Elijah: A Man Who Could Make It Rain

April 2, 2025

Scripture: James 5:16-18

Elijah was a man with a nature like ours. Elijah was a man who could make it rain. The Holy Spirit, through this text, is trying to tell us that, if he can do it, we can do it. We can make it rain. But what does that mean?

Elie: Un Homme Qui Pouvait Faire Pleuvoir

Élie était un homme de la même nature que nous: il pria avec instance pour qu'il ne plût point, et il ne tomba point de pluie sur la terre pendant trois ans et six mois. (Jacques 5 :17?18)

Élie était un homme de la même nature que nous. Élie était un homme qui pouvait faire pleuvoir. Dans ce texte, le Saint?Esprit essaie de nous dire que si il peut le faire, nous pouvons le faire également. Nous pouvons faire pleuvoir. Qu’est?ce que cela signifie?

La Pluie est un Type du Déversement du Saint-Esprit

Dans la typologie biblique, une variété de liquides représentent le Saint?Esprit sous différents aspects :

Le vin nouveau est un liquide qui représente le Saint?Esprit dans l’aspect de l’adoration. Un autre liquide est I’huiIe , qui nous parle de l’onction du Saint?Esprit. Mais I’eau vive , dans l’Écriture, est toujours le déversement du Saint?Esprit. La pluie, déverséedevient de l’eau vive.

Jésus l’a expliqué dans ces termes : Jean 7 :38?39« 38 Celui qui croit en moi, des fleuves d'eau vive couleront de son sein, comme dit l'Écriture. 39 Il dit cela de l'Esprit que devaient recevoir ceux qui croiraient en lui; car l'Esprit n'était pas encore, parce que Jésus n'avait pas encore étéglorifié. » Jésus dit clairement que l’eau vive est le déversementduSaint?Esprit.Ésaïe 44 :3 « 3 Car je répandrai des eaux sur le sol altéré, Et des ruisseaux sur la terre desséchée; Je répandrai mon esprit sur ta race, Et ma bénédiction sur tes rejetons. »

Encore une fois, il est écrit que Dieu déversera l’eau ? la pluie ? sur le sol asséché. Et Il dit que cela signifie qu’Il répandra Son Esprit. La pluie est un type.

De La Pluie Sur Une Ville Et Aucune Sur Une Autre

Amos 4 :7 « 7 Et moi, je vous ai refusé la pluie, Lorsqu'il y avait encore trois mois jusqu'à la moisson; J'ai fait pleuvoir sur une ville, Et je n'ai pas fait pleuvoir sur une autre ville; Un champ a reçu la pluie, Et un autre qui ne l'a pas reçue s'est desséché. »

Pourquoi donc, par exemple, qu’un évangéliste tel que Reinhard Bonnke peut prêcher en Afrique et voir des milliers et des milliers de gens sauvés à une seule réunion mais s’il se rend en Allemagne, en Angleterre ou en Australie, il ne se passe pas grand chose. La réponse se trouve dans Amos 4 :7 Dieu envoie la pluie dans une ville et pas dans l’autre. Cette dernière n’a aucune moisson.

Il se passe une œuvre souveraine de grâce lorsqu’Il déverse Son Esprit. Il pleut au Brésil, en Korée, en Indonésie, aux Philippines et beaucoup en Afrique. Mais dans les pays occidentaux Protestants qui ont la Bible depuis cinq cents ans, il y a maintenant une sécheresse. Dieu tourne Sa grâce des pays riches vers les pays pauvres.

La Chrétienté Protestante, blanche, est en déclin moralement, financièrement, théologiquement, spirituellement et numériquement.

L’Église grandit dans les pays Catholiques romains, les pays de race noire, olivâtre et de race jaune. L’Église Anglicane a décliné massivement en Angleterre, pourtant la plupart des évêques anglicans Africains sont évangéliques (Desmond Tutu est une exception). Les anglicans Africains sont terriblement persécutés par les Musulmans au Nigéria. Au sein de l’Asie, cette Église est très vivante. Mais l’Église d’Angleterre est morte. L’ancien feu qui un jour brûlait dans le Réveil Sunshine en Australie, le Réveil de Azusa Street en Californie et les réveils Sunderland en Angleterre avec Smith Wigglesworth ? est ce qui se passe maintenant dans des endroits tels que l’Équateur, le Chili, les Philippines, l’Indonésie et le Kenya. Dieu envoie la pluie dans une ville alors qu’une autre vit la sécheresse. Aujourd’hui, nous avons des gens qui enseignent des formules pour la croissance de l’Église. C’est tout à fait ridicule. Cela ne fonctionne pas. Il manque un ingrédient ? la grâce souveraine de Dieu; le déversement de Son Esprit.

Sa Parole ne retourne pas sans avoir fait Son effet. Certains seront sauvés, un ici et l’autre là. Mais, si vous parlez d’une grande moisson, pas de pluie signifie pas de grain! Mais Élie était un homme qui pouvait faire tomber la pluie. Et il était un homme de la même nature que nous. En d’autres mots, s’il pouvait le faire, nous le pouvons également.

Par Amour Pour Les Pères Et Par Amour Pour Son Nom

Je suis convaincu que Dieu désire donner une autre opportunité de se repentir aux démocraties occidentales Protestantes avant la venue de Jésus. Non par amour pour nous mais par amour pour Son Nom. Non parce que nous le méritons ? nos églises sont, pour la plupart, rétrogrades; mais par amour pour nos pères.

Tel qu’il est écrit dans Romains 11, Dieu veut donner aux Juifs une autre opportunité à la fin du monde, avant le retour de Jésus. Pourquoi? Parce que Lorsqu’Il regarde Israël, Il ne voit pas seulement son péché et le rejet de son Messie. Lorsque Dieu regarde Israël, Il voit encore Jérémie en prison; Il voit encore Ésaïe être scié en deux par le roi Manassé. Il voit Zacharie se faire martyriser dans le Temple. Il voit Jean le Baptiste se faire trancher la tête. Et Il dit « par amour pour leurs pères, Je veux donner une autre chance à cette nation. »

Il en est de même pour la Grande Bretagne. Lorsque Dieu la regarde, Il ne la voit pas seulement telle qu’elle est aujourd’hui ? une nation soit?disant Chrétienne, où des dieux Hindous sont adorés dans la cathédrale de Canterbury pendant que des évêques renient la résurrection et la virginité de Marie à la naissance de Jésus.

Lorsque Dieu regarde la Grande Bretagne aujourd’hui, Il la voit entièrement ? passée, présente et future. Il voit encore John Bunyan enchaîné au mur de la prison de Bedford County pendant douze ans

et écrire Le Voyage Du Pèlerin ; Il voit encore John Wesley se faire lapider par des groupes qui ont été attisés par l’Église d’Angleterre parce qu’il prêche l’Évangile ; Il voit encore Tynedale attaché à un poteau et se faire brûler vivant par l’église de Rome afin que nous ayons la Bible en Anglais ; Il voit encore Charles Haddon Spurgeon ; Il voit encore Ridley et Latimer et Hooper, des martyrs d’Angleterre. Et Dieu dit « par amour pour leurs pères, et par amour pour Mon nom, Je veux donner une autre opportunité à cette nation. »

Il en est de même pour les États?Unis. Il voit encore Jonathan Edwards et D L Moody et Harry Ironsides. Il voit les Chrétiens fidèles. Il ne voit pas seulement ce qui se passe aujourd’hui avec les Prédicateurs de la Prospérité ? les adorateurs de Mammon et les hérétiques.

Dieu veut donner à ces nations Protestantes Occidentales une autre chance de se repentir. Mais pour qu’elles aient cette opportunité, il doit pleuvoir.

Premièrement, nous devons réaliser que nous vivons une sécheresse. Et, jusqu’à ce qu’elle soit terminée, tous les programmes au monde n’apporteront pas la repentance et le réveil dans l’Église. La pluie est nécessaire. Pas de pluie, pas de grain. Pas de pluie, pas de moisson. Élie était un homme de la même nature que nous qui pouvait faire pleuvoir. De nos jours, Dieu recherche des hommes et des femmes, tels que nous, qui peuvent faire pleuvoir.

« 1 Élie, le Thischbite, l'un des habitants de Galaad, dit à Achab: L'Éternel est vivant, le Dieu d'Israël, dont je suis le serviteur! il n'y aura ces années?ci ni rosée ni pluie, sinon à ma parole. 2Et la parole de l'Éternel fut adressée à Élie, en ces mots: 3Pars d'ici, dirige?toi vers l'orient, et cache?toi près du torrent de Kerith, qui est en face du Jourdain. 4Tu boiras de l'eau du torrent, et j'ai ordonné aux corbeaux de te nourrir là.

5 Il partit et fit selon la parole de l'Éternel, et il alla s'établir près du torrent de Kerith, qui est en face du Jourdain. 6Les corbeaux lui apportaient du pain et de la viande le matin, et du pain et de la viande le soir, et il buvait de l'eau du torrent. 7Mais au bout d'un certain temps le torrent fut à sec, car il n'était point tombé de pluie dans le pays. 8Alors la parole de l'Éternel lui fut adressée en ces mots: 9Lève?toi, va à Sarepta, qui appartient à Sidon, et demeure là. Voici, j'y ai ordonné à une femme veuve de te nourrir. 10Il se leva, et il alla à Sarepta. Comme il arrivait à l'entrée de la ville, voici, il y avait là une femme veuve qui ramassait du bois. Il l'appela, et dit: Va me chercher, je te prie, un peu d'eau dans un vase, afin que je boive.

11 Et elle alla en chercher. Il l'appela de nouveau, et dit: Apporte?moi, je te prie, un morceau de pain dans ta main. 12Et elle répondit: L'Éternel, ton Dieu, est vivant! je n'ai rien de cuit, je n'ai qu'une poignée de farine dans un pot et un peu d'huile dans une cruche. Et voici, je ramasse deux morceaux de bois, puis je rentrerai et je préparerai cela pour moi et pour mon fils; nous mangerons, après quoi nous mourrons.

13 Élie lui dit: Ne crains point, rentre, fais comme tu as dit. Seulement, prépare?moi d'abord avec cela un petit gâteau, et tu me l'apporteras; tu en feras ensuite pour toi et pour ton fils. 14Car ainsi parle l'Éternel, le Dieu d'Israël: La farine qui est dans le pot ne manquera point et l'huile qui est dans la cruche ne diminuera point, jusqu'au jour où l'Éternel fera tomber de la pluie sur la face du sol .

15 Elle alla, et elle fit selon la parole d'Élie. Et pendant longtemps elle eut de quoi manger, elle et sa famille, aussi bien qu'Élie. 16La farine qui était dans le pot ne manqua point, et l'huile qui était dans la cruche ne diminua point, selon la parole que l'Éternel avait prononcée par Élie. 17Après ces choses, le fils de la femme, maîtresse de la maison, devint malade, et sa maladie fut si violente qu'il ne resta plus en lui de respiration. 18Cette femme dit alors à Élie: Qu'y a?t?il entre moi et toi, homme de Dieu? Es?tu venu chez moi pour rappeler le souvenir de mon iniquité, et pour faire mourir mon fils?

19 Il lui répondit: Donne?moi ton fils. Et il le prit du sein de la femme, le monta dans la chambre haute où il demeurait, et le coucha sur son lit. 20Puis il invoqua l'Éternel, et dit: Éternel, mon Dieu, est?ce que tu affligerais, au point de faire mourir son fils, même cette veuve chez qui j'ai été reçu comme un hôte? 21Et il s'étendit trois fois sur l'enfant, invoqua l'Éternel, et dit: Éternel, mon Dieu, je t'en prie, que l'âme de cet enfant revienne au dedans de lui! 22L'Éternel écouta la voix d'Élie, et l'âme de l'enfant revint au dedans de lui, et il fut rendu à la vie. 23Élie prit l'enfant, le descendit de la chambre haute dans la maison, et le donna à sa mère. Et Élie dit: Vois, ton fils est vivant. 24Et la femme dit à Élie: Je reconnais maintenant que tu es un homme de Dieu, et que la parole de l'Éternel dans ta bouche est vérité.

1 Rois 18:1 1 Bien des jours s'écoulèrent, et la parole de l'Éternel fut ainsi adressée à Élie, dans la troisième année: Va, présente?toi devant Achab, et je ferai tomber de la pluie sur la face du sol. 2Et Élie alla, pour se présenter devant Achab. La famine était grande à Samarie. " 1 Rois 18:17 17 A peine Achab aperçut?il Élie qu'il lui dit: Est?ce toi, qui jettes le trouble en Israël?

40 Saisissez les prophètes de Baal, leur dit Élie; qu'aucun d'eux n'échappe! Et ils les saisirent. Élie les fit descendre au torrent de Kison, où il les égorgea. 41Et Élie dit à Achab: Monte, mange et bois; car il se fait un bruit qui annonce la pluie. 42Achab monta pour manger et pour boire. Mais Élie monta au sommet du Carmel; et, se penchant contre terre, il mit son visage entre ses genoux, 43et dit à son serviteur: Monte, regarde du côté de la mer. Le serviteur monta, il regarda, et dit: Il n'y a rien. Élie dit sept fois: Retourne. 44A la septième fois, il dit: Voici un petit nuage qui s'élève de la mer, et qui est comme la paume de la main d'un homme. Élie dit: Monte, et dis à Achab: Attelle et descends, afin que la pluie ne t'arrête pas.

45En peu d'instants, le ciel s'obscurcit par les nuages, le vent s'établit, et il y eut une forte pluie. Achab monta sur son char, et partit pour Jizreel. 46Et la main de l'Éternel fut sur Élie, qui se ceignit les reins et courut devant Achab jusqu’à l’entrée de Jizreel. (1 Rois 18 :40?46)

Et il plut et il plut et il plut encore.

Un Peu d’Information

Les trois ans et demi de sécheresse sont un type des trois ans et demi don’t il est question dans Daniel et Apocalypse, lorsque l’Esprit ne sera pas déversé à la fin du monde. C’est un type de ce qui arrive eschatologiquement, lorsque l’esprit d’Élie revient en opération d’une certaine façon, tel que prédit par le prophète Malachie.

Similairement, la manière qu’Élie a secouru la femme et son fils (des Gentils) nous enseigne sur comment Dieu utilisera l’esprit d’Élie, d’une manière ou d’une autre, pour prendre soin de l’Église des Gentils à la fin du monde.

Élie, Élisée et Jean Le Baptiste avaient tous le même esprit. L’Éternel a dit à Moïse « je prendrai de l'esprit qui est sur toi, et je le mettrai sur eux, » les anciens. (Nombres 11 :17)

Lorsque des événements se déroulent dans une même contrée géographique, cela signifie habituellement qu’il existe une connexion spirituelle et théologique entre eux. Le ministère d’Élie s’est terminé sur la plaine de Jéricho, où Élisée a reçu son autorité, et le ministère de Jean Le Baptiste a eu lieu au même endroit. La mauvaise femme, Jézabel, est un type de la Jézabel dans le livre de l’Apocalypse ? l’esprit de la fausse religion ? qui a tourné le roi, la puissance politique, en quelque chose qu’elle pouvait manipuler. En faveur d’Achab, elle a obtenu la vigne de Nabot, qu’Il convoitait. Dans les Écritures, la vigne représente Israël et, par extension, l’Église. Cette méchante femme a essayé d’obtenir la vigne pour le roi. Ceci l’a plongée en conflit avec Élie et elle a persuadé le roi d’essayer de le détruire. Nous voyons un autre portrait de cette situation dans l’histoire d’Hérodias (Matthieu 14:3?12) ? la mauvaise femme a tourné le roi contre Élie (Jean Le Baptiste).

Dans la Bible, les mauvaises femmes représentent toutes d’une certaine façon le caractère de la mauvaise femme dans le livre de l’Apocalypse, où nous voyons que le conflit avec Élie se déroulera encore dans les derniers jours.

Pourquoi La Pluie a-t-elle Cessé?

La première leçon à tirer de cette étude sur comment Dieu prend un homme tel qu’Élie et fait de lui quelqu’un qui peut faire pleuvoir est de savoir pourquoi la pluie a cessé. La pluie a cessé à cause du péché du peuple de Dieu. Le Saint?Esprit n’est pas déversé sur le monde Protestant occidental à cause de son péché, qui est identique à celui d’Israël aux jours d’Élie.

L’avortement rejoue le sacrifice des enfants aux démons que nous voyons au sein d’Israël et de Juda dans l’Ancien Testament. L’adoration d’autres dieux ? les prêtres de Baal n’étaient pas des étrangers, ils étaient des Juifs. Il en est de même aujourd’hui. Parmi le monde Protestant occidental se trouve une augmentation fulgurante de l’adoration de dieux étrangers ? l’Islam, le Nouvel Âge, l’Hindouisme. Le Nouvel Âge s’infiltre dans plusieurs des églises Évangéliques et Pentecôtistes. Les gens mêlent la Chrétienté avec le paganisme ? ce qui a été le cas du Catholicisme romain et c’est ce qui se passe aujourd’hui dans plusieurs églises Pentecôtistes.

Le Matérialisme ? l’Église est tiède, matérialiste, remplie de doctrines insensées. Elle a une version de la “foi” qui n’est pas biblique ? l’adoration de Mammon se fait sous le couvert d’une mascarade Chrétienne; la convoitise est déguisée en Chrétienté.

C’est pourquoi la pluie a cessé. La responsabilité du déclin de la civilisation occidentale nous revient premièrement, et non à la société. C’était le péché du peuple de Dieu qui a fait cesser la pluie. La prolifération des problèmes de notre société ? drogue, avortement, divorce, violence, crime ? toutes ces choses témoignent du manquement de l’Église.

Le peuple de Dieu a fait des compromis et éventuellement Israël s’est retrouvé avec les prêtres de Baal. C’est ce qui s’est passé au temps d’Élie et c’est ce qui se passe de nos jours. Il ne pleut pas dans nos pays à cause du péché du peuple de Dieu.

Kerith

Dieu a premièrement dit à Élie de se rendre au torrent de Kerith, qui est à l’est du Jourdain (1 Rois 17:3 ),

et qu’à cet endroit des corbeaux le nourriraient.

Kérith était de l’autre côté du Jourdain. Lorsque Dieu a dit à Élie de laisser sa contrée pour s’y rendre, Il lui a dit de laisser son identité nationale, culturelle et son confort derrière lui. De plus, il serait nourri par des corbeaux. Les corbeaux n’étaient pas de la nourriture kosher (pure) ? ils étaient un type d’oiseau

« impur ». Dieu allait pourvoir à ses besoins de façon inattendue.

La sécheresse est si critique dans le monde Occidental aujourd’hui, que ceux qui pourraient faire pleuvoir devront vouloir se rendre à Kérith.

Parfois, cela impliquera le fait que des églises délaissent leur dénominations traditionnelles qui sont entrées dans le compromis. Parfois, cela impliquera le fait que des Chrétiens abandonnent leurs églises qui sont entrées dans le compromis ou qui se sont enlisées dans l’erreur et qui refusent de se repentir. Et cela impliquera sûrement de faire confiance à Dieu pour qu’Il rencontre leurs besoins de façon et dans des endroits inattendus, même au moyen de choses que nous pourrions considérer presque impures, comme les corbeaux. Élie devait être prêt à mettre Dieu premier et sa contrée en deuxième. De nos jours, nous voyons souvent les gens garder leur contrée en première place ? leur culture, leur identité, leur dénomination et leur dévouement à leur dénomination ? au?dessus de l’obéissance à la Parole de Dieu.

Mais ceux qui feront pleuvoir sont ceux qui n’ont pas peur de se rendre à Kérith et de faire confiance à Dieu.

Sarepta

Il fait plus noir avant la levée du jour. Les choses empireront avant de s’améliorer. Le torrent de Kérith s’assèchera éventuellement.

Au verset 9, nous voyons qu’Élie doit se rendre à Sarepta. En Hébreu, Sarepta signifie brûler ou purifier par le feu. Pour que Dieu puisse utiliser quelqu’un de notre nature et le tourner en quelqu’un qui puisse faire pleuvoir, Il doit le purifier par le feu.

Il y aura une période très difficile ? non seulement une mise à l’épreuve, ou une sécheresse ou même une persecution ? mais tous ces éléments ensemble. Ce sera au point où ceux que vous essaierez d’aider penseront que vous les avez trahis, tel que la veuve de Sarepta.

Mais qu’importe à quel point il fera sombre, le degré de sécheresse, je peux vous promettre deux choses: il y aura de la farine dans l’assiette et de l’huile dans le contenant pour ceux qui sont prêts à être purifiés. Les choses empireront avant qu’il y ait une percée. Vous aurez la Parole de Dieu et l’onction de l’Esprit, qu’importe ce qui arrivera. Vous aurez votre grain et votre huile pendant que les autres meurent de famine.

Les Vieilles Outres Mourront

« 18 Cette femme dit alors à Élie: Qu'y a?t?il entre moi et toi, homme de Dieu? Es?tu venu chez moi pour rappeler le souvenir de mon iniquité, et pour faire mourir mon fils? » (1 Rois 17 :18)

Son fils est mort. Et elle a blame Élie. Les gens que vous essayez d’aider verront les difficultés et vous blâmeront. Les choses vont si mal depuis si longtemps que celles que nous aimons le plus devront mourir avant d’être ressuscitées.

Une grande partie de l’Église en occident devra mourir avant de pouvoir être ressuscitée. Le vin nouveau ne peut être versé dans de vieilles outres. C’était l’un des problèmes du Mouvement Charismatique ? ils ont tenté d’emmagasiner le vin nouveau dans de vieilles outres. Pour renouveler une église, vous devez remplacer l’outre. Les choses que nous avons aimées le plus doivent mourir avant d’être ressuscitées.

Les Faiseurs de Troubles d’Israël

« Est?ce toi, qui jettes le trouble en Israël? »(1 Rois 18:17) Est?ce toi qui jettes le trouble dans l’Église? Est?ce toi qui jettes le trouble chez l’Union des Baptistes ? Est?ce toi qui jettes le trouble au sein de l’Assemblée de Dieu ?

Vous qui tenez ferme contre l’oécuménisme, le RoyaumeMaintenant, le mouvement Foi et Prospérité et celui du Confessez et Réclamez.

Vous qui tenez ferme contre les faux miracles et les fausses guérisons.

Vous qui tenez ferme contre les ministres qui s’enrichissent aux depends des autres en les exploitant au moyen de leurs mensonges.

Vous qui troublez Israël !

C’est ce qu’ils ont dit à Élie, et si vous désirez faire pleuvoir, c’est ce qu’ils vous diront également.

Le Conflit

Ensuite, ils se rendent au Mont Carmel. Ici, le confit est avec Jézabel ? l’esprit de la fausse religion, avec le Catholicisme romain, l’oécuménisme, la Franc Maçonnerie, I’Islam, l’homosexualité, l’avortement et le Nouvel Âge. Il y aura un conflit et ceux qui gagneront dans ce conflit seront ceux qui auront été purifiés à Sarepta.

Beaucoup de ce qui se passe dans “l’adoration charismatique” de nos jours ? avec son bruit, son excitation ? ressemble davantage aux prêtres de Baal sur le Mont Carmel qu’à Élie. Notez que les prêtres de Baal croyaient vraiment qu’ils remporteraient la victoire, ils croyaient recevoir une réponse.

Nos frères aujourd’hui enlisés dans l’oécuménisme, la théologie du Royaume Maintenant, celle de la Restauration ? toutes des doctrines non?bibliques, fausses et dangeureuses, toutes associées à l’excitation au moyen de prophéties qui ne s’accomplissent pas ? croient vraiment toutes ces choses. Mais le conflit viendra et les gens verront qui sont les vrais prophètes.

Le Nuage de Pluie

Il commence petit. A prime abord, il ne semble pas qu’il arrivera quoi que ce soit. Où est?il ?

Avec les prêtres de Baal, il s’agissait d’éclats de vantardise, d’arrogance, d’encouragement et d’excitation. Mais Dieu ne travaille pas de la sorte. Il commence petit. Comme une petite main qui sort de l’océan. Cela commence toujours petit. Mais cela devient plus gros et bientôt le ciel se remplit de nuages de pluie. L’éclair frappe et l’Esprit de Dieu tombe. Et il pleut, il pleut et il pleut encore.

C’est De Ma Faute

Il n’existe aucune manière facile de stopper le déclin de la Chrétienté dans le monde Occidental. Il est allé trop loin pendant trop longtemps. Nous avons été vendus par nos dirigeants. Tous les programmes et le tralala au monde ne pourront produire une moisson d’âmes. La pluie est nécessaire. Mais elle a cessé.

Pourquoi? En partie à cause du péché dans la société mais plus particulièrement à cause du péché de l’Église. A moins que l’Église ne se repente, il n’y aura pas de repentance dans le monde.

Pourquoi la pluie a?t?elle cessé? Ce n’est pas premièrement la faute des pornographes ou des pimps ou des prostituées ou des drogués ou des homosexuels ou de ceux qui pratiquent l’avortement. C’est premièrement de ma faute, parce que je connais la vérité et que j’ai le message qui peut faire la différence. C’est de notre faute, parce que l’Église en Occident est Laodicée (Apocalypse 3:17). Parce que nous mettons notre confiance en cette vie et en ce monde plus que nous faisons confiance à Jésus. Il ne pleut pas à cause de mon péché et de votre péché.

Ceux qui font pleuvoir

Ceux qui feront pleuvoir sont ceux qui n’ont pas peur d’aller à Kerith ? des gens qui ne sont pas liés par la tradition ou les institutions. Ils n’essaieront pas de mettre du vin nouveau dans de vieilles outres. Ils feront ce que Dieu leur demande et s’attendront à ce qu’Il pourvoit pour eux de manière inattendue.

Ces gens n’auront pas peur d’être purifés, ils iront à Sarepta, ils seront prêts à voir mourir les choses qu’ils aiment, sachant qu’elles seront ressuscitées dans la pureté. Ce sera difficile. Mais qu’importe le degree de difficulté, je vous promets qu’il y aura de l’huile dans le contenant et de la farine dans l’assiette.

Et ces gens qui seront purifies iront au mont Carmel et se tiendront devant Jézabel ? devant la fausse religion, la Franc Maçonnerie, l’homosexualité, le Catholicisme et l’Islam. Ils se tiendront debout devant les prophètes de Baal ? ceux qui osent s’appeler des ministres de l’Évangile mais qui le compromettent par de faux enseignements.

Il y aura un conflit. Et les faiseurs de trouble d’Israël gagneront.



By David Passmore August 21, 2026
Don't bite the hand that feeds you - Irish hypocrisy towards Israel Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM Amongst European nations, Ireland in recent years has gained the reputation as being the leading anti-Zionist country. The Irish Republic has never been favourably inclined to Israel. It only established an Embassy in Tel Aviv in 1996. In poll after poll the vast majority of the Irish public have indicated hostility towards Zionism and strong support for Palestinian Statehood. The curious aberration to this is that in British Ruled Northern Ireland support is demarcated along sectarian lines. Catholic Republican areas predictably tend to ardently support the Palestinian cause, while Protestant Unionist communities are overwhelmingly pro-Israel. Perhaps some credence can be given to sentiments of traditional Catholic antisemitism hardwired into the Irish psyche as contributing towards this disposition. It was certainly odd that the Irish government promptly sent a delegation to the Nazi German Ambassador in Dublin to convey condolences after news of Hitler's suicide broke at the end of WW2. But more concretely if you were to ask the average Irish protester on a pro-Palestine march the basis of their empathy for the Palestinian cause, they would point to the ostensible parallels between the Irish experience of fighting for independence from British colonial oppression to the plight of Palestinians living under Israeli occupation. Further remonstrations on a diplomatic level concern the actions of the IDF interreacting with Irish Peace Keepers in Southern Lebanon that have caused the deaths of several Irish Peace Keepers over the decades in friendly fire incidents. Ireland has contributed the most peace keepers to this mission per capita and the government has condemned Israel for these deaths that they view as avoidable. This animosity towards Israel is unbalanced. There are reasons to consider that Ireland and Israel have a shared experience of national liberation. Both countries fought the British in the pursuit of independence. Both countries made great efforts to resurrect their ancient languages for modern wide scale use. Both the Irish and Jews form major diaspora communities in New York. Despite all this Ireland ranks as Israel's second largest export market after the US. The preponderance of Israeli exports to Ireland comprises electronic integrated circuits, micro-assemblies, and tech manufacturing components. American multinational colossal tech corporations like Intel are substantially engrossed in this trade through the chain of supply. Ireland and Israel are hubs for design and manufacture of high-tech hardware components for US corporations. So, due to the nature of the most prosperous and competitive sectors of their respective economies, Israel and Ireland are inextricably bound in bilateral trade ties. Resolutions from the Irish government to impose sanctions on West Bank originating produce is merely perfunctory rhetoric. Such actions amount to a drop in the bucket in terms of impact to overall trade. The stark reliance of Ireland on advanced Israeli aviation equipment recently caused a spectacle when Ireland's new government jet struggled to land in heavy fog due to it being ordered without an advanced Israeli made navigation system. This was directly due to a short-sighted government decision not to buy Israeli military technology. There is a marked disparity between the official position of the Irish government designed for domestic public consumption and the economic policies that it actually pursues towards Israel. The government is acutely aware that the US is massively invested in the Irish economy and they don't want to do anything to jeopardise this. Washington demands that their enterprises in Dublin are intertwined with operations in Israel. The Irish government dare not even prevent US military supply flights refuelling at Shannon Airport on their way to Tel Aviv. The Irish government knows that times change and now the gripping social issue is the anti-immigrant/anti-Islam popular street protests. Soon the anti-Israel protests could become a mere side show only really promoted by Sinn Fein given the pressing ramifications of mass migration. So, in the meantime certain politicians will rile against the occupation, purported genocide and pass paltry sanctions against insignificant produce from the West Bank. All the while making hand over fist in money with the Israelis where it really matters in tech.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore July 31, 2026
The Tide Has Changed Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The America that Netanyahu touched down on is a changed America. The death of Lindsey Graham represents a changing of the guard. Graham was a staunch Israeli ally who will most probably become an increasingly rare breed in Washington. Sixty percent of Americans now hold a unfavourable view of Israel which politicians are finding difficult to ignore. It was once unthinkable to believe that New York City with such a strong Jewish electoral base and influence on all sectors of economic and cultural life would have a mayor that is so hostile to Israel to such an extent that he is calling for the arrest of its Prime Minister. From all accounts Netanyahu was cordially welcomed at the White House. The official press release stated that the talks were constructive. What is more telling is what was left unsaid particularly concerning the proposed sale of F35's to Israel's new regional adversary -Turkey. Trump is keen to find a swift resolution to the Iran War, while Netanyahu is opposed to a premature departure. When the US and Israel initiated their attacks on Iran over five months ago, Trump and Netanyahu appeared united in the War's goals and purpose. But as the protracted conflict has staggered to topple the Iranian regime fractures have emerged. Much has been said about the imminent political realities both leaders face. The Republicans could take a big hit in the November midterm elections should the war continue and global energy markets be negatively impacted. Netanyahu is anxious to demonstrate a big win to the Israeli public with the upcoming October election. In Israel, the Iran War is not viewed in isolation, but rather as an extension of the response to the colossal disaster of the October 7th massacre. Netanyahu must rehabilitate his reputation as a competent steward of national security having had the greatest loss of civilian life in an attack happening under his watch. Aside from the Iran issue, Trump is being pressured by Erdogan to insist upon Israeli withdrawal from Syrian territory pre-emptively seized by Israel following the toppling of Assad. Trump has also indicated disapproval of the extent of continuing Israeli measures against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, questioning the proportionality employed. Netanyahu is not in an envious position. Throughout his tenure and political career, he lauded his ability to engage successfully with the American public by zealously advocating Israel's position. Yet under his government Israel's reputation has plummeted in the US. Trump may be the last US President to extend such overwhelming bilateral support to Israel. The days of politicians like Lindsey Graham are fast ending. While John Fetteman and Marco Rubio appear to be remaining more solid, even some of the most warmly inclined leading Republican and Democrat voices like Donald Trump and Rahm Emanuel have nuanced their support for Israel. The tide has shifted and will at best level off if not continuing to shift further.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore July 24, 2026
The Saudi Nuclear Deal: An attempt to alter the Regional Balance of Power Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The initiative to develop a civilian nuclear program in Saudi Arabia with US assistance isn't new. There were concrete plans discussed towards these ends during the first Trump Administration. The recent announcement to actualize this deal follows the geo-political regional tumult in the wake of the Iran War. Several dimensions of motivation underlie the US decision. An overarching US strategic agenda is to keep the Saudis firmly in the American sphere of influence. Washington knows all too well that the Chinese and Russians are eager to offer their nuclear technical assistance to the Saudis in order to draw them closer to their camp. On a personal note, the nuclear agreement is a significant achievement for Bin Salaman. The Saudis have long had designs to diversify their energy supplies. Having a civilian nuclear program also adds prestige to Saudi Arabia as an emerging market economy. For the US, a monopoly on contracting companies for the requisite construction offers lucrative economic opportunities. Although the Civilian Nuclear deal does not allow the enrichment of Uranium, the Saudis will be in a position to do so if Washington gives the green light. This will act as a counterbalanced threat hanging over the Iranians. After the recent flare up of renewed fighting with Iran due to their lack of adherence to the moratorium of understanding, something had to budge in Trump's estimation. A reconfiguration of the power balance in the Gulf by introducing the potential of Saudi Arabia to be able to acquire nuclear weapons shifts the dynamic and places further pressure on Iran to strictly abstain from nuclear proliferation. Despite Israeli concerns about the agreement, Trump sought to assuage their alarm by making it contingent upon Saudi Arabia normalizing relations with them. Given the inherently unstable nature of an autocratic Saudi regime Israel views a diplomatic relationship with the Saudis as being on precarious footing in the long term. Israel is already forced to contend with the implications of one nuclear armed Muslim state - Pakistan and it will further weaken its own deterrent capability if another similarly capable hostile neighbour were to emerge in the future. The roles of Turkey and Qatar in all this foray are a wild card. Officially Turkey is served under the NATO nuclear umbrella for defence that is subject to US control. However, its civilian nuclear program remains in its infancy. Now with the Saudi deal, Erdogan may be inclined to exert pressure on the US to help accelerate his own nuclear program. Just as Erdogan's efforts to acquire F35 fighter jets from the US greatly disturbed Israeli military planners, a heightened Turkish nuclear ability will intensify this fear. Qatar views itself as pursuing its own independent foreign policy that has managed to remain rather neutral during the current war, thereby escaping the ire of Iran's strikes on US regional assets. Overall, the Qatari government has grown closer to the Turkish vision for the region and so likely isn't particularly amiable to the Saudi agreement. Ultimately the Saudi deal is a gamble. Many will see it as throwing more fuel on the fire which will further imperil the tinder box region and heighten tensions. But Trump finds himself at a continuing impasse with a stubborn regime in Tehran that is leveraging their geographic hold on the straits of Hormuz to inflict damage on the global energy markets. Iranian strikes upon US Arab regional allies have underscored the de facto alliance between Israel and the Arabs against Iran and its Shia proxies. The US hopes to use the Saudi nuclear deal as a means of making this alliance official by having Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords as a pre-condition.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore July 14, 2026
Circling the wagons Ruben Rothler LLB, LLM Israel is a society riddled with tension and division. It is sociologically, if not politically miraculous that a country drawing Jews from all over the world is able to exist at all. The army affords a degree of integration as a melting pot. But this is only a marginal source of national unity in the overall scheme of things. More so are the myriads of external threats that face this small country. In the former generation the Ashkenazi (Jews of European descent) - Sephardic (Jews of Oriental descent) divide was far more pronounced. The dominant Ashkenazi establishment held the reins of political and economic power which was resented by the Sephardim. However, due to a combination of inter-marriage and political accommodation much of the chasm that separated these distinct groups was forged. Menachem Begin (an Ashkenazi politician) in 1970 successfully ran on the Likud Party ticket with a campaign that brought Sephardic Jews under his conservative political umbrella. Later the immigration of Russian Jews following the end of Communism would add a whole new dimension to the Israeli demographic milieu. The younger generation of these immigrants tended to adapt well to Israeli society and contributed much to the economy. The wider division in Israeli society that crosses ethnic lines concerns that between religious and secular Jews. This can be further bifurcated to the clash between the secular and specifically ultra-orthodox Jews (Haredim) as distinguished from the national religious Jews (Dati Leumi). The Secular and the Religious generally part on what they envisage a Jewish State to entail. Religious Jews desire the State to strictly adhere to the stipulations of Jewish Law (Halacha), while at present Halakhic influence is largely limited to certain areas of Family Law concerning Jewish citizens. Wider considerations of promoting a socially conservative political agenda would also be forefront amongst the religious mindset broadly. Secular Jews view the imposition of such proposed measures as a serious infringement of their civil rights. With regard to the Haredim, the bone of contention looms larger, in that this group is fundamentally opposed to participating in society at large. This is acutely manifested in diminished contribution to the work force and a refusal to be conscripted into the army. The 2023 judicial reform protests posed a significant threat to social civil order. The nation appeared to be bitterly divided into two opposing camps. This split reflected broader divisions concerning visions of how the country should be governed. The judicial reforms would have weakened the Supreme Court's ability to render the Executive branch accountable. However, the Supreme Court was also accused of using its considerable powers to promote a socially liberal agenda. Left wing secular Israelis tended to oppose the proposed reforms while those on the right (which included the majority of Religious Jews) supported the reforms. Every weekend droves of protesters were brought onto the streets causing major disturbances to traffic. The polarising nature of this impasse threatened the future of Israeli democracy. It was the October 7th attack that brought a swift end to this public debate and civil strife. The nation instinctually united in response to this common existential threat. The judicial reforms were shelved for a future point when the urgent security threats subsided. However, as the war dragged on the enduring issue of Haredi refusal to conscript into the army became more pronounced. Mounting casualties combined with ever increasing manpower demands to field troops on the multiple theatres of action on which the IDF is engaged has depleted the ranks, and the army is now in much need of fresh conscripts. Haredi belligerent refusal to participate in the pressing national defence has escalated from being a political debate to a matter of very practical vital importance. Overall we can observe that the challenges to national unity in successive generations since the establishment of Israel has recurrently been ameliorated by the common necessity of defence towards outside threats. Most recently we can see this happening with regard to the global anti Semitism and anti-Zionism that has been raging since the October 7th atrocities. These hostile attitudes have paradoxically acted as a force which promotes nationalism and a sense of national cohesion in Israel that otherwise might not functionally exist.  (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
By David Passmore July 8, 2026
A Divided Nation Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM The Haredi community has had a complicated, paradoxical relationship with the State since its founding. Rooted in a Talmudic precept that the Jews are forbidden to resettle the land of Israel en masse by force before the coming of the Messiah, the secular democratic State of Israel presents itself as blasphemous by its mere existence. Yet due to practical considerations such as the need to obtain funding for its religious academies the Haredi leadership reached a settlement with the State's founders that exempted Haredi men from being conscripted for military service. This was at a time when the Haredi population in Israel was relatively small. Over the past decades this demographic ballooned until the point that soon the majority of Jewish children in Israel will be born into Haredi families. Such a situation is clearly unsustainable. Recently the Knesset's (Parliament's) Haredi parties have pressured their coalition partners in government to codify Torah Study as part of the Country's Basic Laws. This was purposefully done to elevate the status of their institutions to be on parity with service in the IDF. Israel is yet to promulgate a written Constitution, so legislation classed as a Basic Law holds Constitutional status for all intents and purposes. These moves by the religious parties represent a back door power grab to enshrine in law very significant hurdles to prevent the enlistment of Haredi men. The burden of Israel's defence is comparatively massive for a country its size and it is vastly disproportionately shouldered by the secular population. Until now there have been political initiatives to conscript the Haredim. But given the huge manpower shortages emerging in the wake of near continual conflict on multiple fronts since the events of October 7th this matter has become urgent and not merely a theoretical discussion of what is fair and equitable. It is important to draw a distinction between the Haredim and national religious Jews (Dati Leumi). The Haredim adhere to a lifestyle entirely committed to observance of Jewish Law and Talmudic study. This is embraced to the exclusion of gainful employment and participation in wider society. They are either outrightly opposed to Zionism or consider themselves non-Zionist. Conversely, followers of the national religious movement in Israel although being observant of Jewish law and learning would alongside this pursue secular professions. Furthermore, they are ardently Zionist and disproportionately serve in IDF combat units. This is often done within the framework of a program called Hesder Yeshiva that combines religious learning with military service. Efforts to cater a similar model for accommodating Haredi participation in the IDF have so far failed to make substantial gains. Such measures designed to override Haredi objections to service based upon modesty concerns by strict segregation of the sexes in these specially formed units have failed to appease the Haredi leadership. For them, any form of military service is considered a dereliction of their duty to fully devote themselves to a Torah lifestyle. They argue that their Talmudic learning and prayers are in itself a form of national service and act to protect the Jewish people spiritually from enemy attack. It is as if two parallel societies exist within Israel. And the trajectory of separation between the two is only growing. The Haredim are cloistered away in their Yeshivas, immersed in lives devoted to adhering to the stipulations of Jewish law. While the particulars of actually running the State is left to the Secular. The Haredim desire all the benefits of subsidizing their lifestyle without contributing to society. What we really have going on here at source is two profoundly different and opposing ideological visions of what is important in life and what is the purpose of a Jewish State. At the State's founding these divergent perspectives were more manageable. Ben Gurion only had to contend with one religious party –the National Religious Party. Later in 1970 Begin aligned with the NRP to form a coalition government that also brought Sephardic Jews under the Likud umbrella which had the effect of bringing unity to the country by bridging the Ashkenazi-Sephardi divide. However, over time Israeli politics has seen a proliferation of religious parties, gaining further leverage as king brokers in forming governments due to the proportionate representation voting system which secular Israelis not uncommonly view as political blackmail. (Author is an Israeli American lawyer academically qualified in British and in U.S.A. law, and a graduate of the School of Oriental & African Studies, London. He is a Jewish believer in Jesus and is currently based in Israel).
P
By Mea Fredrickson June 23, 2026
New Paragraph
By David Passmore June 22, 2026
THE CAPTION AT THE HEAD OF THE POSTER IMAGE FOR THE MOVIE ‘DISCLOSURE DAY’ BOLDLY DECLARES ‘WE DESERVE TO KNOW’ Indeed, we do need to know the truth. But will we find it in Stephen Spielberg’s new movie ‘Disclosure Day’? Could it just as well be entitled ‘DECEPTION DAY’? In an interview with USA Today Spielberg says that evidence of non-human contact has become “overwhelming” to him. He has suggested that his film could raise significant theological questions for Christians. But will it? For us Christians - No, not on our watch! The movie raises no questions for those who accept the proven accuracy of God’s Word, the Bible. The film, which is capturing the imagination of the public, only confirms exactly what scripture tells us about what are in fact extra-dimensional beings. ALIENS OR FALLEN ANGELS? God inhabits the heavenly realm along with a vast array of angels. Because Lucifer, a created angel, wanted to usurp God as ruler of the universe, he was expelled to another realm outside of our time and space, along with one third of the angels who rebelled with him. These fallen angels manifest themselves as demons who can appear on earth and disappear at will. Spiritual hosts of wickedness exist in heavenly places, wherever this realm is, it is not the place where God dwells. ARE ALIENS BENEVOLENT? In the movie, the ‘aliens’ are portrayed as friendly beings who want to help mankind in a time of crisis. If the aliens are really demons, not visitors from outer space, this is a dangerous delusion. Whitley Striber in his book ‘Communion’ writes on encountering ‘aliens’; ‘I felt an indescribable sense of menace. Whatever was there seemed so monstrously ugly, so filthy, so dark and sinister. Of course they were demons. They have to be.’ Many others have reported similar malevolent experiences. During the movie, Daniel claims to have had an encounter with extra-terrestrials during which he received a special gift of empathy, which is regarded by him as the ultimate superpower. However, there is only One who completely understands our human frailty. We read this concerning Jesus: ‘For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathise with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are - yet he did not sin.’ (Hebrews 4 v 15). Jesus said: “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.” (Matthew 11 v 28) END TIMES DECEPTION Before he was crucified, Jesus warned his disciples about these last days in which we are living. The first words he used in this context were: “Watch no one deceives you. For many will come in my name saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many.” Deception was top of the list! Later, the Apostle Paul wrote about these days: ‘The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved.’ (2 Thessalonians 2 v 9) Have you received the love of the truth? Have you received Jesus who is the way, the truth and the life? If not, you are in great danger. Perilous times are here and they are only going to get worse as man turns more and more away from his maker. Things will only change when Jesus returns soon to establish his own Kingdom on earth, where justice and peace will rule. JESUS, OUR ONLY HOPE! The Bible says all human beings are sinners. The message of Jesus is simple; repent and believe the good news, that God wants humanity, his highest creation, to be reestablished in relationship with him. His plan was simple: to give his life in unconditional love for every human being that has and ever will live, by shedding his blood on a Roman cross. In doing this, we can receive forgiveness of sins. Our old life will then be buried with him, giving us new life with the hope of an eternal future of true peace, love and joy, with freedom from pain and tears. Why ignore such a great gift of salvation? If you do, your fate will be sealed for eternity in hell, which is a real place without God, and thus without love, to face only eternal consequences of punishment. We condemn ourselves to such a fate. REPENT AND BELIEVE THE GOSPEL BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE! Jesus loves you and asks that you repent and believe in him. It would be the best and safest decision of your life! If you commit your life to him, he will give you a new heart, you will be a new person inside. You will also gain a new desire for all that is right and true. And his Holy Spirit will give you an ability to discern the lies of the age we are living in. ‘For God so loved the world, that he gave us his only son, that whosoever believes in him, will not perish, but have eternal life.’ (John 3:16) FINALLY, A RECOMMENDATION  All that is described in this leaflet has been open, in the light for millennia. On the other hand, the theory of extra-terrestrial life has been hidden in darkness, awaiting ‘Disclosure Day’. Which would you prefer to believe, the Word of God, or the word of Stephen Spielberg? I made my choice years ago, and have never regretted it! If this message has spoken to you, just call upon Jesus in a short prayer. Confess to him that you are a sinner in need of salvation. Ask him in sincerity to forgive you and to fill you with his Holy Spirit. You will then become what the Bible describes as being ‘born again’. (John 3 v 7) Then you need to seek a Bible believing church where you can be baptised and become part of a group of believers who can help you get to know Jesus more and more fully. “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8 v 32)
By David Passmore June 20, 2026
Prayer request for Teerth Sond Petitioned Prayer-Supplication/Personal Prayer/ Collective Prayer/Thanks Giving Prayer Our Dear brethren in Yeshua, my family & myself Teerth request your prayers in The Spirit that the latest drugs Ramicirumab & Pacilitaxel will destroy the cancer cell in the Authority Of The Lord Yeshua in The Power of The Holy Spirit. Targeted Petition: Please stand with us in prayer & fasting; The Lord will target the 2cm legion & that it will be cast out of my Liver in the love (agape), compassion, kindness, grace, mercy of God. I do not deserve it because of me- but By His Stripes we are healed for His Glory. This will allow the main operation to go ahead (which should have been done 18 months ago). Step by Step in the leading of The Holy Spirit and the in the Lord Step by Step, as our beautiful sister Beryl said, has worked on my Spiritual man- thank you Lord for waking me up. Lord raise me up for your glory forever because of your love to me, the family & fellowship- an unworthy sinner saved by your grace & love. Email sent to my Oncologist & my Local MP: Greetings Natasha & Dr Mano Joseph Hope All Is Well Thank you for our meeting today. At our meeting we discussed my MRI & CT scans which were done in May 2026. We discussed the operation on my oesophagus which I believe is the best option. (This should have been done 18 months ago). My Kidney operation will be done- non evasive- Lord willing within the next month. Will you be talking to Mr Chacravaty about this? The liver must be targeted first- this is wisdom and the latest radiotherapy treatments available- proton therapy-radiotherapy atezolizumab and bevacizumab sorafenib lenvatinib regorafenib cabozantinib durvalumab and tremelimumab At the meeting we discussed the next CT & MRI scans to be held end off July. Wouldn't it be to better to have them in August so by then I've had 4 full treatments on the latest medication. Also we have Zolbetuximab on compassionate usage- all glory to The Lord. After all the past wrongs I have no doubt now Dr Joseph you will pursue the best for me and family. Dear brethren- King Manasseh, David, Hannah, The Church For Peter, James, The Lord Jesus Christ for example made petitions onto the Lord. We pray as one body to cast off the illness in the Power of The Holy & The Authority Of Yeshua. The Great Physician who came for the ill. To lay out raised hands 🙌🏽 upon the head of our Lord. ABBA/Daddy/Lord in your mercy have mercy on us. Love you all in Yeshua our Lord & God. Teerth, Family & Fellowship
By David Passmore June 19, 2026
The End of an Extended Honeymoon – Are Trump and Netanyahu Parting Ways? Rubin Rothler LLB, LLM  The Israeli public had high hopes for Trump. Unlike his predecessors, he consistently endorsed Israeli measures of self-defence in the different theatres of conflict in which it had to contend. Further to these ends Trump shared in Netanyahu’s determined agenda of preventing the Iranians from pursuing the proliferation of nuclear weapons. During Trump's first term he tore up Obama's negotiated settlement with the Iranians concerning enriched Uranium, echoing Netanyahu’s position that it didn't go far enough. Now in his second term Trump partnered with Israel in a war with Iran that turned out to lack clearly defined goals. The campaign required resolve on the part of America that it wasn't willing to commit. After an initial lightning blitzkrieg that decapitated the Iranian leadership, the Persians dug in and the conflict became a protracted war of attrition hinging on Iran's stranglehold on the straits of Hormuz that could only be realistically lifted by placing boots on the ground or an intensified air war directed against Iranian coastal positions and the destruction of Kharg island, or at least the viable threat to obliterate Kharg island if Iran did not acquiesce. It transpired that Trump and Netanyahu underestimated the resilience of the Iranian regime, thinking that it had already received a near mortal blow during the prior popular demonstrations. So now we are left with a situation where Trump is exasperated with this protracted endeavour and appears to be aiming his frustration towards Netenyahu. A sticking point is Israel's continued occupation of Southern Lebanon. Iran is insistent that Israel withdraw its forces from there as a precursor to fully committing itself to a final status agreement with the U.S. to put an end to its nuclear aspirations. With the midterm elections looming Trump seems to be desperate for an exit strategy from this war. From Israel's perspective the fight against Hizbollah is an inextricable part of the Iranian equation. The IDF has invested massive resources and personnel in the hopes of quashing the Iranian proxy once and for all. Netanyahu is determined to build on the momentum achieved after the spectacular pager attack in 2024. After the catastrophic Hamas massacres of October 7th, the majority of the Israeli public is unwilling to tolerate a capable hostile force on its borders. Trump's proposed solution to this dilemma unrealistically suggests that Syria should take on the role of disarming and removing Hizbollah from Lebanon. In the ultimate reckoning of international relations, America doesn't have iron clad allies, but rather interests like any other nation. If, (as appears to be occurring now) U.S. and Israeli interests fail to align the two countries will cease to act in unison and there may be a rupture in relations on the not-too-distant horizon. Trump has indicated that Israel owes him big time. He has asserted that were it not for his decisive actions they would have been obliterated by Iran's missiles. This is nothing to say of the robust diplomatic support Trump has lent Israel in such forums as the United Nations Security Council and sanctioning officials of the International Criminal Court. Netanyahu is acutely aware of what may be next after Trump. The way public opinion is turning against Israel it is unlikely that the next administration is going to be any way near as friendly as Trump has been thus far to Israel. Trump too of course is mindful of this turning tide opposing Israel. The Iran war has been unpopular to his domestic audience, and the President has been caricatured as Netanyahu’s stooge doing Israel's bidding. Another major consideration for Trump is the colossal impact that the war has had on his other major regional allies: the Gulf States and Saudi Arabia. They have received the brunt of the Iranian backlash that has effectively targeted their energy infrastructure and trading routes. They, along with the Europeans have been exerting pressure on Trump to end the conflict and reopen the Straits of Hormuz regardless of whether the most favourable terms of Iranian capitulation are achieved. Israel, however important a strategic asset and technological powerhouse will not override these broader concerns that are endangering global energy markets. An unspoken factor is Trump's propensity for a belligerent severing of his relationship with allies in the political sphere. His public displays of hostility with former political allies such Senator Ted Cruz, Governor Ron Santos and Elon Musk demonstrate a temperament that the same kind of falling out could invoke with strategic allies as well as those political. Both Trump and Netanyahu are approaching the sunset of their political careers and are naturally inclined to deeply consider the legacies they will leave behind. In the international sphere Trump projected himself as a peacemaker from a position of strength. But as many commentators have pointed out, the war with Iran demonstrated the limits of U.S. power. Trump appraised Iran as low hanging fruit that could be swiftly toppled like Venezuela. However, when push came to shove and the only prospect of landing a decisive blow demanded a massive ground offensive on the scale of the Iraq war, he bottled out and sued for a premature peace that will leave Netanyahu in the cold. Netanyahu is anxious to rehabilitate the injury inflicted on his reputation of the greatest disaster to have occurred in Israel's history having happened on his watch. Eliminating Iran as the great regional adversary pulling the strings of its proxies would have done much in this regard. Neither leader is able to craft their legacies as they would have wanted. Trump is choosing the perceived option of mitigating the damage done to his legacy in foreign affairs. He is trying hard to sell his Iran deal as being more than what Obama bargained in terms of guaranteeing a nuclear free Iran. But as further details of his proposal are leaked this is becoming a tall order. Netanyahu is faced with October elections and he may decide to stay the course in Lebanon as otherwise he will seem weak to most voters. Should this happen, we will be in uncharted waters as it will thwart Trump's designs for an immediate end to this affair.