité est toujours pIus importante que Ia quantité.

Certains peuvent avoir Ies nombres, I’argent, posséder beaucoup d’immeubIes mais iIs ne sont pas de vaiIIants guerriers au combat. Regardez?Ies. Les voyez?vous conduire des MusuImans à Christ ? Bien sûr que non, puisqu’iIs font des compromis avec eux. En fait, iIs Ies imitent.

Comprenons ce qui se passe. Souvenez?nous que Ie pIus vieiI ennemi de I’ÉvangiIe dans ces îIes étaient Ies druides, cette ancienne reIigion CeItique, Ie regroupement de Stonehenge. . lIs furent Ies premiers à s’opposer à I’ÉvangiIe. Dernièrement, vous Ies avez vus se rendre à Stonehenge pour Ie soIstice, Ia renaissance du paganisme en Grande?Bretagne.

Promenez?vous à BeIfast. Je dois y aIIer dans queIques jours. Nous y voyons Ies muraIes CathoIiques et Ies muraIes Protestantes, Ies anciens dieux guerriers ceItiques et héros mythiques. Cohowin et Arene. Arene était Ia vieiIIe sorcière qui avait demandé Ie sang de Ia jeunesse afin de preserver sa beauté. Ce sont Ià Ies images utiIisées par Ies para?miIitaires et Ies organisations terroristes Iorsqu’iIs tuent des enfants.

Les mêmes puissances démoniaques. Certains Ies appeIIent esprits territoriaux mais « Ies principautés » est en fait une meiIIeure traduction. Bien que Ie pIus vieiI ennemi de I’ÉvangiIe dans ces îIes étaient Ies druides, Ie Ieader de I’ÉgIise d’AngIeterre en est un. Et, iI est un druide qui consacre et appointe comme évêques des homosexueIs. Tout comme lsraëI.

Lorsque vous Iisez Ia Torah, vous y voyez Ia Loi, Ies commandements. lIs devaient garder tous Ies commandements. Parmi eux, Ie Iivre des Lévitiques nous enseigne de nous abstenir des pratiques sexueIIes immoraIes teIIes que Ia bestiaIité, I’inceste et I’homosexuaIité. De nos jours, des Iois sont instituées dans notre pays nous accusant d’un crime de haine si nous décIarons ces choses. QueIIe insuIte aux minorités. lIs disent que c’est I’équivaIent de faire une remarque ethnique dérogatoire, i.e. d’appeIer un Juif un cerf?voIant, un noir un nègre et un asiatique un paki. lIs nous disent donc que Ies Juifs, Ies Noirs et Ies Asiatiques sont au même niveau que Ies homosexueIs. Personne n’est aIIé en enfer à cause de Ia couIeur de sa peau ou à cause de sa race. lI n’y a rien de maI à être un Asiatique, un Noir ou un Juif. La couIeur ou Ia race n’est pas une perversion mais iIs essaient de nous Ie faire croire. lIs vont créer une Ioi permettant de nous arrêter. Si une égIise enseigne ceIa, eIIe perdra son statut d’exemption de taxes. S’iIs ne parviennent pas à obtenir ces Iois, I’Europe Ies imposera.

C’est ainsi que ceIa se passera. Mais pire encore, Ies égIises institutionneIIes Ies supporteront : Ies Méthodistes, Ies Presbytériens, I’ÉgIise Unie Réformée et I’ÉgIise d’AngIeterre. Donnez?Ieur encore queIques années, et Ies Pentecôtistes s’ajouteront à eux.

Nous sommes dans Ies derniers jours. AbsoIument !

AIors lsraëI devint comme Ies nations païennes qui I’entouraient. Je parIais dans une égIise à Somerset avant de me rendre en NouveIIe ZéIande. J’ai dû aIIonger mon chemin de 40 à 50 miIIes pour m’y rendre afin d’éviter tous Ies adeptes du NouveI Age qui se rendaient à Stonehenge. Aux temps bibIiques, Ie peupIe devint païen et immoraI, à I’instar des nations qui Ies entouraient. lIs ont tenté de garder Ie nom de Juifs. lI en est de même aujourd’hui. Certains essaient de garder Ie nom de Chrétien. Mais Jésus a dit : Si vous M’aimez, gardez mes commandements.

Notez ce que dit Ie texte; iIs n’ont pas gardé Ses statuts. Dans Deutéronome, Dieu Ieur avait dit de garder Ses statuts afin qu’iI aiIIent bien. Dieu ne nous demande pas de garder Ses statuts pour Lui. Dieu est Dieu. lI n’a besoin de personne. C’est pour notre bien?être qu’lI Ie dit. Si Ies gens gardaient Ses commandements, iI n’y aurait pas de crime, ni d’injustice, ni de VlH. Tout irait bien. Mais iIs sont devenus comme Ies païens à I’écheIIe mondiaIe. Je vais souvent en Afrique. Contrairement à I’AngIeterre, Ia pIupart des Africains AngIicans sont nés de nouveau. En Ouganda, à Kenya, Ia pIupart sont égaIement sauvés. SeuIs ceux qui suivent Desmond Tutu en Afrique du Sud ne Ie sont pas.

Desmond Tutu désire consacrer des prêtresses Iesbienness et iI fraternise avec Ies sorciers. C’est terribIe, terribIe. lI y a lsraëI et iI y a Juda. Aux yeux d’un Kénien, I’homosexuaIité est une perversion. lI est étonnant de voir des gens dans Ie Tiers Monde vivre Ioin de Ia décadence occidentaIe et ne pas avoir une situation endémique d’homosexuaIité. En effet, vous ne trouvez pas ceIa parmi Ies Africains noirs ou Ies Asiatiques ruraux.

Le seuI endroit où j’ai vu de I’homosexuaIité dans Ie Tiers Monde c’est en ThaïIande, où de jeunes enfants se font entraîner à devenir des prostitués homosexueIs pour combIer Ies besoins des occidentaux. Les Boudhistes vendaient Ies petits garçons et Ies petites fiIIes...Je ne I’ai jamais vu en Afrique. Aux yeux d’un Africain, c’est de Ia perversion. Des girafes n’agiraient pas de Ia sorte ! lsraëI et Juda!

Le groupe de Tutu est infIuencé par I’occident, et internationaIement. Nous retrouvons Ia même situation ici : lsraëI et Juda. Regardons.

Asa se débarrasse de toutes ces choses et Dieu Ie bénit. Verset 9 : Asa marcha au?devant de lui, et ils se rangèrent en bataille dans la vallée de Tsephata, près de Maréscha. »

lI surpasse maintenant Asa par un peu moins de 2 :1

“Asa marcha au?devant de Iui, et iIs se rangèrenet en bataiIIe dans Ia vaIIée de Tsephata, près de Maréscha. Asa invoqua I’ÉterneI, son Dieu, et dit : ÉterneI, Toi seuI peux venir en aide au faibIe comme au fort : viens à notre aide, ÉterneI, notre Dieu ! car c’est sur Toi que nous nous appuyons, et nous sommes venus en Ton nom contre cette muItitude. ÉterneI, Tu es notre Dieu : que ce ne soit pas I’homme qui I’emporte sur Toi ! »

Notez: “Toi seul..” Ces gens ont pIus de chariots, une pIus grande armée et sont pIus forts que nous.

« peut venir en aide au faible comme au fort... » “ Nous nous appuyons sur Toi, Tu es notre Dieu... » Notez: “que ce ne soit pas l’homme qui l’emporte sur Toi!” Sur nous ? ? non ? sur Toi.

Lorsque vous voyez ces gens pousser un agenda immoraI teI que I’homosexuaIité ou Ie paganisme et que Ies Chrétiens fidèIes et Ies égIises fidèIes se Ièvent contre ces choses, iIs ne viennent pas contre nous mais contre I’ÉterneI Lui?même. lIs se font ennemis de Dieu.


By David Passmore July 14, 2026
Circling the wagons Ruben Rothler LLB, LLM Israel is a society riddled with tension and division. It is sociologically, if not politically miraculous that a country drawing Jews from all over the world is able to exist at all. The army affords a degree of integration as a melting pot. But this is only a marginal source of national unity in the overall scheme of things. More so are the myriads of external threats that face this small country. In the former generation the Ashkenazi (Jews of European descent) - Sephardic (Jews of Oriental descent) divide was far more pronounced. The dominant Ashkenazi establishment held the reins of political and economic power which was resented by the Sephardim. However, due to a combination of inter-marriage and political accommodation much of the chasm that separated these distinct groups was forged. Menachem Begin (an Ashkenazi politician) in 1970 successfully ran on the Likud Party ticket with a campaign that brought Sephardic Jews under his conservative political umbrella. Later the immigration of Russian Jews following the end of Communism would add a whole new dimension to the Israeli demographic milieu. The younger generation of these immigrants tended to adapt well to Israeli society and contributed much to the economy. The wider division in Israeli society that crosses ethnic lines concerns that between religious and secular Jews. This can be further bifurcated to the clash between the secular and specifically ultra-orthodox Jews (Haredim) as distinguished from the national religious Jews (Dati Leumi). The Secular and the Religious generally part on what they envisage a Jewish State to entail. Religious Jews desire the State to strictly adhere to the stipulations of Jewish Law (Halacha), while at present Halakhic influence is largely limited to certain areas of Family Law concerning Jewish citizens. Wider considerations of promoting a socially conservative political agenda would also be forefront amongst the religious mindset broadly. Secular Jews view the imposition of such proposed measures as a serious infringement of their civil rights. With regard to the Haredim, the bone of contention looms larger, in that this group is fundamentally opposed to participating in society at large. This is acutely manifested in diminished contribution to the work force and a refusal to be conscripted into the army. The 2023 judicial reform protests posed a significant threat to social civil order. The nation appeared to be bitterly divided into two opposing camps. This split reflected broader divisions concerning visions of how the country should be governed. The judicial reforms would have weakened the Supreme Court's ability to render the Executive branch accountable. However, the Supreme Court was also accused of using its considerable powers to promote a socially liberal agenda. Left wing secular Israelis tended to oppose the proposed reforms while those on the right (which included the majority of Religious Jews) supported the reforms. Every weekend droves of protesters were brought onto the streets causing major disturbances to traffic. The polarising nature of this impasse threatened the future of Israeli democracy. It was the October 7th attack that brought a swift end to this public debate and civil strife. The nation instinctually united in response to this common existential threat. The judicial reforms were shelved for a future point when the urgent security threats subsided. However, as the war dragged on the enduring issue of Haredi refusal to conscript into the army became more pronounced. Mounting casualties combined with ever increasing manpower demands to field troops on the multiple theatres of action on which the IDF is engaged has depleted the ranks, and the army is now in much need of fresh conscripts. Haredi belligerent refusal to participate in the pressing national defence has escalated from being a political debate to a matter of very practical vital importance. Overall we can observe that the challenges to national unity in successive generations since the establishment of Israel has recurrently been ameliorated by the common necessity of defence towards outside threats. Most recently we can see this happening with regard to the global anti Semitism and anti-Zionism that has been raging since the October 7th atrocities. These hostile attitudes have paradoxically acted as a force which promotes nationalism and a sense of national cohesion in Israel that otherwise might not functionally exist.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore July 8, 2026
A Divided Nation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The Haredi community has had a complicated, paradoxical relationship with the State since its founding. Rooted in a Talmudic precept that the Jews are forbidden to resettle the land of Israel en masse by force before the coming of the Messiah, the secular democratic State of Israel presents itself as blasphemous by its mere existence. Yet due to practical considerations such as the need to obtain funding for its religious academies the Haredi leadership reached a settlement with the State's founders that exempted Haredi men from being conscripted for military service. This was at a time when the Haredi population in Israel was relatively small. Over the past decades this demographic ballooned until the point that soon the majority of Jewish children in Israel will be born into Haredi families. Such a situation is clearly unsustainable. Recently the Knesset's (Parliament's) Haredi parties have pressured their coalition partners in government to codify Torah Study as part of the Country's Basic Laws. This was purposefully done to elevate the status of their institutions to be on parity with service in the IDF. Israel is yet to promulgate a written Constitution, so legislation classed as a Basic Law holds Constitutional status for all intents and purposes. These moves by the religious parties represent a back door power grab to enshrine in law very significant hurdles to prevent the enlistment of Haredi men. The burden of Israel's defence is comparatively massive for a country its size and it is vastly disproportionately shouldered by the secular population. Until now there have been political initiatives to conscript the Haredim. But given the huge manpower shortages emerging in the wake of near continual conflict on multiple fronts since the events of October 7th this matter has become urgent and not merely a theoretical discussion of what is fair and equitable. It is important to draw a distinction between the Haredim and national religious Jews (Dati Leumi). The Haredim adhere to a lifestyle entirely committed to observance of Jewish Law and Talmudic study. This is embraced to the exclusion of gainful employment and participation in wider society. They are either outrightly opposed to Zionism or consider themselves non-Zionist. Conversely, followers of the national religious movement in Israel although being observant of Jewish law and learning would alongside this pursue secular professions. Furthermore, they are ardently Zionist and disproportionately serve in IDF combat units. This is often done within the framework of a program called Hesder Yeshiva that combines religious learning with military service. Efforts to cater a similar model for accommodating Haredi participation in the IDF have so far failed to make substantial gains. Such measures designed to override Haredi objections to service based upon modesty concerns by strict segregation of the sexes in these specially formed units have failed to appease the Haredi leadership. For them, any form of military service is considered a dereliction of their duty to fully devote themselves to a Torah lifestyle. They argue that their Talmudic learning and prayers are in itself a form of national service and act to protect the Jewish people spiritually from enemy attack. It is as if two parallel societies exist within Israel. And the trajectory of separation between the two is only growing. The Haredim are cloistered away in their Yeshivas, immersed in lives devoted to adhering to the stipulations of Jewish law. While the particulars of actually running the State is left to the Secular. The Haredim desire all the benefits of subsidizing their lifestyle without contributing to society. What we really have going on here at source is two profoundly different and opposing ideological visions of what is important in life and what is the purpose of a Jewish State. At the State's founding these divergent perspectives were more manageable. Ben Gurion only had to contend with one religious party –the National Religious Party. Later in 1970 Begin aligned with the NRP to form a coalition government that also brought Sephardic Jews under the Likud umbrella which had the effect of bringing unity to the country by bridging the Ashkenazi-Sephardi divide. However, over time Israeli politics has seen a proliferation of religious parties, gaining further leverage as king brokers in forming governments due to the proportionate representation voting system which secular Israelis not uncommonly view as political blackmail. (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
P
By Mea Fredrickson June 23, 2026
New Paragraph
By David Passmore June 22, 2026
THE CAPTION AT THE HEAD OF THE POSTER IMAGE FOR THE MOVIE ‘DISCLOSURE DAY’ BOLDLY DECLARES ‘WE DESERVE TO KNOW’ Indeed, we do need to know the truth. But will we find it in Stephen Spielberg’s new movie ‘Disclosure Day’? Could it just as well be entitled ‘DECEPTION DAY’? In an interview with USA Today Spielberg says that evidence of non-human contact has become “overwhelming” to him. He has suggested that his film could raise significant theological questions for Christians. But will it? For us Christians - No, not on our watch! The movie raises no questions for those who accept the proven accuracy of God’s Word, the Bible. The film, which is capturing the imagination of the public, only confirms exactly what scripture tells us about what are in fact extra-dimensional beings. ALIENS OR FALLEN ANGELS? God inhabits the heavenly realm along with a vast array of angels. Because Lucifer, a created angel, wanted to usurp God as ruler of the universe, he was expelled to another realm outside of our time and space, along with one third of the angels who rebelled with him. These fallen angels manifest themselves as demons who can appear on earth and disappear at will. Spiritual hosts of wickedness exist in heavenly places, wherever this realm is, it is not the place where God dwells. ARE ALIENS BENEVOLENT? In the movie, the ‘aliens’ are portrayed as friendly beings who want to help mankind in a time of crisis. If the aliens are really demons, not visitors from outer space, this is a dangerous delusion. Whitley Striber in his book ‘Communion’ writes on encountering ‘aliens’; ‘I felt an indescribable sense of menace. Whatever was there seemed so monstrously ugly, so filthy, so dark and sinister. Of course they were demons. They have to be.’ Many others have reported similar malevolent experiences. During the movie, Daniel claims to have had an encounter with extra-terrestrials during which he received a special gift of empathy, which is regarded by him as the ultimate superpower. However, there is only One who completely understands our human frailty. We read this concerning Jesus: ‘For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathise with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are - yet he did not sin.’ (Hebrews 4 v 15). Jesus said: “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.” (Matthew 11 v 28) END TIMES DECEPTION Before he was crucified, Jesus warned his disciples about these last days in which we are living. The first words he used in this context were: “Watch no one deceives you. For many will come in my name saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many.” Deception was top of the list! Later, the Apostle Paul wrote about these days: ‘The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved.’ (2 Thessalonians 2 v 9) Have you received the love of the truth? Have you received Jesus who is the way, the truth and the life? If not, you are in great danger. Perilous times are here and they are only going to get worse as man turns more and more away from his maker. Things will only change when Jesus returns soon to establish his own Kingdom on earth, where justice and peace will rule. JESUS, OUR ONLY HOPE! The Bible says all human beings are sinners. The message of Jesus is simple; repent and believe the good news, that God wants humanity, his highest creation, to be reestablished in relationship with him. His plan was simple: to give his life in unconditional love for every human being that has and ever will live, by shedding his blood on a Roman cross. In doing this, we can receive forgiveness of sins. Our old life will then be buried with him, giving us new life with the hope of an eternal future of true peace, love and joy, with freedom from pain and tears. Why ignore such a great gift of salvation? If you do, your fate will be sealed for eternity in hell, which is a real place without God, and thus without love, to face only eternal consequences of punishment. We condemn ourselves to such a fate. REPENT AND BELIEVE THE GOSPEL BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE! Jesus loves you and asks that you repent and believe in him. It would be the best and safest decision of your life! If you commit your life to him, he will give you a new heart, you will be a new person inside. You will also gain a new desire for all that is right and true. And his Holy Spirit will give you an ability to discern the lies of the age we are living in. ‘For God so loved the world, that he gave us his only son, that whosoever believes in him, will not perish, but have eternal life.’ (John 3:16) FINALLY, A RECOMMENDATION  All that is described in this leaflet has been open, in the light for millennia. On the other hand, the theory of extra-terrestrial life has been hidden in darkness, awaiting ‘Disclosure Day’. Which would you prefer to believe, the Word of God, or the word of Stephen Spielberg? I made my choice years ago, and have never regretted it! If this message has spoken to you, just call upon Jesus in a short prayer. Confess to him that you are a sinner in need of salvation. Ask him in sincerity to forgive you and to fill you with his Holy Spirit. You will then become what the Bible describes as being ‘born again’. (John 3 v 7) Then you need to seek a Bible believing church where you can be baptised and become part of a group of believers who can help you get to know Jesus more and more fully. “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8 v 32)
By David Passmore June 20, 2026
Prayer request for Teerth Sond Petitioned Prayer-Supplication/Personal Prayer/ Collective Prayer/Thanks Giving Prayer Our Dear brethren in Yeshua, my family & myself Teerth request your prayers in The Spirit that the latest drugs Ramicirumab & Pacilitaxel will destroy the cancer cell in the Authority Of The Lord Yeshua in The Power of The Holy Spirit. Targeted Petition: Please stand with us in prayer & fasting; The Lord will target the 2cm legion & that it will be cast out of my Liver in the love (agape), compassion, kindness, grace, mercy of God. I do not deserve it because of me- but By His Stripes we are healed for His Glory. This will allow the main operation to go ahead (which should have been done 18 months ago). Step by Step in the leading of The Holy Spirit and the in the Lord Step by Step, as our beautiful sister Beryl said, has worked on my Spiritual man- thank you Lord for waking me up. Lord raise me up for your glory forever because of your love to me, the family & fellowship- an unworthy sinner saved by your grace & love. Email sent to my Oncologist & my Local MP: Greetings Natasha & Dr Mano Joseph Hope All Is Well Thank you for our meeting today. At our meeting we discussed my MRI & CT scans which were done in May 2026. We discussed the operation on my oesophagus which I believe is the best option. (This should have been done 18 months ago). My Kidney operation will be done- non evasive- Lord willing within the next month. Will you be talking to Mr Chacravaty about this? The liver must be targeted first- this is wisdom and the latest radiotherapy treatments available- proton therapy-radiotherapy atezolizumab and bevacizumab sorafenib lenvatinib regorafenib cabozantinib durvalumab and tremelimumab At the meeting we discussed the next CT & MRI scans to be held end off July. Wouldn't it be to better to have them in August so by then I've had 4 full treatments on the latest medication. Also we have Zolbetuximab on compassionate usage- all glory to The Lord. After all the past wrongs I have no doubt now Dr Joseph you will pursue the best for me and family. Dear brethren- King Manasseh, David, Hannah, The Church For Peter, James, The Lord Jesus Christ for example made petitions onto the Lord. We pray as one body to cast off the illness in the Power of The Holy & The Authority Of Yeshua. The Great Physician who came for the ill. To lay out raised hands 🙌🏽 upon the head of our Lord. ABBA/Daddy/Lord in your mercy have mercy on us. Love you all in Yeshua our Lord & God. Teerth, Family & Fellowship
By David Passmore June 19, 2026
The End of an Extended Honeymoon – Are Trump and Netanyahu Parting Ways? Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM  The Israeli public had high hopes for Trump. Unlike his predecessors, he consistently endorsed Israeli measures of self-defence in the different theatres of conflict in which it had to contend. Further to these ends Trump shared in Netanyahu’s determined agenda of preventing the Iranians from pursuing the proliferation of nuclear weapons. During Trump's first term he tore up Obama's negotiated settlement with the Iranians concerning enriched Uranium, echoing Netanyahu’s position that it didn't go far enough. Now in his second term Trump partnered with Israel in a war with Iran that turned out to lack clearly defined goals. The campaign required resolve on the part of America that it wasn't willing to commit. After an initial lightning blitzkrieg that decapitated the Iranian leadership, the Persians dug in and the conflict became a protracted war of attrition hinging on Iran's stranglehold on the straits of Hormuz that could only be realistically lifted by placing boots on the ground or an intensified air war directed against Iranian coastal positions and the destruction of Kharg island, or at least the viable threat to obliterate Kharg island if Iran did not acquiesce. It transpired that Trump and Netanyahu underestimated the resilience of the Iranian regime, thinking that it had already received a near mortal blow during the prior popular demonstrations. So now we are left with a situation where Trump is exasperated with this protracted endeavour and appears to be aiming his frustration towards Netenyahu. A sticking point is Israel's continued occupation of Southern Lebanon. Iran is insistent that Israel withdraw its forces from there as a precursor to fully committing itself to a final status agreement with the U.S. to put an end to its nuclear aspirations. With the midterm elections looming Trump seems to be desperate for an exit strategy from this war. From Israel's perspective the fight against Hizbollah is an inextricable part of the Iranian equation. The IDF has invested massive resources and personnel in the hopes of quashing the Iranian proxy once and for all. Netanyahu is determined to build on the momentum achieved after the spectacular pager attack in 2024. After the catastrophic Hamas massacres of October 7th, the majority of the Israeli public is unwilling to tolerate a capable hostile force on its borders. Trump's proposed solution to this dilemma unrealistically suggests that Syria should take on the role of disarming and removing Hizbollah from Lebanon. In the ultimate reckoning of international relations, America doesn't have iron clad allies, but rather interests like any other nation. If, (as appears to be occurring now) U.S. and Israeli interests fail to align the two countries will cease to act in unison and there may be a rupture in relations on the not-too-distant horizon. Trump has indicated that Israel owes him big time. He has asserted that were it not for his decisive actions they would have been obliterated by Iran's missiles. This is nothing to say of the robust diplomatic support Trump has lent Israel in such forums as the United Nations Security Council and sanctioning officials of the International Criminal Court. Netanyahu is acutely aware of what may be next after Trump. The way public opinion is turning against Israel it is unlikely that the next administration is going to be any way near as friendly as Trump has been thus far to Israel. Trump too of course is mindful of this turning tide opposing Israel. The Iran war has been unpopular to his domestic audience, and the President has been caricatured as Netanyahu’s stooge doing Israel's bidding. Another major consideration for Trump is the colossal impact that the war has had on his other major regional allies: the Gulf States and Saudi Arabia. They have received the brunt of the Iranian backlash that has effectively targeted their energy infrastructure and trading routes. They, along with the Europeans have been exerting pressure on Trump to end the conflict and reopen the Straits of Hormuz regardless of whether the most favourable terms of Iranian capitulation are achieved. Israel, however important a strategic asset and technological powerhouse will not override these broader concerns that are endangering global energy markets. An unspoken factor is Trump's propensity for a belligerent severing of his relationship with allies in the political sphere. His public displays of hostility with former political allies such Senator Ted Cruz, Governor Ron Santos and Elon Musk demonstrate a temperament that the same kind of falling out could invoke with strategic allies as well as those political. Both Trump and Netanyahu are approaching the sunset of their political careers and are naturally inclined to deeply consider the legacies they will leave behind. In the international sphere Trump projected himself as a peacemaker from a position of strength. But as many commentators have pointed out, the war with Iran demonstrated the limits of U.S. power. Trump appraised Iran as low hanging fruit that could be swiftly toppled like Venezuela. However, when push came to shove and the only prospect of landing a decisive blow demanded a massive ground offensive on the scale of the Iraq war, he bottled out and sued for a premature peace that will leave Netanyahu in the cold. Netanyahu is anxious to rehabilitate the injury inflicted on his reputation of the greatest disaster to have occurred in Israel's history having happened on his watch. Eliminating Iran as the great regional adversary pulling the strings of its proxies would have done much in this regard. Neither leader is able to craft their legacies as they would have wanted. Trump is choosing the perceived option of mitigating the damage done to his legacy in foreign affairs. He is trying hard to sell his Iran deal as being more than what Obama bargained in terms of guaranteeing a nuclear free Iran. But as further details of his proposal are leaked this is becoming a tall order. Netanyahu is faced with October elections and he may decide to stay the course in Lebanon as otherwise he will seem weak to most voters. Should this happen, we will be in uncharted waters as it will thwart Trump's designs for an immediate end to this affair.
By David Passmore June 17, 2026
The Battlefield for Israel's Reputation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Israel has enjoyed strong U.S. support since its founding. Within eleven minutes of Israel's Declaration of Independence Truman recognized the Jewish State. Under the Kennedy administration the Pentagon sold advanced missile systems to Israel. However, it was the 1970 attempted PLO takeover of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan that demonstrated to the U.S. Israel's regional prowess and indispensability for implementing Washington's agenda. During Arafat's attempted Coup Syria mobilized its forces on the Jordanian border in support of the PLO's bid to dislodge the ruling Hashemite dynasty. Upon Washington's direction the IDF also mobilized its army upon its border with Jordan, thereby deterring the Syrians from taking further action. From then, the Pentagon and U.S. military planners invested heavily in promoting Israel's defence. During the 1973 Yom Kippur War disaster Nixon's massive air lift came to Israel's aid. For decades U.S. diplomatic and military support for Israel was a non-partisan issue. Both Democrat and Republican members of Congress voted nearly unanimously in support of measures concerning Israel. However, in the mid 2010's this began to change. To the extent that now 80% of Democrats hold views in opposition to Israel and this is reflected in how their representatives are acting. It is difficult to praise an exact moment when this turning point occurred. For years Democrat grassroots activist groups across the nation were lobbying their local representatives about their attitudes to Palestine and the mass student protest movements following the Gaza war built upon this momentum. The dual standards by the academic establishment were riddled with hypocrisy as if by the same criteria Israel is condemned for its responsive self-defence counter attacks in Lebanon and Gaza, Britain and America would be similarly indicted for what they did to Dresden, Hamburg and Berlin in response to Hitler. This is facilitated by the funding of Western Universities by Qatar and other Islamic interests associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. There is alienation between Israelis and the traditional left-centre Jewish Diaspora in the U.S. with a third of New York Jews voting for Mandani a vehement anti-Zionist in the New York Mayoral election. This is counterbalanced by a growing Jewish Right in America led by Ben Shapiro, David Ruben, Dennis Prager, Mark Levin and Trump advisor Steven Miller who are in political harmony with the Evangelical Right. The Republicans are also approaching a crossroads. Just as the Democrats have been hijacked by the Woke Left there has emerged a virulently anti-Zionist Woke Right led by Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes and Candace Owen who are also attempting to hijack the Republicans. What is alarming here, is the fact that the majority of young Republicans under forty now hold an unfavourable view of Israel. So, it is very much a matter of fighting for the future of the Republican Party. The growing populist movements in Britain and Europe may counter the anti-Zionist and anti- Semitic political activities of the Muslim vote and their left-wing allies. In any eventuality, even if the least favourable trajectory of U.S. public opinion were to further materialize it is unlikely to dismantle the massive military and intelligence sharing cooperation between the U.S. and Israel. The Pentagon views Israel as far too big of a strategic asset in a volatile region to cut ties with. (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore June 10, 2026
MAJOR PRAYER REQUEST - STEVE MITCHELL MORIEL ORPHANAGE (Andar Pradesh, INDIA) Please read the enclosed missions report from Moriel Missions Branch India: Our children need us and we put a lot of money into buying and then expanding the Moriel orphanage to take in more children. These precious orphan children are coming to Christ and the devil is angry. Until now we had opposition from radical Sheikhs at the Moriel Horeb church we built in Punjab, but the Hindu Authorities in Andar Pradesh have largely until now left us alone. The BJP government is however as wicked as Hamas or Hezbollah - only Hindu (I was in India when radical Hindus burned the Australian missionary family alive in their car; these are the ones who wanted to murder Steve Mitchell when Moriel helped to quickly get him out of the country some years ago). Some pastors have been murdered again in West Bengal. (Samuel, who oversees the Moriel orphanage went to Bible College with one of them). Because our orphan children are Dalet (treated as subhuman 'out casts' by the Hindu caste system), or from Muslim backgrounds, we have largely been been left alone and some of the local officials liked us. This is obviously not a good situation. Prayer is urgently requested. Please pray for Mark Masih particularly that they will not cancel his visa. They are now forbidding us from bringing any more bibles into the country. What would happen if Britain, Australia, or America outlawed Hindus from bringing the Bhagavad Gita into England, Oz, or the USA? MARANATHA Come Quickly Lord Jesus  "You Will Be Hated By Men For My Name's Sake" Matthew 10:22
By David Passmore May 30, 2026
Staying The Course Amidst Isolation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Living in Israel one gets the feeling that the metaphorical walls are closing in. Israel's reputation is being tarnished all over social media and the mainstream media, and this is reflected in massive public disdain towards this country. We are constantly told that there is near consensus amongst academics and commentators that a genocide was committed in Gaza. The very legitimacy of the state is brought into question. The majority of Americans are now hostile towards Israel. There is real fear that the next U.S. administration will turn against Israel. Even if this were to happen passively, by the U.S. refraining from exercising its veto power towards Security Council Resolutions condemning Israeli actions this could be catastrophic. Internally it is a fractured society leaning increasingly right wing which further alienates Israel from world opinion. An example in point is how Ben Gvir mocked the most recent participants of a global aid flotilla to Gaza. Such conduct further agitates outrage at Israel. The left-wing media presents the ruins of Gaza as a mortal wound in Israel's side. When the world observes this level of carnage no degree of public relations can ameliorate the sense of indignation towards Israel. We can liken the situation of Israel to that of a depressed person. All he sees is hopelessness and gloom. But this isn't the first time that the Jewish nation has been faced with such darkness. Things change and we don't know how the geo-political map will reconfigure in the future. We need to ride out this storm and keep going. On a historical note, the situation is reminiscent of what our ancestors faced when we returned from the Babylonian exile to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. Nehemiah was faced with constant lies and conspiracies designed to entrap him by hostile actors: Sanballat the Horonite, Tobiah the Ammonite and Geshem the Arab. They employed deception, slander and ridicule in order to maintain their political eminence. There was also a certain sense of abandonment amongst the Jews in Israel then as in our own day. We read in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah about the anguish of the leadership in Israel concerning the lack of assistance from the Babylonian diaspora towards the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem and the Temple. Only 20% of the exiles returned to the land. It was largely the poor who returned. Most of the affluent, established Jews remained in Exile. This is a continuing theme in Jewish history. It is also important to observe that from its very beginnings there were bible believing Christians who spearheaded the return of the Jews to their land. The idea of organizing a return of the Jews to Israel began as a Protestant Restorationist objective that can be traced to 17th century Puritan England. The protagonists of the Cromwellian Republic viewed themselves as the new Israel fighting the Papist forces of Satan. Alongside this, interest grew in the notion that biblical prophecies pertaining to the return of the Jews to Israel were a necessary precursor for the return of Christ. The growth of the British Empire in the 19th century lent political clout to Christian Restorationism with specific missions to the Jews established. Although there had been a longing to return to Israel as written in the thrice daily Amidah prayer, Jewish Zionism arose in the midst of mid nineteenth century nationalism and was further fermented by European antisemitism. It was an altogether secular enterprise. Although Israel's situation appears rather stark, we can draw strength from the Providence afforded to our ancestors in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah when they too were faced with defamation. This is also an opportunity to grow closer to our natural allies in the evangelical world who from the beginning of Zionism were steadfast supporters of the project to establish a Jewish homeland in Israel.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).