Book of Jonah - Afrikaans

April 1, 2025

Die Boodskap van Jona.

So baie is al gesê oor hierdie pragtige boodskap in die Woord van die Here. Baie mense verwerp vandag hierdie Boek as onwaar, maar die Woord van die Here is Brood vir die siel en die gees van die mens, dit is Voedsel vir die wat wil eet aan die Tafel van die Here.

 

Hand. 24/27: "Hom het God opgewek, nadat Hy die smarte van die dood ontbind het, omdat dit onmoontlik was dat Hy daardeur vasgehou sou word". En Vers 27 wat uit Jesaja en Psalms aangehaal word: 27: "Want U sal my siel nie aan die doderyk oorlaat of u Heilige oorgee om verderwing te sien nie".

Ons sien in die Boek Hebreers dat Abraham bereid was om sy enigste seun te offer, wat ook 'n tipe van Christus is, want hy het geweet dat God sy seun uit dood kan opwek om Sy doel te vervul. Dit is vir ons 'n voorbeeld hoedat iemand in 'n doods situasie geplaas kan word met die sekerheid dat hy / haar opstanding daarin gevind kan word.

Jona Hoofstukke 1­4:

"En die woord van die HERE het gekom tot Jona, die seun van Amíttai, en gesê: Maak jou klaar, gaan heen na die groot stad Ninevé en preek daarteen, want hulle boosheid het opgestyg voor my aangesig. Maar Jona het hom klaargemaak om na Tarsis te vlug, van die aangesig van die HERE af weg; en hy het na Jafo afgegaan en 'n skip gevind wat na Tarsis sou vaar. En hy het die reisgeld daarvoor betaal en daarin geklim om saam met hulle na Tarsis te vaar, van die aangesig van die HERE af weg. Maar die HERE het 'n sterk wind op die see gewerp, en toe daar 'n groot storm op die see ontstaan, het die skip gevaar geloop om skipbreuk te ly.

Toe word die seeliede bang??hulle het elkeen tot sy god geroep en die lading wat in die skip was, in die see gegooi om vir hulle verligting aan te bring. Maar Jona het na die onderste dele van die skip afgeklim en daar gaan lê en vas aan die slaap geraak.

Daarop kom die skeepskaptein na hom toe aan en sê vir hom: Wat makeer jou dat jy so vas slaap? Staan op, roep tot jou God! Miskien sal dié God aan ons dink, sodat ons nie vergaan nie.

Hulle sê toe vir mekaar: Kom en laat ons loot; dan sal ons weet om wie se ontwil hierdie ramp ons getref het. En hulle het geloot, en die lot het op Jona geval. [Spreuke 16:33: In die skoot word die lot gewerp, maar elke beslissing daarvan kom van die HERE.]

En hulle sê vir hom: Vertel ons tog om wie se ontwil hierdie ramp ons getref het? Wat is jou nering? En waar kom jy vandaan? Wat is jou geboorteland, en uit watter volk is jy?

En hy antwoord hulle: Ek is 'n Hebreër, en ek vrees die HERE, die God van die hemel, wat die see en die droë land gemaak het. Toe word die manne baie bang en sê vir hom: Wat het jy nou gedoen! Want die

manne het geweet dat hy van die aangesig van die HERE af wegvlug; want hy het hulle dit te kenne gegee.

Verder sê hulle vir hom: Wat moet ons met jou doen, sodat die see om ons heen kan bedaar? ??want die see het hoe langer hoe onstuimiger geword. En hy antwoord hulle: Neem my en gooi my in die see; dan sal die see om julle heen bedaar; want ek weet dat om my ontwil hierdie groot storm oor julle gekom het. Nogtans het die manne geroei om die skip weer land toe te bring; maar hulle kon nie, omdat die see hoe langer hoe onstuimiger teen hulle geword het.

Toe roep hulle tot die HERE en sê: Ag, HERE, laat ons tog nie vergaan weens die lewe van hierdie man nie, en bring geen onskuldige bloed oor ons nie; want U, HERE, het gedoen na u welbehae. En hulle het Jona geneem en hom in die see gegooi.

En die see het stil geword van sy onstuimigheid. En hulle het Jona geneem en hom in die see gegooi. En die see het stil geword van sy onstuimigheid.

Toe het die manne die HERE gevrees met 'n groot vrees en 'n slagoffer aan die HERE gebring en geloftes gedoen.

En die HERE het 'n groot vis beskik om Jona in te sluk; en Jona was drie dae en drie nagte in die ingewande van die vis. En Jona het tot die HERE sy God gebid uit die ingewande van die vis en gesê: Uit my benoudheid het ek die HERE aangeroep, en Hy het my verhoor; uit die binneste van die doderyk het ek geroep om hulp??U het my stem gehoor.

U tog het my in die diepte gewerp, in die hart van die see, sodat 'n stroom my omring het; al u bare en u golwe het oor my heengegaan. Toe het ek gesê: Ek is weggestoot, weg van u oë; tog sal ek weer u heilige tempel aanskou".

"Waters het my omring tot aan die siel toe, die vloed was rondom my; seegras was om my hoof gedraai. Ek het afgedaal tot by die grondslae van die berge, die grendels van die aarde het my vir altyd ingesluit; maar U het my lewe uit die kuil opgetrek, HERE my God!

Toe my siel in my versmag het, het ek aan die HERE gedink; en my gebed het tot by U gekom in U heilige tempel. Die wat nietige afgode vereer, verlaat die Een wat vir hulle goedertieren is.

Ek daarenteen sal aan U offer met 'n stem van lof; wat ek beloof het, sal ek betaal.

Die heil behoort aan die Here.

Daarop het die HERE die vis beveel om Jona op die droë grond uit te spuug. En die woord van die HERE het vir die tweede maal tot Jona gekom en gesê: Maak jou klaar, gaan heen na die groot stad Ninevé, en verkondig daar die boodskap wat Ek jou sal sê.

Toe maak Jona hom klaar en gaan na Ninevé volgens die woord van die HERE. En Ninevé was 'n ontsaglike groot stad, drie dagreise te voet. En Jona het begin met een dagreis ver die stad in te gaan en het gepreek en gesê: Nog veertig dae, dan word Ninevé verwoes".???}?[Die woord wat hier gebruik word

vir verwoes is "Nechpakeh'??haphak {haw?fak), dit is dieselfde woord wat in Genesis gebruik word by die verwoesting van Sodom en Gomora, dit was die mees verskriklike verwoesting van 'n stad wat deur die Jode vir ons in die Torah opgeteken is. Met die gebruik van hierdie term in die boodskap van Jona is dit duidelik dat hierdie boodskap ook 'n baie ernstige saak is.]

"En die manne van Ninevé het God geglo en 'n vasdag uitgeroep, en groot en klein het hulle met rougewaad beklee. En toe die berig die koning van Ninevé bereik, het hy opgestaan van sy troon en sy mantel afgehaal en in rougewaad gehuld in die as gaan sit.

En hy het in Ninevé laat uitroep en sê: Op las van die koning en sy groot manne??geen mens of dier, beeste of kleinvee mag aan iets proe nie, hulle mag nie wei of water drink nie; maar mens en dier moet 'n rougewaad om hê, en hulle moet ernstig tot God roep, en elkeen moet hom van sy verkeerde weg bekeer en van die onreg wat aan sy hande kleef.

Wie weet of God nie sal omkeer en berou sal hê nie, sodat Hy Hom afwend van die gloed van sy toorn en ons nie vergaan nie? En God het hulle werke gesien dat hulle hul bekeer het van hulle verkeerde weg; toe het God berou gehad oor die onheil wat Hy gesê het dat Hy hulle sou aandoen, en Hy het dit nie gedoen nie.

Maar Jona was hieroor erg ontstemd, en hy het kwaad geword. Toe bid hy tot die HERE en sê: Ag, HERE, het ek dit nie gedink terwyl ek nog in my land was nie? Daarom het ek tevore na Tarsis gevlug; want ek het geweet dat U 'n genadige en barmhartige God is, lankmoedig en groot van goedertierenheid, en Een wat berou het oor die onheil. O HERE, neem dan nou tog my siel van my weg, want dit is vir my beter om te sterwe as om te lewe.

Daarop sê die HERE: Het jy rede om vertoornd te wees? En Jona het die stad verlaat en aan die oostekant van die stad gaan sit. Daar maak hy toe vir hom 'n skerm, en hy gaan daaronder in die skaduwee sit, totdat hy sou sien wat met die stad gebeur.

Toe beskik die HERE God 'n wonderboom en laat dit oor Jona opskiet om te dien as skaduwee oor sy hoof, om hom van sy ontstemdheid te bevry; en Jona was baie bly oor die wonderboom.

Maar God het die volgende môre toe die dag breek, 'n wurm beskik; en dié het die wonderboom gesteek, sodat dit verdor het. En met sonop het God 'n gloeiende oostewind beskik; en toe die son op die hoof van Jona steek, het hy magteloos geword en gewens dat hy mag sterwe, en gesê: Dit is vir my beter om te sterwe as om te lewe. Toe sê God vir Jona: Het jy rede om vertoornd te wees oor die wonderboom? En hy antwoord: Ek het rede om vertoornd te wees tot die dood toe. Verder sê die HERE: Jy wil die wonderboom spaar waar jy geen arbeid aan bestee het nie en wat jy nie grootgemaak het nie, wat in een nag ontstaan en in een nag vergaan het.

Maar Ek mag Ninevé, die groot stad, nie spaar nie waarin meer as honderd en twintig duisend mense is wat die onderskeid tussen hulle regter?? en hulle linkerhand nie weet nie, en baie vee?"

Die klimaat in hierdie gebied is uiters droog en onvrugbaar, en dit is nie dat die lugversorging nie werk nie, nee dit is 'n onheidhoudbare situasie om in te wees!

Die idee dat hulle nie hulle regterhand van hulle linkerhand kon onderskei nie, is volgens die Hebreeuse teks dit: Ons het die term?'Jad'. Die woord vir regter hand is 'yemani, soos in:

Psalm 137:5 "As ek jou vergeet, o Jerusalem, laat my regterhand dan homself vergeet!" [Im eshchachak yerushalim tiscah yemani]

Die Regterhand van die Here in die Bybel.

Ps. 20:6 "Nou weet ek dat die HERE sy gesalfde verlos; Hy sal hom verhoor uit sy heilige hemel met magtige dade van verlossing van sy regterhand".

Die Regterhand in die Ou Testament is 'n tipe van Koning Jesus, en wat basies hier gesê word is dit: "Hierdie heidene ken nie die Weg tot redding nie, hulle ken nie die verkil tussen hulle regter en linker hand nie, en hulle weet nie hoe om hulle self te red nie!"

Dit is die Regterhand van God wat verlossing bring. Dit is kortweg die betekenis van die Hebreeuse term: Die Regterhand.

Wat 'n wonderlike verhaal! Hierdie Boek was geskrywe gedurende die koningskap van Jerobeam, ongeveer tussen die jaar 814?783V.C. Ons weet uit die geskiedenis dat daar 'n monotheïstiese (Geloof in een God) Asiriese koning met die naam van Adad?Nirari rofweg tussen die jare 810??782 V.C geregeer het. (Daar was ook 'n Egiptiese Farao en 'n paar Babiloniese konings wat ook monotheïsties was?Sien die Boek Daniël) Dit is moontlik dat dit hierdie koning was wat hom tot die Ware God bekeer het.

Die Jode was altyd gereken as 'n lig vir die Heidene???net so ook in die Ou Testament. Hulle het dit egter nie op dieselfde manier gedoen as wat dit vandag gedoen word nie, maar redding moes deur die Jode kom soos wat Koning Jesus sê in Joh. 4 dat die Jode Sy getuies aan die Nasies moet wees om die Ware God aan hulle verkondig.

Vandag kla die rabbis dat die Christene onder die Jode die Evangelie bring, maar hulle vergeet dat die Jode hulleself veronderstel is om, volgens die bevel van Moses, die Ware en Enige God aan die Heidene te verkondig, en die feit dat hulle dit nie doen nie is 'n bewys dat hulle nie meer die Ware Judaisme onderhou nie.

Die Verhaal van Jona.

Jona wou nie na Ninevé toe gaan nie, maar hy het 'n baie goeie rede daarvoor gehad.

Hierdie mense was om die minste daarvan te sê, slegte mense, absoluut goddeloos en heidens, en meer nog, Jona as 'n gelowige Jood, wat sy voorganger, Amos, se profesie gelees het, het sekerlik gesien wat ons Hemelse Vader oor Ninevé deur Amos geprofeteer het. Jona het dus 'n Bybelse rede gehad om nie na hierdie stad toe te gaan nie. Dit was nie net dat hy geweet het dat God medelye gehad vir hierdie mense nie, maar hy was seker daarvan dat hulle hom kan doodmaak. Hy het ook geweet dat Ninevé tot 'n oordeel gedoem is soos wat die profeet Nahum geprofeteer het. (Dit het op 'n latere geleenheid

gebeur toe die Nineviete teruggekeer het na die heidense wee.) Ons sien dus dat Jona sekerlik 'n baie goeie rede gehad het om nie te doen wat die Here hom beveel het nie.

Maar kom ons begin by die naam van Jona.

In Hebreeus beteken die naam Jona 'n duif. Wat sou dit beteken? Een betekenis vind ons in Johannes 2:16 waar Koning Jesus die mense uit die tempel uitgedrywe terwyl hulle besig was om handel te dryf met duiwe. (Ons vind dit in Levitikus 14 waar 'n duif 'n offergawe was en wat ook 'n tipe van Christus was soos wat al die ander diere offers ook was) In Hoogliedere 1:15 sê hy dat sy beminde oë het soos 'n duif.

Duiwe is monogamies, hulle het net een maat. In Genesis 8 het Noag eerste 'n onrein voël, n kraai, uitgestuur, maar die tweede voël wat hy uitgestuur het was 'n duif.

In die Nuwe Testament sien ons dat die Heilige Gees soos 'n Duif op Koning Jesus afgedaal het. Al hierdie beelde was vasgelê in die denkes van die Jode en dit het inspraak op die karakter van Jona gemaak, maar die belangrikste inspraak kom uit die Psalms van Dawid.

Ps.55:4?6: "My hart krimp inmekaar in my binneste, en verskrikkinge van die dood het op my geval. Vrees en bewing kom oor my, en angs oordek my. Toe het ek gesê: Ag, had ek maar vlerke soos 'n duif, dan sou ek wegvlieg en wegbly!"

Die idee hier is dit: Dawid wou probeer weg vlug van die rampe wat hom oorgekom het, net soos wat dit die geval was met Jona, hy wou ook weg vlug.

Wat beteken hierdie rampspoed vir ons? Die eerste ding wat ons van die profeet Jona moet verstaan is dieselfde as wat ons moet verstaan van al die Hebreeuse profete.

Elke Hebreeuse profeet was 'n tipe, 'n skaduwee van Christus, 'n Beeld van die Messias.

Deur hulle leer ons wie Christus is, en wat Hy gedoen het. Daar is nie 'n enkele Hebreeuse profeet wie se lewe nie 'n skaduwee of 'n Beeld van die Messias uitgedra het wat ná hulle gekom het nie. Dit is deur Hom wat daar Redding vir alle volke nasies en tale gekom het soos wat die profete oor Hom geprofeteer het.

Kom ons kyk na Jona as 'n tipe van Christus.

2Kon.14:25 is die eerste plek in die Bybel waar ons oor die profeet Jona lees.

"Hy (Jerobeam) het die grondgebied van Israel herower van die ingang na Hamat af tot by die see van die Vlakte, volgens die woord van die HERE, die God van Israel, wat Hy gespreek het deur die diens van sy dienskneg Jona, die seun van Amíttai, die profeet, wat uit Gat?Hefer was".???U moet oplet dat Jona eertstens na sy eie mense, die Jode, gestuur is, en na dit is hy eers na die heidene toe gestuur.

In Matt. 15:24 lees ons die volgende: "Maar Hy antwoord en sê: Ek is net gestuur na die verlore skape van die huis van Israel".

Christus was eerstens uitgestuur na Sy eie mense, die Jode, en eers later was Koning Jesus gestuur na die nie?Jode. Ons sien dat Jona van die plek Gat?Hefer gekom het, Gat?Hefer was binne loop afstand van Nasaret af. Hier is egter iets in die geskiedenis wat baie uniek is oor Jona, iets wat die Sanhedrin heeltemal misgekyk het.

Joh. 7:52,. "Hulle antwoord en sê vir hom: Jy is tog nie ook uit Galiléa nie? Ondersoek en sien dat daar geen profeet uit Galiléa opgestaan het nie." (Of soos wat hulle in dieselfde hoofstuk, vers 41, gesê het)?? "Ander het gesê: Hy is die Christus. En ander het gesê: Kom die Christus dan uit Galiléa?" Geen profeet het van Galiléa af gekom nie?? Hulle was verkeerd, Jona het van Galiléa af gekom! en net Jona en Christus is die enigste twee Profete wat van Galiléa af gekom het.

In Joh.1:4?6 kom 'n baie groot storm, en die woord in Grieks in die Nuwe Testament vir wind is 'Pneuma', en in Hebreeus is dit 'Ruach', maar in albei gevalle is dit ook die woord vir 'gees'.

In hierdie storm wat deur ons Hemelse Vader gestuur is sien ons dat Jona geslaap het terwyl die storm gewoed het terwyl die mense wat saam met hom die skip was angsbevange was. ??'Hoe kan jy slaap terwyl ons en die skip deur die storm besig is om te vergaan?'

Maar op 'n ander plek in die Skrifte sien ons: Markus 4:37?38: "En 'n groot stormwind het opgekom, en die golwe het in die skuit geslaan, sodat dit al vol wou word. Maar Hy was agter op die skuit aan die slaap op die kussing. En hulle het Hom wakker gemaak en vir Hom gesê: "Meester, gee U nie om dat ons vergaan nie?"

Wat met Jona gebeur het was 'n beeld wat met Koning Jesus gebeur het. Jona was 'n voorbeeld van Christus. Laat ons meer verstaan wat hier gesê word.

Jona 1:12: "Neem my en gooi my in die see; dan sal die see om julle heen bedaar; want ek weet dat om my ontwil hierdie groot storm oor julle gekom het".

Jona, uit sy eie keuse, was gewillig om sy lewe af te lê vir redding vir ander mense, ingeslote die heidene. In Joh.10:17?18 sê Koning Jesus: "Daarom het die Vader My lief, omdat Ek my lewe aflê om dit weer te neem. Niemand neem dit van My af nie, maar Ek lê dit uit Myself af. Ek het mag om dit af te lê en Ek het mag om dit weer te neem. Hierdie gebod het Ek van my Vader ontvang"

Jona was gewillig om uit sy eie vrye wil sy lewe af te lê vir redding vir ander, en so was die Messias, wat deur Jona as 'n teebeeld, 'n teken, voorgestel is, ook bereid om Sy Lewe af te lê vir die redding van ander mense.??Lukas 11:30: "Want soos Jona 'n teken was vir die Nineviete, so sal die Seun van die mens ook wees vir hierdie geslag".

Ons weet uit die Boek Konings dat Jona die seun van Amittai was. Hy profeteer gedurende die heerskappy van Jerobeam. [Daar was twee Jerobeams, albei was baie slegte mense en konings] Met die prediking van Jona het die heidene tot bekering gekom maar nie die Jode nie.

Met Christus het die Heidene die Woord van die Here aanvaar, maar die Jode het Hom verwerp, maar nie al die Jode het nie, net soos wat al die Jode ook nie vir Jona verwerp het nie, maar basies was dit net

die Heidene en nie die Jode nie, wat in die dae van Jona tot bekering gekom het net, soos in die geval van Koning Jesus.

Jona 1:16 vertel vir ons dat die Here 'n groot vis bestel het, en in 2:1 'n groot storm. Jona bid in die ingewande van die vis en sê: "?? Uit my benoudheid het ek die HERE aangeroep, en Hy het my verhoor:"

Die Here het die storm bestel en ook die vis. Hierdie was 'n doods ondervinding.

Sommige mense argumenteer uit die Hebreeuse teks dat Jona biologies gesterf het deur die implikasies wat die woord 'sheol' (doderyk) beteken. Maar sekerlik is die bedoeling hier dat dit 'n plek van dood is, en dit was die Here Self wat hierdie plek van dood vir Jona bestel het.

In Handelinge 2:23 lees ons: "Hom, wat deur die bepaalde raad en voorkennis van God oorgelewer is???". En in Jesaja 53:10: "Maar dit het die HERE behaag om Hom te verbrysel;" Jona was deur die Voorkennis van God bestem tot 'n plek van verwoesting en die dood, en net so was Koning Jesus deur die Voorkennis van God bestem vir 'n plek van verwoesting.

Jona het in die see 'gesterf', dit was sy doods ondervinding, of hy nou werklik gesterf het of nie, hy het in die see sy doodservaring gehad.

Psalm 69.

Hierdie is 'n Psalm van Dawid met 'n Messiaanse Profesie in die Hebreeuse Lofsange. In hierdie Psalm lees ons in Vers 21: "En hulle het aan my gal gegee as my spys, en vir my dors het hulle my asyn laat drink". Dit in 'n Profesie wat met Koning Jesus op die Kruis gebeur het, maar hierdie Psalm wat vooruit gegaan het met die dood van Christus, begin met die woorde:} Hoshanna Elohim} "Vir die musiekleier; op die wysie van: "Lelies." 'n Psalm van Dawid. Verlos my, o God, want die waters het tot by die siel gekom". ???Hier sien ons dan dat die dood van Christus metafories in die Hebreeuse Lofsange uitgebeeld word as 'n verdrinkings ondervinding.

Ons sing die pragtige lied: 'When peace like a river attended my soul; when sorrows like sea billows roll"?? wat geskrywe is deur 'n sekere Mnr. Stockwood, en wat baie mense nie geweet het nie, en ek ook nie tot so ongeveer ses jaar gelede, is dat hy hierdie lied gekrywe het nadat sy familie in Jerusalem, van al die plekke, verdrink het terwyl hy besig was met die bou van die Colony Hotel. Die idee van: "Sea Billows roll', was 'n verdrinkings ondervinding wat met sy famillie gebeur het, maar dit is ook 'n Bybelse tipologie wat verwys na die Verdrinkings proses van Koning Jesus soos wat ons in die Psalm lees.

Jona 3:8: "???maar mens en dier moet 'n rougewaad om hê, en hulle moet ernstig tot God roep, en elkeen moet hom van sy verkeerde weg bekeer en van die onreg wat aan sy hande kleef".

Jona roep uit: bekeer julle, bekeer julle, bekeer julle want God gaan die stad binne veertig dae verwoes,?

?en hy gaan voort en in Vers 8 en hy sê dat as hulle tot bekering kom dan sal God miskien nie Ninevé verwoes nie.

Baie mense wil hierdie profesie nou gebruik om valse profesie te regverdig waar mense dinge profeteer wat nie gebeur nie. Hulle wil sê dat die profeet Jona dinge geprofeteer het wat nie gebeur het nie. Maar

die teks maak dit baie duidelik dat hierdie 'n voorwaardelike profesie was: Hy sê baie duidelik dat as hulle nie tot bekering kom nie dan sal God Ninevé verwoes, hy het nie gesê dit gaan gebeur nie! Hierdie is 'n baie onredelike vergelyking met dit waarmee die valse profete van vandag besig is.

Ons sien dat Jona 'n baie direkte boodskap van bekering aan die Nineviete gebring het, want die Here se oordeel was besig om oor hulle te kom.

In Matt.4:17 sien ons: "Van toe af het Jesus begin om te preek en te sê: Bekeer julle, want die koninkryk van die hemele het naby gekom".

Jona bring ook 'n bekerings boodskap sodat die oordele van God afgeweer kan word. Net so ook is dit met Koning Jesus en Sy Dissipels: "Red julleself van 'n bose en verdraaide geslag".

Jona 2: 4 "Toe het ek gesê: Ek is weggestoot, weg van u oë; tog sal ek weer u heilige tempel aanskou". Die Hebreeuse teks sê dat Jona verwyder was voor die Aangesig van God.

Net so sien ons in Matt.27:46: "??en omtrent die negende uur het Jesus met 'n groot stem geroep en gesê: Eli, Eli, lama sabagtáni? Dit is: My God, my God, waarom het U My verlaat?" Net soos wat Jona deur God verlaat is, is Koning Jesus ook verlaat.

Jona 1:17: "En die HERE het 'n groot vis beskik om Jona in te sluk; en Jona was drie dae en drie nagte in die ingewande van die vis."??Net so was Koning Jesus ook drie dae en nagte in die graf. Jona is net soos wat elke ander Israelse profeet was, 'n tipe, 'n beeld van Christus.

Jona getuig van die Messias wat ná hom sal kom, en net so het al die ander profete ook geprofeteer. Al die profete se lewens getuig op die een of ander wyse oor die Messias, en Jona is nie 'n uitsondering nie.

Jona is oorgegee aan hierdie doods ondervinding, maar daar was dinge in die lewe van Jona wat hom verhoed het om te doen wat die Here van hom verlang het om te doen. Hy het die Wil van God weerstaan toe hy nie wou doen wat God hom beveel het om te doen nie, maar dit was ook nie sonder 'n baie goeie rede nie want hy het geweet wat Amos oor hierdie nasie geprofeteer het, en hy het geweet dat hierdie mense sleg was. Wie wil nou na 'n plek toe gaan waar hulle jou gaan doodmaak?

B) Hy het ook nie die medelye van God gehad nie, hy het egter die Oordeel en die toorn van God verstaan, maar hy het nie die medelye van God gehad nie, en hy was ook baie goed om te kan kla, want hy het oor alles gekla. Maar hy was iemand wat 'n baie goeie rede gehad het om oor te kla teen dit wat God hom beveel het om te doen, want dit wat die Here hom gevra het om te doen was vir hom 'n baie moeilike saak. Hy moes na mense toe gaan wat hy niks van gehou het nie, mense wat hom gaan haat omdat hy nie een van hulle is nie. In terme van die ou tyd was hy van die Weste en hulle van die Ooste.

En by wyse van die feit dat hy 'n Hebreer was, 'n Gelowige in die Ware God, en dat hy nie 'n heiden was nie, en dat hy van die Weste, die gekende Wêreld af gekom het, en hulle van die Ooste, het van hom net om daarna toe te gaan, 'n teiken gemaak. Hierdie dinge was geldige menslike redes vir sy teenkanting om nie te doen wat die Here hom beveel het nie.

Hy kon absoluut nie verstaan hoedat God medelye kon gehad het vir hierdie heidene nie.

Dit sou vir my dieselfde gewees het as om na 'n fondamentel Moslem toe te gaan, of dit sal wees soos vir 'n Jood om die Evangelie aan 'n Duitser te gaan bring.

Die Jona binne in ons.

Die Woord van die Here het twee keer tot Jona gekom. Die betekenis van die woord vir 'Woord' in Hebreeus is 'Dabar'en in Grieks is dit 'Logos' Dit beteken nie net 'n boodskap nie, dit beteken meer 'n persoon. Jesus Christus is die 'Dabar / Logos' in die Bybel.

In die Ou Testament was die Heilige Gees net vir sekere mense in sekere omstandighede en tye, Hoë priesters, konings en profete, maar die Heilige Gees het Jesus Christus aan almal verkondig soos wat dit vandag met ons die geval is.

Dit was net Koning Jesus se identiteit wat nie teenwoordig was nie, maar dit was in alle gevalle Hy wat verteenwoordig was / is. Die Woord het na ons toe gekom, wat beteken dat Koning Jesus self na hulle gekom het. In die Tuin van Eden toe Adam die Here in die tuin hoor wandel het was dit Jesus wat daar was.

Toe Jakob met die Engel (Die Metatron) van God geworstel het was dit Koning Jesus self. Koning Jesus was in die Ou Testament dieselfde as in die Nuwe Testament. Toe die Woord van die Here gekom het, was dit 'n ontmoeting met Christus self.

Wanneer die Here vir ons iets vra om te doen wat ons nie wil doen nie, of as daar iets in ons karakter is wat die werk van die Here ondermyn, dat gaan die Here nie net vir ons 'n boodskap gee nie, nee, Hy gaan self na ons toe kom.

Koning Jesus gaan voor ons staan, en ons gaan Hom 'sien'. Die boodskap gaan baie duidelik tot ons deurkom as Hy na ons toe gekom het, en ons gaan baie sekerlik weet wat met ons verkeerd is. Dit is 'n ontmoeting met die Persoon Self.

Wanneer Christus na ons toe kom en ons voor Hom verskyn dan sal ons absoluut weet waar ons staan. In die Hebreeuse families het die Jode normaal weg hulle kinders vernoem na hulle afgestorwe families, en in die Bybel, in die geskiedenis van Israel het hulle, hulle kinders vernoem na die Bybelse karakters.

In die Hebreerse denke as iemand die seun van iemand is, dan is dit nie noodwendig iemand se nakomeling nie, maar dit kan ook beteken dat die seun in die karakter van 'n sekere persoon is.

In Matt.16:17 sê Koning Jesus aan Petrus: "Geseënd is jy Simon bar Jona"???Dit is natuurlik in Aramees en nie Hebreeus nie, in Hebreeus sou dit 'Ben?Jona' gewees het. Nou hoekom het Koning Jesus hom op sy van en voornaam genoem?

Sy vader se naam was egter Jona, maar daar is meer hieraan verbonde. Dit is egter wonderbaar dat Petrus se naam ook Bar?Jona was, want hy was in die karakter van die profeet Jona, en so is u en ek ook.

Hier was hulle in 'n plek met die naam van Caesarea Philippi, 'n plek waar die Grieke die god Pan aanbid het, en ook 'n plek waar die Romeine die Keiser Augustus aanbid het.

Hier in Matt. 16:22 was Petrus baie ongelukkig en hy wou gehad het dat Christus hierdie heidene moet veroordeel omdat hulle die heilige Land verontreinig het, net soos in die geval van Jona wat wou gehad het dat God die Nineviete moes oordeel. Jona wou nie na die heidene toe gaan nie, en net so wou Petrus wat in die karakter van Jona was, ook nie na die heidene toe gaan nie.

In Handelinge 10 lees ons die verhaal van Cornelius en die onrein voedsel, Petrus wou net soos Jona niks tedoen hê met die heidene nie. Koning Jesus sê vir Petrus dat hy in die karakter van Jona is omdat hy niks met hierdie Romeine en Grieke te doen wil hê nie. Hy wou nie gaan waar die Here hom heen gestuur het nie.

Kyk na Johannes 21:18: "Voorwaar, voorwaar Ek sê vir jou, (Jesus praat hier met Petrus) toe jy jonger was, het jy jouself gegord en rondgegaan waar jy wou; maar wanneer jy oud geword het, sal jy jou hande uitsteek, en 'n ander een sal jou gord en bring waar jy nie wil wees nie."

Petrus, in die karakter van Jona, wou nie gaan waar die Here hom heen gestuur het nie.

Kyk na Galasiërs 2:11?12, Jona het 'n veroordeelde houding teen die Nie?Jode gehad wat veroorsaak het dat hy 'n gedrags probleem gehad het, net so in die geval van Petrus?? V11?12: "Maar toe Petrus in Antiochíë gekom het, het ek hom openlik teëgestaan, omdat hy veroordeeld gestaan het". Want voordat sommige van Jakobus af gekom het, was hy gewoond om saam met die heidene te eet; maar ná hulle koms het hy hom teruggetrek en hom eenkant gehou uit vrees vir die wat uit die besnydenis is".

Net soos in die geval van Jona, was Petrus ook in die karakter van Jona.

Daar was 'n rede waarom Jona om nie iets met die heidene te doen wou hê nie, want hy het gelees wat Amos van hulle gesê het. Hy het geweet wat God met hulle sou gaan doen het, en hy was nie verkeerd nie. Maar hy kon nie die Medelye van God vir hierdie mense insien en verstaan nie.

Dit maak nie saak hoe sleg mense is nie, want die oomblik wanneer God tot ons nader en ons voor Koning Jesus te staan kom dan sal ons weet en sien hoe sleg ons ook is, as ons onsself met Koning Jesus vergelyk.

Die Here bestel 'n groot storm en Jona word in die see gegooi, en God bestel 'n dood en hy word begrawe in 'n buik van 'n groot vis onder die Middellandse see iewers tussen Turkye en Tel?Aviv.

Hierdie is 'n spesifieke ondervinding wat in die Woord van die Here vir ons opgeteken is wat ons Teologies leer van die lewe na die dood. Maar dit is ook een van die dinge wat iets aan ons openbaar oor Koning Jesus. Toe Christus aan die Kruis vir ons sondes gesterf het, kon Sy Vader Hom nie bystaan nie, maar die Stem van ons Hemelse Vader het Koning Jesus uit die doderyk opgewek.

Handelinge 2:24 vertel vir ons: "Hom het God opgewek, nadat Hy die smarte van die dood ontbind het, omdat dit onmoontlik was dat Hy daardeur vasgehou sou word. Die Doderyk, die dood en die graf kon nie onse Here vashou nie.

2Kor. 4:8?14: "Want ons wil nie hê, broeders, dat julle onbekend moet wees met ons verdrukking wat oor ons in Asië gekom het nie, dat ons dit bo ons krag uitermate swaar gehad het, sodat ons selfs aan ons lewe gewanhoop het. Ja, ons het al self by onsself die doodvonnis oor ons gehad, sodat ons nie op onsself sou vertrou nie, maar op God wat die dode opwek; wat ons verlos het uit so 'n groot doodsgevaar en nog verlos; op wie ons hoop dat Hy ook nog sal verlos, terwyl julle ook vir ons saamwerk deur die gebed, sodat daar vir die genadegawe aan ons deur baie persone op baie maniere vir ons gedank mag word.

Want ons roem is dit: die getuienis van ons gewete dat ons in eenvoudigheid en reinheid van God, nie in vleeslike wysheid nie, maar in die genade van God in die wêreld verkeer het, en veral by julle. Want ons skryf aan julle niks anders as wat julle lees of ook verstaan nie, en ek hoop dat julle dit ook tot die einde toe sal verstaan, soos julle ook gedeeltelik van ons verstaan het dat ons julle roem is, net soos julle ook ons roem is in die dag van die Here Jesus".

Soos wat die profeet Hosea dit gestel het in 6:2; die Opstanding van Koning Jesus Christus is ons opstanding, omdat Sy Dood ook ons dood is. Hosea sê: "Hy sal ons ná twee dae lewend maak, op die derde dag ons laat opstaan, sodat ons voor sy aangesig kan lewe".

Kon die dood Koning Jesus vashou? Nee! Kan die dood vir u en vir my deur Koning Jesus Christus vashou???Nee!

Daar is nie 'n tekort aan dinge in my lewe wat die Opdragte van my Here teenstaan nie, en somtyds voel ek dat ek besig is om te sterf as gevolg van die pyne in my liggaam waaroor ek gedurig deur kla, ook wanneer ek kla oor die mense en kerke wat my werke en myself verwerp omdat ek nie saam met hulle stem nie. Maar toe ontvang ek 'n brief van my Christen broer wat vertel van sy werk vir die Here in absolute haaglike omstandighede waar hulle totaal nie instaat is om hulleself te onderhou nie. Dan kyk ek na my eie lewe en dan sien ek dat my kinders 'n dak oor hulle koppe het, en dat hulle altyd genoeg het om te eet en aan te trek. Wat het ek om oor te kla? Ja, my nek is seer, maar ek het pille wat ek kan drink vir die pyn. Daar is mense met erge pyne as ek, wat nie geld het om pille te koop nie! Dan vra ek waarom moet ek elke dag sterwe vir die saak van die Here?

Hoekom is dit so dat al die bedienings wat staan vir die Waarheid, altyd sukkel met geld terwyl die vervalsers altyd genoeg daarvan het? Dit is omdat hulle ook vir geld stry, maar al wat hulle bereik is 'n groter afvalligheid. Eerlike en opregte bedienings stry vir die Waarheid en die Geloof in God en nie vir geld ook nie.

Die dood werk in my, hoekom? Omdat ek die Waarheid omhoog hou.

Wanneer ek standpunt inneem teen die valshede dan sê hulle ek is ongebalanseerd.

Wat sê God vir my deur al hierdie dinge? Wat sê die Here vir jou en my wanneer ons in die ingewande van die vis is? Onthou Koning Jesus het gesê dat Hy soos Jona is.

Dit het vir ons Here an die Kruis voorgekom of Sy Hemelse Vader hom verlaat het. Ons gedrag is nie redeloos nie, ons het 'n rede om so te voel maar ons is in 'n baie slegte situasie. Somtyds het ons nie 'n werk nie, somtyds is ons in 'n finansieële gemors, somtyds het ons gesondheids probleme, probleme in die kerke, en dit wil voorkom asof ons God verlate is. Hy plaas ons in 'n graf. O' Nee, tog nie die Nineviete nie!, ook nie die Mormone of die Moslems nie!

Die Here plaas ons in die doderyk.

Maar die dood kon Jesus Christus nie hou nie, en die dood kan jou en my ook nie hou nie. Ek het dit al duisende kere gesê dat die toets vir 'n ware Christen nie is dat hulle nie verdrukkinge sal hê nie, in teenstelling, as u nie verdrukkinge het nie dan is u nie 'n ware Christen nie.

Nee die toets is nie om in die vis se buik te beland nie, die toets is wat gebeur as jy binne in die vis se buik is.

Blaai na Psalm 18:4?6. Daar is direkte verbindtenisse met dit wat met Jona gebeur het toe hy in die ingewande van die vis was.

"Bande van die dood het my omring, en strome van onheil het my oorval. Bande van die doderyk was rondom my; strikke van die dood het my teëgekom.

Toe ek benoud was, het ek die HERE aangeroep, en ek het tot my God geroep om hulp; Hy het my stem uit sy paleis gehoor, en my hulpgeroep voor sy aangesig het in sy ore gekom".

Ons is miskien uit die Gesigsveld van ons Hemelse Vader, maar Hy Hoor as ons na Hom Roep. Psalm 42:7: "Die vloed roep na die vloed by die gedruis van u waterstrome; al u bare en u golwe het oor my heengegaan".

Psalm 116:3?9: "Bande van die dood het my omring, en angste van die doderyk het my getref; ek het benoudheid en kommer gevind. Maar ek het die Naam van die HERE aangeroep: Ag, HERE, red my siel. Die HERE is genadig en regverdig, en onse God is 'n ontfermer. Die HERE bewaar die eenvoudiges; ek het swak geword, maar Hy het my gehelp. My siel, keer terug tot jou rus; want die HERE het goed aan jou gedoen. Want U het my siel gered van die dood, my oog van trane, my voet van struikeling. Ek sal wandel voor die aangesig van die HERE in die lande van die lewendes.

Al sterf ons, is daar nog steeds 'n opstanding vir ons, want daar is 'n Millennium Koninkryk: Vers 15: 15 "Kosbaar is in die oë van die HERE die dood van sy gunsgenote.

Al sterwe ons sal ons Hom nie in die land van die dooies sien nie maar in die land van die Lewendes. : Job19:25?27: "Maar ek, ek weet: My Verlosser leef; en Hy sal as laaste oor die stof opstaan. En nadat hulle so my vel afgeskeur het, sal ek nogtans uit my vlees God aanskou; Hom wat ék sal aanskou my ten goede, en my oë??en geen vreemde nie???"

Al sterwe ons sal ons nogtans die Goeie van onse Here in die Land van die Lewendes sien!

Dawid skrywe : "Uit die dieptes het ek na U geroep O' HERE"

Wanneer ons in hierdie dieptes is, dan is ons nie in die teenwoordigheid van die Here nie, Ons Argumente kan grondig wees, al is dit vir ons self, maar as ons in die ingewande van die vis is en die waters is besig om ons te verdring dan is ons nie besig om te verdrink nie, want ons is al reeds verdrink en die tralies van die doderyk laat vir ons geen gaping om die Here ons God te aanskou nie, ons het uit die Gesigsveld van die Here u God verdwyn. Maar hierdie Psalms vertel ons nie dat die Here onse God ons sien nie, Nee, Hulle sê Hy 'hoor' ons. En net op hierdie oomblik, alleenlik op hierdie oomblik, sal die vis ons uitspuug op die strand. Jona moes baie sleg gelyk en guruik het, maar hy was reg vir aksie!.

Wanneer ons deur so 'n gemors gegaan het dan sal ons heelwaarskynlik ook nie so goed voel en lyk nie, en ons sal heelwaarskynlik 'n paar liter reukweerder nodig hê, maar ons sal gereed wees vir aksie! Soos wat Paulus sê, sy dood is ons dood, en net so is sy opstanding ons opstanding. Die dood kan hom nie hou nie, en ook nie vir ons nie. Net soos wat Hosea ook gesê het. Die doderyk kon Koning Jesus nie hou nie, en hy kan ons ook nie hou nie.

Miskien gaan ons al onder vir die derde keer, en God roep ons om dinge vir Hom te doen wat ons nie wil doen nie, en ons weet dat daar dinge in ons karakter is wat nie die Karakter van Jesus Christus verteenwoordig nie, net soos in die geval van Petrus en Jona. Daar is Storms wat deur God self gestuur is, en daar is 'n vis wat wag op sy ete, en dit is ons.

Terwyl ons in die dieptes van elende, in die buik van die vis is, is daar valse leraars wat ongestoord voortgaan met hulle valshede, maar die Hand van die Here het teen ons opgekom en nie teen hulle nie. Alles is teen ons, geestelik en emosioneel!

Jona 2:3?9: "U tog het my in die diepte gewerp, in die hart van die see, sodat 'n stroom my omring het; al u bare en u golwe het oor my heengegaan.

Toe het ek gesê: Ek is weggestoot, weg van u oë; tog sal ek weer u heilige tempel aanskou. Waters het my omring tot aan die siel toe, die vloed was rondom my; seegras was om my hoof gedraai. Ek het afgedaal tot by die grondslae van die berge, die grendels van die aarde het my vir altyd ingesluit; maar U het my lewe uit die kuil opgetrek, HERE my God! Toe my siel in my versmag het, het ek aan die HERE gedink; en my gebed het tot by U gekom in u heilige tempel.

Die wat nietige afgode vereer, verlaat die Een wat vir hulle goedertieren is.

Ek daarenteen sal aan U offer met 'n stem van lof; wat ek beloof het, sal ek betaal. Die heil behoort aan die HERE".

Toe ek Wedergebore is het ek 'n gelofte afgelê, ek het belowe dat ek Jesus Christus as die HERE van my lewe sal aanneem. Hy is die Een wat my verlos het. Hy is die Een wat vir my 'n nuwe lewe gegee het, en ek het belowe om my lewe vir Hom te gee, en elke keer wat ek sondig dan verbreek ek hierdie gelofte, en elke keer wat ek nie my Koning se Wil nakom nie dat verbreek ek hierdie gelofte. Ek het 'n gelofte

gemaak, maar elke keer as dit by betaal kom, dan het ek 'n geldige argument om dit nie te doen nie. Wanneer ons 'n gelofte aan die Here gemaak het, moet ons maar liewer betaal wat ons aan Hom verskuldig is want Hy sal ons nie laat vry kom nie. Die storms en die vis gaan verseker kom, hierdie vis gaan ons eet, maar die vis kon nie vir Jona inhou nie, en hy sal ons ook nie kan inhou nie. Wat met ons gebeur, gebeur nie sonder 'n rede nie en die vis sal ons ook op die strand uitspuug. Ek dink almal van ons behoort Bar?Jona genoem te word.

Ek is seker dat so 'n naam my sekerlik sal pas! Somtyds wil die golwe my ook oorspoel en my verdrink, en al bestaan hierdie golwe uit mense, dan is die vraag vir my en u;??Wat wil my Here vir my daardeur sê?

Ek weet nie wat Hy vir u sê nie en baie keer weet ek nie eens wat Hy vir my wil sê nie, maar dit weet ek, dat die enigste plek waar ek somtyds kan weet wat die Here my God vir my wil sê, is in die buik van die vis. Dit maak nie saak in watter omstandighede u u bevind nie, al voel dit vir u of die Here u verlaat het, kan hierdie vis u nie inhou nie.

Die graf kon nie onse Here Jesus Christus nie vashou nie. Ek weet nie wat se soort vis gaan u insluk nie, ek weet ook nie in wat se graf u is nie, maar dit weet ek, as u in die wee van die Here wandel dan sal hierdie vis u nie kan inhou nie.

Die Seën van die Here vir u almal. †††


By David Passmore May 30, 2026
Staying The Course Amidst Isolation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Living in Israel one gets the feeling that the metaphorical walls are closing in. Israel's reputation is being tarnished all over social media and the mainstream media, and this is reflected in massive public disdain towards this country. We are constantly told that there is near consensus amongst academics and commentators that a genocide was committed in Gaza. The very legitimacy of the state is brought into question. The majority of Americans are now hostile towards Israel. There is real fear that the next U.S. administration will turn against Israel. Even if this were to happen passively, by the U.S. refraining from exercising its veto power towards Security Council Resolutions condemning Israeli actions this could be catastrophic. Internally it is a fractured society leaning increasingly right wing which further alienates Israel from world opinion. An example in point is how Ben Gvir mocked the most recent participants of a global aid flotilla to Gaza. Such conduct further agitates outrage at Israel. The left-wing media presents the ruins of Gaza as a mortal wound in Israel's side. When the world observes this level of carnage no degree of public relations can ameliorate the sense of indignation towards Israel. We can liken the situation of Israel to that of a depressed person. All he sees is hopelessness and gloom. But this isn't the first time that the Jewish nation has been faced with such darkness. Things change and we don't know how the geo-political map will reconfigure in the future. We need to ride out this storm and keep going. On a historical note, the situation is reminiscent of what our ancestors faced when we returned from the Babylonian exile to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. Nehemiah was faced with constant lies and conspiracies designed to entrap him by hostile actors: Sanballat the Horonite, Tobiah the Ammonite and Geshem the Arab. They employed deception, slander and ridicule in order to maintain their political eminence. There was also a certain sense of abandonment amongst the Jews in Israel then as in our own day. We read in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah about the anguish of the leadership in Israel concerning the lack of assistance from the Babylonian diaspora towards the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem and the Temple. Only 20% of the exiles returned to the land. It was largely the poor who returned. Most of the affluent, established Jews remained in Exile. This is a continuing theme in Jewish history. It is also important to observe that from its very beginnings there were bible believing Christians who spearheaded the return of the Jews to their land. The idea of organizing a return of the Jews to Israel began as a Protestant Restorationist objective that can be traced to 17th century Puritan England. The protagonists of the Cromwellian Republic viewed themselves as the new Israel fighting the Papist forces of Satan. Alongside this, interest grew in the notion that biblical prophecies pertaining to the return of the Jews to Israel were a necessary precursor for the return of Christ. The growth of the British Empire in the 19th century lent political clout to Christian Restorationism with specific missions to the Jews established. Although there had been a longing to return to Israel as written in the thrice daily Amidah prayer, Jewish Zionism arose in the midst of mid nineteenth century nationalism and was further fermented by European antisemitism. It was an altogether secular enterprise. Although Israel's situation appears rather stark, we can draw strength from the Providence afforded to our ancestors in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah when they too were faced with defamation. This is also an opportunity to grow closer to our natural allies in the evangelical world who from the beginning of Zionism were steadfast supporters of the project to establish a Jewish homeland in Israel.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 25, 2026
Signs of the Times Tony Pearce ‍ ‍ Left, right or center – is our democracy in danger “Things fall apart, the center does not hold. Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.” W.B Yeats ‘The Second Coming. ’ ‍ ‍ Labour’s losses in the council elections and the battle for succession to their unpopular leader Kier Starmer have raised the possibility that we may soon have our seventh Prime Minister in ten years. Local elections saw Reform and the Greens make sweeping gains, leading Green Party leader, Zack Polanski to say that we are seeing ‘the end of the old two party system’. Maybe we are. In which case what comes next? Will we head to the far left, the far right or will the center hold on to power? Or will it end with ungovernable chaos as unqualified people take control of local and national government? Behind all this there are fundamental questions, ‘What is government for? Who does it represent and where is it going?’ ‍ ‍‍ ‍ According to the Bible (Romans 13) the purpose of government is to promote good and restrain evil. The government has the right to raise taxes for the common good of society and people should pay them. In 1 Timothy 2 Paul encourages us to pray for the government that ‘we may live a godly and peaceable life’. In other words, pray that the government will create an orderly and peaceful society and not interfere with our right to set up communities that teach and preach the Word of God. The situation becomes more difficult when we see government promoting things which are harmful and restraining things which are good and clamping down on freedom of speech with a threat to our ability to live a ‘godly and peaceable life’ ‍ Since becoming a Christian in my early twenties, I have wrestled with the question of how our faith applies to contemporary political issues. I started this quest on the left politically after leaving university and working as an English teacher with sympathies for Marxism. I then became a born again Christian in 1970, and joined my late wife Nikki in evangelizing the radical left, by handing out leaflets at their marches and demonstrations in London and attending their meetings to discuss matters of faith and politics with them. ‍ ‍‍ ‍ We had some good discussions with people and hope we made some consider the Christian alternative. However as we looked at Marxism from a Christian point of view and its practice in Communist countries, we understood that behind this ideology there is a strong anti-christian spirit. It denies the existence of God and promotes the idea of human perfectibility by our own effort. This is exemplified in the words of the Internationale, the socialist battle hymn, ‘No saviour from on high delivers, no faith have we in prince or peer, our own right hand the chains will shiver, chains of hatred, greed and fear.’ This Antichrist spirit led to the persecution of Christians in the Communist countries of eastern Europe, the Soviet Union and China. Far from creating the socialist paradise on earth that Lenin wrote about in ‘Socialism and Religion’, it created a society ruled by hatred, greed and fear, controlled by secret police, prison camps and responsible for the death of millions. ‍ ‍ In western society we have witnessed the growth of ‘cultural Marxism’ a movement aimed at infiltrating and changing society from within, rather than fomenting the workers’ revolution. Labour’s Fabian Society, with its (now discarded) logo of the wolf in sheep’s clothing, has been engaged in this process since the beginning of the 20th century. Social change really took off with the permissive society in the 1960s, which succeeded in changing traditional values, especially in the area of sex and the family. It replaced biblical values with a new ‘morality’ that is fundamentally anti Christian. These ideas have permeated large swathes of our society including the education system, the judiciary, the Civil Service, much of the media, mainstream political parties (including even the Conservative ‘wets’ and parts of the established church). ‍ ‍ Melanie Phillips describes the results of this in her book, ‘The Builder’s Stone.’ ‘Having decided that the West was rotten to the core, western elites set out to create a new culture that would usher in the brotherhood of man and eradicate hatred, prejudice, and war. Their Brave New World junked biblical religion with all its constraints on behaviour and revolved instead around self gratification. Everybody had the right to live as they wanted; nobody could say that their way of life was better or worse than anyone else’s; no one had the right to say that their culture was better than any other culture. That was ‘racism.’ At the heart of all this was the doctrine that there was no such thing as objective truth. Everything was relative; everything was a matter of opinion. Because there was no truth feelings became more important than facts. So the West abandoned the codes of morality, conscience, truth and lies, personal responsibility, and duty to others in favour of a culture of the self. In the process it junked its inherited traditions and biblical codes on which western culture was based.’ ‍ Britain changed from being a society that respected values based on the 10 Commandments and the teaching of Jesus Christ to one that discarded them for relative values. Ideas of ‘diversity, inclusion and equity’ became the norm, together with and a form of ‘tolerance’, that is really very intolerant if you oppose it. This ‘tolerance’ means accepting the virtues of multiculturalism and humanism and believing that all gods are equally valid or true (or none are). We must also accept that all lifestyles and family arrangements including homosexual and transsexual ones are just as valid as traditional two parent heterosexual families, with a father and mother committed to each other in lifelong matrimony looking after their own children. ‍ As society accepts this radical change in how we view culture, morality and religion, we are told not to criticize other cultures and world views or imply that they are anything less than equal to the culture, morality and faith derived from the Bible. ‍ All this has not improved society. Instead we have a collapse of values with no central idea to hold it together, just a group of competing ‘communities’ which are often only united in opposition to the traditional values and culture of Great Britain. A good example of this is the ‘red – green alliance’ of radical leftists and Islamists who come together to denounce Israel and campaign to ‘globalise the Intifada’. In practice this means a world wide war against Israel and Judaeo-Christian society and a desire to replace it with their version of either Islamism or Communism. However if one of them were to come to power, you can be sure that the Islamist’s would get rid of the leftists or vice versa. In fact that happened in Iran’s 1979 revolution, when Islamist supporters of Khomeini and Communists came together to get rid of the Shah. Then the Islamists seized power, turned on the Communists and wiped them out. ‍ Alisteir Heath wrote in the Daily Telegraph: ‘Ruined by decades of political vandalism, the Britain we knew and loved, a land of stability, pragmatism, and ancient freedoms, is no more. Today’s UK is uglier, impoverished, volatile and disorderly. We’ve lost our level-headedness. Anger and frustration have become our defining emotions. Our institutions have wasted away, and we have been taught to despise our history. The decline of family, community and faith have led to alienation, dependence on welfare and the rise of novel ideologies, mostly secular but also sectarian, turbocharged by social media. While the state becomes unnervingly authoritarian, the air reeks of insurrection and every variety of extremism. The British public’s sense of betrayal is as well-founded as it is dangerous. The machinery of state is incompetent and self-serving, a vehicle for social engineering in the global interest.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ Criticism of this process now risks being classed as ‘hate crime’ with a growing authoritarian society monitoring social media posts and public teaching of alternative ideas in ways which risk shutting down free speech in our society. A Christian teacher Enoch Burke is currently in prison in Dublin after he was suspended from his job and jailed after refusing to accept and teach transgenderism in the school. ‍ ‍ ‍ Nick Timothy, Shadow Secretary of State for Justice, got into trouble when he questioned mass Muslim prayer in Trafalgar Square. He wrote: ‘Mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. The adhan – which declares there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger – is, when called in a public place, a declaration of domination. The domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook.” He is right in this. Allah hu Akhbar actually means Allah is greater, greater than your God, Muhammad is greater than Jesus and the Koran is greater than the Bible. ‍ ‍ ‍ Tim Dieppe of Christian Concern for our Nation wrote: “The fact that we have mass Islamic prayer in Trafalgar Square at all is indicative of the massive culture change that we have seen in the last few decades. A culture change that was not voted for or ever agreed to by the British people. And, a culture change that can hardly be described as having been entirely beneficial to our culture as a whole. I only need to mention grooming gangs involving mostly Pakistani Muslim men , sharia courts, honour crimes, terror attacks, the assassination of an MP, an attempt to blockade Parliament, mass antisemitic marches through London, a convicted terrorist standing for local elections, sectarianism, and many other examples to make the point. Earlier this month, the Government gave Muslims special protection with the adoption of an official definition of anti-Muslim hostility .” ‍ ‍ ‍ You are not really supposed to question this in public life today. A message circulating on social media is an apt commentary on all this. ‘First they overlook evil, then they permit evil, then they legalise evil, then they promote evil, then celebrate evil, then persecute those who call it evil.’ Soviet dissident Solzhenitsyn wrote: ‘A Communist system can be recognised by how it spares criminals and criminalises its opponents.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ The root cause of all this is the rejection of God and biblical values. The 18th-century French philosopher Joseph de Maistre coined the phrase "people get the government they deserve." David Pawson followed up on this idea, arguing that in democratic societies like ours, the moral and spiritual condition of a nation's citizens is directly reflected in the leaders they elect. If the general public abandons moral truths, they will inevitably vote for governments that reflect those same compromises. David Pawson taught that God may use governmental leadership to judge or bless a nation, depending on the people's obedience. He noted that Hebrew prophets saw wicked rulers as a form of divine judgement on a society that has strayed from God's laws. Therefore a nation's ultimate hope rests on repentance rather than just political change. His conclusion is that Christians should actively stand for moral truth in society. He believed that the church is meant to influence culture upward, and that a decline in national morality inevitably leads to deteriorating governance. ‍ ‍ ‍ Sadly much of the church today has become the ‘salt that has lost its savour’ through compromise with antichristian forces in society and government. It may be too late to save our country and western democracy as social and economic pressures create a collapse of democracy and push us either towards anarchy or dictatorship. ‍ ‍ ‍ Yeats’ poem quoted at the beginning of this article ends with the enigmatic line ‘Some rough beast slouches towards Bethlehem to be born.’ Most likely he is referring to the coming anti-Messiah who is labelled the Beast in the book of Revelation. Many believe his is now waiting in the wings to replace the true Messiah (born in Bethlehem) and bring in the dictatorship prophesied in Revelation 13. The Bible indicates that the Beast or Antichrist will have power for a moment, but it will be short lived and doomed to destruction at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to the earth. Then the kingdoms of this world will become the kingdom of our God and of His Messiah and He shall reign forever and ever (Revelation 11.15) and the ‘government shall be on His shoulder’ (Isaiah 9.6). ‍ ‍ ‍ Maranatha come Lord Jesus. ‍ ‍ ‍ Water, water nowhere and not a drop to drink. (Apologies to the Ancient Mariner) ‍ ‍‍ ‍ While nations worry about supply of oil and gas as a result of the war in the Gulf and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a much more vital commodity for human survival is water. And it is in short supply in a growing number of nations. ‍ ‍ As of 2026, over 25 countries face extremely high water stress, with the most severe crises located in the Middle East and North Africa. This region is home to the world's most water-stressed nations, including Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Yemen, and Libya. India and Pakistan face critical water scarcity due to overexploitation of aquifers and population density. Much of Africa , Somalia and Ethiopia in particular are facing severe shortages due to drought and climate change. Mexico and parts of the United States (particularly Texas and the west coast) are experiencing significant water shortages and declining groundwater levels. ‍ ‍ ‍ Iran is facing a severe, multi-year water crisis as of May 2026, with major cities like Tehran, Mashhad, and Karaj approaching the point where taps could run dry due to depleted reservoirs. Groundwater is depleted across most of the country, and nineteen provinces are experiencing severe drought. The crisis is driven by a combination of climate change and decades of poor water management, including excessive dam construction and inefficient, water-intensive agriculture. China is facing a severe, multi-faceted water crisis defined by extreme scarcity in the north, widespread pollution, and mismanagement, threatening its food supply and economic growth. ‍ ‍ ‍ Several countries are significantly affected by upstream dam construction that reduces downstream water flow, causing, environmental, and diplomatic crises. These countries include Iraq, heavily impacted by dams built on the Tigris and Euphrates rivers by Turkey and Iran, leading to reduced water for agriculture, destruction of forests, and increased sandstorms. Egypt and Sudanface significant water security risks due to the Ethiopian Grand Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile. Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Laosare affected of dams built by China on the upper Mekong River ‍ ‍ One country which bucks this trend is Israel. Israel manages its water resources by transforming a chronic shortage into a surplus through large-scale desalination, extensive wastewater recycling, and a centralised national water carrier system. The agriculture sector has shifted away from freshwater, using treated effluent instead. Advanced drip irrigation technologies are widely used to minimise waste. Israel has exported its water technologies to countries around the world, particularly Africa where it has given advice on how to use limited water resources to great effect. ‍ ‍ ‍ Without water no society on earth can survive. Bible prophecies indicate that water shortage and pollution will be a global problem in the last days. Most obviously no water equals no food, so famine is an inevitable result of water shortages. Jesus warned of this as a sign of the last days in Matthew 24.7. Revelation 8.10-11 speaks of something called ‘Wormwood’ falling on rivers and springs of water causing it to become bitter and many to die from drinking it. ‍ ‍ Prophecy speaks of the two great rivers of the ancient world, the Nile and the Euphrates, being affected by a crisis causing the Euphrates to dry up (Revelation 16.12) and the Nile to become contaminated and its waters turn foul (Isaiah 19.5-11). Isaiah 24 speaks of a curse devouring the earth in the last days causing the earth to be ‘defiled (or polluted) under its inhabitants.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ According to the New Scientist, there are massive amounts of water hidden deep beneath the Earth's surface. Scientists have found evidence of a reservoir of water three times the volume of all surface oceans combined, located roughly 250–400 miles underground within the mantle. ‍ ‍ ‍ It may be that the Lord will release this water to replenish and clean up the earth in the Millennial kingdom when ‘waters shall burst forth in the wilderness, and streams in the desert. The parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water.’ Isaiah 35. Zechariah 14.8-9 says, ‘In that day it shall be that living waters shall flow from Jerusalem, half of them toward the eastern sea and half of them toward the western sea; In both summer and winter it shall occur. And the Lord shall be King over all the earth.’ Zechariah 14.8-9. See also Ezekiel 47. ‍ Rethinking Russia ‍ Things are not going well for Vladimir Putin in his ‘special military operation’. Four years after invading Ukraine in February 2022, Russia is not making advances and actually losing ground. Russia is losing as many as 25,000- 35,000 casualties a month and over 1.2 million have been killed and wounded since the war began. Ukrainian skills in drone warfare have destroyed large quantities of Russian equipment, tanks, armoured personnel carriers, artillery and rocket systems, helicopters, and naval vessels. ‍ ‍ Russia is spending an estimated 40% of the entire federal budget on the war effort. As a result of this and western sanctions, Russia is increasingly unable to fix chronic infrastructure problems at home. During the bitter Russian winter thousands of people were left without heat, light, or even water. All forms of transport, trains, trucks and planes, are facing logistical problems, making it difficult to transport goods and people across the vast Russian regions. Russia is on the way to an infrastructure collapse that will likely take decades to recover. ‍ ‍ Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov warned the State Duma that Russia's faltering economy risks stoking a 1917-style revolution. He demanded urgent financial and economic measures by autumn to avert a potential economic collapse. This raises the danger of the Russian Federation fracturing. The Caucuses are restive, the far east is looking to China and Siberia is facing an acute problem as a result of melting permafrost, causing buildings, bridges and pipelines to collapse. ‍ ‍ In the present circumstances it is hard to see how Russia could lead the Gog and Magog invasion of Israel (Ezekiel 38-39). Some have said that it is more likely that Turkey is the lead power in the War of Gog and Magog. They say that Meshech and Tubal are not Moscow and Tobolsk, but regions of modern Turkey. Erdogan’s Turkey is backed by an Islamist world view hostile to Israel, seeking the recovery of its Ottoman Empire. He has his eyes on taking control of Jerusalem. Turkey is possession of a large land army already stationed in the region, some of it occupying part of Syria. ‍ ‍ The alternative is that the War of Gog and Magog is some way off, possibly part of Armageddon, giving time for Russia to recover from its present distress. We wait and see, but meanwhile spare a thought and a prayer for the people of Ukraine and Russia, suffering as a result of Putin’s futile war, oppressed by his corrupt dictatorship and facing an economic and social collapse caused by his failed policies. ‍ ‍
By David Passmore May 25, 2026
Trump's Visit with Xi Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The tempest path of Sino-U.S. tensions came to a head during Trump's first term in office with the outbreak of Covid. Many commentators believed that the deterioration in relations was in terminal decline and that a major confrontation in the straits of Taiwan was fast looming. Trump held China responsible for the spread of Covid, insisting that he would pursue reparations. The election of Biden halted this commitment. Biden sought a non-confrontational policy towards Beijing. In the aftermath of the disastrous premature withdrawal from Afghanistan handing that country over to the Taliban and the Russian invasion of Ukraine under his watch, Biden became too preoccupied to assertively engage with China. Chinese State media portrayed Trump's visit as being rather unremarkable in the context of other foreign dignitaries lining up to meet Xi, pointing out that just a week later Putin would arrive in Beijing. China manifests that it is winning the trade war that Trump began in 2018, beating America at its own game of capitalism. They frame the U.S. as being in a position of weakness because China is able to source whatever products they buy from the U.S. elsewhere like oil from Canada, and soybeans from Brazil. The oil, soybeans and 200 Boeing's Xi agreed to purchase from Trump were presented as a mere gesture to placate Trump as China has already bought 350 Air Buses in the last year. China would have the world believe that it is only semi-conductors where America has the edge. Here China hints that it is not likely to buy H200 Invidia Chips because it would mean that China will always lag behind the U.S. in building their AI tech. China's major contention and concern is that the U.S. may impose export controls to contain China. China's strategy instead is to invest massively on indigenous innovation. China wants to become an innovation powerhouse that will export its own Chips to the Global South. China is fast catching up with America's lead in AI with the launch of Deep Seek and they claim similar progress with Chip making. China is now ostensibly only eight months behind the U.S. on Large Language Models. Running contrary to this narrative Trump insists that China is desperate to trade with America. China's economy has now peaked. Emblematic of this stagnating growth is rising youth unemployment. China is no longer America's biggest trading partner. Trump has shifted manufacturing back to the U.S. and Trump believes that China can't revive its economy without America. Lined up to meet Xi with Trump were the heads of some of America's biggest Tech Corporations. Corporations like nvidia seek a relaxing of export controls for Chips as they want short term profits, ignoring the risk that China will reverse engineer this technology. More broadly, China and the U.S. are playing a geopolitical chess game spanning the globe. Trump outmaneuvered China in Latin America with the removal of Maduro from power in Venezuela. China is exploiting its influence on Iran in order to get Trump to refrain from taking more active steps towards the defense of Taiwan. Indeed, Trump didn't say anything about Taiwan during his visit. Trump's instincts are of a transactional approach towards alliances, where he is only willing to underwrite defense assistance if allies pay up as an insurer would. It is also important to note that saber rattling the Taiwan card also serves the CCP agenda to distract internal dissent concerning the state of the Chinese economy. Most imminently Trump needs China to pressure Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz and get oil prices down before the midterm elections. China has largely insulated itself from the Gulf energy impact due to stockpiles. Trump would also like China to stop providing Iran with GPS for its missiles. Other Chinese weapons systems and technology sold to Iran have failed to perform well against U.S. and Israeli military hardware. Matters boil down to a leverage between whatever Trump can do on Taiwan, China can do on the strait of Hormouz with Iran. Human Rights concerns, espionage and the alarming rate of Chinese acquisition of U.S. land have been placed on the back burner for the time being.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 17, 2026
Moriel & Jacob Prasch request prayer for Phil Malone and family “Please keep me and my family in prayer. My mum passed away on 13th May at the age of 93. It's a time of mourning, but may it be a time for the Gospel of Christ to be preached to my unbelieving family, especially my brother.”
By Mea Fredrickson May 13, 2026
Moriel & Jacob Prasch request prayer for Sister Joanne Rizzetto, wife of Pastor Dave Rizzetto of Church of The Open Door in New York City. Joanne has developed painful complications and adverse side effects from medications following knee surgery. May The Lord intervene for healing and give guidance to her physicians. Lord, we humbly ask you to intervene in the life of our dear sister. We know you can do all things and that you hear our prayers and consider your servants. Please put a stop to the adverse reaction. Restrain and reverse its effects and restore our sister so that she can continue to serve you in the ministry that you have called them to. We do glorify Your Name. We don't ask as those who treat you as our debtor, but as those who have tasted your goodness and found such mercy and compassion at your feet. Grace and peace and mercy be with Joanne and Pastor Dave.
By David Passmore May 5, 2026
Will Lebanon miss its golden opportunity? Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Converging new facts on the ground have transformed the political landscape in Lebanon. With Assad removed from power in Syria, a vital lifeline of arms supplies for Hezbollah originating in Iran has diminished. Hezbollah suffered considerable losses in its last round of fighting with Israel. The decapitation of its leadership with the targeted pager attack inflicted a severe blow. Hezbollah's new leader Naim Qassem is a weak substitute for the charismatic Nasrallah who was assassinated by Israel in 2024. Hezbollah in its frail state foolishly fell into line with Iran's instruction to join the fighting against Israel following the recent American-Israeli war with Iran. This was contrary to the wishes of the Lebanese government which was fearful of the inevitable destruction that would be wreaked by the Israeli response. The differing attitudes to Israel amongst Lebanon's population is reflective of its ethnic composition. The predominant groups in order of plurality are Christians, Shia Muslims and Sunni Muslims with a smaller minority of Druze. The major concern of most Christians in Lebanon is the dire state of their economy. They have no appetite to further their plight by invoking Israel's rage. During the colonial inter war period the French envisaged the demarcation between Lebanon and Syria as carving out enclaves for Christian and Druze control. Within Lebanon there would be a shared government that by convention would have the Executive power split between a Christian President, a Sunni Prime Minister and Shia Speaker of Parliament. The Christians in southern Lebanon (particularly Maronite Catholics) saw themselves as being anthropologically descendants of ancient Phoenicians as opposed to an Arab identity where the Arab Christians were largely Eastern Orthodox. The schism between the Maronites and the Arab Eastern Orthodox dates back to the time of the Crusades. The Maronites were culturally French, speaking French as their main language and held precedence in much of the Lebanese economy. The first threat to Lebanese stability and cohesion was settled by the U.S. Eisenhower administration in 1958 which landed Marines in an amphibious operation. A repeated attempt at this by the Reagan administration in 1983 ended in a military disaster for the U.S. due to suicide bombings by Iranian controlled terrorists. Israeli efforts to bring in stability during the Lebanese Civil War in conjunction with its Lebanese Christian allies led by Major Saad Haddad likewise came to calamity when the Sabra and Shatila revenge attacks took place following the assassination of Lebanese leader Bashir Gemayel. The ''Good Fence'' policy of an Israeli friendly free Lebanon zone in Southern Lebanon eventually ended badly following Menachem Begin's second incursion into Lebanon called ''Shalom HaGalil'' aimed at stopping the PLO rocket attacks on Israeli border communities like Metulla, Kiryat Shmona, Naharya, Rosh Hanikra, Tzfat and Carmiel. The proxy Israeli occupation from the Israeli border to the Litani river became an imbroglio that many in Israel viewed as Israel's Vietnam with widespread domestic protest and a collapse of morale within the IDF. Eventually Israel absorbed Christian war refugees from Lebanon, while the Vatican and most of the Christian world turned their backs on the Lebanese Christians. Lebanon was then saddled with two states within a state. The first was in the aftermath of Black September in 1970 when King Hussein of Jordan defended his Hashemite throne and government from Yasser Arafat's attempt to take over Jordan due to Jordan having a 70% Palestinian Arab demographic majority. The Jordanian legion drove tens of thousands of its pro Arafat Jordanian citizens into Lebanon, creating a population base for the first state within a state under Arafat. However the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and other factions had their niche interests. Courtesy of the Israeli Air Force Arafat relocated what he saw as his government in exile to Tunisia. This was a missed opportunity by the Lebanese government to assert its autonomy and full territorial control by making a Camp David type peace with Israel inclusive of economic and mutual security provisions. Instead an Iranian backed Syrian intervention replaced Arafat's state within a state with a new one that morphed into Hezbollah. The fall of the Assad regime and the Israeli counter-offensive against Hezbollah re-presents Lebanon with the opportunity that it once lost. The predominantly Christian controlled Lebanese military could and should operationally coordinate with the IDF, to obliterate and remove Hezbollah as the Israelis relieved Lebanon of Arafat's state within a state. Such a rapprochement would likely have strong American and possibly French and British support, allowing Lebanon to be at a non-combative peace with Israel along the lines of Egypt and Jordan, and now some of the Emirates. The natural comradery of the Lebanese Druze community with the Israeli Druze and the pro-Israeli Druze of Syria would additionally re-enforce a regional harmony, as would the Maronite Christian community in Israel with their co-coreligionists in Lebanon.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 5, 2026
PASTOR JOHN ANGLISS It is with profound sadness that we learned of the temporary separation from our friend and brother Pastor John Angliss. We look forward to being reunited with John in the millennial reign of Christ and indeed in God's Eternal Kingdom. Jacob Prasch visited John a few weeks ago in the UK while John was in hospice care having been diagnosed preterminal in his illness. While medically correct, it was of course a misdiagnosis. John is now cancer free and is alive and well in the presence of Jesus awaiting us in glory while his mortal body is being renewed for resurrection and immortality. In the meanwhile, during this temporary season of bereavement we do request prayer for his beloved wife Mary and for his congregation, The Ark Fellowship in England near Reading, England. Because he has recently arrived in the USA and is scheduled to address the Moriel Canada branch conference in Winnipeg, Jacob Prasch will regrettably not be able to attend the memorial service in Britain. Our condolences however are very much with Mary and our brethren in the UK who like us knew and loved Pastor Angliss. John was one of a minority of faithful voices who upheld a traditional biblically based Pentecostalism in the era of counterfeit revivals and apostasy that overtook most of British Pentecostalism. John was a faithful friend of Israel & The Jews standing on the prophetic purposes of God for Israel and the salvation of the Jews. John was a loyal friend to Moriel and Jacob Prasch and a colleague of David Pawson and Derek Prince, both of whom likewise stood by God's promises to Israel. John was also a founding leader of CMFI - the Christian Ministerial Fellowship International, former pastor of Three Mile Cross fellowship , and former board member of Focus On Israel (a Pentecostal Ministry to the Jews). While this separation is temporary, John's eternal gain will be our temporary loss. O GRAVE - WHERE IS THEY VICTORY, O DEATH WHERE IS THY STING ? Hosea 13:14 / 1 Corinthians 15: 55-57
By David Passmore April 28, 2026
We made it this far: Israel at 78 Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Since the last anniversary milestone of Israel at 75, we have been embroiled in relentless wars. Citizens had little respite to enjoy this year's festivities, coming on the heels of a lull in fighting on the Iranian and Lebanese fronts. We are constantly waiting for a breakthrough on the horizon that will normalize our relations with our neighbors and secure our position on the world stage. It is acutely exhausting to be the focus of the world's attention. But also there is a sense of inevitability accompanying the Zionist project. Specifically that Israel is destined to be central in the wider region and global affairs. Why is this? Is it due to it being a western transplant? Being geographically positioned on the crossroads of three continents? Religious believers would point to prophetic fulfillment. It is short sighted to only look at how our problems are rooted in today’s' reality. Greater forces are at work that will dictate the direction that Israel is heading. The Jewish diaspora will likely find itself in a growing precarious position that will lead to increasing Aliyah (immigration to Israel) and will perhaps ferment the emergence of a second Jewish commonwealth that will not need to heed international pressure in the same way that todays' polity finds itself doing. In this light it is interesting to ponder how our posterity would view our predicament and gains. And I frame matters in these terms with intentionality. We are enmeshed in a seemingly intractable conflict with the Palestinians, and yet Israel has made great gains particularly in the technological fields. There is a current of thinking that perceives Israel's way out of its quagmire is by making itself indispensable to technological advancements. We don't know how tomorrows' world will be shaped by the rapidly advancing AI revolution but so far Israel has proven to be uniquely adaptable and innovative to technological change. This has proved to be a boon to Israel's economy, as have offshore natural gas discoveries being developed in concert with Greece, Greek Cypriot and American energy interests that are geographically and strategically removed from any Straits of Hormuz shipping impediments that strangle the Persian Gulf deposits shared by Qatar and Iran. On another note we should contextualize the situation. How different are Israel's challenges from other nations? Is Israel any less stable than other countries (particularly in the region)? Israel doesn't find itself uniquely challenged to define its identity (most European countries do also, particularly in light of immigration). Nor does the government experience any more volatility than other comparable democracies. Israel's real problems lay in the nature of how its Jewish citizens desire to govern themselves. It is arguable whether the judicial reform protests that occupied public discourse in pre-October 7th Israel would have led to serious civil strife. But it is without doubt that this impasse was allayed by the external attack. The underlying tensions remain unresolved and there are many ways that they could play out. It has been framed as a battle for Israel's soul. Israel's enemies predict that Zionism is imploding and that the State won't survive another 5-10 years. Supporting this claim, they point to Israel's increasing alienation and growing pariah status on the international stage. Our Prime Minister has been indicted for war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Even public opinion in our staunchest ally the U.S. has turned sharply against Israel. With 80% of the Democratic Party being anti-Israel in a growing climate of anti-semitism we have even witnessed the shift of Alan Dershowitz to the Republican Party which must be seen as emblematic of a trend. There is apprehension in Israel of a post-Trump America dominated by the Democrats. However, these seeming incontrovertible facts may be offset by other measures of fortitude. This may be partially countered by the high investment by Silicon Valley in the Israeli Hi-tech sector, making Israel an asset for purposes of Research and Development in America's AI race against China. New opportunities for economic relations have also been opened with Arab nations through the Abraham Accords and with the powerhouse India. Furthermore, it is difficult to imagine a world in which Israel's technological prowess will not carry the sway of western decision makers in the long run. Israel's 78th anniversary is a moment to take pause and not catastrophize what the future may behold. The entire world is currently in a state of transformation and Israel is not an outlier in this context.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore April 23, 2026
Please click this link:https://mailchi.mp/christianconcern.com/action-alert-street-preaching-22-04-26?e=f1df30be3f
By David Passmore April 14, 2026
A critical juncture in NATO'S future Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM NATO was originally established in 1949 to keep the Russian hordes at bay from toppling those European countries not forked over to the Soviet sphere of influence at the Potsdam conference. Europe lay in ruins. Britain had passed on the torch of global hegemony to the U.S. by tacitly acquiescing to the decolonization of its Empire when Churchill and Roosevelt agreed terms of the Atlantic Charter for the post-war new world order in 1941. So from its start NATO was very much an American driven endeavor. American money with the Marshall plan was propping up western European economies and its military might was forming the bulk of their defensive capabilities. The lopsided nature of this dynamic has informed how tensions have persisted and recently erupted in the Alliance. During the Cold War the U.S. felt obligated to shoulder the costs of underwriting Europe's security in light of the broader interests to keep the Soviet's in check. Following the fall of the Iron Curtain European complacency became a sticking point with the 'peace dividend' further exploiting American largesse. European NATO allies spent ever smaller percentages of their GDP on defense expenditure at U.S. expense. Now in a multi-polar world U.S. and European perceived threats are less aligned. This was first tested in the aftermath of September 11th when for the first time NATO elected to trigger its article 5 collective defense protocol. And since then the U.S. has sought to continue to expand the traditional theatre of operations beyond Europe's borders. No longer is Russia perceived by America as being a proximate existential threat to its interests, but rather containing Chinese expansion in the Pacific arena. Parallel to NATO a discrete 'five eyes' intelligence sharing alliance comprising the Anglo-sphere (the U.S., U.K., Canada and New Zealand) emerged. This stands at the center of the U.S. – U.K. 'special relationship'. A relevant question would be can this signals intelligence (NSA-GCHQ) partnership persist should the U.S. withdraw from NATO? Conventional thinking would have led one to believe that with Brexit the U.K. would naturally pivot towards closer U.S. relations but under Starmer the U.K. is distancing itself. European powers misrepresent the present conflict as an aggressive, rather than defensive U.S. adventure while they themselves are more likely to be at risk. In this the Starmer government resembles the Labor party led committee for nuclear disarmament in the 1980's. It opposed the Thatcher supported deployment of U.S. cruise missiles in response to the Soviet SS20's pointed at Britain's cities. The British left branded their response to Soviet strategic escalation to U.S. aggression. This time however there is for the moment no Thatcher to bring common sense into an equation dominated by emotionally driven ideologies in the face of an aggressor with definite aims. In terms of the Russian-Ukraine conflict we are reverting to the old question dating back to the Napoleonic war era: to what extent is London happy with the European nations fighting it out alone for dominance of the continent. Britain was never willing to accept a single power in control. Many variables will dictate what kind of world emerges from the current conflicts in Ukraine and Iran. How will power be extracted from potential gains? What will be the strategic impact of this? What is sure, in the age of Trump this pattern of reliance on U.S. muscle is becoming quickly exhausted. Dating back to the Roman Empire, a factor in the decline of major powers has always been astronomical military spending, a budgetary demand that the U.S. under Trump is no longer willing to shoulder alone. (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).