Calatoria Lui Avraam

April 3, 2025

INTRODUCERE Haideti sa deschidem impreuna, va rog, la cartea Genezei capitolul 12. Numim cartea Genezei “B’reshit” – “La inceput” in evreieste. Aceasta incepe cu aproximativ 2166 de ani inainte de nasterea lui Isus.

DOMNUL i-a vorbit lui Avram…
(Acum se numeste “Avram” – nu este inca “Avraam”.)

“1. Domnul zisese lui Avram: "Iesi din tara ta, din rudenia ta si din casa tatalui tau si vino in tara pe care ti-o voi arata.

  1. Voi face din tine un neam mare si te voi binecuvanta; iti voi face un nume mare si vei fi o binecuvantare.
  2. Voi binecuvanta pe cei ce te vor binecuvanta si voi blestema pe cei ce te vor blestema; si toate familiile pamantului vor fi binecuvantate in tine.
  3. Avram a plecat, cum ii spusese DOMNUL, si a plecat si Lot impreuna cu el. Avram avea saptezeci si cinci de ani cand a iesit din Haran.
  4. Avram a luat pe Sarai,…

…ceea ce inseamna “printesa mea” in evreieste…
…nevasta sa, si pe Lot, fiul fratelui sau, impreuna cu toate averile pe care le stransesera si cu toate slugile pe care le castigasera in Haran. Au plecat in tara Canaan si au ajuns in tara Canaan.

  1. Avram a strabatut tara pana la locul numit Sihem, pana la stejarul lui More. Canaanitii erau atunci in tara.
  2. DOMNUL S-a aratat lui Avram si i-a zis: "Toata tara aceasta o voi da semintei tale." Si Avram a zidit acolo un altar DOMNULUI care i Se aratase.
  3. De acolo a pornit spre munte, la rasarit de Betel, si si-a intins cortul, avand Betelul la apus si Ai la rasarit. A zidit si acolo un altar DOMNULUI si a chemat Numele DOMNULUI.
  4. Avram si-a urmat drumul, inaintand mereu spre miazazi.
  5. A venit insa o foamete in tara; si Avram s-a coborat in Egipt ca sa locuiasca pentru catava vreme acolo; caci era mare foamete in tara.
  6. Cand era aproape sa intre in Egipt, a zis nevestei sale Sarai: "Iata, stiu ca esti o femeie frumoasa la fata.
  7. Cand te vor vedea egiptenii, vor zice: "Aceasta este nevasta lui!" Si pe mine ma vor omori, iar pe tine te vor lasa cu viata.
  8. Spune, rogu-te, ca esti sora mea,…

…care, de fapt, era sora lui vitrega…
 …
ca sa-mi mearga bine din pricina ta, si sufletul meu sa traiasca datorita tie."

  1. Cand a ajuns Avram in Egipt, egiptenii au vazut ca nevasta lui era foarte frumoasa.
  2. Slujbasii cei mai de frunte ai lui faraon au vazut-o si ei, si au laudat-o la faraon; si femeia a fost adusa in casa lui faraon.
  3. Pe Avram l-a primit bine din pricina ei; si Avram a capatat oi, boi, magari, robi si roabe, magarite si camile.
  4. Dar DOMNUL a lovit cu mari urgii pe faraon si casa lui, din pricina nevestei lui Avram, Sarai.
  5. Atunci faraon a chemat pe Avram si i-a zis: "Ce mi-ai facut? Pentru ce nu mi-ai spus ca este nevasta ta?
  6. De ce ai zis: "Este sora mea" si am luat-o astfel de nevasta? Acum, iata-ti nevasta; ia-o si pleaca!"
  7. Si faraon a dat porunca oamenilor lui sa-l petreaca pe el, pe nevasta sa si tot ce avea.

Genesa 13: 1. Avram s-a suit din Egipt in tara de la miazazi, el, nevasta sa si tot ce avea, impreuna cu Lot.

  1. Avram era foarte bogat in vite, in argint si in aur.
  2. Din tara de la miazazi s-a indreptat si a mers pana la Betel, pana la locul unde fusese cortul lui la inceput, intre Betel si Ai,
  3. in locul unde era altarul pe care-l facuse mai inainte. Si acolo, Avram a chemat Numele DOMNULUI.
  4. Lot, care calatorea impreuna cu Avram, avea si el oi, boi si corturi.
  5. Si tinutul acela nu-i incapea sa locuiasca impreuna; caci averile lor erau asa de mari, incat nu puteau sa locuiasca impreuna.
  6. S-a iscat o cearta intre pazitorii vitelor lui Avram si pazitorii vitelor lui Lot. Canaanitii si feresitii locuiau atunci in tara.
  7. Avram a zis lui Lot: "Te rog, sa nu fie cearta intre mine si tine si intre pazitorii mei si pazitorii tai, caci suntem frati.
  8. Nu-i oare toata tara inaintea ta? Mai bine desparte-te de mine: daca apuci tu la stanga, eu voi apuca la dreapta; daca apuci tu la dreapta, eu voi apuca la stanga."
  9. Lot si-a ridicat ochii si a vazut ca toata campia Iordanului era bine udata in intregime. Inainte de a nimici DOMNUL Sodoma si Gomora, pana la Toar, era ca o gradina a DOMNULUI, ca tara Egiptului.
  10. Lot si-a ales toata campia Iordanului si a mers spre rasarit. Astfel s-au despartit ei unul de altul.

A INCEPUT INAINTE DE HARAN
  Existau lucruri cunoscute de evreii antici care nu erau scrise in Vechiul Testament biblic, dar care, ulterior, au fost consemnate in Noul Testament. In discursul de aparare al lui Stefan inainte de martirajul sau din Faptele Apostolilor capitolul 7, el ne spune niste lucruri despre calatoria lui Avraam, pe care cartea Genezei nu le mentioneaza. In 
Faptele Apostolilor 7:2 el spune…
…Dumnezeul slavei S-a aratat parintelui nostru Avraam, cand era in Mesopotamia, inainte ca sa se aseze in Haran.

Si i-a zis: "Iesi din tara ta si din familia ta si du-te in tara pe care ti-o voi arata."

El a iesit atunci din tara haldeilor si s-a asezat in Haran. De acolo, dupa moartea tatalui sau, Dumnezeu l-a stramutat in tara aceasta, in care locuiti voi acum.

 Cartea Faptele Apostolilor ne spune ca Dumnezeu l-a chemat pe Avraam in     Mesopotamia – Ur, in Haldeea. Genesa reia naratiunea in Haran mult mai tarziu.

Avraam este tatal tuturor celor ce cred – evreii, arabii, chiar musulmanii privesc inspre Avraam. Arabii il numesc “Ibrahim”, evreii il numesc “Abba Abraham” – “parintele Avraam”. “Tatal tuturor celor ce cred” are o insemnatate teologica de prototip. Experientele lui prefigureaza ce se va intampla descendentilor sai.

TIPOLOGIA EGIPTULUI


        Trebuie sa intelegem expresia “iesirea din Egipt”. Avraam pleaca in Egipt pe timp de foamete; el locuieste acolo. Dumnezeu il judeca pe faraon si Avraam iese din Egipt si pleaca in Israel. Mai tarziu, urmasii sai, fiii lui Iacov, pleaca in Egipt pe timp de foamete. Judecata lui Dumnezeu vine peste Faraon – un faraon aprig, iar urmasii lui Avraam fac ceea ce a facut el: ei ies afara din Egipt, luand comorile Egiptului cu ei in Israel. Deci, ce i se intampla lui Avraam, li se intampla si urmasilor lui biologici, israelitii.

Ulterior, ni se spune de Pavel in 1 Corinteni ca aceasta ni se intampla noua. Egiptul este un simbol al lumii, tara promisa este un simbol al raiului, si, dupa cum Moise a facut un legamant al sangelui stropit pe oameni, trecandu-i prin Marea Rosie in tara promisa, la fel Isus, prin botez, ne transfera din lumea aceasta spre raiul Sau (1 Cor 10). Noi am iesit din“Egipt”. Faraon, desigur, este un simbol al diavolului, dumnezeul acestei lumi, dar, reprezinta totodata un model proeminent al Antichristului care va veni. Asadar, Avraam iese din Egipt, urmasii sai, evreii, ies afara din Egipt si deoarece el este tatal tuturor celor ce cred - noiiesim afara din Egipt prin salvarea daruita de Isus Hristos.
Multi oameni, mai ales teologii liberali, ar avea o problema cu 
Matei 2:15unde, dupa ce regele Irod moare, Matei citeaza din profetul Osea 11:1:“Am chemat pe Fiul Meu din Egipt”.

Osea vorbea despre exilul evreilor. Cum preia Matei ceva care contextual se aplica la evreii din exil si afirma ca este vorba despre Isus?

El face aceasta pentru ca intelegerea evreiasca a profetiei este de tip “model repetat”. Avraam iese afara din Egipt, evreii ies afara din Egipt, noi iesim afara din Egipt, si Isus, care este samanta lui Avraam, trebuie prin urmare sa iese afara din Egipt. El se potriveste modelului repetat: Dumnezeu judeca din nou un rege nelegiuit – Irod – si in caracterul si samanta lui Avraam, Isus iese afara din Egipt.

Profetia ebraica este un model repetativ. In cele din urma, iesirea din Egipt reprezinta rapirea si invierea trupului lui Hristos (biserica). Acele judecati asupra Egiptului sunt reluate in cartea Apocalipsei: intunericul, sangele, etc. Iar modul in care faraon a falsificat miracolele lui Moise si ale lui Aaron este modul in care Anticrist si profetul mincinos vor falsifica minunile lui Isus si ale martorilor Sai.

Ei au luat cu ei din Egipt oasele lui Iosif in Tara Promisa pentru ca cei morti in Hristos vor invia cei dintai; noi iesim din Egipt impreuna. Aceasta reprezinta o imagine a invierii. Este iesirea finala din Egipt. Profetia ebraica urmeaza intotdeauna un model cu impliniri multiple. Dar fiecare model este o “imagine” sau o prefigurare a ultimei impliniri. Acesta este cazul lui Avraam. Experientele lui sunt reluate de evrei si de credinciosi: noi iesim afara din Egipt.

PROMISIUNILE LUI AVRAAM


Dumnezeu i-a facut lui Avraam cinci promisiuni:

  • Ca ii va face numele lui Avraam maret (si aceasta s-a intamplat cu siguranta);
  • Ca va mosteni tara (aceasta s-a intamplat);
  • Ca va deveni o natiune mareata (aceasta s-a intamplat);
  • Ca Dumnezeu ii va binecuvanta pe aceia care binecuvinteaza pe Avraam (aceasta s-a transmis la urmasii lui Iacov si ai lui Avraam prin patriarhi);
  • Ca Dumnezeu ii va blestema pe cei care il blestema pe Avraam si urmasii lui (si aceasta s-a intamplat mereu).

Judecata lui Dumnezeu ar fi cazut si asupra Statelor Unite ale Americii cu mult timp in urma cu exceptia a doua motive: din fiecare cinci dolari cheltuiti pe misiuni, evanghelizari si acte de caritate, trei dolari provin din America de Nord; al doilea motiv este ca America a tratat evreii mai bine decat orice alta natiune.

Soarta Olandei ar fi fost la fel. Imoralitatea este incredibila in Olanda, dar ei au oferit protectieevreilor in Holocaust. Sunt convins ca sunt singurele lucruri care au oprit mana Domnului in privinta aceasta. Nu o sa iti vina sa crezi daca vei merge vreodata in Amsterdam.

Dumnezeu va binecuvanta pe cei ce binecuvinteaza pe evrei si va blestema pe cei ce ii blestema. Cand nazistii au preluat conducerea Germaniei, in cazul in care ati vizionat filmul Lista lui Schindler, ei au construit ziduri in jurul oraselelor evreiesti, a ghetourilor. Iar oricare evreu care ar fi urcat pe zid, ar fi fost ciuruit de gloante. Ce s-a intamplat apoi? Odata ce al treilea Reich a cazut, a fost construit un zid in jurul Berlinului de Est, marea capitala a Reich-ului, si oricare german care a incercat sa se suie pe zid a fost ciuruit de gloante. Iar zidul acesta nu a cazut decat dupa ce politicianul Hess a murit in inchisoarea din Spandau. Zidul nu a cazut pana cand ultimul nazist responsabil pentru intamplarile din anii 30 si 40 a murit.

Bunicii mei erau din Marea Britanie. Marea Britanie era regina marilor pe atunci. Daca le-ai fi spus bunicilor mei ca va veni un timp cand soarele Imperiului Britanic va apune la fiecare 24 de ore (se refera la caderea suprematiei Imperiului Britanic), li s-ar fi parut forarte amuzant. Marea Britanie a abrogat Declaratia Balfour dupa ce le-a promis evreilor dreptul de a se reintoarce in tara lor, iar evreii au mers in lagarele de concentrare. Chiar dupa razboi, cand pretutindeni s-a stiut ce a provocat Holocaustul, britanicii i-au pus pe evrei inapoi in lagerele de detentie din Cipru cu scopul de a-i impiedica sa se reintoarca in Israel ca nu cumva sa-I ofenseze pe musulmani. Acum, soarele apune in Imperiul Britanic la fiecare 24 de ore. Stiu aceasta pentru ca locuiesc acolo.

Inainte de toate acestea, a avut loc Inchizitia Spaniola. Spania a fost cea mai mare putere mondiala, fiind cei ce s-au remarcat in Noua Lume pana la aparitia inchizitiei. In anul 1492 Columb a descoperit America, iar imediat dupa aceea, sub conducerea regelui Ferdinand si a reginei Isabela, la ordinul Bisericii Catolice, incepe inchizitia. Nu a durat mult pana cand Francis Drake a scufundat flota navala Armada dupa care Britania a devenit regina marilor. “Voi binecuvanta pe cei ce va binecuvinteaza, si voi blestema pe cei ce va blestama.”

COPIII LUI AVRAAM


         Aceasta se aplica cu adevarat si la trupul lui Hristos intrucat credinciosii sunt si ei copii ai lui Avraam. Natiunile care au binecuvantat trupul lui Hristos au fost binecuvantate si au prosperat, iar natiunile care au persecutat trupul lui Hristos au primit judecata lui Dumnezeu. Este suficient sa privim la Estul Europei.

Exista o relatie aproape ipostatica (ce tine de situatie) intre anti-semitism si persecutia bisericii credincioase deoarece credinciosii nascuti din nou si evreii sunt singurele categorii de oameni pe care Biblia ii numeste “alesii lui Dumnezeu” (Psalmii 105:62 Tesaloniceni 2:13). In Genesa 3:15citim:

Si voi pune vrajmasie intre tine si femeie, si intre samanta ta si samanta ei.


“Femeia” il reprezinta pe Israel, dar totodata prin adaptare si acceptare, reprezinta biserica, trupul lui Hristos. Veti afla ca cele doua tipuri de oameni pe care Satan le-a urat cel mai mult si dintotdeauna sunt evreii si crestinii nascuti din nou, pentru ca ei sunt cele doua tipuri de oameni care sunt urmasii lui Avraam si care sunt numiti “alesii lui Dumnezeu”.

Pe cine au urat cel mai mult comunistii din Rusia inainte de caderea cortinei de fier? Pe evrei si pe crestinii nascuti din nou. Pe cine persecuta cel mai mult Biserica Catolica? Pe evrei si pe crestinii nascuti din nou. Pe cine urasc musulmanii cel mai mult? Pe evrei si pe crestinii nascuti din nou. La fel si Biserica Ortodoxa Rasariteana.

Dumnezeu va binecuvanta pe cei ce binecuvinteaza pe urmasii lui Avraam, atat pe cei naturali cat si pe acei urmasi prin credinta. Si ii va blestema pe cei ce ii blestema. Cei ce blestema evreii sau biserica adevarata se ating de lumina ochilor lui Dumnezeu (Zaharia 2:8). Ba chiar si mai mult de atat.

O CALATORIE CA A NOASTRA


       Este calatoria lui Avraam. Calatoria lui este o calatorie ca a noastra. Cartea Genezei ne spune de aceasta calatorie ca incepe in Haran, unde tatal sau moare. Se intampla atunci cand el raspunde chemarii lui Dumnezeu. Dar Noul Testament ne spune ca nu atunci a inceput chemarea. Chemarea lui Dumnezeu a inceput in Ur, in Haldeea. In Ur din Haldeea este locul aproximativ unde a fost construit turnul Babel si unde, mai tarziu, se va ridica Imperiul Babilonian.

Tatal lui Avraam a fost un negustor de idoli. Aceasta o aflam din literatura talmudica a traditiei ebraice. O istorioara din Talmud ne spune ca Avraam a luat un ciocan, un “pattiysh”, si a sfaramat toate statuetele de idoli ale tatalui sau cu exceptia uneia punand ciocanul in mana idolului ramas. Dupa ce a vazut tatal sau toate acestea a intrebat “Cine a omorat toti dumnezeii acestia?” Si Avraam i-a zis, “Acel dumnezeu a facut-o, cel care tine ciocanul.” La care tatal raspunde, “Este imposibil! Este doar o bucata de piatra fara viata sau suflare in ea!” Atunci Avraam i-a zis, “Intocmai, tata – intocmai.” Aceasta este doar o istorioara din Talmud; suna adevarat.

Pana ce nu moare tatal sau intr-un moment de criza al vietii sale, el nu va raspunde chemarii lui Dumnezeu pe care a avut-o mult mai devreme, in tinerete, in Ur din Haldeea.

Aceasta se intampla atat de des oamenilor. Dumnezeu ii alege, Dumnezeu ii cheama intotdeauna, dar pana nu ajung intr-un moment de criza al vietii lor, ei nu raspund harului si chemarii Sale. Cateodata este o inmormantare, un dezastru financiar, o criza de sanatate sau o combinatie de lucruri. Dumnezeu cheama si cheama, dar atunci cand oamenii nu raspund, El incepe lucrarea de salvare. El va folosi chiar dezastrul pentru ca ei sa fie salvati.

Observam expresia “cei pe care i-a cunoscut mai dinainte” (Romani 8:29). Nu sunt Calvinist, dar Dumnezeu ne-a cunoscut dinaintea creatiei lumii si El incepe sa ne cheme inca de la conceptie, din copilarie. Cand cineva se naste din nou, cand cineva ajunge la cunostinta salvarii acordate de Isus Hristos, cand cineva ajunge sa inteleaga salvarea daruita de Domnul Isus, primul lucru dupa ce a fost salvat este sa capete sens viitorul, prezentul si inclusiv trecutul sau. Totul devine clar. Odata ce ajungi sa-L cunosti pe Domnul, iti dai seama de ce viata ta a fost in felul respectiv. Lucruri pe care nu poti cu adevarat sa le masori, probabil lucruri care te macinau noaptea inainte sa adormi, poate anumite experiente din viata ta, sau doar impresii, nu erau deloc intelese. Au avut un anumit aspect metafizic, probabil, dar nu puteai sa le cuantifici. Totusi, cand esti salvat iti dai seama ca “Este Dumnezeu Acela care m-a chemat in tot acest timp pana aici, acum, cand am ajuns sa-L cunosc prin Fiul Sau”. Cand cineva se naste din nou, nu capata sens numai viitorul sau prezentul ci chiar si trecutul.

Dumnezeu ne cheama in tot acest timp. Dar intocmai ca si in cazul lui Avraam – Avraam ca si tatal nostru, de multe ori este nevoie de o criza ca sa raspundem harului Sau, chemarii Sale. Si apoi, adevarata calatorie incepe.

Parasind familia este un lucru dificil, dar de foarte multe ori evanghelia necesita (ne-o cere) aceasta. Aceeasi situatie este cu atat mai adevarata printre evrei. Si la fel este si printe musulmani. Dar am cunoscut romano-catolici, am cunoscut oameni din familii comuniste, oameni din familii ortodoxe rusesti cat si greci, – principiul este acelasi. Pavel spune in capitolul 2 din Tesaloniceni caci chiar neamurile experimenteaza acelasi tip de respingere pe care l-au avut evreii din partea familiilor lor. Domnul Isus a venit sa aduca “dezbinare” (Luca 12:51). Este minunat cand familiile sunt mantuie dar de fapt moartea desparte si singurul mod de a fi impreuna cu familia ta este ca si ei sa fie mantuiti.

Deci Avraam isi incepe calatoria si prima oprire in calatoria aceasta, dupa ce il intalneste pe Domnul, o face la Sihem – “Shakem”. “Shakem” este unul din intelesurile pentru cuvantul “umar” in ebraica; nu cu inteles anatomic, ci cu intelesul de a cara o povara; se afla langa orasul Nablus de azi. Si la Sihem Avraam locuieste sub un stejar, numit “stejarul lui More”. “More” in ebraica moderna inseamna “profesor”, iar in ebraica antica inseamna “cunostinta” si anume cunostinta de Dumnezeu.

TIPOLOGIA COPACILOR

Trebuie sa intelegem ceva important despre midrasul ebraic cu privire la insemnatatea locuirii sub un stejar.

Daca un crestin evreu din secolul intai citea Evanghelia lui Ioan – Ioan 1, 2, si 3 – ar fi afirmat ca Evanghelia lui Ioan este midrasul creatiei din Geneza. Creatia noua din Ioan 1, 2, si 3 este un midras al creatiei din Geneza 1, 2, si 3:

  • Cine ar fi spus ca Dumnezeu umbla pe pamant in timpul creatiei? (Va amintiti ca Adam L-a vazut pe Dumnezeu umbland in gradina? Acela era Isus.) Acum Dumnezeu umbla pe pamant in noua creatie; Cuvantul devine trup ( 1:1). 
  • El a zis ca Dumnezeu a venit sa separe lumina de intuneric in creatia Genezei, dar acum Dumnezeu vine sa separe lumina de intuneric in creatia noua a lui Ioan. 
  • El a zis ca Duhul se misca deasupra apelor si da nastere creatiei din Geneza. Odata nascut din apa si din Duh, Dumnezeu produce viata noua din apa in creatia cea noua. 
  • In creatia Genezei El a zis ca avem luminatorul mic si luminatorul mare (soarele si luna), dar in noua creatie vom avea “Johannan Hamadvil” – Ioan Botezatorul, mica lumina, si “Yeshua HaMashiach” – Isus, marea lumina, marturisit de celalalt si reflectand lumina spre celalalt.
  • El a spus ca in ziua a treia a Genezei Dumnezeu a facut o minune cu apa. Iata ca in Ioan 2:1, la nunta din Cana, se zice ca a fost a treia zi. Dumnezeu a facut o minune cu apa.
  • El a zis ca Dumnezeu a inceput planul pentru creatia omului cu o nunta, o uniune de casatorie dintre Adam si Eva. Prin urmare, Dumnezeu isi incepe planul sau pentru noua creatie a omului cu o nunta in Cana. Prima lucrare publica a lui Isus este la o nunta. El a zis ca Dumnezeu face o minune cu apa in ziua a treia a creatiei in Geneza. Priviti in Ioan 2:1, la nunta din Cana, se spune ca a fost a treia zi unde Dumnezeu face o minune cu apa.

In felul acesta ar fi privit un credincios din secolul intai in Ioan. Noua creatie este un midras al creatiei.

 Dar apoi Natanael il intreaba pe Isus in Ioan 1, “De unde ma cunosti?” si Isus ii raspunde, “Te-am vazut sub smochin” (Ioan 1:48).

Oricare ar fi fost smochinul literal sub care L-a vazut Isus pe Natanael, acel smochin este cunoscut ca si “peshit” in midras – “simplul sens”. (Aceasta nu este gnosticism. Gnosticismul foloseste simbolismul ca si baza doctrinara pe cand in midras, simbolismul se foloseste pentru ilustrarea doctrinei.) 

In „Peshit” este: “Te-am vazut sub smochin”. Dar in “pesshur” – “intelesul adanc”, este: “Te-am vazut din gradina, de la inceputul creatiei lumii”.

In Iudaism, pomul vietii, “Ets Chayim”, este reprezentat de un smochin. Deci Isus i-a spus, “Creatie, sau noua creatie, te cunosc pentru ca te-am cunoscut din gradina, de la intemeierea lumii. Te-am vazut sub copacul vietii” – Ets Chayim, smochinul.

Asadar, Avraam se afla sub un stejar. “Stejar” in evreieste inseamna “elon”. Este un lemn foarte tare, un lemn foarte puternic; un lemn al puterii. Ori de cate ori vezi pe cineva in Biblie sezand sub un stejar, aceasta are o insemnatate tipologica in midrasul ebraic. Inainte ca regele Saul sa fie ucis, el sedea sub un tamarisc. (1 Samuel 22:6). Cand se afla intr-o stare de disperare, Ilie se afla sub un ienupar. (1 Imparati 19:4). Dar aici Avraam se afla sub stejarii din More – el se afla intr-un loc al puterii datorita cunoasterii lui Dumnezeu.

“Sihemul” este locul unde iti pui povara jos si incepi sa Il cunosti prima data pe Dumnezeu. Si acolo el face un altar si aduce jertfe. La orice moment de rascruce in relatia ta cu Dumnezeu, El iti va cere sa construiesti un altar. In ebraica, altarul se numeste “mizbeach” si are doar un singur scop: pentru sacrificiu. Fara sacrificiu nu exista progres.

De la SIHEM la BETEL

Pana acum este bine – el ajunge la Sihem. Dar apoi ajunge la urmatoarea oprire. A doua oprire se numeste Betel, in evreieste “Beyth El” – “casa lui Dumnezeu”. Dupa ce cineva ajunge sa-L cunoasca pe Domnul, primul lucru pe care ar trebui sa-l faca este sa vina la biserica, adica sa vina sa aiba partasie cu alti credinciosi. Noi toti suntem templul sau casa lui Dumnezeu prin faptul ca Duhul Sfant locuieste in noi.

 Betel se afla in vest, iar alt loc, care se numeste Ai se afla in est. “Ai” in ebraica inseamna “un morman de ruine”. Avraam construieste un nou altar la Betel si intoarce spatele estului, acolo de unde a venit, de unde provine turnul Babel. Estul, adica trecutul sau, de unde provine el, devine un morman de ruine, iar el se infatiseaza inaintea casei Domnului. Este acelasi tipar pe care Marele Preot avea sa-l urmeze in privinta sacrificiului. El avea sa se intoarca dinspre est, dinspre Babilon, cu fata spre vest. Acolo el construieste un alt altar. Deci, inca odata, este vorba de sacrificiu.

Cand vii la adunarea credinciosilor, te costa ceva. Nu ma refer doar la ceea ce pui in cosul de colecta. Ma refer la renuntarea trecutului tau. Vechii tai prieteni devin niste cunostinte unde singurul tau interes de a avea vreo relatie cu ei este sa li te marturisesti. Poate ca trebuie sa renunti la cateva lucruri, cel putin pentru o vreme.

In ce ma priveste, eu nu am putut asculta nici un gen de muzica in afara imnurilor traditionale pentru ca asociam muzica, in special muzica rock si muzica clasica cu consumul de droguri. Obisnuiam sa ascult genul acesta de muzica atunci cand eram intoxicat. Nu am putut asculta muzica aceasta pentru cativa ani. Cativa ani mai tarziu, cand am crescut in credinta, nu m-a mai deranjat, nu mi-a mai distras atentia, dar cu problema aceasta eu trebuia sa merg la altar pentru o vreme pentru ca ma determina sa imi iau ochii de la Isus. Acum nu mai conteaza odata ce am crescut in credinta. Pentru mine aceasta este doar muzica. Altadata mi-ar fi creat o problema. Nu acelasi lucru trebuie dus la altar pentru toti, dar ceva trebuie dus acolo. Nu mai privim in trecut. Bineinteles ca aceasta inseamna acum intoarcerea din pacat, dar te va costa ceva.

Totul este clar pana aici. Dar sa stiti ca sunt oameni care nu ajung niciodata la Betel. Eu ii numesc “locuitori ai Sihemului”. Ei inteleg evanghelia si poate stapanesc credinta, si se plafoneaza la nivelul acesta. Ei nu merg mai departe.

Am cunoscut un „locuitor al Sihemului” in Londra, Anglia din Speaker’s Corner unde mai predic cateodata evanghelia duminica dupa-amiaza si sunt sicanat de musulmani, etc. Numele acestui individ era Robert – o persoana cumsecade, el avea o pancarta in fata si in spate numita “pancarta sandwich” in Anglia. Si in fata cat si pe spatele pancarzii scria, “Hristos a murit pentru pacatele noastre” si se plimba in jurul acelei alei. Si predicatorii crestini de acolo se cunosteau toti unul pe altul astfel incat i-am zis: “Trebuie sa plec acum, Robert, este timpul pentru serviciul divin in biserica mea”. Ma intrebase la ce biserica merg si i-am zis de biserica baptista din Londra de la acea vreme unde predicam. El mi-a zis ca merge la o biserica anglo-catolica. L-am sfatuit sa mearga la o biserica evanghelica, dar el mi-a raspuns ca acolo toti sunt deja nascuti din nou. Nu ai cui sa-i predici acolo. A fost foarte sincer. El cunostea cuvantul evangheliei, dar cam atat parea ca stie. El nu a venit niciodata la Betel.

In concluzie, Avraam ajunge la Betel, construieste altarul si renunta la trecut. Dar apoi, ceva nu merge bine.

CALATORIND SPRE EGIPT

Matei 13 ne vorbeste de samanta care cade pe diferite feluri de pamant. Daca diavolul nu poate face pe cineva sa lunece sau sa cada prin poftele carnii, poftele tineretii sau ceva de genul acesta, el va incerca altceva: criza – calamitatea. El te va face sa crezi ca trebuie sa-ti iei destinul in propriile maini, sau ca Dumnezeu te-a abandonat intr-un anume fel atunci cand lucrurile sunt dificile. Si trebuie sa incepi sa iei decizii proprii. Si este usor pentru un crestin nou venit la credinta sa fie descurajat.

Vedeti, de indata ce oamenii sunt mantuiti, ei au dragostea dintai si ei cred ca vor fi ca Matei, Marcu, Luca si Ioan din prima zi mergand si facand minuni. Ei cred ca pot face orice. Ei sunt la dragostea dintai, au foarte mult zel, dar nu au nici o experienta sau cunostinta, si nu stiu nimic desi ei cred ca stiu totul. Dar abia dupa ce au trecut prin primele incercari cateva luni mai tarziu, ei isi vor da seama ca de fapt stiu foarte putin. Ei au dragostea dintai– trebuie sa le acordam credit pentru aceasta, ceva ce noi tindem sa pierdem, dar ei nu au intelepciune, experienta sau cunostinta. Si din cauza aceasta incep sa apara probleme in viata lor.

Deci ce face Avraam? El pleaca in Egipt. Ce imagine reflecta Egiptul? Lumea.

Sa ne uitam ce spune profetul Isaia in capitolul 30 cu referire la plecarea in Egipt. Regele Ezechia a fost un rege bun, dar a fost sfatuit gresit. El se afla intr-o criza strategica. Ii avea pe asirieni invadand intr-o parte din est iar pe egipteni de cealalta parte. A fost prins in mijlocul a doua superputeri. Si a fost sfatuit sa mearga sa ceara ajutor din partea Egiptului. Si profetul Isaia avertizeaza impotriva acestor oameni care i-au zis sa faca acest lucru, adica sa actioneze la criza prin intelepciunea lui proprie indreptandu-se spre Egipt. Sa ne uitam la Isaia 30:1

1."Vai - zice Domnul - de copiii razvratiti, care iau hotarari fara Mine, fac legaminte care nu vin din Duhul Meu si ingramadesc astfel pacat peste pacat!

Mergand pe aceeasi idee, uitandu-ma la oamenii implicati in ecumenism vad ca ei fac aliante care nu sunt din Duhul lui Dumnezeu. Ei merg spre Egipt, religia lumii.

2.Ei se coboara in Egipt fara sa Ma intrebe, ca sa fuga sub ocrotirea lui faraon si sa caute un adapost sub umbra egiptenilor!

Sa observam ca ei nu doar merg in Egipt, ci ei merg in Egipt fara sa-L consulte pe Domnul. Cand esti implicat cu Domnul trebuie sa ai intelepciunea si calauzirea Lui. Esti implicat in sistemul legal lumesc? Trebuie sa ai calauzirea lui Dumnezeu acolo. Esti implicat in sistemul financiar al lumii acesteia, in sistemul de sanatate, in sistemul de invatamant – oricand esti implicat in lumea aceasta trebuie sa-L consulti pe Dumnezeu. Nu as merge asa departe incat sa va zic ca trebuie sa va rugati inainte sa inghititi o aspirina. Oricand esti implicat cu lumea, trebuie sa-L consulti pe Dumnezeu. Carnea tinde sa graviteze in timpul crizei in jurul a ce considera ea ca e puternic: lumea.

  1. Dar ocrotirea lui faraon va va da de rusine, si adapostul sub umbra Egiptului va va da de ocara.

Cand cineva se indreapta spre lume sfarseste prin a fi umilit. Cei ce luneca intotdeauna termina asa. Ei ajung intr-o stare de umilinta extrema. Priviti ce i s-a intamplat lui Avraam. A ajuns atat de jos incat a fost de acord sa-si dea sotia altui om pentru ca se temea pentru propria sa viata, si, aparent, asa s-a intamplat.

NICIODATA NU MAI POTI FI ACELASI


          Vedeti, nu il poti intalni pe Isus si sa mai fi acelasi. Odata ce ajungi sa-L cunosti, poti fi mai bun sau mai rau, dar nu poti ramane acelasi. Daca te vei intoarce inapoi in lume, te vei scufunda la un nivel de depravare morala mai rau ca inainte de a fi salvat. Nu poti sa-L intalnesti pe Hristos si sa ramai la fel; vei fi mai bun sau mai rau.

Si, mai mult de atat, vei ajunge intr-o stare de umilinta. Sa ne uitam la Isaia 31:1… 

  1. Vai de cei ce se coboara in Egipt dupa ajutor, se bizuie pe cai si se incred in multimea carelor si in puterea calaretilor, dar nu privesc spre Sfantul lui Israel si nu cauta pe Domnul!
  2. Dar si El este intelept si aduce nenorocirea, si nu Isi ia vorbele inapoi, ci Se ridica impotriva casei celor rai si impotriva ajutorului celor ce savarsesc nelegiuirea.
  3. Caci egipteanul este om, nu Dumnezeu, si caii lui sunt carne, nu duh. Doar mana sa-Si intinda Domnul, si ocrotitorul se va clatina, iar cel ocrotit va cadea, si vor pieri cu totii.

Nu exista nici un ajutor in Egipt! Puterea cailor este material, nu spirit. Vechea creatie va privi intotdeauna spre carne; va privi intotdeauna la lucruri pe care lumea le considera puternice: bani, putere politica, influenta, faima. Cand esti implicat cu Domnul, daca El va folosi lucrurile lumesti, va fi cu conditiile Lui, niciodata cu conditiile lumesti. Cand esti implicat cu Domnul, ai nevoie de intelepciunea Domnului; carnea vrea sa se increada in ceea ce lumea considera puternic.

Avraam invata pe calea cea grea ca varianta aceasta nu functioneaza. Si incepe de aici. El a mers pana a ajuns in locul cunoscut in timpurile antice sub denumirea de pustiul Sur. Pustiul Sur, in general, era zona de est a desertului Sinai si zona de vest a desertului Negev. Este o calatorie lunga, caniculara pana in “Mitstrayim” – Egypt. (In ebraica numim Egiptul “Mistrayim”.) Dupa aceea vine inapoi la Betel in Genesa 13:1.

CONTINUAND CALATORIA INITIALA


       Vedeti, reiei de unde ai ramas. Avraam ar fi putut sa se afle mai departe in calatoria sa, acolo unde Dumnezeu l-a vrut sa fie, dar el si-a irosit timpul. Recidivistii isi irosesc timpul, ei isi irosesc viata. Ce sunt 10 sau 20 de ani in comparatie cu eternitatea? Nimic. Dar in comparatie cu 80 sau 90 de ani cel mult, atat cat ai avea de trait in aceasta lume, 10-20 de ani este o perioada lunga irosita. Recidivistii isi irosesc timpul, si cu siguranta isi irosesc tineretea. Si nu vor ajunge nicaieri. Vor sfarsi prin a fi umiliti. Vor trebui sa iese din Egipt sau vor muri acolo; si iesind din Egipt vor relua de unde au ramas. Tot acest timp este pierdut in zadar. Inapoi la Betel.

Apoi el isi continua calatoria in care ar fi trebuit sa fie de la inceput. De la Betel el inainteaza inspre sud. Merge printre dealurile lui Iuda; din muntii Samariei spre dealurile lui Iuda. Este o calatorie lunga si laborioasa dar nicidecum atat de dificila ca plecarea in Egipt si inapoi. El ajunge la Hebron. “Hebron” deriva din cuvantul ebraic folosit pentru “tovarasie” – “heet ha brut”. Cuvantul ebraic “heet ha brut” folosit pentru tovarasie inseamna “caramizi puse impreuna”. Petru isi bazeaza explicatia pe aceasta idee in 1 Petru 2:5: noi suntem pietrele templului, biserica fiind templul. Noi suntem “pietrele vii”.

In duminica Floriilor cand Isus paseste pe muntele Templului prin poarta de est si oamenii ii canta Hallel Rabbah (Psalmii. 113-118) – “Osana Fiului Lui David”, Sanhedrinul ii spune lui Isus sa reduca oamenii la tacere. Si Isus raspunde: “Daca ei vor tacea atunci pietrele vor striga” (Luca 19:40). Ce spunea El in midrasul ebraic este ca daca evreii nu ma proclama pe Mine ca Mesia, crestinii o vor face. Ioan Botezatorul spune ca Dumnezeu ar putea ridica copii ai lui Avraam din pietre. (Matei 3:9) – Crestinii sunt copiii lui Avraam.

Hebron este locul de partasie – pietre cimentate impreuna.

Sa presupun ca ma duc intr-o biserica si ii spun pastorului: “Ai o biserica frumoasa – destul de aratoasa, dar lipsesc multe caramizi din perete. Unde sunt caramizile care lipsesc?” Iata-le – sunt una peste cealalta in mijlocul podelei. La ce folosesc caramizile puse in mijlocul podelei? Pentru ca si caramizile sa serveasca la ceva, ele trebuie sa fie asezate in perete imbinate intre ele. E una sa vii la biserica insa e alta sa vii la partasie.

Spre Hebron a fost o calatorie lunga si laborioasa, printre munti si dupa ce a ajuns acolo Avraam a avut de construit un altar. Daca vrei sa vii la partasie, te va costa ceva. Oricine poate veni la biserica, sa cante cantari, sa dea zeciuiala, sa salute – “Buna, frate, ce mai faci? Ne vedem saptamana viitoare.” Oricine poate face aceasta.

Nu este rau sa faci aceasta. Cand esti nou venit la credinta, vii la Betel, dar este gresit sa stai in Betel. Trebuie sa vii la Hebron, trebuie sa vii la partasie. Pentru ca la locul partasiei Avraam locuieste sub alt tip de stejari, stejarii din Mamre. (Aceasta se afla astazi langa locul numit Kirath-Arba in West Bank, o zona foarte tulburata. Detine pestera din Machpela unde patriarhii au fost ingropati.) “Mamre” in ebraica inseamna “fermitate” sau “vigoare”: “Stejarii puterii”. Si numai atunci cand ajunge la Hebron, locuind sub stejarii lui Mamre, se va afla intr-o pozitie strategica puternica ca sa-si poata salva ruda sa, pe Lot. El nu si-a putut salva nepotul daca era in Betel, a trebuit sa se coboare in Hebron, aproape de unde se afla Lot.

DE LA O BISERICA LA O PARTASIE


        Vedeti, noi vrem sa ne vedem familiile mantuite, vecinii nostrii salvati, la fel pe prietenii nostrii, vrem sa ne vedem compatriotii salvati din paganism – de Canaanitii din tara, salvati din curentul New Age, din Islam, din ocultism, din crestinismul fals, dar nu vom vedea asta niciodata prin mersul la biserica.

Am fost misionar in Orientul Mijlociu pentru ani de zile – ascultati-ma! Nu exista vreo biserica in lume – nu ma refer in termenul grecesc “eklesia” ci in sensul de “congregatie” – nu exista nici o biserica in lume care sa poata prelua o moschee si sa o castige. Auziti ce am spus? Nu exista nici o biserica in lume care sa poata lua o moschee si sa o castige. Daca vreti sa preluati o moschee, trebuie sa fiti partasie. Daca vreti sa castigati impotriva islamului trebuie sa va aflati in locul fermitatii, al vigorii, in locul puterii reale.

Nu exista biserica in lume care sa poata birui pe mormoni sau martorii lui Iehova – ei sunt prea dedicati. Ei sunt mai zelosi pentru o minciuna decat sunt crestinii pentru adevar. Nici o biserica nu poate sta impotriva martorilor lui Iehova cu Turnul lor de Veghere sau a templului lui Mormon. Nici una. Nici o biserica din lume nu poate sta impotriva acestor locuri; o partasie poate – nu o biserica.

BETELUL VA AVEA PROBLEME


        Locuiesti in Betel sau in Hebron? Daca locuiesti in Betel vei avea o problema. Sa privim la 
Amos 4:4-5… 

  1. Duceti-va numai la Betel si pacatuiti! Duceti-va la Ghilgal si pacatuiti si mai mult! Aduceti-va jertfele in fiecare dimineata si zeciuielile la fiecare trei zile!

  2. Faceti sa fumege jertfe de multumire facute cu aluat!
    …(pacat, doctrina falsa)…
    Trambitati-va, vestiti-va darurile de mancare de bunavoie!

Intri in Betel si incalci legea? Oh, iti aduci zeciuiala si jertfele, dar aduci o jertfa pacatoasa pentru ca este aluat dospit!


Caci asa va place, copii ai lui Israel, zice Domnul Dumnezeu.

Caci asa va place crestinilor dupa evanghelie! Caci asa va place penticostalilor! Caci asa va place presbiterienilor! Caci asa va place baptistilor!

“Oh, Eu vin la biserica! Imi platesc zeciuiala!” Este aluat. Mandrie spirituala, pacat, doctrina falsa. “Oh, Eu vin la biserica, bine?! Imi fac particica! Imi platesc zeciuiala! In regula!” Carnea iubeste religia. Vechea creatie va incerca intotdeauna sa se justifice prin respectarea regulilor, prin intoarcerea la Lege. Sa privim la Amos 5:5

Nu cautati Betelul, nu va duceti la Ghilgal si nu treceti la Beer-Seba
(Toate aceste lucruri au o semnificatie in ebraica.)
Caci Ghilgalul va fi dus in robie, si Betelul va fi nimicit

Ati vazut? “Betelul va fi nimicit.” Biserica te va dezamagi. Daca nu s-a intamplat deja, mai devreme sau mai tarziu iti garantez – biserica te va dezamagi. Motivul pentru care biserica te va dezamagi este pentru ca biserica este formata din oameni care sunt ca tine si ca mine. Biserica te va dezamagi. O biserica nu poate sa dainuiasca. “Betelul va avea probleme”. Partasia este ceea ce va dainui.

Avem aici cativa credinciosi care au fost crestini sub regimul comunist din Romania. Bisericile nu insemnau nimic. Politia comunista se putea scapa de orice biserica; era partasia care a dainuit. Oamenii care au simtul devotamentului, comunitatea, familia; oameni dornici sa-si puna viata in joc unul pentru celalalt, acestea sunt lucrurile care au fost dedesubtul persecutiilor. Si persecutia se va intoarceinainte de revenirea Domnului Isus chiar in tari pe care le consideram democratice. “Betelul va avea probleme”.

Nu exista siguranta in biserica; exista siguranta in Hebron – acolo este puterea. Acolo cresc stejarii din Mamre.

LOCUITORII DIN BETEL


        Ce este un “locuitor din Betel”? Exista mai multe moduri de a-i recunoaste. Unii, desigur, sunt oamenii care vin la Biserica duminica dimineata dar nu sunt prezenti la serviciul de seara. Nu pentru un motiv bun ca avand o slujba sau copii bolnavi. Doar pentru ca ar prefera sa urmareasca meciul de fotbal in loc sa-l inregistreze si sa-l urmareasca cand ajung acasa. Acesta este “locuitor al Betelului”. Astazi poti inregistra jocul daca iti plac sporturile, dar acesti oameni au o problema. Sau oameni care vin duminica si isi fac partea dar nu vin la intalnirile de peste saptamana facand asta consistent. Nu ma refer la cei cu motive intemeiate, ci la oameni care gasesc scuze ca sa nu fie acolo. Oamenii acestia au o problema. Prioritatile lor sunt gresite.

Dar exista o cale sigurasa poti recunoaste un “locuitor al Betelului”. Va spun eu cum sa-i recunoasteti: sunt mantuiti de 5 ani, 10 ani sau 60 de ani si nu stiu daca sunt “ochi”, “picior”, sau “mana”. Ei nu stiu ce daruri au, nu stiu care e lucrarea lor, nu stiu daca au darul invataturii, nu stiu daca au darul evanghelizarii sau al ajutorarii – ei nu stiu ce daruri au. Ei nu stiu daca se potrivesc in zid si in consecinta raman doar o caramida jos pe podea. Ei vin la biserica, platesc zeciuiala, canta cantarile, si zic, “Ne vedem saptamana viitoare”. Acesta este un “locuitor al Betelului”.

Cei mai multi crestini din Occident sunt “locuitori ai Betelului”. In cele mai multe biserici occidentale pe care le frecventez exista 15% din crestini care fac 85% din rugaciuni. Anuntati o seara de rugaciune, sa vedeti cati oameni vin. Sunt 15% din oameni care fac 85% din lucrare. Sunt 15% din oameni care fac 85% din daruri. Nu ma refer cantitate, ci la abilitate – participare. Exista 15% care constituie partasia; restul, merg doar la biserica.

“Betelul va avea probleme”. Nu ar fi trebuit sa zambesc. Dar “Betelul va avea probleme”. Va spun ca biserica va va dezamagi. Iar in zilele din urma ne va dezamagi pe toti.

Nu vei dobandi nimic doar prin venirea la biserica. Esti un tanar crestin? Foarte bine, vino la biserica, dar apoi trebuie sa vii la partasie si sa construiesti un altar. Te va costa ceva sa vii la partasie. Te costa: timp, finante, atacuri spirituale – va fi un pret. Fara altar nu exista sacrificiu; fara sacrificiu nu exista progres.

Existam cu totii undeva pe aceasta harta


        Sa privim la harta calatoriei lui Avraam. Fiecare suntem undeva pe harta. Chiar acei copilasi de la cresa sau scoala duminicala – ei nu stiu inca, dar ei sunt in Ur din Haldeea. Prin credinta parintilor credinciosi ei sunt deja luati de Domnul pe calea salvarii. Dumnezeu ii cheama deja. Noi nu botezam copilasii, dar Dumnezeu vede copii crestinilor diferit de copiii lumii.

Poate ca te afli in Haran si esti la un moment de criza. Daca citesti aceste randuri si nu esti nascut din nou si nu l-ai acceptat pe Isus, exista un motiv pentru care citesti. Nu motivul tau personal, motivul lui Dumnezeu. Viata ta nu are sens, dar daca vii la Isus va avea sens pentru ca a deveni crestin este foarte usor. Poate lucrurile pe care le-ai citit astazi sunt complicate, dar cand se naste un copilas nu stie prea multe – el invata. Fiind nascut din nou e acelasi lucru: inveti mai multe pe parcurs. Dar sa te nasti este usor, la fel si cu nasterea din nou.

Nu ma refer la propaganda sau nonsensul pe care il vedeti la escrocheria unor predicatori din America sau la televizor, aceea nu este nastere din nou, aceea este escrocherie. Vorbesc despre evanghelie. Evanghelia e simpla. Acelasi fel de dragoste pe care-l ai pentru propriul tau copil, daca ai avea un copil, este dragostea pe care a creat-o Dumnezeu sa te invete cat de mult te iubeste. Si la fel cum v-ati da viata de bunavoie sa salvati viata copilului vostru este exact ce a facut Isus cand a mers la cruce pentru pacatul tau. Aceasta a facut El. Vedeti, cu totii ne-am razvratit impotriva iubirii lui Dumnezeu si I-am respins autoritatea. Am fost sub influenta cuiva numit diavol, dumnezeul acestei lumi. De aceea, nici unul din sistemele politice sau economice umane nu vor functiona vreodata, de aceea distrugem mediul inconjurator, de aceea casatoriile esueaza, de aceea vrem sa fim buni si sa facem bine dar cu totii facem lucruri pe care le stim ca sunt rele, pentru ca avem o natura decazuta si intreaga lume sta in puterea celui nelegiuit.

La Dumnezeu un om fara pacat valoreaza mai mult decat toti oamenii cu pacat. Din aceasta cauza a fost posibil ca Isus sa moara pentru fiecare, pentru ca unul fara pacat valoreaza mai mult decat toti care au pacat. Dumnezeu devine om si El ia pacatele. Toate lucrurile pe care Eu le-am facut, toate lucrurile rele pe care tu le-ai facut, Dumnezeu le transfera lui Isus. Si apoi Dumnezeu Ii ia dreptatea si ne-o da noua. Si, dupa cum El a inviat din morti El ne va invia din morti pentru a avea viata vesnica. Aceasta este evanghelia.

Trebuie sa te intorci din pacat. Cere lui Dumnezeu sa-ti dea putere sa te intorci din pacat si El iti va da acea putere. El m-a eliberat de dependenta de cocaina cand eram la Universitate, o dependenta teribila. Diavolul mi-a stapanit viata, dar Isus a fost mai puternic decat diavolul. El a fost mai puternic decat acea cocaina. Ceea ce El a facut pentru mine tot El poate face pentru fiecare. El o va face pentru tine. El iti va da puterea sa te intorci din pacat daca ii ceri. El iti va lua pacatul si iti va da viata.

Daca nu Il cunosti cand te afli in Haran, esti la momentul de criza din viata ta. Poti trece de la moarte la viata astazi. Nu trebuie sa mergi in iad, nu trebuie sa mergi la judecata, poti deveni astazi un copil al lui Avraam.

Sau poate te afli in Betel unde vii la biserica. Diavolul vine la biserica in fiecare duminica. El este foarte religios. Diavolul duce mai multi oameni in iad cu religia decat o face cu narcoticele, toate abuzurile de substante si toate jocurile de noroc impreuna.

Religia este un drog.

Stiti, primii doi cei mai influenti oameni din istorie au fost amandoi evrei: Isus Hristos si Karl Marx. Exista un singur lucru cu care au cazut amandoi de acord: religia este cea mai mare frauda perpetuata in umanitate. Religia nu te va duce nicaieri; este Isus Hristos care te va duce undeva. Religia nu este solutia problemei mondiale. Priviti la Irlanda de Nord– aceasta este religie. Religia nu este solutia problemei lumii, religia este problema lumii. Isus este solutia.

Dar probabil ca lucrurile au mers prost. Probabil din vina legilor omenesti, lucruri pe care vechea natura le-a placut, poftele trupesti, imoralitatea sexuala, relatiile nelegiuite, drogurile – orice ar fi – dragostea de bani sau pur si simplu lucrurile nu au mers bine. Ai simtit ca Dumnezeu te-a abandonat. El nu a facut-o, doar ai simtit. Ai inceput sa pribegesti si sa nu-ti mai asumi guvernarea existentei proprii ca asociat secundar ci ca cel principal si ai plecat in Egipt. Te afli inapoi in lume.

Nu exista speranta pentru tine acolo; vei sfarsi doar intr-o stare de umilinta. Vei iesi de acolo sau vei muri. Nu exista recidivist “de succes”. Este o imposibilitate teologica. Iti irosesti timpul, iti irosesti tineretea – o irosesti doar. Trebuie sa te intorci la Betel, vino inapoi la Domnul si la casa Lui si continua de unde ai ramas.

Acesta e locul unde sunt cei mai multi oameni – Betel, dar nu este locul unde Dumnezeu vrea sa fim. El ne vrea sa fim in Hebron. El nu ne vrea sa fim caramizi pe podea, El ne vrea sa fim caramizi cimentate in perete. El vrea ca tu sa iti cunosti locul in trup, El vrea sa fii in locul de fermitate si vigoare ca sa iti poti salva rudele de imparatii intunericului. Acolo vrea El ca tu sa fii.

Unde esti? Copilasii se afla in Ur din Haldeea – putem agrea cu aceasta, dar te afli tu in Haran unde nu l-ai acceptat niciodata pe Isus? Esti la acel moment de criza? Iti poti incepe calatoria astazi. Biblia spune, “Nu te fali cu ziua de maine, caci nu stii ce poate aduce o zi!” (Proverbe 27:1). Acum este timpul hotarat, astazi este ziua salvarii. Daca nu-L cunosti pe Domnul, contacteaza-ne. Nu continua fara ca sa-L cunosti pe El.

Poate ca esti in Egipt. Te rog – Dumnezeu nu te iubeste mai putin, viata aceasta este prea scurta, inceteaza sa o mai irosesti. Tineretea zboara; nu o irosi. Ni se spune in Eclesiastul, “Tineretea zboara” (Ecclesiastul 12:1). Nu o irosi.

Dar cei mai multi dintre voi va aflati unde se afla cei mai multi crestini – cel putin in lumea occidentala, cei mai multi dintre voi va aflati in biserica. Cei mai multi crestini sunt in Betel. Am o speranta si o rugaciune pentru biserica voastra. Aceasta este speranta si rugaciunea mea pentru biserica voastra: curand sa nu mai fie o biserica. Rugaciunea mea pentru voi este ca biserica voastra sa devina o partasie.


By David Passmore May 30, 2026
Staying The Course Amidst Isolation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Living in Israel one gets the feeling that the metaphorical walls are closing in. Israel's reputation is being tarnished all over social media and the mainstream media, and this is reflected in massive public disdain towards this country. We are constantly told that there is near consensus amongst academics and commentators that a genocide was committed in Gaza. The very legitimacy of the state is brought into question. The majority of Americans are now hostile towards Israel. There is real fear that the next U.S. administration will turn against Israel. Even if this were to happen passively, by the U.S. refraining from exercising its veto power towards Security Council Resolutions condemning Israeli actions this could be catastrophic. Internally it is a fractured society leaning increasingly right wing which further alienates Israel from world opinion. An example in point is how Ben Gvir mocked the most recent participants of a global aid flotilla to Gaza. Such conduct further agitates outrage at Israel. The left-wing media presents the ruins of Gaza as a mortal wound in Israel's side. When the world observes this level of carnage no degree of public relations can ameliorate the sense of indignation towards Israel. We can liken the situation of Israel to that of a depressed person. All he sees is hopelessness and gloom. But this isn't the first time that the Jewish nation has been faced with such darkness. Things change and we don't know how the geo-political map will reconfigure in the future. We need to ride out this storm and keep going. On a historical note, the situation is reminiscent of what our ancestors faced when we returned from the Babylonian exile to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. Nehemiah was faced with constant lies and conspiracies designed to entrap him by hostile actors: Sanballat the Horonite, Tobiah the Ammonite and Geshem the Arab. They employed deception, slander and ridicule in order to maintain their political eminence. There was also a certain sense of abandonment amongst the Jews in Israel then as in our own day. We read in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah about the anguish of the leadership in Israel concerning the lack of assistance from the Babylonian diaspora towards the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem and the Temple. Only 20% of the exiles returned to the land. It was largely the poor who returned. Most of the affluent, established Jews remained in Exile. This is a continuing theme in Jewish history. It is also important to observe that from its very beginnings there were bible believing Christians who spearheaded the return of the Jews to their land. The idea of organizing a return of the Jews to Israel began as a Protestant Restorationist objective that can be traced to 17th century Puritan England. The protagonists of the Cromwellian Republic viewed themselves as the new Israel fighting the Papist forces of Satan. Alongside this, interest grew in the notion that biblical prophecies pertaining to the return of the Jews to Israel were a necessary precursor for the return of Christ. The growth of the British Empire in the 19th century lent political clout to Christian Restorationism with specific missions to the Jews established. Although there had been a longing to return to Israel as written in the thrice daily Amidah prayer, Jewish Zionism arose in the midst of mid nineteenth century nationalism and was further fermented by European antisemitism. It was an altogether secular enterprise. Although Israel's situation appears rather stark, we can draw strength from the Providence afforded to our ancestors in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah when they too were faced with defamation. This is also an opportunity to grow closer to our natural allies in the evangelical world who from the beginning of Zionism were steadfast supporters of the project to establish a Jewish homeland in Israel.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 25, 2026
Signs of the Times Tony Pearce ‍ ‍ Left, right or center – is our democracy in danger “Things fall apart, the center does not hold. Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.” W.B Yeats ‘The Second Coming. ’ ‍ ‍ Labour’s losses in the council elections and the battle for succession to their unpopular leader Kier Starmer have raised the possibility that we may soon have our seventh Prime Minister in ten years. Local elections saw Reform and the Greens make sweeping gains, leading Green Party leader, Zack Polanski to say that we are seeing ‘the end of the old two party system’. Maybe we are. In which case what comes next? Will we head to the far left, the far right or will the center hold on to power? Or will it end with ungovernable chaos as unqualified people take control of local and national government? Behind all this there are fundamental questions, ‘What is government for? Who does it represent and where is it going?’ ‍ ‍‍ ‍ According to the Bible (Romans 13) the purpose of government is to promote good and restrain evil. The government has the right to raise taxes for the common good of society and people should pay them. In 1 Timothy 2 Paul encourages us to pray for the government that ‘we may live a godly and peaceable life’. In other words, pray that the government will create an orderly and peaceful society and not interfere with our right to set up communities that teach and preach the Word of God. The situation becomes more difficult when we see government promoting things which are harmful and restraining things which are good and clamping down on freedom of speech with a threat to our ability to live a ‘godly and peaceable life’ ‍ Since becoming a Christian in my early twenties, I have wrestled with the question of how our faith applies to contemporary political issues. I started this quest on the left politically after leaving university and working as an English teacher with sympathies for Marxism. I then became a born again Christian in 1970, and joined my late wife Nikki in evangelizing the radical left, by handing out leaflets at their marches and demonstrations in London and attending their meetings to discuss matters of faith and politics with them. ‍ ‍‍ ‍ We had some good discussions with people and hope we made some consider the Christian alternative. However as we looked at Marxism from a Christian point of view and its practice in Communist countries, we understood that behind this ideology there is a strong anti-christian spirit. It denies the existence of God and promotes the idea of human perfectibility by our own effort. This is exemplified in the words of the Internationale, the socialist battle hymn, ‘No saviour from on high delivers, no faith have we in prince or peer, our own right hand the chains will shiver, chains of hatred, greed and fear.’ This Antichrist spirit led to the persecution of Christians in the Communist countries of eastern Europe, the Soviet Union and China. Far from creating the socialist paradise on earth that Lenin wrote about in ‘Socialism and Religion’, it created a society ruled by hatred, greed and fear, controlled by secret police, prison camps and responsible for the death of millions. ‍ ‍ In western society we have witnessed the growth of ‘cultural Marxism’ a movement aimed at infiltrating and changing society from within, rather than fomenting the workers’ revolution. Labour’s Fabian Society, with its (now discarded) logo of the wolf in sheep’s clothing, has been engaged in this process since the beginning of the 20th century. Social change really took off with the permissive society in the 1960s, which succeeded in changing traditional values, especially in the area of sex and the family. It replaced biblical values with a new ‘morality’ that is fundamentally anti Christian. These ideas have permeated large swathes of our society including the education system, the judiciary, the Civil Service, much of the media, mainstream political parties (including even the Conservative ‘wets’ and parts of the established church). ‍ ‍ Melanie Phillips describes the results of this in her book, ‘The Builder’s Stone.’ ‘Having decided that the West was rotten to the core, western elites set out to create a new culture that would usher in the brotherhood of man and eradicate hatred, prejudice, and war. Their Brave New World junked biblical religion with all its constraints on behaviour and revolved instead around self gratification. Everybody had the right to live as they wanted; nobody could say that their way of life was better or worse than anyone else’s; no one had the right to say that their culture was better than any other culture. That was ‘racism.’ At the heart of all this was the doctrine that there was no such thing as objective truth. Everything was relative; everything was a matter of opinion. Because there was no truth feelings became more important than facts. So the West abandoned the codes of morality, conscience, truth and lies, personal responsibility, and duty to others in favour of a culture of the self. In the process it junked its inherited traditions and biblical codes on which western culture was based.’ ‍ Britain changed from being a society that respected values based on the 10 Commandments and the teaching of Jesus Christ to one that discarded them for relative values. Ideas of ‘diversity, inclusion and equity’ became the norm, together with and a form of ‘tolerance’, that is really very intolerant if you oppose it. This ‘tolerance’ means accepting the virtues of multiculturalism and humanism and believing that all gods are equally valid or true (or none are). We must also accept that all lifestyles and family arrangements including homosexual and transsexual ones are just as valid as traditional two parent heterosexual families, with a father and mother committed to each other in lifelong matrimony looking after their own children. ‍ As society accepts this radical change in how we view culture, morality and religion, we are told not to criticize other cultures and world views or imply that they are anything less than equal to the culture, morality and faith derived from the Bible. ‍ All this has not improved society. Instead we have a collapse of values with no central idea to hold it together, just a group of competing ‘communities’ which are often only united in opposition to the traditional values and culture of Great Britain. A good example of this is the ‘red – green alliance’ of radical leftists and Islamists who come together to denounce Israel and campaign to ‘globalise the Intifada’. In practice this means a world wide war against Israel and Judaeo-Christian society and a desire to replace it with their version of either Islamism or Communism. However if one of them were to come to power, you can be sure that the Islamist’s would get rid of the leftists or vice versa. In fact that happened in Iran’s 1979 revolution, when Islamist supporters of Khomeini and Communists came together to get rid of the Shah. Then the Islamists seized power, turned on the Communists and wiped them out. ‍ Alisteir Heath wrote in the Daily Telegraph: ‘Ruined by decades of political vandalism, the Britain we knew and loved, a land of stability, pragmatism, and ancient freedoms, is no more. Today’s UK is uglier, impoverished, volatile and disorderly. We’ve lost our level-headedness. Anger and frustration have become our defining emotions. Our institutions have wasted away, and we have been taught to despise our history. The decline of family, community and faith have led to alienation, dependence on welfare and the rise of novel ideologies, mostly secular but also sectarian, turbocharged by social media. While the state becomes unnervingly authoritarian, the air reeks of insurrection and every variety of extremism. The British public’s sense of betrayal is as well-founded as it is dangerous. The machinery of state is incompetent and self-serving, a vehicle for social engineering in the global interest.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ Criticism of this process now risks being classed as ‘hate crime’ with a growing authoritarian society monitoring social media posts and public teaching of alternative ideas in ways which risk shutting down free speech in our society. A Christian teacher Enoch Burke is currently in prison in Dublin after he was suspended from his job and jailed after refusing to accept and teach transgenderism in the school. ‍ ‍ ‍ Nick Timothy, Shadow Secretary of State for Justice, got into trouble when he questioned mass Muslim prayer in Trafalgar Square. He wrote: ‘Mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. The adhan – which declares there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger – is, when called in a public place, a declaration of domination. The domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook.” He is right in this. Allah hu Akhbar actually means Allah is greater, greater than your God, Muhammad is greater than Jesus and the Koran is greater than the Bible. ‍ ‍ ‍ Tim Dieppe of Christian Concern for our Nation wrote: “The fact that we have mass Islamic prayer in Trafalgar Square at all is indicative of the massive culture change that we have seen in the last few decades. A culture change that was not voted for or ever agreed to by the British people. And, a culture change that can hardly be described as having been entirely beneficial to our culture as a whole. I only need to mention grooming gangs involving mostly Pakistani Muslim men , sharia courts, honour crimes, terror attacks, the assassination of an MP, an attempt to blockade Parliament, mass antisemitic marches through London, a convicted terrorist standing for local elections, sectarianism, and many other examples to make the point. Earlier this month, the Government gave Muslims special protection with the adoption of an official definition of anti-Muslim hostility .” ‍ ‍ ‍ You are not really supposed to question this in public life today. A message circulating on social media is an apt commentary on all this. ‘First they overlook evil, then they permit evil, then they legalise evil, then they promote evil, then celebrate evil, then persecute those who call it evil.’ Soviet dissident Solzhenitsyn wrote: ‘A Communist system can be recognised by how it spares criminals and criminalises its opponents.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ The root cause of all this is the rejection of God and biblical values. The 18th-century French philosopher Joseph de Maistre coined the phrase "people get the government they deserve." David Pawson followed up on this idea, arguing that in democratic societies like ours, the moral and spiritual condition of a nation's citizens is directly reflected in the leaders they elect. If the general public abandons moral truths, they will inevitably vote for governments that reflect those same compromises. David Pawson taught that God may use governmental leadership to judge or bless a nation, depending on the people's obedience. He noted that Hebrew prophets saw wicked rulers as a form of divine judgement on a society that has strayed from God's laws. Therefore a nation's ultimate hope rests on repentance rather than just political change. His conclusion is that Christians should actively stand for moral truth in society. He believed that the church is meant to influence culture upward, and that a decline in national morality inevitably leads to deteriorating governance. ‍ ‍ ‍ Sadly much of the church today has become the ‘salt that has lost its savour’ through compromise with antichristian forces in society and government. It may be too late to save our country and western democracy as social and economic pressures create a collapse of democracy and push us either towards anarchy or dictatorship. ‍ ‍ ‍ Yeats’ poem quoted at the beginning of this article ends with the enigmatic line ‘Some rough beast slouches towards Bethlehem to be born.’ Most likely he is referring to the coming anti-Messiah who is labelled the Beast in the book of Revelation. Many believe his is now waiting in the wings to replace the true Messiah (born in Bethlehem) and bring in the dictatorship prophesied in Revelation 13. The Bible indicates that the Beast or Antichrist will have power for a moment, but it will be short lived and doomed to destruction at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to the earth. Then the kingdoms of this world will become the kingdom of our God and of His Messiah and He shall reign forever and ever (Revelation 11.15) and the ‘government shall be on His shoulder’ (Isaiah 9.6). ‍ ‍ ‍ Maranatha come Lord Jesus. ‍ ‍ ‍ Water, water nowhere and not a drop to drink. (Apologies to the Ancient Mariner) ‍ ‍‍ ‍ While nations worry about supply of oil and gas as a result of the war in the Gulf and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a much more vital commodity for human survival is water. And it is in short supply in a growing number of nations. ‍ ‍ As of 2026, over 25 countries face extremely high water stress, with the most severe crises located in the Middle East and North Africa. This region is home to the world's most water-stressed nations, including Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Yemen, and Libya. India and Pakistan face critical water scarcity due to overexploitation of aquifers and population density. Much of Africa , Somalia and Ethiopia in particular are facing severe shortages due to drought and climate change. Mexico and parts of the United States (particularly Texas and the west coast) are experiencing significant water shortages and declining groundwater levels. ‍ ‍ ‍ Iran is facing a severe, multi-year water crisis as of May 2026, with major cities like Tehran, Mashhad, and Karaj approaching the point where taps could run dry due to depleted reservoirs. Groundwater is depleted across most of the country, and nineteen provinces are experiencing severe drought. The crisis is driven by a combination of climate change and decades of poor water management, including excessive dam construction and inefficient, water-intensive agriculture. China is facing a severe, multi-faceted water crisis defined by extreme scarcity in the north, widespread pollution, and mismanagement, threatening its food supply and economic growth. ‍ ‍ ‍ Several countries are significantly affected by upstream dam construction that reduces downstream water flow, causing, environmental, and diplomatic crises. These countries include Iraq, heavily impacted by dams built on the Tigris and Euphrates rivers by Turkey and Iran, leading to reduced water for agriculture, destruction of forests, and increased sandstorms. Egypt and Sudanface significant water security risks due to the Ethiopian Grand Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile. Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Laosare affected of dams built by China on the upper Mekong River ‍ ‍ One country which bucks this trend is Israel. Israel manages its water resources by transforming a chronic shortage into a surplus through large-scale desalination, extensive wastewater recycling, and a centralised national water carrier system. The agriculture sector has shifted away from freshwater, using treated effluent instead. Advanced drip irrigation technologies are widely used to minimise waste. Israel has exported its water technologies to countries around the world, particularly Africa where it has given advice on how to use limited water resources to great effect. ‍ ‍ ‍ Without water no society on earth can survive. Bible prophecies indicate that water shortage and pollution will be a global problem in the last days. Most obviously no water equals no food, so famine is an inevitable result of water shortages. Jesus warned of this as a sign of the last days in Matthew 24.7. Revelation 8.10-11 speaks of something called ‘Wormwood’ falling on rivers and springs of water causing it to become bitter and many to die from drinking it. ‍ ‍ Prophecy speaks of the two great rivers of the ancient world, the Nile and the Euphrates, being affected by a crisis causing the Euphrates to dry up (Revelation 16.12) and the Nile to become contaminated and its waters turn foul (Isaiah 19.5-11). Isaiah 24 speaks of a curse devouring the earth in the last days causing the earth to be ‘defiled (or polluted) under its inhabitants.’ ‍ ‍ ‍ According to the New Scientist, there are massive amounts of water hidden deep beneath the Earth's surface. Scientists have found evidence of a reservoir of water three times the volume of all surface oceans combined, located roughly 250–400 miles underground within the mantle. ‍ ‍ ‍ It may be that the Lord will release this water to replenish and clean up the earth in the Millennial kingdom when ‘waters shall burst forth in the wilderness, and streams in the desert. The parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water.’ Isaiah 35. Zechariah 14.8-9 says, ‘In that day it shall be that living waters shall flow from Jerusalem, half of them toward the eastern sea and half of them toward the western sea; In both summer and winter it shall occur. And the Lord shall be King over all the earth.’ Zechariah 14.8-9. See also Ezekiel 47. ‍ Rethinking Russia ‍ Things are not going well for Vladimir Putin in his ‘special military operation’. Four years after invading Ukraine in February 2022, Russia is not making advances and actually losing ground. Russia is losing as many as 25,000- 35,000 casualties a month and over 1.2 million have been killed and wounded since the war began. Ukrainian skills in drone warfare have destroyed large quantities of Russian equipment, tanks, armoured personnel carriers, artillery and rocket systems, helicopters, and naval vessels. ‍ ‍ Russia is spending an estimated 40% of the entire federal budget on the war effort. As a result of this and western sanctions, Russia is increasingly unable to fix chronic infrastructure problems at home. During the bitter Russian winter thousands of people were left without heat, light, or even water. All forms of transport, trains, trucks and planes, are facing logistical problems, making it difficult to transport goods and people across the vast Russian regions. Russia is on the way to an infrastructure collapse that will likely take decades to recover. ‍ ‍ Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov warned the State Duma that Russia's faltering economy risks stoking a 1917-style revolution. He demanded urgent financial and economic measures by autumn to avert a potential economic collapse. This raises the danger of the Russian Federation fracturing. The Caucuses are restive, the far east is looking to China and Siberia is facing an acute problem as a result of melting permafrost, causing buildings, bridges and pipelines to collapse. ‍ ‍ In the present circumstances it is hard to see how Russia could lead the Gog and Magog invasion of Israel (Ezekiel 38-39). Some have said that it is more likely that Turkey is the lead power in the War of Gog and Magog. They say that Meshech and Tubal are not Moscow and Tobolsk, but regions of modern Turkey. Erdogan’s Turkey is backed by an Islamist world view hostile to Israel, seeking the recovery of its Ottoman Empire. He has his eyes on taking control of Jerusalem. Turkey is possession of a large land army already stationed in the region, some of it occupying part of Syria. ‍ ‍ The alternative is that the War of Gog and Magog is some way off, possibly part of Armageddon, giving time for Russia to recover from its present distress. We wait and see, but meanwhile spare a thought and a prayer for the people of Ukraine and Russia, suffering as a result of Putin’s futile war, oppressed by his corrupt dictatorship and facing an economic and social collapse caused by his failed policies. ‍ ‍
By David Passmore May 25, 2026
Trump's Visit with Xi Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The tempest path of Sino-U.S. tensions came to a head during Trump's first term in office with the outbreak of Covid. Many commentators believed that the deterioration in relations was in terminal decline and that a major confrontation in the straits of Taiwan was fast looming. Trump held China responsible for the spread of Covid, insisting that he would pursue reparations. The election of Biden halted this commitment. Biden sought a non-confrontational policy towards Beijing. In the aftermath of the disastrous premature withdrawal from Afghanistan handing that country over to the Taliban and the Russian invasion of Ukraine under his watch, Biden became too preoccupied to assertively engage with China. Chinese State media portrayed Trump's visit as being rather unremarkable in the context of other foreign dignitaries lining up to meet Xi, pointing out that just a week later Putin would arrive in Beijing. China manifests that it is winning the trade war that Trump began in 2018, beating America at its own game of capitalism. They frame the U.S. as being in a position of weakness because China is able to source whatever products they buy from the U.S. elsewhere like oil from Canada, and soybeans from Brazil. The oil, soybeans and 200 Boeing's Xi agreed to purchase from Trump were presented as a mere gesture to placate Trump as China has already bought 350 Air Buses in the last year. China would have the world believe that it is only semi-conductors where America has the edge. Here China hints that it is not likely to buy H200 Invidia Chips because it would mean that China will always lag behind the U.S. in building their AI tech. China's major contention and concern is that the U.S. may impose export controls to contain China. China's strategy instead is to invest massively on indigenous innovation. China wants to become an innovation powerhouse that will export its own Chips to the Global South. China is fast catching up with America's lead in AI with the launch of Deep Seek and they claim similar progress with Chip making. China is now ostensibly only eight months behind the U.S. on Large Language Models. Running contrary to this narrative Trump insists that China is desperate to trade with America. China's economy has now peaked. Emblematic of this stagnating growth is rising youth unemployment. China is no longer America's biggest trading partner. Trump has shifted manufacturing back to the U.S. and Trump believes that China can't revive its economy without America. Lined up to meet Xi with Trump were the heads of some of America's biggest Tech Corporations. Corporations like nvidia seek a relaxing of export controls for Chips as they want short term profits, ignoring the risk that China will reverse engineer this technology. More broadly, China and the U.S. are playing a geopolitical chess game spanning the globe. Trump outmaneuvered China in Latin America with the removal of Maduro from power in Venezuela. China is exploiting its influence on Iran in order to get Trump to refrain from taking more active steps towards the defense of Taiwan. Indeed, Trump didn't say anything about Taiwan during his visit. Trump's instincts are of a transactional approach towards alliances, where he is only willing to underwrite defense assistance if allies pay up as an insurer would. It is also important to note that saber rattling the Taiwan card also serves the CCP agenda to distract internal dissent concerning the state of the Chinese economy. Most imminently Trump needs China to pressure Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz and get oil prices down before the midterm elections. China has largely insulated itself from the Gulf energy impact due to stockpiles. Trump would also like China to stop providing Iran with GPS for its missiles. Other Chinese weapons systems and technology sold to Iran have failed to perform well against U.S. and Israeli military hardware. Matters boil down to a leverage between whatever Trump can do on Taiwan, China can do on the strait of Hormouz with Iran. Human Rights concerns, espionage and the alarming rate of Chinese acquisition of U.S. land have been placed on the back burner for the time being.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 17, 2026
Moriel & Jacob Prasch request prayer for Phil Malone and family “Please keep me and my family in prayer. My mum passed away on 13th May at the age of 93. It's a time of mourning, but may it be a time for the Gospel of Christ to be preached to my unbelieving family, especially my brother.”
By Mea Fredrickson May 13, 2026
Moriel & Jacob Prasch request prayer for Sister Joanne Rizzetto, wife of Pastor Dave Rizzetto of Church of The Open Door in New York City. Joanne has developed painful complications and adverse side effects from medications following knee surgery. May The Lord intervene for healing and give guidance to her physicians. Lord, we humbly ask you to intervene in the life of our dear sister. We know you can do all things and that you hear our prayers and consider your servants. Please put a stop to the adverse reaction. Restrain and reverse its effects and restore our sister so that she can continue to serve you in the ministry that you have called them to. We do glorify Your Name. We don't ask as those who treat you as our debtor, but as those who have tasted your goodness and found such mercy and compassion at your feet. Grace and peace and mercy be with Joanne and Pastor Dave.
By David Passmore May 5, 2026
Will Lebanon miss its golden opportunity? Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Converging new facts on the ground have transformed the political landscape in Lebanon. With Assad removed from power in Syria, a vital lifeline of arms supplies for Hezbollah originating in Iran has diminished. Hezbollah suffered considerable losses in its last round of fighting with Israel. The decapitation of its leadership with the targeted pager attack inflicted a severe blow. Hezbollah's new leader Naim Qassem is a weak substitute for the charismatic Nasrallah who was assassinated by Israel in 2024. Hezbollah in its frail state foolishly fell into line with Iran's instruction to join the fighting against Israel following the recent American-Israeli war with Iran. This was contrary to the wishes of the Lebanese government which was fearful of the inevitable destruction that would be wreaked by the Israeli response. The differing attitudes to Israel amongst Lebanon's population is reflective of its ethnic composition. The predominant groups in order of plurality are Christians, Shia Muslims and Sunni Muslims with a smaller minority of Druze. The major concern of most Christians in Lebanon is the dire state of their economy. They have no appetite to further their plight by invoking Israel's rage. During the colonial inter war period the French envisaged the demarcation between Lebanon and Syria as carving out enclaves for Christian and Druze control. Within Lebanon there would be a shared government that by convention would have the Executive power split between a Christian President, a Sunni Prime Minister and Shia Speaker of Parliament. The Christians in southern Lebanon (particularly Maronite Catholics) saw themselves as being anthropologically descendants of ancient Phoenicians as opposed to an Arab identity where the Arab Christians were largely Eastern Orthodox. The schism between the Maronites and the Arab Eastern Orthodox dates back to the time of the Crusades. The Maronites were culturally French, speaking French as their main language and held precedence in much of the Lebanese economy. The first threat to Lebanese stability and cohesion was settled by the U.S. Eisenhower administration in 1958 which landed Marines in an amphibious operation. A repeated attempt at this by the Reagan administration in 1983 ended in a military disaster for the U.S. due to suicide bombings by Iranian controlled terrorists. Israeli efforts to bring in stability during the Lebanese Civil War in conjunction with its Lebanese Christian allies led by Major Saad Haddad likewise came to calamity when the Sabra and Shatila revenge attacks took place following the assassination of Lebanese leader Bashir Gemayel. The ''Good Fence'' policy of an Israeli friendly free Lebanon zone in Southern Lebanon eventually ended badly following Menachem Begin's second incursion into Lebanon called ''Shalom HaGalil'' aimed at stopping the PLO rocket attacks on Israeli border communities like Metulla, Kiryat Shmona, Naharya, Rosh Hanikra, Tzfat and Carmiel. The proxy Israeli occupation from the Israeli border to the Litani river became an imbroglio that many in Israel viewed as Israel's Vietnam with widespread domestic protest and a collapse of morale within the IDF. Eventually Israel absorbed Christian war refugees from Lebanon, while the Vatican and most of the Christian world turned their backs on the Lebanese Christians. Lebanon was then saddled with two states within a state. The first was in the aftermath of Black September in 1970 when King Hussein of Jordan defended his Hashemite throne and government from Yasser Arafat's attempt to take over Jordan due to Jordan having a 70% Palestinian Arab demographic majority. The Jordanian legion drove tens of thousands of its pro Arafat Jordanian citizens into Lebanon, creating a population base for the first state within a state under Arafat. However the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and other factions had their niche interests. Courtesy of the Israeli Air Force Arafat relocated what he saw as his government in exile to Tunisia. This was a missed opportunity by the Lebanese government to assert its autonomy and full territorial control by making a Camp David type peace with Israel inclusive of economic and mutual security provisions. Instead an Iranian backed Syrian intervention replaced Arafat's state within a state with a new one that morphed into Hezbollah. The fall of the Assad regime and the Israeli counter-offensive against Hezbollah re-presents Lebanon with the opportunity that it once lost. The predominantly Christian controlled Lebanese military could and should operationally coordinate with the IDF, to obliterate and remove Hezbollah as the Israelis relieved Lebanon of Arafat's state within a state. Such a rapprochement would likely have strong American and possibly French and British support, allowing Lebanon to be at a non-combative peace with Israel along the lines of Egypt and Jordan, and now some of the Emirates. The natural comradery of the Lebanese Druze community with the Israeli Druze and the pro-Israeli Druze of Syria would additionally re-enforce a regional harmony, as would the Maronite Christian community in Israel with their co-coreligionists in Lebanon.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore May 5, 2026
PASTOR JOHN ANGLISS It is with profound sadness that we learned of the temporary separation from our friend and brother Pastor John Angliss. We look forward to being reunited with John in the millennial reign of Christ and indeed in God's Eternal Kingdom. Jacob Prasch visited John a few weeks ago in the UK while John was in hospice care having been diagnosed preterminal in his illness. While medically correct, it was of course a misdiagnosis. John is now cancer free and is alive and well in the presence of Jesus awaiting us in glory while his mortal body is being renewed for resurrection and immortality. In the meanwhile, during this temporary season of bereavement we do request prayer for his beloved wife Mary and for his congregation, The Ark Fellowship in England near Reading, England. Because he has recently arrived in the USA and is scheduled to address the Moriel Canada branch conference in Winnipeg, Jacob Prasch will regrettably not be able to attend the memorial service in Britain. Our condolences however are very much with Mary and our brethren in the UK who like us knew and loved Pastor Angliss. John was one of a minority of faithful voices who upheld a traditional biblically based Pentecostalism in the era of counterfeit revivals and apostasy that overtook most of British Pentecostalism. John was a faithful friend of Israel & The Jews standing on the prophetic purposes of God for Israel and the salvation of the Jews. John was a loyal friend to Moriel and Jacob Prasch and a colleague of David Pawson and Derek Prince, both of whom likewise stood by God's promises to Israel. John was also a founding leader of CMFI - the Christian Ministerial Fellowship International, former pastor of Three Mile Cross fellowship , and former board member of Focus On Israel (a Pentecostal Ministry to the Jews). While this separation is temporary, John's eternal gain will be our temporary loss. O GRAVE - WHERE IS THEY VICTORY, O DEATH WHERE IS THY STING ? Hosea 13:14 / 1 Corinthians 15: 55-57
By David Passmore April 28, 2026
We made it this far: Israel at 78 Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Since the last anniversary milestone of Israel at 75, we have been embroiled in relentless wars. Citizens had little respite to enjoy this year's festivities, coming on the heels of a lull in fighting on the Iranian and Lebanese fronts. We are constantly waiting for a breakthrough on the horizon that will normalize our relations with our neighbors and secure our position on the world stage. It is acutely exhausting to be the focus of the world's attention. But also there is a sense of inevitability accompanying the Zionist project. Specifically that Israel is destined to be central in the wider region and global affairs. Why is this? Is it due to it being a western transplant? Being geographically positioned on the crossroads of three continents? Religious believers would point to prophetic fulfillment. It is short sighted to only look at how our problems are rooted in today’s' reality. Greater forces are at work that will dictate the direction that Israel is heading. The Jewish diaspora will likely find itself in a growing precarious position that will lead to increasing Aliyah (immigration to Israel) and will perhaps ferment the emergence of a second Jewish commonwealth that will not need to heed international pressure in the same way that todays' polity finds itself doing. In this light it is interesting to ponder how our posterity would view our predicament and gains. And I frame matters in these terms with intentionality. We are enmeshed in a seemingly intractable conflict with the Palestinians, and yet Israel has made great gains particularly in the technological fields. There is a current of thinking that perceives Israel's way out of its quagmire is by making itself indispensable to technological advancements. We don't know how tomorrows' world will be shaped by the rapidly advancing AI revolution but so far Israel has proven to be uniquely adaptable and innovative to technological change. This has proved to be a boon to Israel's economy, as have offshore natural gas discoveries being developed in concert with Greece, Greek Cypriot and American energy interests that are geographically and strategically removed from any Straits of Hormuz shipping impediments that strangle the Persian Gulf deposits shared by Qatar and Iran. On another note we should contextualize the situation. How different are Israel's challenges from other nations? Is Israel any less stable than other countries (particularly in the region)? Israel doesn't find itself uniquely challenged to define its identity (most European countries do also, particularly in light of immigration). Nor does the government experience any more volatility than other comparable democracies. Israel's real problems lay in the nature of how its Jewish citizens desire to govern themselves. It is arguable whether the judicial reform protests that occupied public discourse in pre-October 7th Israel would have led to serious civil strife. But it is without doubt that this impasse was allayed by the external attack. The underlying tensions remain unresolved and there are many ways that they could play out. It has been framed as a battle for Israel's soul. Israel's enemies predict that Zionism is imploding and that the State won't survive another 5-10 years. Supporting this claim, they point to Israel's increasing alienation and growing pariah status on the international stage. Our Prime Minister has been indicted for war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Even public opinion in our staunchest ally the U.S. has turned sharply against Israel. With 80% of the Democratic Party being anti-Israel in a growing climate of anti-semitism we have even witnessed the shift of Alan Dershowitz to the Republican Party which must be seen as emblematic of a trend. There is apprehension in Israel of a post-Trump America dominated by the Democrats. However, these seeming incontrovertible facts may be offset by other measures of fortitude. This may be partially countered by the high investment by Silicon Valley in the Israeli Hi-tech sector, making Israel an asset for purposes of Research and Development in America's AI race against China. New opportunities for economic relations have also been opened with Arab nations through the Abraham Accords and with the powerhouse India. Furthermore, it is difficult to imagine a world in which Israel's technological prowess will not carry the sway of western decision makers in the long run. Israel's 78th anniversary is a moment to take pause and not catastrophize what the future may behold. The entire world is currently in a state of transformation and Israel is not an outlier in this context.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore April 23, 2026
Please click this link:https://mailchi.mp/christianconcern.com/action-alert-street-preaching-22-04-26?e=f1df30be3f
By David Passmore April 14, 2026
A critical juncture in NATO'S future Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM NATO was originally established in 1949 to keep the Russian hordes at bay from toppling those European countries not forked over to the Soviet sphere of influence at the Potsdam conference. Europe lay in ruins. Britain had passed on the torch of global hegemony to the U.S. by tacitly acquiescing to the decolonization of its Empire when Churchill and Roosevelt agreed terms of the Atlantic Charter for the post-war new world order in 1941. So from its start NATO was very much an American driven endeavor. American money with the Marshall plan was propping up western European economies and its military might was forming the bulk of their defensive capabilities. The lopsided nature of this dynamic has informed how tensions have persisted and recently erupted in the Alliance. During the Cold War the U.S. felt obligated to shoulder the costs of underwriting Europe's security in light of the broader interests to keep the Soviet's in check. Following the fall of the Iron Curtain European complacency became a sticking point with the 'peace dividend' further exploiting American largesse. European NATO allies spent ever smaller percentages of their GDP on defense expenditure at U.S. expense. Now in a multi-polar world U.S. and European perceived threats are less aligned. This was first tested in the aftermath of September 11th when for the first time NATO elected to trigger its article 5 collective defense protocol. And since then the U.S. has sought to continue to expand the traditional theatre of operations beyond Europe's borders. No longer is Russia perceived by America as being a proximate existential threat to its interests, but rather containing Chinese expansion in the Pacific arena. Parallel to NATO a discrete 'five eyes' intelligence sharing alliance comprising the Anglo-sphere (the U.S., U.K., Canada and New Zealand) emerged. This stands at the center of the U.S. – U.K. 'special relationship'. A relevant question would be can this signals intelligence (NSA-GCHQ) partnership persist should the U.S. withdraw from NATO? Conventional thinking would have led one to believe that with Brexit the U.K. would naturally pivot towards closer U.S. relations but under Starmer the U.K. is distancing itself. European powers misrepresent the present conflict as an aggressive, rather than defensive U.S. adventure while they themselves are more likely to be at risk. In this the Starmer government resembles the Labor party led committee for nuclear disarmament in the 1980's. It opposed the Thatcher supported deployment of U.S. cruise missiles in response to the Soviet SS20's pointed at Britain's cities. The British left branded their response to Soviet strategic escalation to U.S. aggression. This time however there is for the moment no Thatcher to bring common sense into an equation dominated by emotionally driven ideologies in the face of an aggressor with definite aims. In terms of the Russian-Ukraine conflict we are reverting to the old question dating back to the Napoleonic war era: to what extent is London happy with the European nations fighting it out alone for dominance of the continent. Britain was never willing to accept a single power in control. Many variables will dictate what kind of world emerges from the current conflicts in Ukraine and Iran. How will power be extracted from potential gains? What will be the strategic impact of this? What is sure, in the age of Trump this pattern of reliance on U.S. muscle is becoming quickly exhausted. Dating back to the Roman Empire, a factor in the decline of major powers has always been astronomical military spending, a budgetary demand that the U.S. under Trump is no longer willing to shoulder alone. (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).